United Airline
Topic Author
Posts: 8782
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 8:45 am

KLIA is a very nice and modern airport. Even more advanced than Singapore Changi International Airport I think.

However it seems that no body wants to fly there and KUL is not a hub for anyone except MH. Also it is underused

Does anyone know why? Is there a chance that it will ever become a hub like SIN? Or even surpass SIN?
 
INNflight
Posts: 3526
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:11 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 1:04 pm

Air Asia has its whole fleet ( 20 B737-300 at the moment, ordered 40 A320s already ) based there.
Jet Visuals
 
United Airline
Topic Author
Posts: 8782
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 1:09 pm

Guess MH dominates the entire KUL for long haul service.

Wonder if we will see NW, AF, BA, QF etc back in KUL.

LH pulled out and it is back now
 
INNflight
Posts: 3526
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:11 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 1:15 pm

Maybe QF does not fly to KUL anymore because on the SYD-KUL route there's already a MH 772 service, codesharing with KL; and also the Austrian ( opt by NG ) 772 service continuing to VIE. Just not enough demand for a 3rd airline I guess.
Jet Visuals
 
United Airline
Topic Author
Posts: 8782
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 1:19 pm

Heard that Australian Airlines plans to return to KUL. Can anyone confirm that?
 
Checo77
Posts: 1263
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:39 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 1:47 pm

KLM uses KUL as a transfer airport for flight to SYD and MEL. Anytime you want to fly to Australia with KLM, they direct you through KUL where you then connect on a MH flight to Australia.
Regards,
Adam
Czech Boeing lover living in Lima
 
Kahala777
Posts: 1513
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 7:28 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 2:06 pm

Quoting United Airline (Thread starter):
However it seems that no body wants to fly there and KUL is not a hub for anyone except MH

Uh.... Think Again!

Malaysia Airlines is a regional hubs, and has an airport that makes Changi blush! KLIA, is an incredible airport and is served by a great number of airlines, to an immense number of destinations. Inclusive of the only connection from South America to Asia.

KLIA Current Roster if Airlines:

.... Air Asia

.... Air India

.... Air Mauritius

.... Asiana Airlines

.... Austrian Airlines

.... Biman Bangladesh

.... Cathay Pacific

.... China Airlines

.... China Eastern Airlines

.... China Southern Airlines

.... Emirates Airlines

.... Eva Airways Corpration

.... First Cambodia Airlines

.... Garuda Indonesia

.... Gulf Air

.... Indian Airlines Limited

.... Iran Air

.... Japan Airlines International Co. Ltd

.... KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

.... Korean Airlines

.... Lion Airlines

.... Lufthansa German Airlines

.... Malaysia Airlines

.... Merpati Nusantara Airlines

.... Myanmar Airways International

.... Philippines Airlines

.... Qatar Airways

.... Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd

.... Royal Jordanian Airlines

.... Royal Nepal Airlines

.... Saudi Arabian Airlines

.... Singapore Airlines

.... Sri Lankan Airlines

.... Thai Airways International

.... Uzbekistan Airways

.... Vietnam Airlines

.... Xiamen Airlines

.... Yemenia Yemen Airlines
 
PhilSquares
Posts: 3371
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 2:21 pm

Quoting Kahala777 (Reply 6):
Malaysia Airlines is a regional hubs, and has an airport that makes Changi blush! KLIA, is an incredible airport and is served by a great number of airlines, to an immense number of destinations.

Really???? I live in Singapore that must be another airport (KLIA) you're talking about. Or is this another EXPERT? opinion????
Fly fast, live slow
 
Kahala777
Posts: 1513
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 7:28 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 2:35 pm

Quoting PhilSquares (Reply 7):
I live in Singapore that must be another airport (KLIA) you're talking about.

The airport at Kuala Lumpur, from this persons stand point is much cleaner and enjoyable than that of Changi. The airport in Singapore, has much to be desired. In addition Malaysia Airlines products as of late are more and more becoming.


