zootrix
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:40 pm

Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:50 am

Folks,
While flying on a Comair CRJ100 between BOS-BGR, we were cruising (FL150-180) on one engine. Sitting in 12 D, you can rotate your neck by 180deg. (almost) and see the right engine (# 2??). The fan was not rotating. I checked repeatedly and NO, the fan was not rotating!! I even tried taking a pic. but could not due to scratches/haze on the plastic and glass of the window. Now taxiing on one engine is common practice, but how common is this method of conserving fuel, esp. in light of Delta's bankruptcy and Comair's financial woes?

Back in the 80s, I had heard the FAA penalizing some US airlines who were trying to save fuel by switching off 1 or 2 engines while cruising.

Any thoughts?...Thanks
 
CWAFlyer
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 3:33 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:10 am

If the engine was shut down it had something wrong with it. Financial
woes or not, airlines do not operate airplanes this way.
 
Tornado82
Posts: 4662
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 10:19 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:19 am

The CRJ is lucky to have enough power/lift to fly with 2 engines... they wouldn't be shutting one down for sh*ts and giggles...

That said, some engines, when running at a certain speed, the fan gives an appearance as if its not moving. It's an optical illusion caused by the refresh rate of your eye, similar things happen when you look at wheels on a car going by sometimes. I once noticed this on a NW DC-9 before too. Made for a nervous second or two.
 
zootrix
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:40 pm

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:27 am

Agree with Tornado82 about thoughts on optical illusion, but I did check the engine repeatedly just to make sure it was ruled out. I have seen CRJ and EMB turbofans in action while in flight, so I'm absolutely sure the engine was OFF in this case.....dead sure!
 
EMBQA
Posts: 7795
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 3:52 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:34 am

Sorry dude, no way..... If they had shut down an engine in flight you would have known it. Your flight would have been greated in BGR by a parade of fire trucks, you would have lost pack air cooling and the flight crew would have announced it. What you might have been seeing is the Stators in the engine. They do not turn and in some lighting conditions and angles you can't see the fan blades spinning, only the stators.
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
 
N766UA
Posts: 7843
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 1999 3:50 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:39 am

I don't believe it at all, but if it were true there'd be a serious problem. Re-starting an engine mid-air is very difficult and tricky. They would've landed immideately.
This Website Censors Me
 
Tornado82
Posts: 4662
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 10:19 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:40 am

Quoting EMBQA (Reply 4):
What you might have been seeing is the Stators in the engine. They do not turn and in some lighting conditions and angles you can't see the fan blades spinning, only the stators.

I thought of those too, but they didn't seem as noticable in any CRJ I've ever been on as opposed to some engines... not to mention I didn't know the technical name of them and didn't want to look like a dumbass  Smile
 
AA737-823
Posts: 4887
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2000 11:10 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:48 am

This is NOT the same thing as what you can see on a DC-9, but way similar.
The DC-9 has IGV's- inlet guide vanes- in front of the fan. They don't turn, and give the appearance of the engine not spinning.
In the case of the CRJ, you were seeing the stationary stator vanes BEHIND the fan. The fan was spinning to the point that it looked like it wasn't even there- and you saw the stators behind it.

It's not legal to operate a part 121 transport cat aircraft with only one engine. Not to mention stupid.

But yes, stator vanes vehind the fan.
 
soaringadi
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:56 pm

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:20 pm

Quoting Zootrix (Thread starter):
Now taxiing on one engine is common practice

Now thats one thing thats a totally new concept to me. Am I missing something.

Btw: A buddy told me that they were operating on 1 engine (fan not turning, plane rolled a little towards good one etc.) for a short flight. There are some regs. (part 121) that allow airlines to operate (or continue would be more appropriate) a flight for certain distance (which is pretty short) on one engine.
If it ain't Boeing, I'm not going !
 
777STL
Posts: 2770
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:22 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:21 pm

Quoting Soaringadi (Reply 8):
Now thats one thing thats a totally new concept to me. Am I missing something.

DL's been doing it for a while, a few other prolly too.
PHX based
 
swmdal
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:00 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:35 pm

A Comair captain told me she once had to shut down an RJ engine in flight because of overheating. They were fairly close to their destination at CVG, so they just continued on without making any announcements and landed normally. Was it legal? I don't know. I guess she didn't want to cause a panic by making an announcement.
 
acidradio
Crew
Posts: 1595
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2001 3:19 pm

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:28 pm

How well does a CRJ do in a go-around with 1 engine? Obviously not all that well, but doable, right?
Ich haben zwei Platzspielen und ein Microphone
 
UAXDXer
Posts: 700
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 3:36 pm

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:14 pm

Quoting Soaringadi (Reply 8):
There are some regs. (part 121) that allow airlines to operate (or continue would be more appropriate) a flight for certain distance (which is pretty short) on one engine.

This is absolutly 100% false! Their is no FAR Part 121 regulation that allows single engine operations on a twin engine aircraft. The regs say that you lose an engine due to mechanical failure, the crew is to land at the nearest suitable airport.
It takes a bug to hit a windsheild but it takes guts to stick
 
DAL767400ER
Posts: 5084
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 2:47 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:20 pm

Quoting Soaringadi (Reply 8):
Now thats one thing thats a totally new concept to me. Am I missing something.

DL started doing that fleet-wide after trials at DLX had been successful, and Southwest has probably been doing that for decades now. Usually, the engine is being turned off, as it not only means less fuel burn, but also that baggage handlers and other ground crew can get to the plane way faster than if they had to wait for the engine to spool down, so it effectively also means a reduction in turnaround time.
 
RJ
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2001 9:28 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:43 am

As a Comair pilot, I can assure you that intentionally shutting down an engine in flight to save fuel is NOT ALLOWED. Period. If there was a problem and the crew had to do an in-flight shutdown at the altitude that you stated, you would have known about it. The Flight Attendant would have been briefed and you would have as well.

The Part 121 FAR's say that if you have an engine failure enroute, that you must land at the nearest suitable airport in point of time.

Now, with that out of the way, Comair does taxi on the number 2 engine as standard operating procedure. It saves a lot of money on taxi outs. There are times when it is not warranted to taxi on one engine, such as when there is heavy snow on the taxiway or when it is icy. Tight parking spaces (JFK) also warrant taxiing on two engines.

Oh, and the CRJ does just fine on single engine go-around. We practice them in the sim on every checkride. Actually, the CRJ performs reasonably well at low altitudes. It is when it is above 20K that performance degrades.

Happy flying!!!

RJ
 
LFutia
Posts: 3155
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 11:04 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:51 am

KLM also shuts down 1 engine after landing in Amsterdam...Thats what they said in the website in one of the sustainability or yearly reports i forget though...

I dont know if KLM shuts down an engine after landing at other airports though.

Leo
Leo/ORD -- Groetjes uit de VS! -- Heeft u laatst nog met KLM gevlogen?
 
EMBQA
Posts: 7795
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 3:52 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Sat Nov 19, 2005 10:57 am

Quoting RJ (Reply 14):
The Part 121 FAR's say that if you have an engine failure enroute, that you must land at the nearest suitable airport in point of time.

Gotta add though... between BOS and BGR the only 'suitable' airport is the Naval Air Station in Brunswick.
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
 
Tornado82
Posts: 4662
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 10:19 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Sun Nov 20, 2005 3:55 am

Quoting EMBQA (Reply 16):

Gotta add though... between BOS and BGR the only 'suitable' airport is the Naval Air Station in Brunswick.

MHT? or then even PSM or something despite not being a DL airport? I would think if the CRJ had actually lost an engine they would have turned inland ASAP anyways, right?
 
nugpot
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 4:53 pm

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Sun Nov 20, 2005 5:21 am

One thing you guys seem to lose sight of. If the engine was shut down, it would be windmilling. In other words, the fan would be turned by the airflow through it. There is no way to stop the fan from turning unless the N1 core had seized.

You can even see fans turning in a 5 kt wind from the front on the ground, although they then turn very slowly. At cruise speed you have 250+ kts turning that fan.
 
dw747400
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2001 8:24 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Sun Nov 20, 2005 5:32 am

I was thinking the same thing Nugpot. Any even that would cause an engine to completely stop turning in flight would certainly be noticed by everyone onboard!
CFI--Certfied Freakin Idiot
 
eclipseflight7
Posts: 482
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 10:00 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Sun Nov 20, 2005 5:37 am

Like Nugpot says, there's no way to feather a jet engine, so the blade would definatly be moving. The next time your out for a drive, take a look at a car next to you at a stop light and watch its wheels as it accelerates, and you'll see this exact same phenomenon.

Delta Express, to cut down on fuel costs, would have one of the engines (left?) shut off for taxi out and start it shortly before takeoff. On landing they would shut the other one (right?) off for the taxi in, to maintain the general number of hours on the engines.

While having to use a crapload more rudder on the ground, there's no real problem with taxiing with one engine, but there is no way in hell a plane is certified for single engine operation flight when it's multienginei, thanks to the Part 121 regulations. However, I have heard of four engine aircraft flying with three (without passengers, of course) for short ferry flights to go and replace an engine. However, as we've seen with the South African 742 at Rand, a jetliner has a lot of performance to throw around when there's nothing on board.
Holy sh*ts and burritos.
 
EMBQA
Posts: 7795
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 3:52 am

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Sun Nov 20, 2005 6:23 am

Quoting Tornado82 (Reply 17):
MHT? or then even PSM or something despite not being a DL airport? I would think if the CRJ had actually lost an engine they would have turned inland ASAP anyways, right?

MHT is just slightly south and west of BOS (departure wise, not physically) and is really no factor. You cross PSM just minutes after departure, so unless your problem happened seconds after departure, it would be behind you as well. The route up from BOS to BGR really doesn't take you over water and for the most part you hug the coast until crossing over NAS (NHZ / KNHZ), USA - Maine">NHZ.. Brunswick NAS then turn inland up to BGR. I've jump seated on that route more times then I can count. It was always a fun ride with a great view...!!!
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
 
nugpot
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 4:53 pm

RE: Comair CRJ100 Cruising On One Engine?!

Sun Nov 20, 2005 3:53 pm

Quoting EclipseFlight7 (Reply 20):
While having to use a crapload more rudder on the ground, there's no real problem with taxiing with one engine

This is not really relevant on the CRJ. The engines are close to centreline and you use hydraulic nosewheel steering on ground in any case. You would not feel an engine out on ground for taxi purposes.

Just the question of fuel saving. At cruise the CRJ burns 550 - 650 kg per hour per engine, depending on speed and flight level. On one engine, it has to run at max continuous thrust to give you a semi-decent speed. That would mean higher fuel burn plus reduced engine life on that engine (It will have to run at very high ITT, which seriously reduces engine life.)

I can't see any saving being made by shutting down one engine. You might save 50 kg on a shortish sector, but you will end up paying double that in reduced engine life.

I did my annual IF renewal on CRJ 200 yesterday. We spent most of the flight in simulated single engine ops (other engine at idle thrust). You have to burn the live engine to do anything more than 200 KTS and we were operating over Table Bay in Cape Town at 9000' above SL. Plus we were VERY light. 5 crew members on board, no pax, no baggage, no catering.

The CRJ has decent single engine performance for emergency purposes, but the live engine takes a hammering. Bombardier said that every 5 min at ITT over 800 degrees C , reduces engine life by up to one hour.

Sorry Zootrix, I don't want to rain on your parade, but the CRJ100 with the 3A engine will run at even higher ITT's than the -200 with the 3B engine. I just cannot see it making economic, operational or safety sense to intentionally shut down a serviceable engine on a revenue flight.

I wasn't there though. Could happen. I know that airline beancounters are the most dangerous species on this planet.  Wink

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 9vswr, AABB777, alfa164, askme, Baidu [Spider], cabochris, Cipango, cornishsimon, GCT64, Google [Bot], ikolkyo, jamesontheroad, karungguni, keesje, piedmont762, Polot, SANFan, sbworcs, SCQ83, seat1a, SFOA380, Sylus, TK105, Ty134A and 355 guests