User avatar
legacyins
Posts: 1790
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:11 pm

Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:56 am

http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/new...t_story.jsp?id=news/aw041706p3.xml

According to the article above, Star is close to signing a new member from China. It sounds like Star is saying, " it would be an honnor for any carrier to join them"? Air China, over the past year, has been getting closer to Cathay, a One World member. They, Star, have just signed on Shanghai Airlines as their new member. Right now, Beijing and Shangahi are the main ports of entry into China and can connect with Shangahi Airlines for Intra-Country flights. I believe the majority of Star Air carriers serves one of these cities respectively. So, Does Star really need Air China and does Air China need Star?
 
PSA727
Posts: 845
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:49 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:28 pm

I guess they have every right to be choosy.

It's a great alliance, member airlines from every continent/region.

Or they can go "Sky Team" with the combination of...

The French's love of work stopages (AF),
The financial insecurity of Alitalia, Delta, and Northwest,
the customer service skills of Aeroflot, etc.

Well at least they have CO, KL, and OK.
fly high, pay low...Germanwings!
 
superhub
Posts: 398
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:17 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose

Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:36 pm

It works both ways. An alliance will choose an airline if that airline adds value to an alliance. The airline will choose that alliance if it adds value to the airline.

If the alliance chooses the airline and the airline chooses that alliance, Bingo, the alliance has a new member.

This happens not just in Star, but also OneWorld and Skyteam.
 
xiaotung
Posts: 790
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 7:58 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:42 pm

With regard to Shanghai Airlines, expect an announcement on May 10.
 
User avatar
Zkpilot
Posts: 3678
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:21 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:56 pm

Star does tend to go for the more reputable/established/premier/top tier airlines eg SQ,NZ,LH,OZ,AC,UA,TG,SA
SQ, TG compete directly with MH in particular
LH, OZ, SA compete with AF and the various other european/african airlines.
AC,UA compete with AS, NW, DL, etc etc
NZ competes with QF
56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
 
mutu
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:04 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:01 pm

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 4):
Star does tend to go for the more reputable/established/premier/top tier airlines

DOnt think I agree with that at all! WHilst not into bashing *A or any other alliance, none of them have created a perfect fit. The way I look at it, if there were no alliances and i was planning a RTW with carriers I trust/admire/route network/would like to fly, i would pick my route around CX/SQ/BA/EK/UA. This covers all alliances (or with EK no alliance at all) but would never IMHO have been allowed due to stiffling competition on key routes

ALliances add network so that any point to any point with mileage earning opportunity is supposed to switch us away from some preference to an alliance based purchase, and it works. BUt there is NO consistency of product, to my mind the most important factor.

My only negative about *A is ironically its size. There are so many members that it is almost a case of "if non OW or ST then you will be on a *A carrier". Feels more like Holiday Inn than Four Seasons?
 
User avatar
Zkpilot
Posts: 3678
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:21 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:20 pm

Quoting Mutu (Reply 5):
My only negative about *A is ironically its size. There are so many members that it is almost a case of "if non OW or ST then you will be on a *A carrier". Feels more like Holiday Inn than Four Seasons?

More like if you aren't *A or OW then you either go ST or you are out in the wilderness. *A for the most part only selects one carrier in each country/region... or has one big carrier and one smaller carrier eg UA with US, LH with Swiss and Austrian.
The only places *A doesn't really serve is central america, northern africa, and North Asia( Russia, China, Mongolia etc). With the exception of China (and thats still a developing market) these places aren't exactly large aviation markets, high demand, or high yielding.
56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
 
AKLDELNonstop
Posts: 320
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:04 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:39 pm

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 6):
The only places *A doesn't really serve is central america, northern africa, and North Asia( Russia, China, Mongolia etc). With the exception of China (and thats still a developing market) these places aren't exactly large aviation markets, high demand, or high yielding

Mate you forgot India. With currently 60mn odd passengers annually and a potential market of 400mn passegers, I urge you to find a bigger market.

Also can anyone enlighten me as to why NZ has so few flights to Asia barring Japan, as its obviously a huge market currently being milked by TG, SQ, EK and MH

Cheers
 
User avatar
Zkpilot
Posts: 3678
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:21 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:28 pm

Quoting AKLDELNonstop (Reply 7):
Mate you forgot India. With currently 60mn odd passengers annually and a potential market of 400mn passegers, I urge you to find a bigger market.