Regards - Kahala777
 
intothinair
Posts: 392
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 3:05 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 4:10 pm

Here we go
KLIA 2004: 21,000,000PAX
Changi 2004: 30,353565PAX
BKK 2004: 37,960,169PAX
Ok, as visible, BKK and Changi is still quite a bit ahead of KLIA!
However I must say that KLIA has a chance of expanding rapidly, however BKK, and SIN can as well. All 3 airports are expanding fast, so if KLIA puts a foot down, they can really start to challenge SIN, and BKK.
Even though I live in Malaysia, I still find Changi slightly better in terms of comfort, entertainment etc. than KLIA, however KLIA is a magnificent airport, as well as Malaysia being a magnificent country!
BKK is average, nothing too special, except some good plane spotting places.
Will KUL ever become a hub? YES(If it's not one already)
However i excpect BKK and SIN to expand a lot as well.

Cheers, Konstanin G.
 
United Airline
Topic Author
Posts: 8782
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 4:25 pm

KLIA is newer. That's for sure.

However, Changi is still a busier airport with a lot more long haul flights. The Malaysian Government hopes to attract more flights from major airlines and they hope to get BA and QF back.

Guess they need to get more awards. Changi has won many awards over the past 20 years and I think in general Changi is a more comfortable/cozy airport. KLIA is more magnificant though....

SIN and BKK are likely to grow quickly
 
United Airline
Topic Author
Posts: 8782
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 4:33 pm

Guess KUL has a chance too. But everytime I go, I find the airport pretty empty

The Malaysian Government plans to turn KUL into a major international hub for long haul flights and have BA, QF, AF etc back
 
PhilSquares
Posts: 3371
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 4:43 pm

Quoting Kahala777 (Reply 8):
The airport at Kuala Lumpur, from this persons stand point is much cleaner and enjoyable than that of Changi.

I must have been at a different airport in SIN or a different one in KUL!!!!

For a statistical analysis of the airport's potential take a look at this link. Very interesting and very objective.

http://www.koti.re.kr/project/coop.n...5B49256DF60011213F/$file/Park1.pdf
Fly fast, live slow
 
United Airline
Topic Author
Posts: 8782
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 4:52 pm

The infrastructure of KUL is more magnificant. Also it is more advanced simply because it is newer.

However, Changi is more comfortable and has won a lot more awards.

Both airports are clean though
 
6thfreedom
Posts: 2628
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:09 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 6:11 pm

Folks, you seem to be forgetting one major thing.
An airports performance is largely determined by the economy and other external factors such as tourism.

To argue that one airport is a hub compared to another based on the airport's design, practicality, etc is useless.

SIN, HKG, ORD, FRA, AMS etc are hubs because they operate in cities that are major financial centres.

BKK, FCO, CDG are both tourist centres and major cities.

both SIN and KUL are hubs as far as i'm concerned, as there they generate and serve significant amounts of 'connecting' traffic!
 
squared
Posts: 352
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 1:48 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 8:34 pm

Quoting Kahala777 (Reply 8):
The airport at Kuala Lumpur, from this persons stand point is much cleaner and enjoyable than that of Changi. The airport in Singapore, has much to be desired.

That's probably because KUL is almost empty! On my seven hour layover in KUL, the best way to take a nap, was to head to the main terminal, where there appeared to be only a handful people. It's hard to get an airport dirty, when there aren't that many passengers (compared to SIN).

From my perspective SIN, is much more interesting, with many more things to do. Although SIN is quite busy, it still feels spacious and clean.

Quoting United Airline (Reply 11):

The Malaysian Government plans to turn KUL into a major international hub for long haul flights and have BA, QF, AF etc back

This is what the Malaysian gov't has attempted to do with very low landing fees, even lower than that of SIN! Few airlines have taken the bait though, I wonder why?

