User avatar
1337Delta764
Topic Author
Posts: 4919
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:02 am

Single-engined RJs

Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:06 am

How is the idea of single engined RJs with 50 seats or less? Would it be any better than twins for that market?
The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
 
KELPkid
Posts: 5247
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:33 am

RE: Single-engined RJs

Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:22 am

Too many rules against this...the FAR's virtually guarantee that at the 50 seat capacity level, you must be using a multi-engined aircraft.

IIRC, the FAR's in the U.S. specifically state that the maximum number of pax seats that can legally be utilized in a single-engined aircraft is 9.

I remember talking to a Cessna Caravan sales rep at an airshow once who told me that U.S. operators could only have 9 seats, where as there were several operators in Africa and South America that were routinely operating with 13-14 seats installed in their Grand Caravans.
Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
 
smokeyrosco
Posts: 1441
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:21 am

RE: Single-engined RJs

Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:28 am

Does this mean you could have a single jet engined business jet?

Don't get me wrong I'd prefer knowing when one engine goes down that you have another one but just curious.
John Hancock
 
BlatantEcho
Posts: 1818
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2000 10:11 am

RE: Single-engined RJs

Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:29 am

I am one of the few who believes we will see single engine commerical aircraft be viable in the next 20-30 years.
They're not handing trophies out today
 
cloud4000
Posts: 478
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:38 am

RE: Single-engined RJs

Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:31 am

Single-engine business jets are untapped market, and there are several companies that have designs for such an aircraft: 4-5 seat aircraft, with a 1,500 mile range, priced under $2 million on the high end.
Boston, USA
 
smokeyrosco
Posts: 1441
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:21 am

RE: Single-engined RJs

Thu Dec 22, 2005 8:50 am

i assume they would be tail mounted?
John Hancock
 
APFPilot1985
Posts: 1840
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 12:51 pm

RE: Single-engined RJs

Thu Dec 22, 2005 8:54 am

http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=382
The Visonaire Vantage.... never made it past the design stage... had a single engine mounted in the tail with twin inlets above the rear fuselage.
Stand Up and Be Counted Visit Site Related to Voice your opinion
 
smokeyrosco
Posts: 1441
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:21 am

RE: Single-engined RJs

Thu Dec 22, 2005 9:05 am

just googles this

http://www.flightinternational.com/A...n/177/203127/Dividing+light++.html

Quote:
Now a recognised sector of the business jet spectrum, the VLJ class covers aircraft ranging from Diamond’s four-seat, single-engined D-Jet to Embraer’s Phenom 100, which has a cabin rivalling that of larger entry-level business jets. What they have in common is that they are lighter – and cheaper – than the smallest business jets now available.
John Hancock
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

RE: Single-engined RJs

Thu Dec 22, 2005 9:52 am

Quoting BlatantEcho (Reply 3):
I am one of the few who believes we will see single engine commerical aircraft be viable in the next 20-30 years.

I agree, though not for overwater use.
 
PPVRA
Posts: 7878
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:48 am

RE: Single-engined RJs

Thu Dec 22, 2005 10:03 am

D-Jet:


Visonaire Vantage:


Both are single-engined aircraft, even though the latter one does not look like and the program, AFAIK, has been halted for a long time.

Cheers
"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat