aircanada014
Posts: 1224
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 2:24 pm

Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:34 am

Hello all


I couldn't find a post for this one. So I know everyone has been talking about 4 engines vs 2 engines and that 2 engines are more efficiency than the 4 engines and saves maintenance costs too. However if Boeing wants to do the quad on B777 and manages to keep the weight down and make more efficiency that would be great or not? Keep GE as the sole supplier of the engines and design a newer engine for more efficiency. 60,000 to 76,000lb thrust per engine.

What do you think about it? comments appreciate please.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22920
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:41 am

A four-engined 777 exists.

It's called the 747.  Wink

The 777 was designed with two engines because Boeing felt it was a better idea then using four engines.

Looking at 777 vs. A340 sales, it was, but not a tremendously good one, since the A340 still sells and sells well.

But Boeing has landed firm orders for more then 1000 777s over the current life of the program, and should continue to ring up hundreds more in the years ahead, so I am sure they are content with their decision on two vs. four.
 
aircanada014
Posts: 1224
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 2:24 pm

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:56 am

Ok I guess I didn't explain properly. Using the existing 777 fuselage and wings and tails and landing gears why not put quad engines on. 777 is not the same a/c as 747. 777 with 4 engines doesn't exist.
 
airxliban
Posts: 4285
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:14 pm

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:59 am

Quoting AirCanada014 (Reply 2):
Using the existing 777 fuselage and wings and tails and landing gears why not put quad engines on.

The wing ain't designed for four engines - end of story.
PARIS, FRANCE...THE BEIRUT OF EUROPE.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22920
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:01 am

It doesn't exist for a reason.

Hanging four lower-thrust engines off it just makes it perform a lot worse in many areas compared to having two high-thrust engines, to say nothing of how poorly it would do versus existing four-engined widebodies of comparable capacity (A343/A346).

It's size and two engines are advantages. Hanging more engines on it just negates one of those.

[Edited 2005-11-30 00:05:28]
 
A360
Posts: 426
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 11:41 pm

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:02 am

Quoting AirCanada014 (Thread starter):
Keep GE as the sole supplier of the engines and design a newer engine for more efficiency. 60,000 to 76,000lb thrust per engine.

It's not going to happen, but instead of the 2*115k lb, 4*55k lb would be enough.

Regards:
A360
 
Doona
Posts: 3382
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 9:43 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:04 am

Check out http://www.cardatabase.net/modifiedairlinerphotos

They have a few modified pics of 777s..

Cheers
Mats
Sure, we're concerned for our lives. Just not as concerned as saving 9 bucks on a roundtrip to Ft. Myers.
 
AC773
Posts: 1700
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:03 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:15 am

Both the 777 and the 330 are gorgeous aircraft in my opinion, whereas the 340 just looks foolish (apart from the 346). I don't envision a T7 with a similar engine arrangement looking any better.
Better to be nouveau than never to have been riche at all.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22920
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:18 am

Gotta say I think the A330 is the funniest looking one of the three. The extra two engines on the A340 balance out the long wings better.

IMO, the 777 is just a classic design, so adding four engines would just ruin her.
 
TinkerBelle
Posts: 1436
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:46 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:43 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 1):
Looking at 777 vs. A340 sales, it was, but not a tremendously good one, since the A340 still sells and sells well.

You gotta be kidding with that statement of 'A340 still sells and sells well'. Please define 'selling well' coz I think you're going out on a limb with that statement.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 8):
Gotta say I think the A330 is the funniest looking one of the three. The extra two engines on the A340 balance out the long wings better.

I agree with you as far as far as the A330 goes. I gotta tell you though, I'm a big T7 fan but the A340 is the 2nd most beautiful aircraft out there (nothing beats a 747). I love the wingspan and legth of the A346.

Quoting AirxLiban (Reply 3):
The wing ain't designed for four engines - end of story.

Couldn't be more right.
If you are going through hell, keep going.
 
BlueSky1976
Posts: 1603
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:18 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:48 am

Back in the late 1990s, after 747-500X/-600X cancellation, Boeing was studying an all-new 400 - 500 seat quad that looked like a scaled-up clone of the 777-200 with four engines. I think the working name was Project 390-67 or something like that (I'm not sure about the numbers). AW&ST had a three-way drawing published, that's how I remember the silhouette of that monster.
It was designed as a single passenger deck widebody with three aisles, btw...
POLAND IS UNDER DICTATORSHIP. PLEASE SUPPORT COMMITTEE FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACY, K.O.D.
 
airxliban
Posts: 4285
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 12:14 pm

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:42 am

Quoting TinkerBelle (Reply 9):
Quoting Stitch (Reply 1):
Looking at 777 vs. A340 sales, it was, but not a tremendously good one, since the A340 still sells and sells well.