Also can anyone enlighten me as to why NZ has so few flights to Asia barring Japan, as its obviously a huge market currently being milked by TG, SQ, EK and MH

Yes and middle east also. SQ and TG serve India quite well but obviously not domestically.

NZ is looking at direct flights to India either with 772LR or 787 so probably around 2009 for those. As for the rest of Asia, NZ owns the NZL-Japan market. NZL is too small a country and too small a population to support services to all asian cities which is why they get airlines like SQ to do it for them. AKL-PVG soon. Possible AKL-ICN in the future as OZ pulled out and its only the Pepsiplane (KE) flying it at the moment. Increase in capacity to HKG later in the year 763ER -> 744. AKL-SIN has already gone from 763ER -> 772ER. NZ used to fly to BKK but TG now does it. Indonesia isn't considered a valuble market except Bali which was before the bombings and the drug issues, now anyone who is of Caucasian descent is reluctant to go there, those that do are rather foolish in my opinion and in the view of many governments. AKL-TPE wasn't profitable with 763ER and def not big enough market for 772ER, maybe with 787 NZ might fly there again.. EVA flies with with A330s now. If MH pulls out of AKL then I'd give it better than 50% odds of NZ flying to KUL at least 3times a week with 772ER.

The main thing for New Zealand in general is that after years and years of double digit growth in tourism numbers it has come to the stage where New Zealand doesn't really want more growth in numbers, but wants growth in quality instead, ie more $ per visitor rather than more visitors. This of course affects how NZ does its network planning which is why there is more focus on the US and Europe currently as generally there is more $ per visitor from those areas than from China, India etc etc but yes those two are still both markets NZ is keen on, China for Business and sheer volume. India for the fact it has a very large middle class (highest number of millionaires I understand...) and because there is a large Indian community in New Zealand.
56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
 
aviationwiz
Posts: 882
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 7:20 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:43 pm

Quoting PSA727 (Reply 1):
The financial insecurity of Alitalia, Delta, and Northwest,

To be fair, *A has US and UA, who were in pretty big trouble just a few years ago.

It does seem true though that *A is a bit more "choosy", which is their right. It helps them maintain a better product.
Proudly from the Home of the Red Tail.
 
yak42
Posts: 662
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2000 6:17 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:26 am

Does anyone think OW and ST should do the *A thing with logojets. I think this gives them an edge for publicity.
 
USPIT10L
Posts: 1866
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:24 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:37 am

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 6):
The only places *A doesn't really serve is central america, northern africa, and North Asia( Russia, China, Mongolia etc). With the exception of China (and thats still a developing market) these places aren't exactly large aviation markets, high demand, or high yielding.



Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 8):
Yes and middle east also. SQ and TG serve India quite well but obviously not domestically.

There have been rumors that TACA (Central America), SibirAir (Russia/Central Asia), Air-India (India), and Qatar Airways (Middle East) may join Star soon. I'm suprised Air China hasn't yet joined Star, they've been preparing for it allegedly for about two years now, since Asiana joined in 2003. I do love the coverage, but I like how LH handles it best. They codeshare with everybody. As a result, I feel (opinion) LH has the best airline network of any in the world.
It's a Great Day for Hockey!
 
LAX2IADandORD
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 1:52 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:06 am

Once upon a time, Mexicana was a Star Alliance member, which was great for connections to Mexico, which *A currently lacks. Of course there are the various flights (sparse) that UA offers from Chicago and a scant few from LAX but nothing with the regularity of MX or AM, which is in Sky Team.

These days, AM is far superior that MX in terms of in flight service and route network, but I can remember distinctly being at MTY boarding a MX flight right around the time they must have left (or been removed from) *A a few years ago as they were removing *A signage and telling passengers that *A Gold meant nothing to MX anymore when trying to preboard.

What happened? As a UA 1K member I would love AM to join *A, but as a founding member of SkyTeam there is no chance of that I know.......
 
Ibhayi
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 7:23 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:12 am

They choose SAA so no their not arrogant.
fat girls give the best head because they're hungry
 
cy319
Posts: 368
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:42 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:38 am

they are very selective indeed but i recognize that they have the best network coverage among all alliances.

i should also mention that they are the most expensive alliance in terms of fares.
wanna be travel buddies ,sex buddies .. or both ?
 
