mauriceb
Posts: 2150
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 2:50 am

Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Tue May 24, 2005 9:44 pm

here it is: http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/...05/photorelease/q2/pr_050524g.html


so no 747-400adv or 737-900X today....
 
AirWales
Posts: 434
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 10:43 pm

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Tue May 24, 2005 9:48 pm

Bugger - i was really hoping for the 744adv.

Good news though!
 
dalecary
Posts: 834
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2000 10:28 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Tue May 24, 2005 10:20 pm

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...aerospace/2002286070_boeing24.html

mention of up to 50 commitments from AC/AF/Atlas/EK/EVA. Etihad,Cargolux,SQ and LH are also reportedly interested.
 
User avatar
solnabo
Posts: 5006
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:53 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Tue May 24, 2005 10:31 pm

I bet LH AC AF EK EVA CargoLux SQ Etihad gonna order 777LRF in near future, but I guess its bye bye 744ERF.  wave 

Just my  twocents 

Micke//SE
Airbus SAS - Love them both
 
beauing
Posts: 329
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 1:59 pm

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Tue May 24, 2005 10:40 pm

Quoting Solnabo (Reply 3):
but I guess its bye bye 744ERF.



Quote:
Air Cargo Management Group's market forecast is based on an assumption that Boeing also will soon launch the new derivative of its jumbo, the 747 Advanced, and that this too will have a freighter version later.

If Boeing failed to launch that airplane — which would be a surprise — the market for the 777 freighter would be even bigger.

Both FedEx and United Parcel Service, the major express air freight companies, are committed in the next few years to expanding their MD-11 fleets by converting old passenger jets, Dahl said.

Roughly 160 MD-11s worldwide are slated for such conversions.

Once those are done, there'll be few jets of that size available, and the 777 freighter market should grow.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...aerospace/2002286070_boeing24.html

[Edited 2005-05-24 15:43:25]
 
fbwless
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2000 2:07 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Tue May 24, 2005 10:52 pm

you mean "bye bye 747AdvF", the 744ERF is already in service
 
jacobin777
Posts: 12262
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:29 pm

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Tue May 24, 2005 11:00 pm

Quoting FBWless (Reply 5):
you mean "bye bye 747AdvF", the 744ERF is already in service

really, I would rather go with the seattletimes article than your opinion... sarcastic 


"Air Cargo Management Group's market forecast is based on an assumption that Boeing also will soon launch the new derivative of its jumbo, the 747 Advanced, and that this too will have a freighter version later"

"If Boeing failed to launch that (747ADV) airplane — which would be a surprise — the market for the 777 freighter would be even bigger."


http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...aerospace/2002286070_boeing24.html
"Up the Irons!"
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Tue May 24, 2005 11:07 pm

Quoting Solnabo (Reply 6):
Why building 747ADV-F when Boeing got 773ER and maybe (just maybe) a 773ER-F version, I´m sure its gonna compete with 747ADVF...

If you think the B777-200F will significantly impact B747Adv sales, then you are ignorant of the freighter market. They have different capabilities. If you think Boeing would ever build a B777-300F, then you are aggressively ignorant. In the freighter business, weight is much more important than volume. Your hypothetical B777-300F would carry less payload by weight than the B777-200F, burn more fuel doing so, have less range, and cost more to manufacture. Only package haulers like FedEx and DHL might have any interest. To a general freight company a B777-300F would be absurd.
 
mauriceb
Posts: 2150
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 2:50 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Tue May 24, 2005 11:08 pm

Why building 747ADV-F when Boeing got 773ER and maybe (just maybe) a 773ER-F version, I´m sure its gonna compete with 747ADVF...

no it won't, the 777-300ERF is, just like the A380F underpowered for big cargo stuff and therefore only good for package flights...
 
SNATH
Posts: 3049
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:23 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Tue May 24, 2005 11:36 pm

Quoting MauriceB (Reply 10):
no it won't, the 777-300ERF is, just like the A380F underpowered for big cargo stuff and therefore only good for package flights...

...and let's not forget the B747AdvF's front loading capability (which I assume it will have!) that allows it to carry outsized cargo that wouldn't otherwise fit through a side cargo door.

Quoting Beauing (Reply 4):
and that this too will have a freighter version later.

Wasn't there a rumour that the freighter version of the B747Adv was going to have an earlier EIS than the passanger version?

Tony
Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
 
beauing
Posts: 329
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 1:59 pm

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 12:03 am

Quote:
In recent news briefings about the 777 freighter, Boeing executives say they believe a fuel-efficient, twin-engine freighter that can fly between a variety of cities will be competitive in range and payload with the four-engine A380.

Payload???
Whoda thunk...
 
boeingbus
Posts: 1509
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 12:37 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 1:15 am

Quoting SNATH (Reply 11):
Wasn't there a rumour that the freighter version of the B747Adv was going to have an earlier EIS than the passanger version?

Yes this was mentioned... I believe most likely to happen...


The 772LRF and the 747Adv has a KEY difference:

747 Advanced would be able to haul about 134 metric tons compared to 113 w/ the current 744.

777LRF would be able to haul about 100 metric tons... 34% less!

A380 would be able to haul about 150 metric tons

So no, sales of the 747Adv should do well, as its more efficient and bigger that the 777... The A380 lacks key features to compete fully with the 747Adv, such as loading aspects...
Airbus or Boeing - it's all good to me!
 
CX747
Posts: 5566
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 2:54 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 1:27 am

50+ commitments for this program is outstanding. While I love the 747, the 777-200LR is really starting to grow on me.
"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
 
PanHAM
Posts: 8531
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:44 pm

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 2:21 am

Good to see the go ahead for the 777LRF and I do think that the 747ADV Freighter will get the offical start as well this year.

The A380F has a big problem. loading the upper deck, which will be very difficult if not impossible with conventional, height adapted high loaders and loading outsize pieces. That will limit its operations hub to hub, good for integrators but look at the route structire of Cargolux, no way they can make full use of the A380 throughout their netowork. The can with the 744F and will be able to do so with the 747ADVF as well.
powered by Eierlikör
 
ConcordeBoy
Posts: 16852
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 8:04 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 3:01 am

Quoting MauriceB (Reply 8):
the 777-300ERF is, just like the A380F underpowered for big cargo stuff

not underpowered... just that it would be something of a deadweight, considering that the lighter -200 can still heft essentially the same payloads.
Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre c'est impossible sans Concorde!
 
Airportgal
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 2:23 pm

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 3:03 am

Quoting CX747 (Reply 12):
50+ commitments for this program is outstanding.

according to Airbus ACI-NA May 2005 pitch, (only) 27 firm orders and commitments for A380F... way to go, Boeing!
 
widebodyphotog
Posts: 885
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 1999 9:23 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 3:38 am

Quoting BoeingBus (Reply 11):
So no, sales of the 747Adv should do well, as its more efficient and bigger that the 777... The A380 lacks key features to compete fully with the 747Adv, such as loading aspects...

The 777F will have 15-20% better ton/mile economics than the current 747-400ERF. It will burn less fuel for a given payload and have longer range with a full volume or structural weight limited payload. This is significant as it will allow such routes as NRT-SFO with full payload and without a costly technical stop in ANC. 777F will be able to load 22 120 inch high pallets vs the 747-400F's 21. Despite the 747's nose door the advantage here goes to 777F because those pallets are too high to load through the nose anyway.

Fundamentally I do think there will be some impact on future 747F sales driven by operators who do not absolutely need the extra 20t of payload or two additional main deck positions that the current 747 offers, and who are attracted to the much lower operating cost. As far as the 747ADV Freighter goes, it will offer four more main deck positions vs the current 747 plus 12t more structural payload. The 747ADV proposal Boeing has released shows a slight increase in fuel capacity, so this combined with more efficient engines should keep range on par the the current 747-400ERF. Still, 747ADVF will be a much more expensive plane to purchase and operate than any 777F, and the advantages of operating 747F's are for carriers who specifically require it's unique capabilities. If operators are willing to trade a few less main deck pallet positions, for longer range and lower operating cost the 777F will be the choice more often than not.

Quoting MauriceB (Reply 8):
no it won't, the 777-300ERF is, just like the A380F underpowered for big cargo stuff and therefore only good for package flights...

Actually the problem with a potential 773F is that while you would gain an additional six main deck positions plus four on the lower deck, range with a similar payload to 772F would suffer dramatically. Power is not a problem, as GE90 power can easily be extended beyond 115,300lbs , but the structural capability of 773 can not be extended much over an allowable MTOW of 800,000lbs. This limits fuel load with a near maximum payload, and subsequently range. You would end up with an aircraft that could load just as much as a 747-400ERF structurally, but range would be as much 1,000nm less. So for the moment, a 773F not a very good idea.

-widebodyphotog
If you know what's really going on then you'll know what to do
 
na
Posts: 9129
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 1999 3:52 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 3:43 am

zero surprise here.

That the 777LRF makes a great freighter (apart from its inevitably sky-high, and, therefore in some cases prohibitive, pricetag) and is the perfect replacement for all the DC-10F, MD-11Fs and part of the 747 Classic freighters in the the next decade is without a doubt.
 
ikramerica
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 9:33 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 3:58 am

The 777LRF and 773ER effectively kill off the new 747 production, which of course is the plan for Boeing. They want to move on from the 747. They are basically now in the 747F conversion business, with most new "orders" for the plane as SF conversions.

The whole point of the 777F is that it will carry the same cargo pallets, have the same cockpit, and use the same pilots as the 744F,ERF,SF,ERSF, so it makes integration and transition easy.

Which would also indicate that any new freighter version of 74xadv, 797 would also share those same economies.

PS - what makes the MD11 such a great cargo plane compared to it's flopping as a pax plane? Is it the 3 engines vs. 4, but longer range than a twin aspect, or is there something else at work (or is it just that it's easy to get them?). I liked flying in the MD11 the one time i did so for all of 1 hour.
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
 
User avatar
yyz717
Posts: 15689
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:26 pm

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 4:07 am

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 18):
PS - what makes the MD11 such a great cargo plane compared to it's flopping as a pax plane? Is it the 3 engines vs. 4,

Good question. Several reasons:
1. The M11 always had an F version on offer. Fedex was an early M11 customer, so its freighter capability was always proven.
2. The early M11 fell short of promised range/payload guarantees which lost it some passenger-version sales (in particular, SQ).
3. The A340 never had an F version, whether as a new build or as a conversion.
4. Fedex operates a huge portion of the worldwide M11 fleet, so it distorts the stats.
I dumped at the gybe mark in strong winds when I looked up at a Porter Q400 on finals. Can't stop spotting.
 
B742
Posts: 3559
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 12:48 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 4:13 am

Dam! I still wishing for the day the 747ADV is launched!

Are any other airlines intrested in the 777LRF except AC/AF/Atlas/EK/EVA/EY/Cargolux/SQ/LH?

Rob!
 
ConcordeBoy
Posts: 16852
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 8:04 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 4:22 am

Quoting Yyz717 (Reply 19):
Good question. Several reasons:

...course, you failed to give the primary (not to mention, most fundamental) reason-- namely, that the M11 has an enormous payload density factor that only the 777F can surpass (for relative size).

The A340 etc cannot match this for a 90-100T freighter, the 747 too large, the 767/A330 too small.
Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre c'est impossible sans Concorde!
 
ultrapig
Posts: 568
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 11:38 pm

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 5:28 am

Maybe someone can help me-I assume the capital cost of a 777lrf is much more than a used 747-400 converted to a freighter. Since the "passengers" on a freighter don't care about the age of the plane can the improved operating ecomics make up for the huge capital cost diffential-Is one of the reasons that large freighters unlike the small DC9 and 727 counterparts spent alot of time in the air?
 
DC10GUY
Posts: 2590
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2000 5:52 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 9:12 am

Cool Airplane. Looks like the main cargo door will be behind the left wing like the 747 ...
Next time try the old "dirty Sanchez" She'll love it !!!
 
BEG2IAH
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 3:42 pm

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 9:23 am

Quoting BoeingBus (Reply 11):
747 Advanced would be able to haul about 134 metric tons compared to 113 w/ the current 744.
777LRF would be able to haul about 100 metric tons... 34% less!

Not quite.

B772LRF would carry 25.37% LESS than B747Adv.
(134-100)/134 = 0.2537 [Base of comparison is B747Adv]

B747Adv would carry 34% MORE than B777LRF.
(134-100)/100 = 0.34 [Base of comparison is B772LRF]

BEG2IAH
 
LHB727230Adv
Posts: 247
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 1:49 pm

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 9:41 am

Congrats to Boeing. Looking forward to LH Cargo buying it.

Cheers,
Alex  bigthumbsup 
 
ChiGB1973
Posts: 1394
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 6:39 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 10:40 am

So, in reference to my "Why no A-380 for DHL?" maybe this will be the plane for them?

M
 
harry
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 12:01 pm

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 1:34 pm

interesting....  Smile
can't wait to see it in real life
Harry
 
ikramerica
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 9:33 am

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 2:45 pm

just look at a 772LR, and imagine it with no windows and a big door. Big grin
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
 
AFROTC
Posts: 185
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 4:59 pm

RE: Boeing Official Launches 777-200LRF

Wed May 25, 2005 4:06 pm

And the Boeing family is growing growing growing..... Good news for boeing and the cargo industry, I hope this turns out to be a real money maker for them.
We've Been Looking For You, United States Airforce, Cross Into The Blue!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 7BOEING7, AABB777, AS512, Baidu [Spider], Beardown91737, Bing [Bot], doug_or, FAST Enterprise [Crawler], fsafsx, Gemuser, georgiabill, Google Adsense [Bot], gregn21, jake112, ktrick45, msycajun, OzarkD9S, Pengaea, Shuttle, thomasphoto60, Tokushima, Toulouse and 243 guests