SQuared
 
Joost
Posts: 1845
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:27 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Tue May 31, 2005 8:47 pm

Quoting SQuared (Reply 15):
This is what the Malaysian gov't has attempted to do with very low landing fees, even lower than that of SIN! Few airlines have taken the bait though, I wonder why?

Most probably just a lack of demand. The longer distances, the less the landings fees contribute to the total trip costs. When low landing fees mean that they will pay $5.000 instead of $10.000, it's the difference of one C-class passenger. It's not the same situation as short-haul LCC sectors. For a Ryanair flight HHN-STN, the euro's they save because HHN doesn't charge landing fees, is a huge part of the trip. Not for a 744 CDG-KUL.

Next to that, AF and BA ar both using SIN for their australia-connections. If MH would join Skyteam, it will most likely get a big increase in passenger numbers. Otherwise, it will just follow the growth of the economy.

The Boston Consulting Group (Airports - dawn of a new era; 2004) sees KUL growing to 45 million pax in the next decade. In comparasion, they expect BKK to grow to 100 mio, HKG to 87, ICN to 100. For SIN, they don't have exact figures about expected expansion.
 
swissgabe
Posts: 5147
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2000 4:57 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Wed Jun 01, 2005 1:32 am

Why shouldn't we call KUL already a hub ???

A hub is where an airline is based and offers a network out of it's hub. It doesn't mean to offer as much airlines as possible. An airport with one airline offering over 100 different destinations is a bigger hub than an airport being served by 5 different airlines and being connected to 20 destinations only!
Smooth as silk - Royal Orchid Service /// Suid-Afrikaanse Lugdiens - Springbok
 
Ryanair!!!
Posts: 4079
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2002 8:55 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Wed Jun 01, 2005 2:36 am

For those who sing praises about KLIA's aesthetic attributes, lets not forget that you are comparing something that was built in the 90s to something that has the infrastructure that dates back to the 1970s. Yes, Changi's terminals are nothing much to scream about and are rather staid. But it is not the exterior that wins the hearts of travellers, it is what that is offered within.

Changi
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v451/sirius_cruiser/100_3432.jpg
Lush greenery and cozy settings greets the weary traveller that spells "WELCOME" with wide open arms. Whenever I arrive home in Changi, I cannot help but beam with pride that this airport truly spells a consistent excellence but without the din of loud drums. Rather, the virtues are laid out quietly and the serenity creeps up on you slowly.

It is the traditional stopover point for traffic between Australia and Europe due to the historical links we have with the British Empire of the past. Although Malaysia was part of the empire as well, much of the trade was routed via Singapore so i guess this is a habit that is hard to break and it is manifested in the way airlines route their network

KLIA

Screams "MODERNITY" from head to toe! A true technological marvel and one of the most beautiful airports to ever have been built on this earth. Many call it a "white elephant", or an airport that is truly ahead of its time. But let's all recollect our senses and turn back time to that dump of a pisshole that was known as Subang. Malaysia NEEDED desperately a new airport that was worthy of an international standing. And they did achieve this, albeit going to the other extreme, by building one that is indeed out of this world.

Natural lighting is allowed to flow in with the help of the generous use of floor to ceiling windows. While the expansive surroundings are indeed awesome with high quality luxurious marble and metal finishings, the Zen-like result might come off as stand-offish or cold at times. This is accentuated by the low traffic volumes at certain times of the day (actually most of the day) giving it a almost sterile and clinical feel. Piped in soothing music might do the trick, which the airside terminal sorely lacks!

So back to the original question, will KLIA ever become a hub? Well, a hub in what sense, one might ask? A stopover point for the Kangaroo route? With the withdrawal of BA and QF, MAS has managed to almost monopolise this route. Other than UK-Australia routes, most traffic into Malaysia seems to be low-yield so airlines might find it a rather challenging scenario to make money from the routes.

Well, KLIA is a hub for the flag carrier MAS (needless to say). And the airline within the last decade has proven to be a serious competitor with its award winning service. It has proven that the airline can overcome adversity and perpetual underdog reputation to rise above competition shouting out loud and proud. That has garnered a lot of attention for the country, and KLIA, by default.

Traffic in Subang wasn't anything to shout about to begin with. Now put that volume and juxtapose it against the seemingly huge amount of space that is KLIA (and increase it by just a bit), it is bound to be a little jarring. However, what they lack in mainline carriers making them a port of call, they make up for it by hosting exotic ones not normally seen in the region like Yemenia and Uzbekistan Airways. I once saw an Air Onur A300 there as well.

So you see, all is not lost for KLIA. Such a jewel of an airport is too good to let go. Just wait and see, traffic will definitely continue to expand into the airport and soon it will no longer be the white elephant everyone says it is.
Welcome to my starry one world alliance, a team in the sky!
 
GuyBetsy1
Posts: 808
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2001 4:00 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Wed Jun 01, 2005 3:00 am

The problem is not so much as being modern but rather flight times operated by its largest operator, Malaysia Airlines. To make KLIA a hub, MH has got to offer more flights to more flights more often.

Try to book BKK/HKG-DPS/CGK v.v. via KUL or Indonesia to Northern Asia and you'll see what I mean. When compared to say, SQ, you can do the above routes rather easily.
 
MAS777
Posts: 2757
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 1999 7:40 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Wed Jun 01, 2005 4:01 am

It does often amaze me when people complain that KUL is 'always empty' - on my last few trips the airport has been buzzing. Don't forget that KUL was designed to BE quiet and spacious - so if it was crowded - the architect would have failed miserably in its first few years of operation.

I flew KUL-LGK recently and the check-in queue snaked all the way to the entrance doors of the terminal building and ALL the domestic check-in counters (well I guess almost all of them as I could tell) were working and busy. These were all Malaysia Airlines passengers and the idea is to move AirAsia out into a LCC terminal to reclaim the peace - see later.

On our return there was a mass of passenger traffic from all parts of Malaysia shuffling smoothly along the domestic corridors leading out into the Arrivals Hall. More recently on many flights coming in to KUL - the Baggage Belts have all been in use - sometimes with multiple flights. (I admit there are times like mid-afternoon when this is not so common - but the same can be said about lots of airports).

I also fly KUL-AMS frequently and that route is certainly packing the loads in. Flights are often full and on my last trip the Plaza Premium lounge had to open its connecting door into the lounge next door (wasn't sure who's it was but it had magazines belonging to Eva Air and Japan Airlines) - just to cope with the number of Business travellers passing through that evening. I have also sat in MAS Golden Lounges both in Business and First and they have both been busy too.

What you are currently seeing is the bunching of flights at KUL - which is how a hub should work so arriving/departing passengers can transfer. As these peak hour slots become full - you will no doubt start seeing a more constant flow of traffic. I remember when Subang was only busy first thing in the morning (usually only deps though) and last thing at night (with both deps/arr). KLIA continues to be busy at both these periods but the hours are extending with a smaller peak between 2pm and 5pm. Things will change in time.

Plans are already underway to expand KUL - with the Low-Cost Terminal set to open first (I gather work is already underway). The Aerotrains get upgraded this Summer to offer more capacity and the shops and food outlets are to begin renovation work. Satellite B is slated to open in 3 years time too.

On top of all this - someone I know at KLM has already advised me to look out for an announcement from Skyteam later this Summer... goodvibes   shhh 

KUL - Hub without the Hubbub perhaps...
 
United Airline
Topic Author
Posts: 8782
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Wed Jun 01, 2005 4:36 am

Did Qantas use KUL as a hub between Australia and Europe?

I am sure SIN will continue to be a super leading hub of Asia. It is also a major international business centre. SIN is a traditional hub between Australia and Europe. Also Asia. Doubt KUL, DXB etc will surpass it easily.


