b6sea
Posts: 347
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:44 pm

SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:51 pm

I think the topic really says it all, but why doesnt seattle have service from any of the Japanese carriers or Chinese carriers and why does Vancouver get so much more traffic, being the larger city, I would think that SEA would get more of the traffic... can someone explain this, Yes I do understand Vancouver has a large asian population, Yes i do understand that AC has a large base for connections in YVR but still, SEA seems like a perfectly viable route from cities like NRT, NGO, KIX, PEK, shanghai (forgot the code) and HKG... I know hkg was specifically discussed earlier but as a whole why doesnt sea see more service than currently?
 
brokenrecord
Posts: 747
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:45 am

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:36 pm

Because like you said, YVR has it already, and most airlines are not going to pack up and move just because SEA also has viable routes. Also, Perhaps the taxes are higher at SEA than at YVR?
 
ssides
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 12:57 am

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:44 pm

Simple, there are more connecting opportunities at YVR, and because of that, airlines aren't going to duplicate or move their service.
"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
 
as739x
Posts: 4993
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 7:23 am

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:51 pm

Yeah, this has been discussed many times, but all the reason above are valid not to mention there just is not the demand. If one of these airlines saw it viable to operate from SEA and YVR, they'd do it. But the fact is that connection opportunities are better from SEA via YVR/SFO/ and even LAX. Using their own metal just is to expensive. Now in my opinion the 787 may change this a little.

A couple of side note: Its been mention that ANA is looking at Nagoya-Seattle. Maybe some of our buddy's from JP have heard more. Centralair?

And Seattle's Cantonese population is a fraction of Vancouver's. CX I'd highly doubt will ever come to SEA.

ASSFO
"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
 
squirrel83
Posts: 1219
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 12:28 pm

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:44 pm

Quoting B6sea (Thread starter):
seattle have service from any of the Japanese carriers or Chinese carriers

Sorry to bother but is China Airlines a chinese carrier? Don't they fly IAH-SEA-TPE TPE-SEA-IAH?
A346, 7E7, 747, 777, Sonic Cruiser
 
MAH4546
Posts: 24521
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 1:44 pm

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:47 pm

Quoting Squirrel83 (Reply 4):
Sorry to bother but is China Airlines a chinese carrier? Don't they fly IAH-SEA-TPE TPE-SEA-IAH?

China Airlines does fly to Seattle, but they are not a Chinese carrier. They are Taiwanese.
a.
 
drerx7
Posts: 4203
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2000 12:19 am

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:50 pm

Quoting Squirrel83 (Reply 4):
Sorry to bother but is China Airlines a chinese carrier? Don't they fly IAH-SEA-TPE TPE-SEA-IAH?

Taiwanese--and yes they fly TPE-SEA-IAH and back; and from what I understand the route is doing pretty good.
Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
 
keno
Posts: 1809
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 5:46 pm

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:51 pm

SEA being the hub for Alaska Airlines, are the connecting opportunities in SEA really that unattractive? (YVR arguments aside)
 
Shenzhen
Posts: 1664
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 12:11 pm

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:53 pm

Eva Airlines
North West
Asiana.....
 
ctbarnes
Posts: 3269
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2000 2:20 pm

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 12:05 am

JAL, Thai and China Eastern have all operated out of Seattle at various times in the 70's and 80's. Cathay Pacific had plans in the 1980's to extend their HKG-YVR service to SEA but pulled out at the last minute.

SEA-HKG has been tried by both UA and NW, neither of whom were able to make any money on the route, so it was eventually dropped.

It can be argued that SEA is now quite well served across the pacific:

SEA-NRT by UA and NW
SEA-ICN by OZ and KE
SEA-TPE by CI and BR

Also, NW did operate SEA-KIX for a while and dropped it after 9/11, and (I think) had plans to run a seasonal flight to NGO, which was also scrapped.

Charles, SJ
The customer isn't a moron, she is your wife -David Ogilvy
 
7e72004
Posts: 3440
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 12:15 am

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:09 am

They are waiting for BFI to open up!!  bigthumbsup  *lol*
The next generation of aircraft is just around the corner!
 
flyinghippo
Posts: 688
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:48 am

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:31 am

CI operates TPE-SEA-IAH
BR operates TPE-SEA-EWR

I guess depends on where in Asia you want to go, there are different choices.

If you want to go SEA-HKG, can either goto YVR then HKG on CX
Or SEA-TPE-HKG on CI or BR.

