quickmover
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 4:28 am

Airtran Circling Rival

Fri Aug 19, 2005 10:38 pm

 
7e72004
Posts: 3440
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 12:15 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:40 am

I think AirTran and Midwest would be a good match...it would give them the 2nd hub they need at MKE. I wonder how NW would react considering they have a focus city at MKE  Smile
The next generation of aircraft is just around the corner!
 
User avatar
drerx7
Posts: 4223
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2000 12:19 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:42 am

So Midwest's signature service would go bye bye? Or would they operate them as a separate entity?
Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
 
727LOVER
Posts: 6682
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 12:22 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:52 am

"They are clearly looking for a window to expand outside of Atlanta," Robert Mann, a Port Washington, N.Y.-based airline consultant, said of AirTran.


DFW anyone?
Love Trumps Hate
 
quickmover
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 4:28 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am

"So Midwest's signature service would go bye bye? Or would they operate them as a separate entity?"

I would think it would go bye bye in favor of a first class cabin and about 30 more total seats. If you check the airfares, YX rarely commands any premium fares for the signature service on competitive routes. Adding the extra seats and business class (for those willing to pay for it) would bring those 717s alot closer to profitability. Lack of signature service hasn't seemed to slow down NW in MKE and they use alot of rjs.
 
N1120A
Posts: 26468
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 1:14 am

Quoting Quickmover (Reply 4):
I would think it would go bye bye in favor of a first class cabin and about 30 more total seats. If you check the airfares, YX rarely commands any premium fares for the signature service on competitive routes. Adding the extra seats and business class (for those willing to pay for it) would bring those 717s alot closer to profitability. Lack of signature service hasn't seemed to slow down NW in MKE and they use alot of rjs.

Would be interesting to see if FL adopted the baked on board cookies, given the low cost. Then again, do they have hot capable galleys?
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
 
quickmover
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 4:28 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 1:25 am

Cookies are nice, but I just don't think they sell plane tickets. FL would surely want to keep things common with the rest of their operations. When you check the last round of load factor reports, just about everyone is coming in around 80%. Fares are relatively the same, the cost to operate a 717 is about the same. It seems like a no brainer business wise to be selling 80% of 117 seats rather than 80% of 88 seats. I think in that scenario, the YX jets would turn a profit.
 
Mikey711MN
Posts: 1232
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 4:19 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 1:25 am

Quoting 727LOVER (Reply 3):
"They are clearly looking for a window to expand outside of Atlanta," Robert Mann, a Port Washington, N.Y.-based airline consultant, said of AirTran.

DFW anyone?

If this happened a year ago, I'd have agreed with you. But DFW's old DL gates have been available for a long time as has the incentive package for a carrier to set up shop there, so I would think that FL has, at least for now, let that go by the wayside.

As I've expressed in the few FL-YX threads before this one, IMHO the lack of response to DFW's vacancy combined with their enthusiasm for ATA's space at MDW leads me to believe that their expansion plans are a little more north than Texas, at least for a second hub or expanded point-to-point operations. To that end, YX is attractive enough...the fleet commonality (at least as far as the 717s are concerned) is a benefit to be sure, but it isn't the primary one (despite the opinions of a few a.netter's).

What makes such a deal between these two airlines so complicated is what MEH [Midwest Express Holdings] is vis-a-vis just Midwest Airlines. What does FL do with the MD's? the Skyway/Connect operation of 328s and 1900s? the charter operations? ATA didn't have nearly that much "baggage", but YX does, so any merger or buyout will really have to be creative.

So in the spirit of a.net armchair CEO'ing, I would guess that if a deal went through, it would be because FL was able to get the leases for the 717s and gate space at MKE and other YX stations, leaving MEH to fend for themselves on paying for the Connect operation and the MDs (which, IMO, could be configured to their fancy charter layout pending an analysis on adequate demand for such service). I'm not sure if FL would be interested in Connect providing regional services--even in some short term--to feed mainline services in MKE or anywhere else, but the guys at the cookie palace aren't going to let FL walk away with the cow and leave them holding the spoiling milk.

-Mike
I plan on living forever. So far, so good...
 
