User avatar
PM
Topic Author
Posts: 4837
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:05 pm

RR Take The Lead On A330/A340 Programme

Sun Mar 05, 2006 8:16 pm

Last month (February) when A330-243 SU-GCK took to the air it was the 241st A330/A340 to fly with RR engines. On that day RR passed CFM's total of 240 aircraft off the line.

So far 717 planes have come off the joint A330/A340 line. Of these...

241 (34%) have RR (A330s & A340s)
240 (33%) have CFM (A340s)
126 (18%) have PW (A330s)
110 (15%) have GE (A330s)

If you crudely divide CFM 50:50 between GE and SNECMA that makes:

34% for RR
32% for GE
18% for PW
17% for SNECMA
 
tigerotor77w
Posts: 159
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 11:35 am

RE: RR Take The Lead On A330/A340 Programme

Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:39 am

I think it would be interesting to see how each aircraft (A330, A340) breaks down under those manufacturers... certainly the CFM56 is not related to the CF6s.
 
User avatar
PM
Topic Author
Posts: 4837
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:05 pm

RE: RR Take The Lead On A330/A340 Programme

Mon Mar 06, 2006 2:42 am

Quoting Tigerotor77W (Reply 1):
I think it would be interesting to see how each aircraft (A330, A340) breaks down under those manufacturers...

Aircraft built and flown to date:

A340 (all models) = 240 @ CFM and 78 @ RR.

A330 (all models) = 110 @ GE, 126 @ PW and 163 @ RR.

For both types, RR holds the largest backlog.
 
User avatar
lightsaber
Crew
Posts: 11857
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:55 pm

RE: RR Take The Lead On A330/A340 Programme

Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:09 am

Wow, to think that on the A333 Pratt used to hold the lead...
And then they botched the Pw4272 and without a 72k engine for the A332 (and High MTOW A333), they have been slowly kicked out of the market.  Sad

Good for RR! Well executed.
Lightsaber
"They did not know it was impossible, so they did it!" - Mark Twain
 
Glom
Posts: 2051
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 2:38 am

RE: RR Take The Lead On A330/A340 Programme

Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:43 am

3 engine choices for the A330. Why isn't there the same choice in new aircraft? You'd think there'd be a third choice for the 787/A350 market.
 
User avatar
PM
Topic Author
Posts: 4837
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:05 pm

RE: RR Take The Lead On A330/A340 Programme

Mon Mar 06, 2006 4:05 am

Quoting Glom (Reply 4):
3 engine choices for the A330. Why isn't there the same choice in new aircraft? You'd think there'd be a third choice for the 787/A350 market.

Never again. Boeing offered three engines on the 777 and Airbus offered three on the A330. It was (and in some ways still is) a bloodbath. None of the three could expect to make any kind of money with fierce three-way competition, it was and is more expensive for the manufacturers, and sharing the sales meant no-one sold all that many.

GE addressed this by buying exclusivity on the second generation of 777s.

Boeing addressed it by refusing to even consider three engine types for the 787. They toyed with just one or a maximum of two - which is why it was always going to be such a blow for whoever was going to be squeezed out.

Airbus didn't expressly comment on not having a third choice for the A350 (that I'm aware of) but, since they were piggy-backing on 787 engines, it was a moot point.

Boeing insisted on just one engine type on the 747-8.

Finally, just look at the numbers. Something like 550+ A330s have been sold so far. For just one engine manufacturer that would be good business - say 1,100+ engines. But the way it is, even the most successful engine on the A330 (the RR Trent) has not yet reached 250 airframes. To put that in context, the TriStar - which sold fewer than half the number of A330s (so far) gave RR business worth some 800 RB211s. They aren't even up to 500 on the A330 yet. GE are in even worse shape with fewer than 300 engines sold on the programme.

No, the days of a three-way race have long gone and won't come back.