Quoting Ryanair!!! (Reply 18):

Lush greenery and cozy settings greets the weary traveller that spells "WELCOME" with wide open arms. Whenever I arrive home in Changi, I cannot help but beam with pride that this airport truly spells a consistent excellence but without the din of loud drums. Rather, the virtues are laid out quietly and the serenity creeps up on you slowly.

Exactly. Very cozy indeed

[Edited 2005-05-31 21:45:51]
 
United Airline
Topic Author
Posts: 8782
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Wed Jun 01, 2005 7:24 am

Quoting Intothinair (Reply 9):
Here we go
KLIA 2004: 21,000,000PAX
Changi 2004: 30,353565PAX
BKK 2004: 37,960,169PAX

Quite surprised that BKK is ahead of SIN. Does anyone know why?

Actually among all three airports, which is the largest in terms of size???

Quoting Ryanair!!! (Reply 18):
So back to the original question, will KLIA ever become a hub? Well, a hub in what sense, one might ask? A stopover point for the Kangaroo route? With the withdrawal of BA and QF, MAS has managed to almost monopolise this route. Other than UK-Australia routes, most traffic into Malaysia seems to be low-yield so airlines might find it a rather challenging scenario to make money from the routes.

Well lots of Malaysians travel too. KL is the number 1 business centre of Malaysia. Certainly there are plenty of businessmen and airlines can connect millions and millions of Malaysians to Europe and Australia. Routes like KUL-LHR run out full from time to time.

Quoting MAS777 (Reply 20):
with the Low-Cost Terminal set to open first

Any pictures?
 
RCS763AV
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 1:22 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Wed Jun 01, 2005 8:07 am

Quoting Kahala777 (Reply 6):
Inclusive of the only connection from South America to Asia.

B.S., JAL flies 4x weekly to GRU, RG also flies from GRU to NRT.
 
United Airline
Topic Author
Posts: 8782
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Wed Jun 01, 2005 8:12 am

Quoting RCS763AV (Reply 23):
JAL flies 4x weekly to GRU, RG also flies from GRU to NRT.

Yes.

BTW what aircraft does JAL use on the SIN-KUL run? In the past it was a B 767. What about now? Have they ever used a B 747 on this route before?

[Edited 2005-06-01 01:13:53]
 
intothinair
Posts: 392
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 3:05 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Wed Jun 01, 2005 9:01 pm

Quoting United Airline (Reply 22):
Quite surprised that BKK is ahead of SIN. Does anyone know why?

When I saw it first, I was also very surprised.
But, Thailand is a very popular tourist destination, and way bigger than Singapore. As well as that, BKK is situated in a better spot for connecting traffic from Europe/Australia to India/China, where the economy is booming at the moment, therefore airports are growing very fast. Changi is quite a bit further south.
So, to sum it up, it's where Changi is located, and due to the size of Singapore that makes it get less passengers.
Overall, I definitely prefer changi from the facilities, and usually rather connect through SIN than BKK.
Hope this helps.

Cheers, Konstantin G.
 
Joost
Posts: 1845
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:27 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Wed Jun 01, 2005 9:20 pm

Quoting United Airline (Reply 22):
Quite surprised that BKK is ahead of SIN. Does anyone know why?

As already stated, it's a popular tourist destination.

Next to that, compare Thailand with Singapore:

Thailand: 62 mio inhabitants, $388 billion GDP
Singapore: 4,4 mio inhabitants, $124 billion GDP
 
6thfreedom
Posts: 2628
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:09 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Wed Jun 01, 2005 9:27 pm

So what are the rules here guys. The goal posts seem to be constantly moving. Everyone keeps going on about SIN being the best hub, yet it has fewer pax than BKK.

So if you judge it on pax numbers and no. of airlines, BKK is a better.
If you judge it on techonology, KUL is the better hub.
And if u judge it purely on asthetics, as most of you have done, SIN is the best hub.

Based on the above, when the new BKK opens next year, and is the most techonologically advanced, has the most pax and the most airlines, will it automatically become the BEST hub. I don't think so.

AFAIK, there are too many elements involved in the equation. As long as the airport provides the necessary amenities, provides reasonable MCT and get's me between A and C, then I think it's a great hub.

Here's one for you. Who thinks Sydney is a great airport/hub?
 
United Airline
Topic Author
Posts: 8782
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Thu Jun 02, 2005 2:22 am

Quoting 6thfreedom (Reply 27):
Here's one for you. Who thinks Sydney is a great airport/hub?

SYD is nice.

Quoting Intothinair (Reply 25):
But, Thailand is a very popular tourist destination, and way bigger than Singapore. As well as that, BKK is situated in a better spot for connecting traffic from Europe/Australia to India/China, where the economy is booming at the moment, therefore airports are growing very fast. Changi is quite a bit further south.
So, to sum it up, it's where Changi is located, and due to the size of Singapore that makes it get less passengers.

SIN is very convenient too. Also Singapore is a much more bigger/important international financial/business centre than Thailand.

Quoting 6thfreedom (Reply 27):
So if you judge it on pax numbers and no. of airlines, BKK is a better.
If you judge it on techonology, KUL is the better hub.
And if u judge it purely on asthetics, as most of you have done, SIN is the best hub.

Based on the above, when the new BKK opens next year, and is the most techonologically advanced, has the most pax and the most airlines, will it automatically become the BEST hub. I don't think so.

I am sure KUL, HKG are just as advanced as the new BKK airport. They are all new generation airports while SIN was built in the 70s.

Quoting Joost (Reply 26):
Thailand: 62 mio inhabitants, $388 billion GDP
Singapore: 4,4 mio inhabitants, $124 billion GDP

Coz Thailand is a bigger country with more people. What about Malaysia? I suppose Malaysia is a bigger economy than Singapore right? But how does it compare to Thailand?

Quoting Intothinair (Reply 25):
Thailand is a very popular tourist destination

Yes indeed.
 
MAS777
Posts: 2757
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 1999 7:40 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Thu Jun 02, 2005 4:34 am

With regard to Singapore and its relation to Malaysian traffic. The DCA (Civil Aviation Authority) of Malaysia is well aware of Singapore being a historical transit point for passengers travelling into/out of Malaysian points. This is already being addressed by Malaysia Airlines expanding its International and Regional routes as well as capping flights between Singapore and cities like Kota Kinabalu, Kuching, Langkawi, etc.

The last point is a difficult one since the government is torn between trying to develop these cities (and therefore provide the free-market growth of flights into/out of SIN) but also continue to encourage the growth of KUL as the transit hub of choice - just one of a number of reasons Malaysia-Singapore Airlines split into its current two entities - MAS and SIA over 30 yrs ago.

So to get back to the point - If you compare BKK, KUL and SIN - you must also realise that a there is quite a large amount of traffic between SIN, KUL and other Malaysian airports. The KUL-SIN shuttle alone carries a significant amount of traffic which will transit onto other airlines. I once flew on a SIN-KUL shuttle to find about a third of the passengers (including myself) had just stepped off the incoming Air France flight from CDG (into SIN) for example.

So guess what I am trying to say is that just comparing figures between BKK, KUL and SIN is not quite as straight forward as it seems.
 
ZKOJH
Posts: 1463
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 9:51 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:32 am

U might see a return from NZ in the next couple of years , bit short of planes at the moment LOL !!
Vietnam time..
 
United Airline
Topic Author
Posts: 8782
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:42 am

Quoting Zkojh (Reply 30):
U might see a return from NZ in the next couple of years , bit short of planes at the moment LOL !!

I hope so too. When did NZ suspend service to KUL???? I remember Ansett Australia flew to KUL as well.

Northwest did. Also Qantas. Hope they will return one day.

Wonder if UA will ever start service to KUL. They did plan to start service to Kuala Lumpur many years ago. A pity that plan didn't go through.
 
ZKOJH
Posts: 1463
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 9:51 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:41 am

i think it was around 97 , but someone from nz might confirm this,
Vietnam time..
 
NZ747
Posts: 849
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:01 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Thu Jun 02, 2005 8:01 am

Quoting Zkojh (Reply 32):
i think it was around 97 , but someone from nz might confirm this,

The began servicing KL in feb 1990, and ceased services november 1993.
 
Southamerica
Posts: 2303
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 2:56 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Thu Jun 02, 2005 8:27 am

Quoting RCS763AV (Reply 23):
B.S., JAL flies 4x weekly to GRU, RG also flies from GRU to NRT.

Like you said, B.S.

JAL flies 3 times a week to Sao Paulo.




SOUTHAMERICA
 
6thfreedom
Posts: 2628
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:09 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Thu Jun 02, 2005 8:32 am

Quoting United Airline (Reply 28):
SYD is nice.



Quoting United Airline (Reply 28):
SIN is very convenient too. Also Singapore is a much more bigger/important international financial/business centre than Thailand.

There you go United. U have answered your own question. Uou can't judge an airport on convenience on one hand, or astheatics. It needs to be a complete package.

as for SYD, you have got to be kidding me! As a hub, Sydney sucks, with a capital S! In your last reply you mentioned conevenience. If having to transit across the airport by bus for a domestic-international connection is your idea of convenient, then there is something seriously wrong.!
 
Ex_SQer
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 5:43 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:10 am

Quoting United Airline (Reply 22):
Quite surprised that BKK is ahead of SIN. Does anyone know why?

because the figures include domestic pax.
 
United Airline
Topic Author
Posts: 8782
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:36 am

Quoting 6thfreedom (Reply 35):
as for SYD, you have got to be kidding me! As a hub, Sydney sucks, with a capital S! In your last reply you mentioned conevenience. If having to transit across the airport by bus for a domestic-international connection is your idea of convenient, then there is something seriously wrong.!

I mean SYD is ok...

Quoting Ex_SQer (Reply 36):
because the figures include domestic pax.

Oh yes. Thanks.

So does Phuket Air operate any long haul routes? They pulled out of LHR a while ago.

What about Orient Thai? Do they have plans to fly long haul with their B 747 classics?
 
aviasian
Posts: 1244
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2001 8:11 am

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:29 pm

Ex_SQer : Thanks for finally putting the key difference in those figures. You will see that statistics from SIN and HKG must always be seen in a different context from those of most other airports in the Asia Pacific region because for these two airports, you only get international passenger traffic. When you begin to rank only international traffic, you see these two airport rising up the table.

Phuket Air has effectively pulled out from longhaul traffic and will instead concentrate on future expansion regionally. This will however take place only after the airline has a chance to completely revamp its product, fleet and network. Don't write off this airline yet.

With regards to Orient Thai operating longhaul flights with their B747 classics, I am certain that A.netters in Sweden have seen them in some of their airports. Has anyone flown on any of these routes and could share their experiences?

KC Sim
Bangkok
 
United Airline
Topic Author
Posts: 8782
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 5:24 pm

RE: Will KUL Ever Become A Hub?

Thu Jun 02, 2005 1:33 pm

Quoting Aviasian (Reply 38):
Phuket Air has effectively pulled out from longhaul traffic and will instead concentrate on future expansion regionally. This will however take place only after the airline has a chance to completely revamp its product, fleet and network. Don't write off this airline yet.

So where do they fly to??? What cities? Any plans to resume long haul travel in the future??? I hope they do

Any cabin shots of this airline????

Quoting Aviasian (Reply 38):
With regards to Orient Thai operating longhaul flights with their B747 classics, I am certain that A.netters in Sweden have seen them in some of their airports. Has anyone flown on any of these routes and could share their experiences?

Oh do they fly to Sweden? Chartered flight maybe???

Do they have plans to start scheduled long haul service????

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos