jdwfloyd
Posts: 799
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 10:29 am

What Would US Need To Start South American Ops?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 3:38 am

I know that flights to South America are slot restricted to only AA, CO, DL and UA but what would US have to do to get a PHL-GIG or PHL-GRU route approved? Is there a waiting list or could they be bought off of an other airline? Maybe there is a chance of deregulation to South America in the future.
 
MAH4546
Posts: 24522
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 1:44 pm

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 6:22 am

Quoting Jdwfloyd (Thread starter):
I know that flights to South America are slot restricted to only AA, CO, DL and UA but what would US have to do to get a PHL-GIG or PHL-GRU route approved? Is there a waiting list or could they be bought off of an other airline? Maybe there is a chance of deregulation to South America in the future.

There are only two unallocated US-Brazil slots. They could ask for those, but there is no use flying twice weekly. Other than that, they could ask for an exemption. The US gov't would likely give it approval, the Brazilian government would likely not. The US and Brazil really need to agree on a new air treaty.

None the less, just as important as slots, they would need a market. PHL-GRU? When an ERJ can make it that far, then US Airways will talk about it.
a.
 
A330323X
Posts: 2666
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:06 pm

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 6:31 am

Quoting Jdwfloyd (Thread starter):
I know that flights to South America are slot restricted to only AA, CO, DL and UA but what would US have to do to get a PHL-GIG or PHL-GRU route approved? Is there a waiting list or could they be bought off of an other airline? Maybe there is a chance of deregulation to South America in the future.

South America is a big place, you know.  Wink

It's true that there are restrictive bilaterals with many countries, and US would have some difficulty flying to GRU, or GIG, or EZE, or BOG.

But US could easily start flying to LIM, or CCS, or SCL, or plenty of other places.

(The only one likely, though, is FLL-LIM, which has been rumored for a good while now.)

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 1):
None the less, just as important as slots, they would need a market.

An even bigger problem, for deep South America, is that they're fresh out of planes that can make it down there.  Silly
I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
 
SHUPirate1
Posts: 3428
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 2:53 pm

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 6:34 am

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 1):
None the less, just as important as slots, they would need a market. PHL-GRU? When an ERJ can make it that far, then US Airways will talk about it.

What if US flew FLL-BSB with a 319, and codeshared with Varig for connecting flights to Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and other places?

edited for spelling changes

[Edited 2005-08-22 23:49:52]
Burma's constitutional referendum options: A. Yes, B. Go to Insein Prison!
 
PPVRA
Posts: 7865
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:48 am

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops

Tue Aug 23, 2005 6:47 am

Quoting SHUPirate1 (Reply 3):
What if US flew FLL-BSB with a 319, and codeshared with Varig for connecting flights to Sao Paolo, Rio de Janiero, and other places?

That'd be kinda nuts. Six or seven hours in an A319...? Plus the heavy GRU/GIG-MIA competition...

But it's an idea, maybe even with a stop in MAO.

Btw, it's Sao Paulo. Common mistake, no big deal. And you switched the "ei" in Rio de Janeiro.

Sorry for being picky...

Cheers,
PPVRA

[Edited 2005-08-22 23:48:31]
"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
 
supa7E7
Posts: 1360
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 2:05 am

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 7:17 am

Quoting A330323X (Reply 2):
An even bigger problem, for deep South America, is that they're fresh out of planes that can make it down there. Silly

US has plenty of more or less spare 767-200ERs all winter long.
"Who's to say spaceships aren't fine art?" - Phil Lesh
 
A330323X
Posts: 2666
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:06 pm

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops

Tue Aug 23, 2005 7:24 am

Quoting SHUPirate1 (Reply 3):
What if US flew FLL-BSB with a 319, and codeshared with Varig for connecting flights to Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and other places?

In addition to the idea being of dubious quality, the problem remains that there is a dearth of available U.S.-Brazil frequencies, whether you plan on using them to GRU or GIG or BSB or CNF or wherever.

It's been rumored that AA plans to attempt to get authority to be able to fly to destinations other than GRU/GIG on an extrabilateral basis, but it's yet to happen.

Quoting Supa7e7 (Reply 5):
US has plenty of more or less spare 767-200ERs all winter long.

Well, yes, US does have a few spare 762s that it sends to the islands during the winter, but one would assume that US would not open deep South America as a seasonal destination.

(In reality, of course, if US really wanted to fly PHL-GRU right now and could get the slots, it would just can Ireland or whatnot. But don't hold your breath.)
I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
 
SHUPirate1
Posts: 3428
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 2:53 pm

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 7:28 am

Quoting A330323X (Reply 6):
the problem remains that there is a dearth of available U.S.-Brazil frequencies

Per what our LatAm expert in reply 1 says, there are two frequencies available. This could be a way to get into the FLL-BSB market on a twice-weekly basis, and then if somebody pulls their service, freeing up more slots, surely US Airways would be in a prime position to acquire the other five to have daily service.
Burma's constitutional referendum options: A. Yes, B. Go to Insein Prison!
 
A330323X
Posts: 2666
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:06 pm

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 7:32 am

Quoting SHUPirate1 (Reply 7):
Per what our LatAm expert in reply 1 says, there are two frequencies available.

I never said otherwise.  Yeah sure

Quoting SHUPirate1 (Reply 7):
This could be a way to get into the FLL-BSB market on a twice-weekly basis

Now there's a winning idea.  Silly
I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
 
bsbisland
Posts: 315
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:45 am

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 7:41 am

Sorry for my ignorance, but doesn´t US Airways have a hub in FLL?

I think FLL would have the market to some Latin American cities, but the problem is, as stated above, the slot restrictions in many countries. In Brazil, secondary cities nowadays would just work for MIA and MAYBE NYC. FLL being close to MIA might work, but I don´t know. They are a Star partner, so that´s an advantage in Brazil. For other countries, I´m not sure about the market, but FLL-LIM, FLL-CCS doesn´t seem bad. PHL maybe would work for GRU ( depending a lot on connections), but I don´t think it´s ever going to happen in the near future...

And what about NW? I always wondered why they don´t fly to anywhere in South America. I know they code-share with CO (or used to) but that´s it.

Rgs
 
Arcano
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:34 am

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 12:41 pm

Quoting A330323X (Reply 2):
But US could easily start flying to LIM, or CCS, or SCL, or plenty of other places

With AA and DL increasing frequencies, I don't see we have market for another carrier to PHL. Remember we don't even have a JFK direct service, so that would be a start...

Regards )( ARCANO
in order: 721,146,732,763,722,343,733,320,772,319,752,321,88,83,744,332,100,738, 333, 318, 77W, 78, 773, 380, 73G, 788, 789, 346
 
A330323X
Posts: 2666
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:06 pm

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:05 pm

Quoting BSBIsland (Reply 9):
Sorry for my ignorance, but doesn´t US Airways have a hub in FLL?

US has a focus city at FLL, with their international flights catering primarily to the O&D market and not connections. Currently, they only offer daily domestic flights to their other hubs/focus cities, with Express flights to MCO/EYW. The international routes are CUN/KIN/SDQ. Additional destinations can be reached via codeshares on partner airlines. Some new routes, including some that US previously offered earlier this year, will be announced soon.

Quoting Arcano (Reply 10):
With AA and DL increasing frequencies, I don't see we have market for another carrier to PHL. Remember we don't even have a JFK direct service, so that would be a start...

I didn't say that US to SCL would be a good idea. Just the opposite, it would be a total disaster. All I said was that there's nothing stopping US from flying to a number of South American markets, and that SCL is one of them.
I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
 
cltguy
Posts: 541
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:54 pm

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:47 pm

All US needs to start South American Ops is clearance Clarence.
 
N1120A
Posts: 26467
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:51 pm

Quoting SHUPirate1 (Reply 3):
What if US flew FLL-BSB with a 319, and codeshared with Varig for connecting flights to Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and other places?

At 3135nm, US would have a fun time trying to get the A319 to hit Brasilia every day
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
 
StarCruiser
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 12:12 am

RE: What Would US Need To Start South American Ops?

Tue Aug 23, 2005 8:28 pm

Quoting Jdwfloyd (Thread starter):
I know that flights to South America are slot restricted to only AA, CO, DL and UA but what would US have to do to get a PHL-GIG or PHL-GRU route approved? Is there a waiting list or could they be bought off of an other airline? Maybe there is a chance of deregulation to South America in the future.

How about we wait to see if the newly merged company survives first? Flying to far flung areas of the world is a nice idea, but I'd suggest they get their house in order first. One of their biggest problems from my experience is that they need to work on the attitude of their CSRs and baggage handlers in PHL. There is no excuse for the way they treat Pax. I suggest their CEO experience it firsthand and let some heads roll.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: adamblang, Amiga500, blockski, Caryjack, EasternA300, FAST Enterprise [Crawler], float66, Geoff1947, haynflyer, huaiwei, kd9gy, keesje, kzba, lavalampluva, msycajun, olle, qf002, qf789, ScottB, TWA772LR and 370 guests