PHLBOS
Posts: 6504
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 6:38 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 1:30 am

Should a deal with Midwest fail to materialize, another potential AirTran target could include privately held Spirit Airlines Inc. of Miramar, Fla. Spirit has raised $225 million since February 2004 from private equity sources led by Oaktree Capital Management LLC in a move to build its operation across the Caribbean and Latin America, but the airline faces mounting competition as airlines big and small target tourist destinations such as those Spirit serves.

FL merging w/NK? There definitely would be some fleet commonality issues. Would FL inherit NK's proposed terminal expansion at ACY? They'll definitely be going head-to-head w/NW at DTW more so than they're originally planning to be.

AirTran also could make another run at ATA should that company's agreement with Southwest falter, or attempt to purchase gates or other assets at Washington's Dulles International Airport from struggling FlyI Inc. should that company need to restructure.

That would be one way to get some 738s rather quickly. Not that they would keep any of TZ's 752s, 753s, or any remaining charter L-1011s; but it would be interesting to see those planes in FL colors. I know, I know, it ain't going to happen.
"TransEastern! You'll feel like you've never left the ground because we treat you like dirt!" SNL Parady ad circa 1981
 
quickmover
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 4:28 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 1:39 am

"That would be one way to get some 738s rather quickly. Not that they would keep any of TZ's 752s, 753s, or any remaining charter L-1011s; but it would be interesting to see those planes in FL colors. I know, I know, it ain't going to happen."

They were giving up alot of their 753s and 738s in favor of some old UA 735s and 733s I believe. I think they have 8 or so gates left at MDW which would not be as good as the 14 they originally wanted, but could be used for a very nice operation. I just don't know how WN still fits in this mix. ATA is probably obligated for a certain period of time providing code share services for WN. WN also owns a non voting stake in the company. ATA, still operating under ch. 11, would also have to have any FL aquisition approved by a judge. I'm sure WN would want to prevent this from happening, probably by bidding for the company themselves. IMO, MDW would be much better than MKE.

interesting stuff
 
wjcandee
Posts: 5188
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2000 12:50 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 2:37 am

Personal opinion: These people are idiots. There's no reason for Airtran to buy another company when it has plenty of wherewithal to buy ASSETS from distressed carriers or just buy what it needs new or used from the manufacturer or lessor. There are 717s out there beyond Midwest, if that's really what Airtran wants. Some of these guys, possibly including Midwest, will eventually go under, and Airtran can choose to cherry-pick some of their assets. But to buy an operating entity? Why? It just brings problems that Airtran doesn't need. Much better to expand sanely from within.

And -- hello? -- last I looked Milwaukee was a very different city than Chicago, no matter how "nearby" it is.
 
7e72004
Posts: 3440
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 12:15 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 2:39 am

Maybe FL should start GYY service  bigthumbsup 
The next generation of aircraft is just around the corner!
 
MaverickM11
Posts: 15324
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 1:59 pm

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 2:52 am

Quoting Drerx7 (Reply 2):
So Midwest's signature service would go bye bye?

Signature service is simply not viable these days; it might potentially be viable in ATL to select business markets, but MKE forget about it. I really believe its days are numbered, regardless of whether AirTran becomes involved with Midwest.

Quoting 727LOVER (Reply 3):
DFW anyone?

DFW has been a major disappointment for FL. I don't see much further expansion there for FL, especially if the Wright Amendment goes away.
E pur si muove -Galileo
 
User avatar
kc135topboom
Posts: 11007
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:26 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 3:00 am

Quoting Mikey711MN (Reply 7):
If this happened a year ago, I'd have agreed with you. But DFW's old DL gates have been available for a long time as has the incentive package for a carrier to set up shop there, so I would think that FL has, at least for now, let that go by the wayside.

As has any other airline. You don't see anyone lineing up to beat down DFW's doors to get 22 gates and $22M, do you?  scared 

You have to ask yourself, why is that?  listen 

Because as part of the deal, at least 70% of the seats you fly from DFW have to fly to other airports already served by a DFW carrier.

Now, since AA has 83% of the service from DFW, who do you think you have to compete against?  scratchchin 
 
quickmover
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 4:28 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 3:01 am

"Signature service is simply not viable these days; it might potentially be viable in ATL to select business markets, but MKE forget about it. I really believe its days are numbered, regardless of whether AirTran becomes involved with Midwest."

You're right. Adding a business class is the smart move, that way if you want the type of amenities that signature service offers, you pay for it. I would bet that most passengers just want to get from point a to point b on time in coach. At least this way, you're not obligating your entire aircraft to first class specs and charging coach fares. Plus you can reward loyal customers with upgrades and burn up FF miles another way. Much better revenue model for airlines.
 
Tornado82
Posts: 4662
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 10:19 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 3:08 am

Quoting 7E72004 (Reply 11):
Maybe FL should start GYY service

Naahhh, VPZ, it has less of a negative connotation than GYY.  Wink
 
ramerinianair
Posts: 1452
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 6:03 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 3:11 am

I think they should invest their $$$ in purchasing their A/C. Most of the 717s are now leased. A lot of the DC-9s and MD-80s were owned outright. If they put this money into their A/C, it would help their bottom line. Also, they could reconsolidate their debt and put the money towards their debt to help file down financing costs- this also would go to help their bottome line. Both of these options will put them in a better position to battle higher fuel costs and DL.
Steve
W N = my Worst Nightmare!!!!!
 
srbmod
Posts: 15446
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 1:32 pm

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 4:35 am

Alright, which one of our members wrote this article?????

As Travatl has hinted to in a few threads, YX is not the possible merger target; an airline a little further west supposedly is.

Perhaps YX could be bought on the cheap leaving room for a second merger involving a western US based airline.....
 
CIDFlyer
Posts: 1894
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:19 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 4:42 am

Quoting Srbmod (Reply 17):
YX is not the possible merger target; an airline a little further west supposedly is.

Who would that be? Frontier? Alaska?
 
User avatar
mariner
Posts: 18260
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2001 7:29 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 4:50 am

Quoting CIDflyer (Reply 18):
Who would that be? Frontier? Alaska?

From the other thread about this:
RE: Airtran Raising $225 Mil. (by Mariner Aug 17 2005 in Civil Aviation)

$225 million wouldn't even get you in the door at Alaska. They have nearly $1 billion in the bank, their market cap is just under $1 billion, and any investor would expect a 50% premium.

To merge with Frontier would not be cheap, either. The market cap is up there at around $400 million, and, again, there would need to be about a 50% premium.

Quoting Quickmover (Reply 25):
code share: Frontier better route structure.

Airtran and Frontier discussed a code share a couple of years ago. It didn't happen because the computer systems were incompatible.

Since then, Frontier has changed to Sabre. i don't know what Airtran uses.

Quoting Quickmover (Reply 25):
They would be a great merger partner if they didn't have all of those planes that start with the letter "A".

Well, thank goodness they do. A code share might be good, but I don't want to see 'em merge with Airtran.

I'd miss the critters.


 Smile

cheers

mariner
aeternum nauta
 
quickmover
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 4:28 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 4:59 am

Frontier would be the perfect merger for Airtran, but two things will probably stop it.
1) Boeing vs Airbus
2) Business class vs single class seating.

I just don't think it will happen.
 
User avatar
mariner
Posts: 18260
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2001 7:29 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 5:17 am

Quoting Quickmover (Reply 20):
1) Boeing vs Airbus

And this is different from jetBlue's Airbus and Embraer how?

Quoting Quickmover (Reply 20):
2) Business class vs single class seating.

if the airlines merged, as opposed to code share, this could be changed.

However:

Quoting Quickmover (Reply 20):
I just don't think it will happen.

I agree. But for a different reason. The price tag on Frontier would be about $600 million.

cheers

mariner
aeternum nauta
 
flashmeister
Posts: 2671
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2000 4:32 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 5:47 am

The price tag on Frontier would be about $600 million.
At least. I think, given Frontier's position in a hub that UA is steadily retreating from, plus their extremely impressive RASM performance (up double-digits year over year), they'd likely command more than a 50% premium.

And, I think there could be a battle for Frontier if it suddenly went into play. jetBlue + Frontier has been discussed ad nauseum, but I think that if Neeleman and Soros saw their scrappy Southern competitor poised to grow bigtime, they'd jump in the fight. A battle drives the price up.

I'd be very surprised -- and even more skeptical -- if AirTran and Frontier sealed a deal. Frontier knows that they don't have to merge to stay afloat. Midwest doesn't have the same luxury.
 
airtran737
Posts: 3222
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 3:47 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 5:52 am

I waited a while to weigh in on this one. It has been a rumor for years that FL and YX were going to get together. As a MKE based employee I can say that the rumors are more rampant now than they have ever been in the past. YX and FL make perfect sense, the only issue would be seniority, which I will break down in my opinion of how it would pan out.

Pilots-
Midwest is represented by A.L.P.A., AirTran by N.P.A.
Midwest pilots will lose out on this one. As small as the N.P.A. is, with FL being the aggressor, the pilots will either have to go to the bottom of the list, or be given prefered interviews.

Flight Attendants-
Both companies are represented by the A.F.A.
The advantage on this one will go to Midwest. A.F.A. always merges their lists, and being that YX is about 10 years older than FL any senior YX F/A's could win big on this one. Unless FL keeps the hubs separate from one another I see no way for the FL F/A's to win.

Mechanics-
AirTran is represented by the Teamsters, Midwest is non-union.
Midwest loses big time on this one, no ifs ands or buts.

Dispatchers-
AirTran is represented by the T.W.U. (correct me if I am wrong) YX is non union.
Midwest loses again.

Customer Service/Ramp
Both carriers are non-union. When the TZ deal almost happened we were told that any acquired employees would go to the bottom, and as the aggressive carrier in this potential deal I see no reason to believe otherwise.

Midwest Connect-
Skyway is a great little airline, their maintenance program is one to be envied, and those B1900's and 328Jets have kept YX afloat for a while. I don't know what would happen to them. I would hope that they would stay on, but I can't be too sure.

This deal could be great for both companies. For AirTran it gives them a Midwestern hub, and for YX it lets the employees keep their jobs. It maybe another airline, but they will still get a paycheck. FL wants another hub. After being scorned in the TZ deal by WN they have become more aggressive. MKE is only an hour and a half from downtown Chicago. The Milwaukee metro area has a population of well over a million people, and on top of that you would still be able to tap into Northern Illinois. This could be a great merger, fleet commonality will help ,and the fact that the aircraft are both financed through Boeing Capital is a plus for FL. I would love to see this go through. I await the "no way in Hell" response from 917ME and SideFlare.
Nice Trip Report!!! Great Pics, thanks for posting!!!! B747Forever
 
sideflare75
Posts: 417
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 2:30 pm

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 6:58 am

AirTran,

You say that only the FA's will come out ahead on this merger deal but then say that YX's employees get to keep their jobs. It can't be both.

I never said this would not happen, I just said the reasons that are giving are not enough to convince me. 717's are the only reason that even remotely makes sense, and I still say that if AirTran wanted more they could have just ordered them when they had the chance. Why go throught the mess of a merger for that?

So there's your "no way in hell" response that you wanted. I'm am trying to look at this logically and not because I work for YX. Give me some solid reasons that this should take place and try to convince me. All I hear are the same old reasons that have been around for years. Sorry but I'm not convinced.
 
PHLBOS
Posts: 6504
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 6:38 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 7:07 am

Quoting RamerinianAir (Reply 16):
A lot of the DC-9s and MD-80s were owned outright.

Neither FL nor YX fly any DC-9s anymore. They were retired within the last year or two.
"TransEastern! You'll feel like you've never left the ground because we treat you like dirt!" SNL Parady ad circa 1981
 
User avatar
JBo
Posts: 1613
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 7:23 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 7:58 am

Quoting AirTran737 (Reply 23):
Skyway is a great little airline, their maintenance program is one to be envied, and those B1900's and 328Jets have kept YX afloat for a while. I don't know what would happen to them. I would hope that they would stay on, but I can't be too sure.

If FL and YX were to merge, either the money would be there to expand the regional network. [with a more nationwide presence, the combined airline might be able to better pull off having a regional carrier.

Or, they could always sell Skyway off [god forbid]. Maybe that other Wisconsin-based regional carrier would buy them out. Random thought? Maybe.
I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day.
 
srbmod
Posts: 15446
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 1:32 pm

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 10:43 am

Quoting Mariner (Reply 19):

Since then, Frontier has changed to Sabre. i don't know what Airtran uses.

Navitaire's Open Skies system. FL has been using it for years.
 
Indy
Posts: 3957
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:37 pm

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:16 am

For an airline that is supposedly so interested in YX and MKE they haven't been beating down the door to add routes there. Could it be that there is simply nothing to the rumor?
Indy = Indianapolis and not Independence Air
 
quickmover
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 4:28 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:20 am

quoting mariner "And this is different from jetBlue's Airbus and Embraer how?"

I have not seen one JetBlue Embraer in revenue service yet. Granted Neeleman & Co are a smart bunch, but I think the jury is still out on this move. F9 constantly commented about the goal of going to one fleet type on their conference calls. I believe if FL had the benefit of 20/20 hind sight, they would be all 737 today and would have skipped the 717 altogether, but that is irrelevant now. Having 717s and 737s is bad enough, but at least you are dealing with the same manufacturer and lender. The best part about a Midwest deal would be that FL is about the only defacto buyer for 717s, so FL can just about name their price for the most part.

One fleet type has certainly worked for WN.
 
Midway2AirTran
Posts: 847
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 7:34 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:39 am

It is pretty obvious (now to most anyone) that AirTran is highly interested in the Chicago market, but IMO it will be happening in Chicago and not MKE! They're close together, but different markets. YX is not the answer unless its got some major ties to something else (probably unknown) to really make a benefit.

I have to admit that this noise out at YX could be a good way of diverting attention of analyst and apparently now the media.

IMO AirTran has an excellent record of carefully watching over its stockowners so far, unlike many airlines, and whatever the leadership decides will have that attached to it. If they decide to sell more shares, the return would be more likely be enough to make for the loss in the new offering. They still have much of a process to go through till that can be done anyway so it ain't happening next week or even for months!
"Life is short, but your delay in ATL is not."
 
Indy
Posts: 3957
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:37 pm

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:42 am

Where would they go in Chicago? MDW and ORD are full. They might want Chicago but odds are it isn't going to happen.
Indy = Indianapolis and not Independence Air
 
User avatar
mariner
Posts: 18260
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2001 7:29 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:47 am

Quoting Quickmover (Reply 29):
One fleet type has certainly worked for WN.

Yes, it has. A lot of things have worked for WN. A single class has worked for WN. The concept of "no hub" has worked for WN (helloooo, ATL and MKE).

And I could argue that a mixed fleet - and a mixed class and one very specific hub with zero feed - has not hurt the fortunes of Virgin Atlantic.

 wave 

cheers

mariner
aeternum nauta
 
Indy
Posts: 3957
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:37 pm

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:50 am

Quoting Mariner (Reply 32):
The concept of "no hub" has worked for WN

Of course that brings up the debate whether you call MDW or BWI a hub for WN. If you look at the number of routes connecting in those airports you'd definately call it a hub. The difference being they don't scrape bottom with 40% of their passengers being O/D. They just have better O/D to Connecting traffic ratios.
Indy = Indianapolis and not Independence Air
 
User avatar
mariner
Posts: 18260
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2001 7:29 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:54 am

Quoting Indy (Reply 33):
If you look at the number of routes connecting in those airports you'd definately call it a hub.

Yes, I would call them both hubs. I would say that WN has several hubs.

But the mantra is that WN does not have hubs and does point to point flying.

I have had several battles about that on this website.  Smile

cheers

mariner
aeternum nauta
 
LawnDart
Posts: 861
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 11:33 pm

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:05 pm

Quoting Mariner (Reply 21):
And this is different from jetBlue's Airbus and Embraer how?

The A320 and the E190 serve different market segments...the potential fleet of 737/A319/A318/717 are much more closely spaced in capacity and capability.

However, if there was ever a large hub (DEN, not MKE) dominated by one carrier that could be vulnerable (UA) that was ripe for the picking, then AirTran would surely be considering F9 / DEN over YX / MKE.

MKE is a crappy hub - that's part of the reason YX isn't in a position to acquire anyone. And "Chicagoland" has plenty of service by AA / UA / WN.
 
ChiGB1973
Posts: 1394
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 6:39 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:10 pm

Quoting AirTran737 (Reply 23):
MKE is only an hour and a half from downtown Chicago.

HEHE, when? At 2am? I live just north of downtown and it takes me 30 minutes to get to O'Hare. This is when I report to work at 5am.

Granted, the train is an option. Drive to the train station, take the train to MKE and fly to wherever. It would turn out like the movie, "Planes, Trains and Automobiles."

With the price of gas, I really doubt you would save anything at all driving to MKE from Chicago. Sure, you are about 50/50 when you get close to the state line. UA (TED), WN, TZ, F9, FL from MDW; TED, Spirit, HP and the competition between airlines at MDW and ORD, it is hard to find a less expensive ticket than you can from Chicago to anywhere.

Maybe I took the 1 1/2 hour from downtown Chicago the wrong way, but it would be worthwhile for me to pay $60-$100 more in Chicago rather than driving to MKE. Gas, parking, time, traffic, when from downtown I can take the Blue Line for 30 minutes, no traffic, $2 ride to the airport, no parking fees, familiarity with the airport. I am just not seeing it here.

M
 
User avatar
mariner
Posts: 18260
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2001 7:29 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:17 pm

Quoting LawnDart (Reply 35):
The A320 and the E190 serve different market segments

I understand that.

But Quickmover is using the WN model and arguing against any two type fleet.

It is a completely valid point of view. I don't think it is the only point of view.

cheers

mariner
aeternum nauta
 
quickmover
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 4:28 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:29 pm

"But Quickmover is using the WN model and arguing against any two type fleet"

I could also use the Frontier model, but there are not too many combinations in the LCC field that would even have a common fleet type in the first place. The only two I can think of would be F9/B6 and FL/YX.
 
quickmover
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 4:28 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:30 pm

Although you really couldn't call YX a LCC.
 
DAYflyer
Posts: 3546
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:35 pm

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 5:57 pm

Quoting Quickmover (Reply 6):
Cookies are nice, but I just don't think they sell plane tickets.

They would get my vote over the pretzles, thats for sure.

Quoting Midway2AirTran (Reply 30):
It is pretty obvious (now to most anyone) that AirTran is highly interested in the Chicago market, but IMO it will be happening in Chicago and not MKE! They're close together, but different markets. YX is not the answer unless its got some major ties to something else (probably unknown) to really make a benefit.

Who else could they buy in Chicago? There is no one available for sale.
One Nation Under God
 
User avatar
mariner
Posts: 18260
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2001 7:29 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sat Aug 20, 2005 6:08 pm

Quoting Quickmover (Reply 38):
I could also use the Frontier model,

Well - not quite. Yes, Frontier mainline is all A320 family. But Frontier is also one of the few LCC's (HP the other) that has a contracted Express carrier.

Horizon/Frontier Jet Express flies CR7's and is paid on a cost plus basis, not fee for departure. In other words, Frontier is meeting all the costs.

So one can argue that Frontier has a two type fleet.

cheers

mariner
aeternum nauta
 
Tornado82
Posts: 4662
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 10:19 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sun Aug 21, 2005 12:13 am

Quoting Mariner (Reply 32):
The concept of "no hub" has worked for WN (helloooo, ATL and MKE).



Quoting Mariner (Reply 34):
Yes, I would call them both hubs. I would say that WN has several hubs.

But the mantra is that WN does not have hubs and does point to point flying.

I have had several battles about that on this website. Smile

Want to know where the WN hubs are, just look at where they began PIT service to. I'm still surprised we didn't get service to the BWI pseudo-hub, for connections across the NE, if they really wanted to drive it to USAirways. I agree with you 110% on that one Mariner.

Quoting DAYflyer (Reply 40):

Who else could they buy in Chicago? There is no one available for sale.

United.  stirthepot 
 
Midway2AirTran
Posts: 847
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 7:34 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sun Aug 21, 2005 7:23 am

Quoting DAYflyer (Reply 40):
Who else could they buy in Chicago? There is no one available for sale.

Anything is available at a price. Considering that AirTran backed out increasing its low-end bid for ATA's assets and still continues to hold stance to serve Chicago is a sign IMO that another plan may be (probably was already) in the workings. It could along the lines of the ORD expansion of which I have heard some direct speculation about.

Eitherway, I still doubts it would be anything involved with YX unless it is something dirt cheap and benefits more than it sounds. What would FL gain from YX?

A bunch of B717's oddly configured, great Ramp/ground service(sarcastic), a MKE hub that Midwest could not make happen all with plenty of NW competition to boot, combination of workforce would have to be done, MD-80's, debt to take up, a regional carrier that has nothing above 50 seats, and MCI? Where is the value created to AirTran or better yet both in all this?
"Life is short, but your delay in ATL is not."
 
BH
Posts: 518
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 7:27 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sun Aug 21, 2005 7:51 am

Quoting Midway2airtran (Reply 43):
A bunch of B717's oddly configured, great Ramp/ground service(sarcastic), a MKE hub that Midwest could not make happen all with plenty of NW competition to boot, combination of workforce would have to be done, MD-80's, debt to take up, a regional carrier that has nothing above 50 seats, and MCI? Where is the value created to AirTran or better yet both in all this?

Maybe they are planning on NWA falling apart, who knows? New service to DTW and a possibility of expanding in MKE maybe the are just trying to position theirself to be ready if something happens? This is not my opinion but just another way to look at it
 
FutureFO
Posts: 2811
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2001 10:58 pm

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sun Aug 21, 2005 7:55 am

What everyone is seeming to forget that the rumours have been around for years. There will be no merger between YX and FL. That has been emphatically been stated by Timmy several times.


Sean from MCO and MKE
I Don't know where I am anymore
 
srbmod
Posts: 15446
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 1:32 pm

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:52 am

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 12):

DFW has been a major disappointment for FL. I don't see much further expansion there for FL, especially if the Wright Amendment goes away.

If it's been a disappointment, why did they go from 2 DFW-LAS/LAS-DFW and 2 DFW-LAX/LAX-DFW to 3 dailies back in June? The loads are there for the flights, and not all of those pax originated at ATL or terminate at ATL, because they added an additional ATL-LAS-ATL and an additional ATL-LAX-ATL flight as well (and have added an additional ATL-LAS-ATL since then as well.).
 
n917me
Posts: 492
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 9:18 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:48 am

Quoting Midway2airtran (Reply 43):
a MKE hub that Midwest could not make happen all with plenty of NW competition to boot,

Actually the MKE hub is great for YX. YX carries more than 50% of all MKE traffic, NW market share in MKE has steadily declined.


I do not see YX and FL merging. I think FL is building up their cash for other things, future fuel prices, DL struggling in ATL, new aircraft.

The rumor has been around for YEARS. nothing has happened yet, nor will it happen now.
 
Midway2AirTran
Posts: 847
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 7:34 am

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sun Aug 21, 2005 1:46 pm

Quoting N917ME (Reply 47):
Actually the MKE hub is great for YX. YX carries more than 50% of all MKE traffic, NW market share in MKE has steadily declined.

Is that 50% of flights or passenger traffic? It would be great if YX could make a profit with that to help the rumor hit the fan finally!


If B717 carriers are such a value to AirTran, then why won't they just go after Hawaiian Airlines too. Afterall they have B717's, intra-island routes, a few B767's to connect to the mainland, lower renegotiated debt, westward expansion for FL and a much nicer, warmer climate than MKE..hehe spin 

Maybe that's why Delta tried to get started early out of ATL???

Forget cookies, how about pineapple and spam!
^Please don't take me seriously on the above.  Smile

This will be my official end to responding to the FL-YX threads!!!
"Life is short, but your delay in ATL is not."
 
sllevin
Posts: 3312
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2002 1:57 pm

RE: Airtran Circling Rival

Sun Aug 21, 2005 2:05 pm

Quoting Mariner (Reply 19):
$225 million wouldn't even get you in the door at Alaska. They have nearly $1 billion in the bank, their market cap is just under $1 billion, and any investor would expect a 50% premium.

Not that I'm saying it'll happen, but just to clarify, money in the bank, if anything, makes a takeover target MORE desireable. Cash on hand can then be used to service newly acquired payments on other money....sound familiar?  Smile

$225 million and some institutional investors would probably get the job done to take over AS.

Steve