NRT - You have UA and NW flying direct, ICN you have KE and Asiana, and there are lots of connections from NRT and ICN to CAN, PVG and PEK in China.

So you got plenty of choices!

Pretty interesting that both CI and BR serve SEA and YVR with pretty good loads. (Along with SFO and LAX)
 
b6sea
Posts: 347
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:44 pm

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:53 am

Quoting 7E72004 (Reply 10):
They are waiting for BFI to open up!! *lol*

errrr not sure if u are joking or not? But i sincerely hope so, Seattle doesnt need two airports at this time, Sea is good enough for us, sw can pack up and leave if they dont like it,in fact id like open the door for them and wish them good day... but anyway

Quoting KEno (Reply 7):
SEA being the hub for Alaska Airlines, are the connecting opportunities in SEA really that unattractive? (YVR arguments aside)

This is one of my main thoughts, AS has grown by leaps and bounds since the hong kong flights or the kix flight and I hold the belief that, seeing the KE flight being added and china airlines last year, is it a possibility, beyond just saying anything is possible? Also, I've heard this come up before somewhere, maybe as a joke i dont know, but is it that unfathomable that AS could place an order for 772s or 787s in the forseeable future for trans pac flights. I think the only condition for this is that AS would probably have to rebrand in order to establish that they dont only fly to Alaska. Also AS being such a codeshare whore could probably team up with ANA or JAL in order to offer the flight.

Also with so many aircraft pieces being built in Japan nowadays, for Boeing, wouldn't there be an opportunity for one of the majors or the Japanese carriers to offer a flight with business traffic in mind. I dont know exactly where in Japan they are built but I'm assuming somewhere south of Tokyo like NGO or KIX.

I dont really think taxes pay a huge role in this because YVR, from what i've heard, has higher taxes than SEA. I know this to be true on flights from the states.

Yes, I agree that Vancouver has a much larger cantonese population, due to heavy immigration to Canada right before Hong Kong transferred to Chinese rule. So CX may not happen.

And back to YVR, I dont believe that many people use it as an alternative airport when flying to asia. Look at the flights between the city, all are prop aircraft and the flight is rather expensive (I am flying it friday with UA and AC on the return). Although I've heard LAX is used a lot for people from SEA. And I believe that maybe in the past most of the "YVR is bigger" arguments work but in today's environment thats just not true.

edit (grammatical error)

[Edited 2005-08-22 19:55:06]
 
7e72004
Posts: 3440
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 12:15 am

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:56 am

I was JOKING...i am against opening up BFI as a second airport out there  Smile
The next generation of aircraft is just around the corner!
 
centrair
Posts: 2845
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 3:44 pm

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:58 am

I finally saw this post.

Well there was an article I read a while back (All the links are broken for the article now) that ANA is considering NGO-SEA using a 767 that would start in the fall of 2006.
ANA Nagoya-Seattle: ANA is Looking!

The idea was the following:
1) Seattle is a huge trading partner for Nagoya heavy industry, mainly aviation. Some of the 787 parts are being made right here in the Chubu area.
2) Gifu Prefecture (in Chubu area)has many software and hardware development companies.
3) The number of tourists from Chubu taking flights to Tokyo and transfering to Seattle bound flights is on the rise. (Thank you Ichiro) NH feels that a direct could work but the aircraft has to be the right size.

Seattle is a 767/787/A330 market in my opinion. There have been many rumors floating about NW also looking at the route using an A332 but I think that won't happen.

Once the 787 is deployed I could see SEA having increased direct flights to destinations in Japan and China.

There also has to be, in my opinion, more domestic connections from SEA to make it worthwhile. SEA is a destination but you have to have enough connections.
Yes...I am not a KIX fan. Let's Japanese Aviation!
 
rwsea
Posts: 2422
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:23 pm

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:11 am

I too think SEA could use a few more flights to Asia. As mentioned, ANA has been rumored to be considering SEA-NGO sometime in 2006.

NRT, TPE, and ICN are all well-covered.

I'd like to see UA/CX start SEA-HKG, and NW reinstate SEA-KIX. SEA-KIX seemed to be a strong performer for NW prior to 9/11 and there are persistent rumors of it returning.

In the past, NW got good loads on SEA-HKG, however the yields were not as strong as hoped. I'm thinking a smaller plane (they used the 747-200 on the route) such as a 332 or 777 might be more successful. A 787 would definitely be successful.

One note about YVR: yes, it is a much smaller city than SEA. However, it is Canada's only major gateway to Asia. In the US, we have SFO/LAX/SEA all competing for Asian traffic. Often times SFO/LAX win out because of all the connecting opportunities, as well as their much larger O&D. YVR has great connections to the rest of Canada, and if an Asian carrier wants to serve Canada (not necessarily just Vancouver), then YVR is the logical choice. And it has been mentioned that YVR is a very cosmopolitan and worldly city, with very strong Asian ties.
 
charlib52
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:03 am

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:55 pm

Quoting RwSEA (Reply 15):
One note about YVR: yes, it is a much smaller city than SEA

Actually Vancouver's population is basically the same as Seattle -- roughly 550,000-600,000. And Portland, Or, much to most people's surprise, is also the same range -- in the 540,000 range.

SEA's catchment area of the whole Puget Sound area (3.5 M), however, is bigger than YVR (1.5 M).

Another fact: if it weren't for NIMBYs, Everett's PAE would almost certainly get quite a bit of service as well. It's catchment area is almost as big as YVR! (1.1 Million)

But I digress....another day, another post!

Cheers!

Quick rough references:
http://www.abbotsfordairport.ca/docu...etSizes2004-DataNotes31March05.pdf
http://www.amlife.us/economic_trends.html
PAE_Summary_Recomm.pdf" target=_blank>http://www.painefield.com/pf_pdf/PAE_Summary_Recomm.pdf
 
DYK
Posts: 353
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 2:29 pm

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:35 am

Quoting Charlib52 (Reply 16):
SEA's catchment area of the whole Puget Sound area (3.5 M), however, is bigger than YVR (1.5 M).

Another fact: if it weren't for NIMBYs, Everett's PAE would almost certainly get quite a bit of service as well. It's catchment area is almost as big as YVR! (1.1 Million)

Actually Vancouver metro population is 2,250,000. , its cathcment area is approx 2,,800,000 and if extended o the province it is approx 4,500.000 as 90% of the international traveling population in the province is funneled through Vancouver.

I think that both cities will see substantial future growth to the Asia PAcific. The major advantage Sea has over YVR is they do not have the restrictions placed on foreign carriers as Vancouver does. AS the U.S. government is open to open skies with foreign carriers the Canadian Gov. is not.
AC,CP,PW,WD,ND,UA,AA,NW,CO,DL,WA,AS,QX,PR,SQ,AI,TG,MH,JL,9W,IC,UL,PG,BW,NZ,QF,DJ,BA,LH,KL,OA,OS,ME,RJ,HA,AQ
 
charlib52
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:03 am

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Wed Aug 24, 2005 3:41 am

Quoting DYK (Reply 17):
Actually Vancouver metro population is 2,250,000.

Well, according to the City of Vancouver, BC:

"With a present population of about 560,000 (estimated),"
http://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/aboutvan.htm

So my figure is not false.

Could be wrong on the catchment area, but the factoid I got was from the Abbotsford Airport (I used the one for the entire area, not just abbotsford it think), so I just assumed they knew what they are doing.
 
dforce1
Posts: 506
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 4:16 am

RE: SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service?

Wed Aug 24, 2005 3:58 am

Quoting B6sea (Reply 12):
but is it that unfathomable that AS could place an order for 772s or 787s in the forseeable future for trans pac flights.

I don't think it is unfathomable. If we see a lot of the big legacy carriers go down, or merge, you might see AS move in a little bit. Certainly there would be good code sharing opportunities. On the other hand, AS has a successful business model and I wouldn't want to deviate too far from that.

Quoting B6sea (Reply 12):
And back to YVR, I dont believe that many people use it as an alternative airport when flying to asia. Look at the flights between the city, all are prop aircraft and the flight is rather expensive (I am flying it friday with UA and AC on the return). Although I've heard LAX is used a lot for people from SEA. And I believe that maybe in the past most of the "YVR is bigger" arguments work but in today's environment thats just not true.

Everyone in Western Canada use Vancouver as their gateway to Asia. If you're living in SEA, I can't see why you would choose SFO/LAX over YVR. Not only is YVR a nicer airport, but who doesn't like flying on a prop?!

Quoting RwSEA (Reply 15):
O&D

What does this stand for?

Quoting Charlib52 (Reply 16):
Actually Vancouver's population is basically the same as Seattle -- roughly 550,000-600,000. And Portland, Or, much to most people's surprise, is also the same range -- in the 540,000 range.

Don't forget we have the Olympics coming in 2010. All airlines will want a strong presence in YVR for that, not to mention the future economic benefits including tourism.