You gotta be kidding with that statement of 'A340 still sells and sells well'. Please define 'selling well' coz I think you're going out on a limb with that statement.

Yup, something like 2 to 1 was the sales ratio back in the day, probably even more favourable to Boeing now with all the sales of the 773ERs and the 772LRs
PARIS, FRANCE...THE BEIRUT OF EUROPE.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22920
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:58 am

Quoting TinkerBelle (Reply 9):
You gotta be kidding with that statement of 'A340 still sells and sells well'. Please define 'selling well' coz I think you're going out on a limb with that statement.

I constantly hear that the 777 outsells the A340 around 6:4, but then folks jump all over that and produce numbers contradicting it.

As of the end of 2004, Airbus shows 469 orders for the A340 family vs. the 672 Boeing shows for the 777 family, so 6:4 seems to be a reasonable claim.

When it comes to deliveries, the 500 777s delivered is close to 2:1 compared to the 228 A340s delivered.

Quoting TinkerBelle (Reply 9):
I agree with you as far as far as the A330 goes. I gotta tell you though, I'm a big T7 fan but the A340 is the 2nd most beautiful aircraft out there (nothing beats a 747). I love the wingspan and legth of the A346.

See I think the A340, especially the A346, is just too long and narrow. The 777 has a more..."balanced"...look to me in terms of diameter and length.

But hey, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  Smile
 
airfoilsguy
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 7:28 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 10:17 am

The jet engine is the single most expensive item on an airliner, both in initial cost and maintenance cost. Now if you were in the market for an airliner for your business what would you chose, A Cool 4 holer or an economical 2 holer.
It's not a near miss it's a near hit!!
 
TinkerBelle
Posts: 1436
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:46 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 10:28 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 12):
As of the end of 2004, Airbus shows 469 orders for the A340 family vs. the 672 Boeing shows for the 777 family, so 6:4 seems to be a reasonable claim.

If you factor in that the T7 is a couple of years younger than the A340 family, the 6-4 ratio goes up because A had a 2 year head-start. Just my  twocents . Now, as for the 'A340 family' 469 orders, don't those include A330 orders too? I could be wrong tho'

Quoting Stitch (Reply 12):
See I think the A340, especially the A346, is just too long and narrow. The 777 has a more..."balanced"...look to me in terms of diameter and length.

The A346 might be a tad too long but that's what brings out it's elegance....especially in VS colors. Couldn't agree more with the T7's balance but unfortunately balance doesn't translate to beauty for me.
If you are going through hell, keep going.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22920
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 10:38 am

Quoting TinkerBelle (Reply 14):
If you factor in that the T7 is a couple of years younger than the A340 family, the 6-4 ratio goes up because A had a 2 year head-start.

Well I believe "total orders" is a more...relevant...yardstick, since it gauges total interest for the plane over the program.

Afterall, people like to say the A330 whips the pants off the 767 based on orders the past few years, yet the 767 has 946 orders through 12/04 vs. 604 for the A330 for a greater then 3:2 advantage.

Quote:
Now, as for the 'A340 family' 469 orders, don't those include A330 orders too?

Total A330 (604) and A340 (469) orders stands at 1073 as of 12/04. This is from the Airbus 1974-2004 O&D spreadsheet PDF.

Mind you, why Airbus website shows 963 orders for the combined A330/A340/A350...
 
TinkerBelle
Posts: 1436
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:46 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 10:55 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 15):
Stitch

Thanx for the spreadsheet Stitch. Never seen it before.
If you are going through hell, keep going.
 
ACYWG
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 7:20 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 12:31 pm

The thing would probably go supersonic with 4 GE90 class engines on it I imagine. Though that might be after the wings and empennage were torn from the fuselage...
 
User avatar
lightsaber
Crew
Posts: 11732
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:55 pm

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 12:34 pm

Quoting Airfoilsguy (Reply 13):
The jet engine is the single most expensive item on an airliner, both in initial cost and maintenance cost.

 checkmark  about half of the maintenance cost is the engines. Four little engines cost a lot more to maintain than two big ones. The four engine airframe is going to cost about $1.6 million a year more in maintenance.

Looks should have nothing to do with an aircraft design, its all about the money. Otherwise, the 787 would still have the shark's tail and cool nose!

Lightsaber
"They did not know it was impossible, so they did it!" - Mark Twain
 
zippyjet
Posts: 5077
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 3:32 pm

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 1:05 pm


Modified Airliner Photos:
Click here for bigger photo!
Design © Erfawn Akhtar-Khavari
Template © Jerrold Wu (Je89 W.)



Here she is at least as a fantasy airliner. Imagine a 4 holer 787!
I'm Zippyjet & I approve of this message!
 
Aircellist
Posts: 1242
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 8:43 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Wed Nov 30, 2005 1:38 pm

Urgh! That 4-engined 777 is ugly!
"When I find out I was wrong, I change my mind. What do you do?" -attributed to John Maynard Keynes
 
Johnny
Posts: 812
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:38 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:05 am

Hello everybody!

don´t compare apples with potatoes,please...

compare the figures for BOTH A330/340 vs. B777.

You will figure out a BIG difference,because Airbus has outsold Boeing, not vice versa..!


Best regards,


Johnny
 
drerx7
Posts: 4203
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2000 12:19 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:35 am

Quoting Johnny (Reply 21):
compare the figures for BOTH A330/340 vs. B777.

Uh no...the original poster compared the A340 to the 777 i.e. the thread of the 4 engine 777. You could compare the total A330/A340 numbers if you like but it won't be addressing the original question.
Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
 
User avatar
N328KF
Posts: 5806
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 3:50 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:40 am

Quoting Johnny (Reply 21):
You will figure out a BIG difference,because Airbus has outsold Boeing, not vice versa..!

You can't do that, because the A330-200 competes with the 767, and the A330-300/A340 competes with the 777.
When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' -Theodore Roosevelt
 
CHRISBA777ER
Posts: 3715
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 12:12 pm

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:42 am

What do you mean you dont have any bourbon? Do you know how far it is to Houston? What kind of airline is this???
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22920
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:58 am

Quoting Johnny (Reply 21):
compare the figures for BOTH A330/340 vs. B777. You will figure out a BIG difference,because Airbus has outsold Boeing, not vice versa..!

Actually, when you count up all orders through 12/31/04 for all models of the 777 and the 767, they are about 2:1 over those of all models of the A330/A340.

When it comes to deliveries, it's more like 4:1 in Boeing's favor at this time.

[Edited 2005-11-30 20:00:11]
 
Daleaholic
Posts: 2653
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 9:38 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:04 am

This is my take on a 4 engine 777. Just a very quick job... Not sure about using photo's here, but Hopefully 'K.H.NG - HKAEC' will let me off this time, a great shot!

Religion is an illusion of childhood... Outgrown under proper education.
 
Devil505x
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 3:55 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:13 am

Can you imagine a new three holer?
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22920
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:28 am

Quoting AirxLiban (Reply 3):
The wing ain't designed for four engines - end of story.

Evidently Boeing "imaginneer" Pedro Aragão disagrees:
http://www.cardatabase.net/modifiedairlinerphotos/photos/big/00003222.jpg

Quoting Devil505x (Reply 27):
Can you imagine a new three holer?

You mean the 777-400*?

http://www.cardatabase.net/modifiedairlinerphotos/photos/big/00000040.jpg


* - Thanks to Garry Lewis
 
PMN
Posts: 547
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 7:44 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:47 am

Well...Having seen some modified photos of the 777 as a 4 holer, it looks ugly as hell, but the pictures of it in this configuration show all engines as GE90's or Trent 800's. Of course it's going to be ugly with 4 disproportianately HUGE engines on it! Give it 4 RB-211's and it may look a little different.

(In fact, scrap that. Just leave this baby as it is!)

Paul

[Edited 2005-11-30 23:48:47]
Edith in his bed, a plane in the rain is humming, the wires in the walls are humming some song - some mysterious song
 
manzoori
Posts: 1459
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2002 7:08 am

RE: Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines?

Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:59 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 28):
* - Thanks to Garry Lewis

Thanks to Garry Lewis?!?! Cheeky git, that's my handiwork!!  Wink

Here are a couple more:-
http://cardatabase.net/modifiedairlinerphotos/photos/big/00000043.jpg

http://cardatabase.net/modifiedairlinerphotos/photos/big/00000044.jpg

Cheers!

Rez
Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist

Who is online