AKLDELNonstop
Posts: 320
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:04 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:55 am

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 8):
NZ is looking at direct flights to India either with 772LR or 787 so probably around 2009 for those.

Thanks for the info. Thats good to know. Will be very good for NZ if they can time their flights with LH. Then for the first time passengers from Europe will be able to transit to Pacific through India on any alliance.

Also shouldnt NZ be looking at increasing numbers as well along with $, otherwise how else do you get people to come here. It is not a transit point by any stretch of imagination, other than Aus-US traffic. So they do need more tourists.

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 8):
This of course affects how NZ does its network planning which is why there is more focus on the US and Europe currently

Where does it fly to in Europe other than LHR?

Cheers
 
JAL
Posts: 3875
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2000 12:37 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:56 am

I think that Star is getting way too big!
Work Hard But Play Harder
 
skymileman
Posts: 577
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2001 2:32 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:00 am

Quoting PSA727 (Reply 1):
I guess they have every right to be choosy.

It's a great alliance, member airlines from every continent/region.

Or they can go "Sky Team" with the combination of...

The French's love of work stopages (AF),
The financial insecurity of Alitalia, Delta, and Northwest,
the customer service skills of Aeroflot, etc.

Well at least they have CO, KL, and OK.

I must argue this one. I have never gotten good service on ANY Star Alliance Member. However, I have found every Skyteam carrier I have traveled on (except NW) to be incredibly good and have outstanding service (again excluding awful NW).
 
IL96M
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 5:14 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:29 am

Quoting Legacyins (Thread starter):
Shangahi Airlines

Are you sure it isn't China Eastern (Zhongguo Dongfang Hangkong) which is based in Shanghai?

Quoting USPIT10L (Reply 11):
TACA (Central America), SibirAir (Russia/Central Asia),

What??? Are you on pills
 
User avatar
Zkpilot
Posts: 3678
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:21 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:58 am

Quoting Ibhayi (Reply 13):
They choose SAA so no their not arrogant

SAA is the premier airline in Africa.

Quoting AKLDELNonstop (Reply 15):
Also shouldnt NZ be looking at increasing numbers as well along with $, otherwise how else do you get people to come here. It is not a transit point by any stretch of imagination, other than Aus-US traffic. So they do need more tourists.

Until infrastructure improves, there are tourist spots which are already overloaded at times. NZ is looking at increasing numbers, New Zealand as a country is more interested in improving the value of the tourists that come here.

Quoting AKLDELNonstop (Reply 15):
Where does it fly to in Europe other than LHR?

LHR only, they used to fly to FRA but did a codeshare with LH insted to focus on LHR. There is a decent feed from Europe into LHR however. Tourist numbers to New Zealand from Germany have been on a steady decline for years.. It seems that German tourists prefer places like Thailand and the Mediteranian..
56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
 
jfr
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 8:16 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 11:36 am

Quoting Mutu (Reply 5):
The way I look at it, if there were no alliances and i was planning a RTW with carriers I trust/admire/route network/would like to fly......

I do this very thing six to eight times a year, and find that there is no viable alternative to Star for a RTW itinerary. I do find the US carriers to be problematic, with service levels way below the others, but being able to make changes enroute and getting all my miles on one carrier is fantastic.

Also, my SQ Solitaire card does wonders with every Star airline, something a non-alliance itinerary couldn't provide.

Years ago, there were similar deals, but they were so choice limited as to be useless.

To my mind, this is one of the very best advantages of the alliances, and Star is the best at it.

They are right.......they've earned the right to pick and choose! (That being said, they do seem to be "choosing" lots of airlines.)
 
afay1
Posts: 1206
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2001 2:37 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:15 pm

Any alliance that took, and keeps, USair can't be that arrogant!
 
USPIT10L
Posts: 1866
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:24 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:50 pm

Quoting LAX2IADandORD (Reply 12):
Once upon a time, Mexicana was a Star Alliance member, which was great for connections to Mexico, which *A currently lacks. Of course there are the various flights (sparse) that UA offers from Chicago and a scant few from LAX but nothing with the regularity of MX or AM, which is in Sky Team.

These days, AM is far superior that MX in terms of in flight service and route network, but I can remember distinctly being at MTY boarding a MX flight right around the time they must have left (or been removed from) *A a few years ago as they were removing *A signage and telling passengers that *A Gold meant nothing to MX anymore when trying to preboard.

What happened? As a UA 1K member I would love AM to join *A, but as a founding member of SkyTeam there is no chance of that I know.......

MX withdrew of Star Alliance in September 2003 to pursue a close tie-up with AA. UA/AC/LH were the only airlines using extensive codeshare service within the MX network and MX wasn't very keen on building new relationships with other existing members, or expanding service to existing Star hubs IIRC.

Quoting IL96M (Reply 18):

I heard them from posts on here and also speculation from various airline trade magazines. Also, TA discontinued their codeshare and marketing partnerships with AA not too long ago. MX is now AA's chief partner in Central America.
It's a Great Day for Hockey!
 
SR 103
Posts: 1618
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 6:19 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:46 pm

Quoting PSA727 (Reply 1):
I guess they have every right to be choosy.

It's a great alliance, member airlines from every continent/region.

Or they can go "Sky Team" with the combination of...

The French's love of work stopages (AF),
The financial insecurity of Alitalia, Delta, and Northwest,
the customer service skills of Aeroflot, etc.

Umm...Are you kidding?

- United has not exactly been the pinnacle of financial health these past few years.
- USAirways has been through two bankruptcies
- Air Canada was recently hemoraging money
- VARIG has been on life support for God knows how long
- Air New Zealand was forced to accept government intervention to stay afloat
and lastly
- Ansett Australia, how can we forget that the pride of Australia disappeared off the radar screens in 2001?

So, I ask you , what makes Star invincible? Every alliance has their issues and Star is no exception. At the moment, Skyteam is the one with the limping dogs, however Star is not immune from this "illness." So please let's back up our opinions with facts.

There was a time when I was a Star Elite. As I am currently Elite with Skyteam and oneworld, I can honestly say I am still traveling the globe in style without flying a Star Alliance carrier.

SR 103
 
CXA330300
Posts: 1256
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 5:51 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:08 pm

Personally, I just avoid carriers that I think are bad.........so I have three FFPs: oneworld (AsiaMiles), *A (KrisFlyer) and ST (OnePass).

Quoting PSA727 (Reply 1):
It's a great alliance, member airlines from every continent/region.

For regions, they're missing the Middle East, India, Russia, North Africa, and Central America. And unless pigs fly and G-d makes a miracle, VG will go kaput and now you have almost no Latin American Network.

Quoting PSA727 (Reply 1):
The French's love of work stopages (AF),
The financial insecurity of Alitalia, Delta, and Northwest,
the customer service skills of Aeroflot, etc.



Quoting SR 103 (Reply 23):
- United has not exactly been the pinnacle of financial health these past few years.
- USAirways has been through two bankruptcies
- Air Canada was recently hemoraging money
- VARIG has been on life support for God knows how long
- Air New Zealand was forced to accept government intervention to stay afloat
and lastly
- Ansett Australia, how can we forget that the pride of Australia disappeared off the radar screens in 2001?

Add:
-the wonderful past financial health of BD
-the basically emergency buyout of LX by LH
-the poor health of SK
AC/AA/UA/DL/B6/WN/US*/CO*/FI/BA/IB/AF/SK/LX/Sabena*/TK/LY/SA/MN/SW/AM/CE*/CX/CA/MU/JL/SQ/TG/MH/KA/5J
 
User avatar
Zkpilot
Posts: 3678
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:21 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:59 pm

AA has been in Chpt 11 recently, QF receives government protection, JL is losing money badly
not forgetting other airlines like AZ, DL, NW.
No alliance is perfect, but for a single alliance, Star has the biggest coverage.
56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
 
kiwiandrew

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:07 pm

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 25):
AA has been in Chpt 11 recently

sorry but it hasn't - although it did teeter on the brink of Ch 11 for a while it has managed to avoid it ( so far )
 
b777a340fan
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:42 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:43 pm

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 4):
Star does tend to go for the more reputable/established/premier/top tier airlines eg SQ,NZ,LH,OZ,AC,UA,TG,SA

I don't think there's anything wrong with that. In order to be the best, you have to play/be with best. Simple life theory.

Quoting AKLDELNonstop (Reply 7):
Mate you forgot India. With currently 60mn odd passengers annually and a potential market of 400mn passegers, I urge you to find a bigger market.

I agree, whoever can add Air India and its regional partners would benefit greatly.

Quoting JAL (Reply 16):
I think that Star is getting way too big!

I don't think so. I think it intends to be big in order to create sort of a monopoly on the market. They hope that it will attract more customers. It makes sense to be big.

Quoting IL96M (Reply 18):
I must argue this one. I have never gotten good service on ANY Star Alliance Member. However, I have found every Skyteam carrier I have traveled on (except NW) to be incredibly good and have outstanding service (again excluding awful NW).

Really?? You're telling me that you never had good service on SQ? Swiss? ANA? Boy you have high standards!
 
carmenlu15
Posts: 4517
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 1:24 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Tue Apr 18, 2006 11:39 pm

Quoting USPIT10L (Reply 22):
Also, TA discontinued their codeshare and marketing partnerships with AA not too long ago.

... and at the same time started codesharing with UA, thus making the way for a possible *A membership (or so it seems). Indeed, rumors have been afloat for a while here...
Don't expect to see me around that much (if at all) -- the contact link should still work, though.
 
CHI787ORD
Posts: 668
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:27 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:18 am

Quoting B777A340Fan (Reply 27):
I agree, whoever can add Air India and its regional partners would benefit greatly.

For star, either AI or 9W. I'd personally go with AI, it's long established, has a nice route network and will be merging with domestic carrier IC soon. Plus they are currently upgrading their fleet and service. With two major hubs at DEL and BOM, AI can make a great addition to Star.
 
abrelosojos
Posts: 4049
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 6:48 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:16 am

Quoting CXA330300 (Reply 24):
For regions, they're missing the Middle East, India, Russia, North Africa, and Central America.

= INDIA? Are you serious? Star is the best linked alliance to India - you forget the amount of frequencies + destinations of TG, SQ and LH ... with additional services by AC, OZ, OS, BD, LO (soon), SK, SA, and SR. Isn't this far superior to anything offered by SKY or ONE?

Cheers,
A.
Live, and let live.
 
Ibhayi
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 7:23 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:26 am

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 19):
SAA is the premier airline in Africa.

That's because there is no other.

SAA racially discriminate on employment selection, blacks are chosen above whites, coloureds and Indians. They havnt turned a profit in god knows how many years. They have no compatent managers and their CEO uses tax payers money to fly a helicopter to wkrk every morning.

Their products aint that bad, first and business class but their way of pushing people of specific colour through the rank is shamefull. There cabin service is no where as good as BA, QF, SQ the list goes on.....
fat girls give the best head because they're hungry
 
CXA330300
Posts: 1256
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 5:51 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:53 am

Quoting Abrelosojos (Reply 30):
INDIA? Are you serious? Star is the best linked alliance to India - you forget the amount of frequencies + destinations of TG, SQ and LH ... with additional services by AC, OZ, OS, BD, LO (soon), SK, SA, and SR. Isn't this far superior to anything offered by SKY or ONE?

Most people do not want to go on a BOM-BKK-CCU itinerary.
AC/AA/UA/DL/B6/WN/US*/CO*/FI/BA/IB/AF/SK/LX/Sabena*/TK/LY/SA/MN/SW/AM/CE*/CX/CA/MU/JL/SQ/TG/MH/KA/5J
 
User avatar
Zkpilot
Posts: 3678
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:21 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Wed Apr 19, 2006 8:00 am

Quoting Ibhayi (Reply 31):
That's because there is no other.

SAA racially discriminate on employment selection, blacks are chosen above whites, coloureds and Indians. They havnt turned a profit in god knows how many years. They have no compatent managers and their CEO uses tax payers money to fly a helicopter to wkrk every morning.

Their products aint that bad, first and business class but their way of pushing people of specific colour through the rank is shamefull.

Doesn't that describe most African airlines? Hence why it isn't hard for SAA to be the best one?
Having said that, most people still seem to rave about SAA's service.
56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
 
CHI787ORD
Posts: 668
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:27 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:14 am

Quoting CXA330300 (Reply 32):
Quoting Abrelosojos (Reply 30):
INDIA? Are you serious? Star is the best linked alliance to India - you forget the amount of frequencies + destinations of TG, SQ and LH ... with additional services by AC, OZ, OS, BD, LO (soon), SK, SA, and SR. Isn't this far superior to anything offered by SKY or ONE?


Most people do not want to go on a BOM-BKK-CCU itinerary.

Exactly. Star Alliance provides NO domestic coverage of India, which is the sector of the market which is really booming right now.
 
CXA330300
Posts: 1256
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 5:51 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:32 pm

Quoting Ibhayi (Reply 31):

Their products aint that bad, first and business class but their way of pushing people of specific colour through the rank is shamefull.

Well its just an attempt to redistribute the power after the crimes of the apartheid era.......I, personally, think its perfectly legitimate. As for them turning a profit, I don't think they turned a single profit before 1994. Last year (not counting balance) they made a R100m profit (annual report).
AC/AA/UA/DL/B6/WN/US*/CO*/FI/BA/IB/AF/SK/LX/Sabena*/TK/LY/SA/MN/SW/AM/CE*/CX/CA/MU/JL/SQ/TG/MH/KA/5J
 
captaink
Posts: 3987
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 10:43 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:04 pm

Quoting Afay1 (Reply 21):
Any alliance that took, and keeps, USair can't be that arrogant!

That is a silly statement.

Anyhow I don't think it has anything to do with arrogance. An airline with a route network that would serve as an asset to Star members, would be considered. I am sure the airline would have to have some reasonable level of inflight service, so the passenger won't go from riding in comfort to riding on a crate in the back of a DC3. US Airways provided Star with a good coverage of the US NEasst coast and the caribbean, and was and still is a great asset to Star.
There is something special about planes....
 
abrelosojos
Posts: 4049
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 6:48 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:53 pm

Quoting CXA330300 (Reply 32):
Most people do not want to go on a BOM-BKK-CCU itinerary.

= I never said anything to the contrary. All I am saying is that STAR has the best coverage of India. Of course, all 3 would need an Indian partner to entranch within the market.

-A.
Live, and let live.
 
SA7700
Posts: 2940
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 9:38 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:34 am

Quoting CXA330300 (Reply 35):
Last year (not counting balance) they made a R100m profit (annual report).

Profit yes, but for how long? Forgive my language, but passengers and SA staff are steadily getting royally pissed off by CEO Khaya Ngqula, as well as Jacqui O'Sullivan, Head of SAA Corporate Communications. There is always a spin to a story - they like to highlight the airline's achievements, but unfortunately fail to recognise and publicly acknowledge the many things that bother passengers and staff alike.

No matter how you look at it, the balance sheet reflects negatively on the airline - R6 billion of repayable loans is no small matter. I wouldn't just stare at the income statement.


Rgds

SA7700
When you are doing stuff that nobody has done before, there is no manual – Kevin McCloud (Grand Designs)
 
PSA727
Posts: 845
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:49 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:57 am

Quoting CXA330300 (Reply 24):
For regions, they're missing the Middle East, India, Russia, North Africa, and Central America.

There are plenty of Star Alliance carriers which fly to those regions.

Quoting CXA330300 (Reply 24):
VG will go kaput and now you have almost no Latin American Network.

Which is basically what you have right now with Sky Team.

Except for smaller cities in Mexico, there is a Star Alliance airline at
every airport served by Aeromexico.

Plus, it looks like TACA might be joining Star Alliance in the future.
fly high, pay low...Germanwings!
 
CXA330300
Posts: 1256
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 5:51 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:03 am

Quoting SA7700 (Reply 38):
R6 billion of repayable loans is no small matter.

Sorry-didn't know about the loans...........wait.......SIX BILLION?

Quoting PSA727 (Reply 39):

There are plenty of Star Alliance carriers which fly to those regions.

But within them? Slim to none. Most are not going to go on a BOM-BKK-CCU or MOW-WAW-LED itinerary.

Quoting PSA727 (Reply 39):

Plus, it looks like TACA might be joining Star Alliance in the future.

And you base this on what?

Quoting PSA727 (Reply 39):
Except for smaller cities in Mexico, there is a Star Alliance airline at
every airport served by Aeromexico.

But soon Copa is joining as an associate member..........and Acapulco-MEX-GRU is infinitely easier than ACA-ORD-GRU.
AC/AA/UA/DL/B6/WN/US*/CO*/FI/BA/IB/AF/SK/LX/Sabena*/TK/LY/SA/MN/SW/AM/CE*/CX/CA/MU/JL/SQ/TG/MH/KA/5J
 
PSA727
Posts: 845
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:49 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:03 pm

Quoting CXA330300 (Reply 40):


Plus, it looks like TACA might be joining Star Alliance in the future



Quoting CXA330300 (Reply 40):
And you base this on what?

The fact that United and TACA have just signed a code-share
agreement, and when TACA broke off its ties with American, they
expressed interest in joining an alliance.
fly high, pay low...Germanwings!
 
SA7700
Posts: 2940
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 9:38 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:12 pm

Quoting CXA330300 (Reply 40):
Sorry-didn't know about the loans...........wait.......SIX BILLION?

R6.1 billion to be exact.


Rgds

SA7700
When you are doing stuff that nobody has done before, there is no manual – Kevin McCloud (Grand Designs)
 
kiwiandrew

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:28 pm

Quoting SA7700 (Reply 42):
R6.1 billion to be exact.

how much is ZAR 6.1 billion ? about USD 0.99 ?  

sorry , I realised that I was mixing you up with your neighbour - I am sure that if I was talking Zim $ my conversion rate would be about right

[Edited 2006-04-20 12:35:04]
 
SA7700
Posts: 2940
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 9:38 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:16 pm

Quoting Kiwiandrew (Reply 43):
how much is ZAR 6.1 billion ? about USD 0.99 ?

sorry , I realised that I was mixing you up with your neighbour - I am sure that if I was talking Zim $ my conversion rate would be about right

At today's exchange rate ZAR 6 billion would be just a bit more than USD 1 billion. 1 Zimbabwe Dollar = 0.00001014 USD. You do the maths (I still have serious jetlag) - it is far too mind boggling for me at this stage.  Smile


Rgds

SA7700
When you are doing stuff that nobody has done before, there is no manual – Kevin McCloud (Grand Designs)
 
Nimish
Posts: 2890
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:46 pm

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose

Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:41 pm

Quoting Abrelosojos (Reply 30):
Isn't this far superior to anything offered by SKY or ONE?

If I remember right, a post on A.net last year indicated that Skyteam had slightly more flights to India than *A. That may have changed now that *A has all the additional services you mentioned.

That being said, *A is definitely missing out on a lot of potential traffic by not tying in with an existing Indian carrier (AI/IC or 9W). They have large domestic networks, and a lot of their pax flying internationally would benefit from code shares/FFP accrual etc. with *A.
Latest Trip Report - GoAir BLR-BOM-BLR
 
MGA
Posts: 717
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:58 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:28 am

Quoting CXA330300 (Reply 40):
But soon Copa is joining as an associate member..........and Acapulco-MEX-GRU is infinitely easier than ACA-ORD-GRU.

What in the world are you talking about? Copa is an associate member of Sky Team...

MGA
Que viva el guaro, el dinero y los aviones!!!
 
abrelosojos
Posts: 4049
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 6:48 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:39 am

Quoting MGA (Reply 46):
What in the world are you talking about? Copa is an associate member of Sky Team...

MGA

= I think the post is pointing out that with COPA as part of SKYTEAM, the hypothetical itinerary of ACA-MEX-(SJO)-GRU would be easier than STAR alternative of going via ORD,

-A.
Live, and let live.
 
MGA
Posts: 717
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:58 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Fri Apr 21, 2006 3:19 am

Quoting Abrelosojos (Reply 47):
= I think the post is pointing out that with COPA as part of SKYTEAM, the hypothetical itinerary of ACA-MEX-(SJO)-GRU would be easier than STAR alternative of going via ORD,

Would be ACA-MEX-PTY-GRU (SJO is TA´s hub...)

Got the idea though... thanx.

MGA
Que viva el guaro, el dinero y los aviones!!!
 
abrelosojos
Posts: 4049
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 6:48 am

RE: Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose?

Fri Apr 21, 2006 3:54 am

Quoting MGA (Reply 48):
Would be ACA-MEX-PTY-GRU (SJO is TA´s hub...)

Got the idea though... thanx.

MGA

= Oops - thats what I meant!

Cheers,
A.
Live, and let live.

Who is online