Halibut
Topic Author
Posts: 943
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:43 am

Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Fri May 05, 2006 10:40 pm

As Boeing rakes in orders for the Hot Selling 787 & gearing up to mass produce there new a/c . Airbus on the other hand , is current bogged down dealing with a good number of issues that need to be resolved .

The A350 for starters , is under consideration to be re-desiged due to it being criticsized by many Blue chip airlines . One of those Blue chip airlines are also warning Airbus to enhance there " already defered " order of A340-600[s] or risk loosing the order .

On top of all that . Airbus is still working on completing the A380 . Which has a number of issues as well , that must be addressed before it enters commercial service at the end of the year .

As great of a Company Airbus is . With all that Airbus has on its plate at this time . Do they have the resourses & time , this decade , to counter Boeing's " Next major step in Aviation history " the composite 787 !

How much of a factor did the A380 play in this situation ???

The Heat is on Airbus !  hot 

http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...+integrate+A350+technology+on.html

Flight HomeSubscribeYou are in: Home ?News Article
DATE:05/05/06
SOURCE:Flight International

Emirates pushes Airbus to integrate A350 technology on A340-600
By Murdo Morrison in Dubai

Dubai carrier wants airframer to migrate technology from A350 to improve -600 or face losing its deferred order

Airbus is being warned that it must take steps to adapt technologies developed for the A350 to dramatically improve the A340-600 if it is not to lose Emirates?deferred order for up to 18 aircraft.





Halibut
6 million Jews were slaughtered-Do you see Jews flying planes into buildings in Germany to kill 1000s of innocent, NO !
 
co7772wuh
Posts: 381
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 7:13 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Fri May 05, 2006 11:07 pm

Quoting Halibut (Thread starter):
How much of a factor did the A380 play in this situation ???

A big factor . I believe that the 747-8 will out sell the a380 .
 
JeffB
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 1:38 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Fri May 05, 2006 11:17 pm

May the Friday flame fest begin!
 
Halibut
Topic Author
Posts: 943
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:43 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Fri May 05, 2006 11:26 pm

Quoting JeffB (Reply 2):
May the Friday flame fest begin!

I disagree JeffB,
This is a legitimate question I ask . I am not saying nor will I say Airbus is going under . I know that will never happen & is not taking place . Just that Boeing now has the momentum & Airbus has a few things it must iron out .

The question is : How long will Boeing be able to ride this wave ???

Halibut
6 million Jews were slaughtered-Do you see Jews flying planes into buildings in Germany to kill 1000s of innocent, NO !
 
keesje
Posts: 8757
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Fri May 05, 2006 11:28 pm

I think someone is in need of inspiration here. It´s getting a bit dull.

http://www.airliners.net/discussions...id&search=halibut+airbus&starter=1

http://www.airliners.net/discussions...id&search=halibut+airbus&starter=1

Come on, you can do better!
"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
Aither
Posts: 991
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:43 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Fri May 05, 2006 11:38 pm

Quoting Halibut (Thread starter):
On top of all that . Airbus is still working on completing the A380 . Which has a number of issues as well

Like what ?

Quoting Halibut (Thread starter):
Next major step in Aviation history " the composite 787 !

From what we have read from airlines, the 787 advantage over the A350 is rather the fuselage size than its full composite structure.

Quoting Halibut (Thread starter):
One of those Blue chip airlines are also warning Airbus to enhance there " already defered " order of A340-600[s] or risk loosing the order .

What about some 777 to be cannibalized by the 787-10 Boeing has been forced to propose to compete against the A350 ?

And the 737 surpassed by the A320 when new airlines are choosing their single aisle fleet.

And now the A380 will start to bring some cash to Airbus.

Etc.

Nothing is black or white.

[Edited 2006-05-05 16:38:43]
Never trust the obvious
 
Halibut
Topic Author
Posts: 943
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:43 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Fri May 05, 2006 11:39 pm

Quoting Keesje (Reply 4):
Come on, you can do better!

I understand if you do not what to engauge in another "Pickle Thread " However , I am trying to discuss an even bigger "Pickle" here . Something of even greater significance . I would appreciate if you'd jump in but it looks as if you have nothing to counter my claims !!!


   Hhmm

Halibut

[Edited 2006-05-05 16:43:33]
6 million Jews were slaughtered-Do you see Jews flying planes into buildings in Germany to kill 1000s of innocent, NO !
 
BR076
Posts: 1032
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 4:10 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Fri May 05, 2006 11:43 pm

Quoting Halibut (Reply 6):
you'd jump in but it looks as if you have nothing to counter my claims !!!

You only have to look one post above you  Smile
ú
 
RichardPrice
Posts: 4474
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 5:12 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 12:11 am

I highly doubt the situation is as bad as people think, after all Boeing have managed to survive a full 9 years without having a suitable competitor to the 767 killing A330-200 and 14 years for the A330-300 (although in some markets the 777 could be a suitable competitor, so I place less emphasis on that). The current A350 is still outside of a design freeze, and comments have been made about an announcement in June/July regarding it so I dont think theres anything more to be said on that subject until further information comes to light.

Secondly, how important are those 18 A340 orders to Airbus, is it enough to justify an expendature on upgrades that potentially would only be taken by one single airline? With 787, 777 and the A350 potentially eating into the A340 line, maybe its time for Airbus to say 'Enough is enough, the A340 will not be upgraded but replaced in due course. We will not be making peicemeal updates to the airframe.' Emirates after all placed the order for a particular airframe with a particular performance, there comes a point when they have to accept that Airbus wont change the offering on demand.

How many problems is the A380 causing Airbus exactly? It cant be really taking up many 'required elsewhere' resources at the moment, the flight test crew have nothing else to do, the cabin interiors are being fitted in the same place they will be for the next 20 years, the design team certainly wont be kept at full strength just to make some minor modifications over the next 6 months - so what resources is the A380 sucking up that would be a problem to other projects? Remember that all other current projects are paper projects, they dont need factory space yet.

Until the A380 fails to enter service by year end, theres nothing that can be discussed outside of rumour and speculation - the IAE engines havent flown yet, but they were only hung on the airframe 3 months ago, the wings certification still hasnt been decided but it isnt holding up flight testing, the IACO seperation recommendations are rumoured to be changed in the near future. There are long threads on each of those things.

The 787 is a great plane, but it doesnt cover the entire market. Its an evolution, as all aircraft have been.
 
okelleynyc
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:26 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 12:15 am

I think the article is fascinating:

The text reminds me of a conversation a wayward son would have with a displeased father; pretty firm, lays out the consequences, but leaves you some wiggle room to mend your ways.

Furthermore, Clark seems to infer that Airbus is not being entirely candid with Emirates regarding their launch order and at the very least implies that they don't have a lot of confidence in Airbus's ability to deliver the product on time. If I was working at Airbus and got this "message" from Emirates (a valued customer) I'd blanche and then get very angry.

Angry, because I felt that Clark was misrepresenting our organization and trying to gain a negotiating advantage on future sales, Angry, because he may be right and I'm chagrined for being in this position, or Angry, because the 787 hasn't even flown yet and I'm trying to compete against a paper tiger.

Anyway you look at it, this doesn't bode well for Airbus and the Blue Chip airlines are beginning to be more vocal about their "concerns".

I really hope that Airbus is able to address this with better PR if they are in fact convinced that their strategy is actually better than Boeing's. Otherwise, a nice shake up before Farnborough with new leadership and some significant revisions to their future offerings would be great.

I personally want Airbus to succeed here because it stimulates competition and technological development. Plus, we really need to plan for the $100+ barrels of oil.

What an awesome Case Study for some young gun at Wharton, Kellogg, or Harvard.
Just give me my Vario, my Ozone Mojo and a gorgeous day of soaring.
 
JayinKitsap
Posts: 627
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:55 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 12:29 am

Not another thread with "Pickle", its time for some variety. Like "Jam", "hot water", "stew", "sticky wicket". Pickle should be banned for a few weeks.

I agree that for whatever reason Airbus has moved from challenger to being challenged. They must also be feeling that, how often has an Airbus used the work "react" of late.

Competition in an industry always has trends and movements in relative strengths, market share, and momentum. The trend of Airbus having the momentum appears to have peaked, with Boeing now reclaiming some lost ground. How far and hard will this trend swing - who knows. It will be interesting to watch though.
 
11Bravo
Posts: 1679
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:54 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 12:52 am

Quoting Halibut (Thread starter):
How much of a factor did the A380 play in this situation ???

It seems very likely that the decision to build the A380 has everything to do with this situation. Neither Airbus or Boeing have the resources to produce clean-sheet designs across the entire market spectrum simultaneously.

Airbus decided that the VLA sector was where they wanted to do that, and as a consequence they must be content with derivative improvements for the rest of the market until they're finished with the A380.

The derivative strategy has certainly been successful on a number of occasions in the past most notably with the B737, but it seems that there are limits as well. For a derivative to succeed it must be able to bridge the performance gap from old to new in a significant way.

I think it's becoming increasingly obvious that the A350 cannot do that because the performance gap created by the composite construction of the B787 is too wide. The only way Airbus can achieve parity, or near-parity, is to produce an aircraft with a composite fuselage, and that requires resources that they just don't have right now.

The choice to build the A380 was a gamble. It's too soon to tell whether or not that's going to work out, although I would be very nervous about the A380 sales in the last two years if I were Airbus. It looks like Airbus bet the mid-sized market in that gamble and they're going to have to sleep in that bed.
WhaleJets Rule!
 
leelaw
Posts: 4520
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 4:13 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 1:33 am

Quoting 11Bravo (Reply 12):

Nice post. Additionally, IMO, the engineering resources diverted from the A380 program in order to react to the 787, has had a very negative impact on Airbus' execution of the final development and early production/flight-test phases of the A388.
Lex Ancilla Justitiae
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23100
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 2:12 am

Quoting Aither (Reply 5):
From what we have read from airlines, the 787 advantage over the A350 is rather the fuselage size than its full composite structure.

The 787's lighter OEW (thanks, in part, to it's composites-use) has helped it in the face of higher fuel prices because it needs less fuel to get itself into the air and more of it's MTOW is revenue-generating payload. So while the A350 was pretty close back at $30 a barrel, now closing on $80 (and probably $90 by EIS), the 787's advantage continues to increase.

Part of that OEW advantage was countered by the A350's greater passenger capacity (allowing more passenger revenue to help offset the lower fuel efficiency). But now the 787 (in 9 abreast) has essentially the same capacity as the A350.

So in the end, the 787 carries the same number of people farther with better fuel efficiency and that is why it is enjoying strong sales.

Quoting RichardPrice (Reply 9):
Secondly, how important are those 18 A340 orders to Airbus, is it enough to justify an expendature on upgrades that potentially would only be taken by one single airline? With 787, 777 and the A350 potentially eating into the A340 line, maybe its time for Airbus to say 'Enough is enough, the A340 will not be upgraded but replaced in due course. We will not be making peicemeal updates to the airframe.'

Agreed. Airbus is better offering "employee pricing" on the A345 and A346 to secure whatever orders they can get from current A340 operators and save that cash and time towards developing a new large twin ("A370") or trying to get an A320RS to market earlier. An A345E/A346E may end up being better planes then the 772LR/773ER, but that would just give Boeing the reason to launch Y3 and scuttle both of them, leaving Airbus in the same position they are in now with the A350 vs. 787.

Airbus could very well get the "A370" into service before Boeing could with Y3 and they could "turn the tables" so to speak on Boeing. Both companies have to come out with new narrowbodies, but considering RyanAir and Southwest will probably take the first few years of Y1/797 production all to themselves, Airbus might just be able to afford to wait on A320RS and launch "A370" first.

Of course, a fantastic A370 would probably negate a good deal of future A380 sales, but as Boeing decided with the 772 vis-a-vis the 787-10, you're better off killing your own product then having it killed off by someone else's product.

Quote:
The 787 is a great plane, but it doesnt cover the entire market. Its an evolution, as all aircraft have been.

Agreed. Which is where Airbus could (conceivably) make money on an A370.

Quoting 11Bravo (Reply 12):
The choice to build the A380 was a gamble. It's too soon to tell whether or not that's going to work out, although I would be very nervous about the A380 sales in the last two years if I were Airbus. It looks like Airbus bet the mid-sized market in that gamble and they're going to have to sleep in that bed.

Looking at the situation today, Airbus seems to have bet wrong with the A380.

Slot restrictions at most airports today are artificial in nature (imposed by treaty [Bermuda II at LHR] or local/country ordinance [ORD]). And fuel prices continue to rise, making the A380 more and more expensive to operate. BA doesn't need the A380 because they can swap narrowbody slots at LHR for more widebody slots. SQ needs the A380, because they can't. But if Gatwick or Stanstead ever decide to expand, and Open Skies becomes a reality, airlines could schedule smaller widebody service to those two airports, and then where does that leave the A380?

Of course, Airbus had no more a crystal ball on today then Boeing did. If the Sonic Cruiser was being assembled right now, this forum would be filled with predictions/stories of massive cancellations and "imminent doom" for Boeing. Boeing was "fortunate" to have their customers - the US majors - meltdown early enough that they could stop the project and develop a new project that tailored better to their needs. It was just...serendipity...that fuel prices rose so high that the project happened to better tailor every airline's needs.

Quote:
For a derivative to succeed it must be able to bridge the performance gap from old to new in a significant way. I think it's becoming increasingly obvious that the A350 cannot do that because the performance gap...(with)...the B787 is too wide.

And only getting wider as the price of fuel increases.

I expect Airbus to announce additional measures to try and shed weight with the A350 at Farnsborough (sic) and they may even offer "torture class" nine-abreast seating or perhaps even the "standing room only" option falsely attributed to them in order to raise capacity and lower CASM. However, it's still not going to bring the A350 into parity with the 787. However, it could make the A350 more palatable to current A330 and A340 operators and keep them from choosing to employ a 787 subfleet.
 
Ken777
Posts: 9050
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 5:39 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 2:18 am

I don't think that Airbus is in a "pickle", but they are getting hard on the 350/787 market right now. It's one of those times where senior management actually needs to earn their pay, working out solutions instead of panicking.

Their main problem isn't the 350 - it's the 380. The money has been invested, the plane is undergoing testing and it is critical that Airbus takes care of all problems that come up. And problems will come up - the 380, like all modern commercial airliners, are very complex and there will always be teething problems when EIS hits. Putting you best people on identifying and correcting those problems will be Job One for Airbus.

There is also a need to protect the 320 market. Saying "it's good enough" today leaves Airbus in the same position it was in when they talked about the 330 against the 7E7. Getting caught again with their pants down would cause a huge problem for them, in terms of their reputation with their customers.

The 350 "challenge" needs to be addressed with these two other lines in mind. They can go *now* for a wider tube, but do they want to do that now - before deciding on the materials to be used? How much work do they need to do before they are ready to look at composites? In the long term would they be better if they stayed the course, protected the 320 and 380 markets and developed a followup to the 350 in an orderly manner.

It just seems to me that outside comments are putting short term pressure on Airbus when they need to focus on the medium and long term issues.
 
b777a340fan
Posts: 652
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:42 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 4:10 am

Quoting Halibut (Thread starter):
How much of a factor did the A380 play in this situation ???

Taking finances aside, Airbus having won the race to successfully design a double-decker is already an accomplishment of its own. I think the industry is on "waiting" mode to see what the market reaction to the A380 will be. I'm sure airlines will start ordering more A380s should it prove successful for other airlines such as SQ or EK.

Quoting Halibut (Reply 3):
How long will Boeing be able to ride this wave ???

Every market has its own phase. In a tight airliner market where there are only two major stakeholders, if one wins, the other loses. However, I don't think it's something permanent.
 
SFOerik
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:17 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 4:38 am

I now call the Airbus A380 the Airbus Ego380. This plane is all bout ego and not built on sound business decisions. The plane will never get to the break even point but Airbus just can't let it go. I don't have much respect for a company that operates this way.

Now they are really feeling the heat with their not so new A350 and A340-600. Additionally I can't wait to find out how many millions Airbus is kicking back to Singapore and the like for missed delivery dates for the ego380.

The pressue is really on at Airbus - thats my 2 cents.
I will no longer stress about upgrades!
 
Ken777
Posts: 9050
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 5:39 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 5:01 am

Quoting Sfoerik (Reply 17):
The plane will never get to the break even point

I Think that the 380 will eventually break even, but it will take a longer time that Airbus wants - and they may make less gross margin off of each plane. THe 380 can well serve its market for 20 years or more (just look at the 747) and, let's face it - Airbus doesn't have a choice. They can't simply drop the plane from their offerings.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 14):
Airbus could very well get the "A370" into service before Boeing could with Y3 and they could "turn the tables" so to speak on Boeing. Both companies have to come out with new narrowbodies, but considering RyanAir and Southwest will probably take the first few years of Y1/797 production all to themselves, Airbus might just be able to afford to wait on A320RS and launch "A370" first.

Unlike the 787, I believe that Boeing will plan on multiple production lines for Y1 right from the start, making a delay with the 320RS a huge risk. While some airlines like WN will probably place large orders I think that the orders will be spread over a period of time that will allow Boeing to sell to a large number of airlines.

Airbus might get the jump on Y3, but how far along is the technology transfer from the 787 program to Y3? Like Y1 I believe Boeing and their suppliers are maximizing the knowledge that is being obtained from the 787 program and that Y3 is slowly starting to take shape.
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 5:02 am

Quoting Halibut (Reply 3):
I am not saying nor will I say Airbus is going under . I know that will never happen

Of course Airbus will go under. So will Boeing. It's just a matter of time. The United States of America and the European Union will both go under. That's a certainty, given sufficient time. The Roman Empire, the British Empire, and the Soviet Empire are all gone. Nothing lasts forever, but the future lasts a long time.

Quoting Aither (Reply 5):
the 787-10 Boeing has been forced to propose to compete against the A350 ?

Outside of A.net, where has it been written that the B787-10 is a response to Airbus? I rather believe that the airlines saw the possibility and wanted it.

Quoting Aither (Reply 5):

From what we have read from airlines, the 787 advantage over the A350 is rather the fuselage size than its full composite structure.

No, the advantage of the B787 over the A350 is a 15 tonne difference in OEW for same-size (cabin space) models.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 14):
An A345E/A346E may end up being better planes then the 772LR/773ER, but that would just give Boeing the reason to launch Y3 and scuttle both of them, leaving Airbus in the same position they are in now with the A350 vs. 787.

Airbus could very well get the "A370" into service before Boeing could with Y3 and they could "turn the tables" so to speak on Boeing.

The simpler response from Boeing to an A340E would be a B787-11X with a MTOW in the 600,000 to 640,000 lbs range. Still, I would rather see Airbus produce a clean-sheet composite-fuselage twin with a fuselage width between those of the B777 and B747 (which would kill the B777-300ER and B747-8 stone cold dead) than develop an A340E (which I don't think would catch the B777-300ER in CASM).

Quoting Stitch (Reply 14):
a fantastic A370 would probably negate a good deal of future A380 sales

A fantastic large composite twin from Airbus would kill the WhaleJet, the SuperJumbo, and the B777-300ER. Bring it on!

Quoting B777A340Fan (Reply 16):
Taking finances aside, Airbus having won the race to successfully design a double-decker is already an accomplishment of its own.

In business, one never gets to set finances aside in judging success. Finances are the metric by which success in business is judged.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23100
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 5:06 am

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 19):
The simpler response from Boeing to an A340E would be a B787-11X with a MTOW in the 600,000 to 640,000 lbs range.

Were there not worries about the length of such a stretch? Or would she be within the fuselage length of a 777-300 and the 787-12 would be "too long to turn"?
 
deltadc9
Posts: 2788
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:00 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 5:22 am

Quoting B777A340Fan (Reply 16):
Taking finances aside, Airbus having won the race to successfully design a double-decker is already an accomplishment of its own.

What race? It does take 2. Boeing chose not to proceed. They had at their disposal double decker designs for the MD-12 and the 747 and that's probably not all of their options.

They chose to stay with the larger markets not the larger plane and milk the 747. Are you seriously implying that Boeing does not know how to design AND build a full double decker?

Early 747 design from the late 60's

Big version: Width: 916 Height: 449 File size: 182kb


MD-12 design from the early 90's IIRC

Big version: Width: 225 Height: 139 File size: 7kb
Dont take life too seriously because you will never get out of it alive - Bugs Bunny
 
SONICDANCE
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:13 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 5:31 am

I just think Emirates is playing games to get Boeing to lower the price on the 787-10 through luring Airbus to change the A350. We all know they kept pushing Boeing to do that for a long long time and I think the order is pretty much Boeings. I guess the reason that -10 is still not launched is 1) Boeing stands real firm in the price of the -10 and 2) THe engines for the -10 is not in sight (but they got RR's reassurance on doing that already so no big deal).

In my Opinion, A350 should stay the way it is. Maybe they should offer -1000 rather than going after a wider fuselage coz, like everyone here says, they are extremely strained with the current project, plus it can sorta replace the A340 market rather than throwing money into the A340E, which has no hope for the future. I know -1000's performance won't be "great", as long fuselage leads to additional structure weight and there's no engine for it yet. But it could at least slow Boeing down for a bit in order to buy time to find out further improvements on the A350.

My personal opinion is that the worst decision Airbus made in the A350 issue is not changing the wing design. If they could spend that much money in reprofiling the wing and produce a composite wing, why not go a step further and totally redesign the wing? (well... I know it's expensive!) It would at least put the A350 closer to the 787, just like 737NG as a response to the A320.

Finally Airbus won't collapse. Airliners and Europeans won't let that to happen either. But Airbus will have to endure the down time for a while... Hopefully NSR will save them from it's weak position...
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 5:49 am

Quoting Ken777 (Reply 18):
THe 380 can well serve its market for 20 years or more (just look at the 747) and, let's face it - Airbus doesn't have a choice.

From the JumboJet's inception, it had unmatched range until the B777-200ER and A340-500 entered service. For its entire life (right up to today) it has been unmatched in CASM. That will change for a few years from the WhaleJet's EIS (in 2007) until the SuperJumbo's EIS (in 2010?). The WhaleJet will never be best in range and will be best in CASM only for a few years. Range and CASM were the main reasons airlines bought JumboJets, not because of slot limitations.

Quoting Ken777 (Reply 18):
They can't simply drop the plane from their offerings.

When airlines are no longer willing to order the WhaleJet at any price above Airbus' cost of the production and the backlog is gone, Airbus will stop production.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 20):
Were there not worries about the length of such a stretch? Or would she be within the fuselage length of a 777-300 and the 787-12 would be "too long to turn"?

Assuming each stretch is 240 inches (difference between the B787-8 and B787-9), a B787-11X would be almost exactly the same length as the A340-600, slightly longer than the B777-300ER. A B787-12X would have turning difficulties on many taxiways.

Quoting SONICDANCE (Reply 22):
My personal opinion is that the worst decision Airbus made in the A350 issue is not changing the wing design. If they could spend that much money in reprofiling the wing and produce a composite wing, why not go a step further and totally redesign the wing? (well... I know it's expensive!)

Changing the sweep would have allowed Airbus to increase the cruise speed a bit, but it would not have helped with fuel consumption. Increasing the span (longer thinner wings are possible with composite construction) would have helped with economy, but long wingspans limit the gates one can use. I think the wing issues with the A350 are overblown.
 
SONICDANCE
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:13 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 6:20 am

Zvezda:
I checked the wingspan of the A350... Can't believe they are even wider than the 787-9 (A350: 61.1m, 787-9: 60m). I'm just wondering how far can the wings be skretched withouth interfering w/ gate operations. I also have a question on the aspect ratio of A330 and A350... It doesn't seem like it will be higher than 787's as the area of the wing on the A330's is larger than 787s while its span is not much wider. And if I didn't forget the numbers, the aspect ratio of 787-8 and -9's should be over 10. I also suspect the wingtip efficiency won't be as high as 787's, as they are a lot more conventional looking... (JUST SPECULATION! Airbus will of course try to refine them to the best they can)

I think the sweep angle is an issue, not from an fuel consumption standpoint but from the crew schedule standpoint. Judging from Airbus's action to reprofile the cockpit in response to airliner's request on increasing cruise speed (well... it's more than cruise speed. It's also about crew rest area), I think airliners do have a little issue w/ the cruise speed, which Airbus can't do anything to improve it as the sweep is the biggest factor in cruise speed
 
keesje
Posts: 8757
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 6:33 am

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 19):
Outside of A.net, where has it been written that the B787-10 is a response to Airbus? I rather believe that the airlines saw the possibility and wanted it.

Even Mike Bair can´t deny it.
Skeptics have cautioned that a 787-10 would cannibalize sales for one of Boeing's most popular jets, the 777-200ER, which has a similar seating capacity.

But Bair has an answer for that problem, too.

"Better us to step on [the 777] than somebody else," he said. "If you can do a product that the market is clamoring for, you'd be silly to deny it."

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...echnology/2002698084_boeing22.html

Quoting Co7772wuh (Reply 1):
Quoting Halibut (Thread starter):
How much of a factor did the A380 play in this situation ???

A big factor . I believe that the 747-8 will out sell the a380 .

I do think the Airbus380 variants will be the real game changers of long haul travel.
- 80% of current long haul traffic is hub-hub at this moment
- fuel prices are rising
- traffic will tripple in the next 20 years

160 orders & 100 options doesn´t seem a lot before EIS but these aircraft count double. Most flag carriers ordered them, 747´s orders were only good for freight during the last 5 years.

Folks form the other side of the ocean may not like it, but that won´t play a role in BA, CX and UA boardrooms.

http://www.cardatabase.net/modifiedairlinerphotos/photos/big/00006518.jpg
"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
astuteman
Posts: 6341
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:50 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 6:38 am

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 23):
Increasing the span (longer thinner wings are possible with composite construction) would have helped with economy, but long wingspans limit the gates one can use.

I suspect a long narrow wing would be heavier, too, indicating that a trade-off compromise would have to be reached.

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 23):
I think the wing issues with the A350 are overblown.

Agree with this.

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 19):
Of course Airbus will go under. So will Boeing. It's just a matter of time. The United States of America and the European Union will both go under. That's a certainty, given sufficient time. The Roman Empire, the British Empire, and the Soviet Empire are all gone. Nothing lasts forever, but the future lasts a long time.

Absolutely agree with this  Smile
Profound words indeed, Zvezda, and oh so true.

Regards
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23100
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 6:43 am

Quoting Keesje (Reply 25):
Folks form the other side of the ocean may not like it, but that won´t play a role in BA, CX and UA boardrooms.

And I imagine that if SQ's internal performance models are true, CX won't like the fact that the A388 won't be able to do LAX/SFO-HKG at full load 365 days a year when a 747-8I can. However, I will note that the CX color scheme actually flatters the A380 (whose shape does very little for me, aesthetically - not that aesthetics were a function of the design).

And UA won't like the fact that they have trouble filling a 744 to NRT and LHR on a year-round basis (the 772 is replacing the 744 on some runs to both cities), so filling an A380 would be even more difficult for them (though the same applies to the 748I, as well, but fuel savings and range improvements might open new opportunities for them).

Though I will admit BA probably likes the fact that "slot restrictions" don't apply to them at LHR (since they can combine frequencies on their narrowbodies to free up slots for more widebodies) so they can pick the plane with the best CASM for their needs and if that plane is smaller then an A380, so be it.  

[Edited 2006-05-05 23:45:59]
 
b777a340fan
Posts: 652
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:42 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 6:52 am

Quoting DeltaDC9 (Reply 21):
What race? It does take 2. Boeing chose not to proceed. They had at their disposal double decker designs for the MD-12 and the 747 and that's probably not all of their options.

They chose to stay with the larger markets not the larger plane and milk the 747. Are you seriously implying that Boeing does not know how to design AND build a full double decker?

 Wow!  Yeah sure  eyepopping   expressionless  I hope you're not an engineer because that statement, I hope you realize, was completely unrealistic. Designing an airplane takes a little more than drawings and building a model that you can put on your desk. I'm NOT saying that Boeing doesn't know how to design AND build a full double decker, but the fact remains that they didn't and Airbus did. You can't use the specs for the 747 or the A340, for instance, and just tag on a full double decker. Physics just doesn't work that way. You can perhaps use similar ideas/concepts, but sometimes you have to rebuild the entire thing. So in turn, I hope that you seriously aren't saying that Airbus had a free ride in the park designing/building/testing the A380. You have preliminary designs, then changes, then during testing, even more changes. It's not as easy as you think.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 20):
In business, one never gets to set finances aside in judging success. Finances are the metric by which success in business is judged.

I may be completely idealistic, but I think from an engineering point of view, I still think that they've accomplished something great. But no matter what, you will never see Airbus fade away because no governments would let that happen. It's called holding a monopoly.
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 7:07 am

Quoting Keesje (Reply 25):

"Better us to step on [the 777] than somebody else," he said. "If you can do a product that the market is clamoring for, you'd be silly to deny it."

The first part of Bair's remark tends to support your hypothesis, but doesn't admit that the A350 had anything to do with driving the B787-10. The second part of Bair's remark supports my hypothesis that the B787-10 is being developed because customers want it irrespective of the A350.

Quoting Astuteman (Reply 26):
Profound words indeed, Zvezda, and oh so true.

Thank you for the kind words.
 
jacobin777
Posts: 12262
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:29 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 8:20 am

Quoting 11Bravo (Reply 12):
Airbus decided that the VLA sector was where they wanted to do that, and as a consequence they must be content with derivative improvements for the rest of the market until they're finished with the A380.

while I'll admit for their irresponsibility in wasting valuable resources for building the A380, to a certain extent..I can't blame them about the A330...it was kicking the bum off the 767, and when the A345 and A346 was offered in the late 1990's, fuel price was around $12/barrel.. Wow!....

the A320 series was being picked up by a lot of new carriers, not to mention entrenced Boeing carriers such as UA....it seems like a lot was going for them..

A lot of Boeing's recent success did have to do with luck.....and some good experience and vision...

the Sonic Cruiser wasn't too far into development when 9/11 and the price of fuel started to go up.....so it wasn't too difficult for them to shelve the Sonic Cruiser and take the ideas/technology/money/resources to the 7E7 program...

the A345 and A346 was selling well until 2004-2005 when prices of fuel really started to go up....and by then, they had quite a few A345/A346 carriers such as IB, VS, LH. CX, SQ, EK-all who are very happy with their planes...even with the orginal "teething problems" VS had with their planes back in 2002-2003...i

it took GE a while before it can really get their GE90-110/115 engines up to service and reliability....

now that carriers were using those GE engines, and Boeing produced data which showed that the 777-300ER was performing better than it had anticipated, it was no surprise so many new orders last year was for the 777-300ER and 77-200LR/-200F........

ts the price of oil which is killing the A340 series...

when Boeing came out with the 7E7/787, Airbus was so wrapped up in the A380-first (showcasing/1st flight, etc), they really didn't think too much of the 787......

"One year ago, Noel Forgeard was still flying high. When asked to comment on the announcement of chief rival Boeing's plans to introduce the long-haul, super-efficient 787 Dreamliner jet, the Airbus chief responded: "We don't need to react to the presentation of this plane.""

source:spiegelonline....

it wasn't until when AC, NW chose the 787 when Airbus started to take the A350 more seriously...but even then, they didnt' take it as seriously as possible, hence the losing of the QF order...

also....fundamentaly, though Airbus will eventually build a large composite plane, they don't believe in building a CFRP plane like the 787....(for whatever reason)..

"However, aluminium lithium – rather than composites on the 787 – has been adopted for the fuselage skin. The driver for this was the need to cope with accidental damage, and the alloy represents around a fifth of the A350’s advanced materials, says Hunter. “Aluminium lithium allows for easy damage assessment and standard procedures for repair,” he (Dougie Hunter, A350 chief engineer) adds.

source:flightinternational.com



..will market forces change this...we'll see...

Quoting Stitch (Reply 14):
So while the A350 was pretty close back at $30 a barrel, now closing on $80 (and probably $90 by EIS), the 787's advantage continues to increase.

actually, the A350 was intro with oil at around $40-$45 barrel..and as of closing today, its at $70.20 barrel... Wink

but I agree, oil might go much higher....

Quoting Stitch (Reply 14):
So in the end, the 787 carries the same number of people farther with better fuel efficiency and that is why it is enjoying strong sales

 checkmark 

Quoting Stitch (Reply 14):
Of course, a fantastic A370 would probably negate a good deal of future A380 sales, but as Boeing decided with the 772 vis-a-vis the 787-10, you're better off killing your own product then having it killed off by someone else's product.

true, but the 777 project has paid for itself, and its only affecting one plane of the family, where as killing the A380 will put a massive dent in Airbus' budget..they can't afford that...they need to sell some frames..they can't cannablise their own market so soon.....

Quoting Sfoerik (Reply 17):
I now call the Airbus A380 the Airbus Ego380. This plane is all bout ego and not built on sound business decisions. The plane will never get to the break even point but Airbus just can't let it go. I don't have much respect for a company that operates this way.

I think it will break even, but it certainly won't be the money-maker they were dreaming of back in 1999-2000..and it was certaily an "ego-driven" idea...

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 19):
A fantastic large composite twin from Airbus would kill the WhaleJet, the SuperJumbo, and the B777-300ER. Bring it on!



Quoting Zvezda (Reply 23):
The WhaleJet will never be best in range and will be best in CASM only for a few years

even the 787-10 will beat it..

"What is attracting Emirates is the dash 10's seat-mile costs and fuel burn, both of which will be lower than the A380's. It also will have 80% more revenue cargo space than the A380, according to sources at Emirates. It is understood that Singapore Airlines and British Airways are among the carriers keen on the version."

source:atwonline.com



----

Quoting Keesje (Reply 25):

Folks form the other side of the ocean may not like it, but that won´t play a role in BA, CX and UA boardrooms.

no...but maybe their management has something to say about it...

"BA is more interested in the 787-9 and the proposed larger dash 10 than the 787-8. He also revealed it "very much pushed Boeing to produce the 747-8." (BA-Fleet Planning Director Robert Boyle )

source:atwonline.com

"."We are looking at them but we may not make a decision this year, because we are very well served with our strategy not to order [new] aircraft too early," (CX)COO Tony Tyler told ATWOnline in Hong Kong. He joked that the airline might make an exception "if Boeing gives us a killer offer."

"Discussing the passenger fleet, Tyler said the airline is very interested in the 787-10 as well the dash 9. "That's the [kind of] future long-haul aircraft we are looking for," "

source:atwonline.com

"But when it does, Boeing's 787 Dreamliner would be a good addition to United's fleet, as might Boeing's bigger jumbo jet, the 747-8, said Glenn Tilton, United's chief executive."

""I have not been able to see it," Tilton said when asked if the A380 has a future with United."

source:seattlepi.com

so Keesje..what do you have to say about that?
"Up the Irons!"
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23100
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 8:29 am

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 29):
The first part of Bair's remark tends to support your hypothesis, but doesn't admit that the A350 had anything to do with driving the B787-10. The second part of Bair's remark supports my hypothesis that the B787-10 is being developed because customers want it irrespective of the A350.

I would imagine that, when the 787 was configured with 8-across, a 787-10 was a better match in terms of passenger capacity to the A350-900. As such, EK would have wanted a larger 787-10 to match the larger A350-900 in terms of passenger capacity.

However, as you have noted many times, a 787-9 with 9-across now matches an A350-900 (at 8-across) and so the 787-10 now offers greater passenger capacity above the A350-900.
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 9:43 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 31):
I would imagine that, when the 787 was configured with 8-across, a 787-10 was a better match in terms of passenger capacity to the A350-900. As such, EK would have wanted a larger 787-10 to match the larger A350-900 in terms of passenger capacity.

Do you think that EK, who fit their B777s 10 abreast, only thought of fitting B787s 9 abreast after they started pushing Boeing for a B787-10? I think that EK planned to fit B787s 9 abreast (if purchased) from the first moment they knew its cross-section.
 
art
Posts: 2679
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:46 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 10:29 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 14):
Airbus is better offering "employee pricing" on the A345 and A346 to secure whatever orders they can get from current A340 operators and save that cash and time towards developing a new large twin ("A370") or trying to get an A320RS to market earlier. An A345E/A346E may end up being better planes then the 772LR/773ER, but that would just give Boeing the reason to launch Y3 and scuttle both of them, leaving Airbus in the same position they are in now with the A350 vs. 787.

I go along with your thinking.

Quoting Sfoerik (Reply 17):
I now call the Airbus A380 the Airbus Ego380. This plane is all bout ego and not built on sound business decisions. The plane will never get to the break even point but Airbus just can't let it go.

How do you propose Airbus should let it go? Refuse new orders? Refuse options take up and re-orders?

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 19):
No, the advantage of the B787 over the A350 is a 15 tonne difference in OEW for same-size (cabin space) models.

It looks more and more like those 15 tonnes represent a major problem with oil at $60+ a barrel. What happens if the price rises to $100-$150 in the next few years so that fuel becomes a much larger component of the cost of running an airline? I see a risk that Airbus could end up with an aircraft that has become unsaleable.
 
User avatar
ER757
Posts: 2458
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 10:16 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 11:03 am

Quoting Keesje (Reply 4):
I think someone is in need of inspiration here. It´s getting a bit dull.

Congratulations on this thread Halibut, you finally made me agree with Keesje  Big grin

Quoting Sfoerik (Reply 17):
I now call the Airbus A380 the Airbus Ego380. This plane is all bout ego and not built on sound business decisions. The plane will never get to the break even point but Airbus just can't let it go. I don't have much respect for a company that operates this way.

While I am no Airbus cheerleader (I live in Seattle for crying out loud!), this constant gloom and doom talk about what a mess Airbus is in is getting quite tiresome. The A380 may in fact end up being a bust, but OTOH, it could be that Airbus got the market forecast right and that this will be the blue chip carriers' aircraft of choice for the next 20 years. We really truly don't know. So let's get off the "Airbus is in trouble" merry go round for awhile and get on to more constructive topics.
 
Halibut
Topic Author
Posts: 943
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:43 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 11:47 am

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 30):
now that carriers were using those GE engines, and Boeing produced data which showed that the 777-300ER was performing better than it had anticipated, it was no surprise so many new orders last year was for the 777-300ER and 77-200LR/-200F........

is the price of oil which is killing the A340 series...

Interesting hypothesis Jacobin777,
I think it may be a combination of both ? Honestly , I am baffled why Emirates is attempting to push Airbus to enhance the A346 . How much more efficiency can you get out of a quad ???

Quoting ER757 (Reply 34):
Congratulations on this thread Halibut, you finally made me agree with Keesje

At 1st I saw Airbus's dilemma with the A350 . After further review . I came to the conclusion that there was the " AMPP " : Airbus's Multiple Pickle Problem " . I am simply expanding on that . My apologies if I offended you .

Quoting ER757 (Reply 34):
Congratulations on this thread Halibut, you finally made me agree with Keesje

Are you insinuating that Keesje is wrong most of the time ?  


Halibut


  

[Edited 2006-05-06 04:49:53]
6 million Jews were slaughtered-Do you see Jews flying planes into buildings in Germany to kill 1000s of innocent, NO !
 
User avatar
ER757
Posts: 2458
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 10:16 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 11:59 am

Quoting Halibut (Reply 35):
Are you insinuating that Keesje is wrong most of the time ?

Not wrong per se, just that is Airbus-centric views can be a tad askew of the truth  Wink
 
jacobin777
Posts: 12262
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:29 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 1:17 pm

Quoting Halibut (Reply 35):
Interesting hypothesis Jacobin777,
I think it may be a combination of both ? Honestly , I am baffled why Emirates is attempting to push Airbus to enhance the A346 . How much more efficiency can you get out of a quad ???

certainly is a combination of many factors....those which I listed included...

I think EK is trying to push Airbus to develop the best possible plane, even if its a quad.....as it will 1)give them more negotiating leverage against the 777-300ER and 2)they might have a need for that plane in certain routes (i.e.-ETOPS won't work and cargo..as the A346 has great cargo)......

the A346 isn't a dud by any stretch of the imagination.....carriers such as LH certainly like their planes, they are performing exceptionally well for them..
"Up the Irons!"
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 2:56 pm

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 37):
the A346 isn't a dud by any stretch of the imagination.....carriers such as LH certainly like their planes, they are performing exceptionally well for them..

What was the price of oil when LH placed their last A340-600 order?
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 13851
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 8:16 pm

Quoting Ken777 (Reply 18):
I Think that the 380 will eventually break even, but it will take a longer time that Airbus wants

And of course the longer it takes to sell airframes, the further out the break even point shifts in time, due to the time value of money. The original quoted 250 frame break even point was really 250 frames in 10 years. Now even Airbus has said the number is 300 and some speculate 350 is more accurate.
Inspiration, move me brightly! Light the song with sense and color.
Hold away despair, more than this I will not ask.
Faced with mysteries dark and vast, statements just seem vain at last.
Some rise, some fall, some climb, to get to Terrapin!
 
PlaneHunter
Posts: 6512
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 3:17 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 9:02 pm

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 37):
the A346 isn't a dud by any stretch of the imagination.....carriers such as LH certainly like their planes, they are performing exceptionally well for them..

 checkmark 

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 38):
What was the price of oil when LH placed their last A340-600 order?

The A346 is still a fuel efficient airliner even under the today's circumstances. Unlike the belief of certain members of that board, the A346's operating costs don't explode while other types remain unaffected.

And you should know well that a decision to order a certain type of aircraft is not just dependant on the oil price. Additionally, it's quite likely LH's fleet managers evaluated a drastic increase of fuel prices over the next years prior to the order decision.


PH
Nothing's worse than flying the same reg twice!
 
mauriceb
Posts: 2150
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 2:50 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 9:27 pm

Although im a boeing fan, i will defend Airbus in this case.

1. A340-500/600 did sell well for its class, and airlines like LH/VS are happy with them, and there are still many updates wich makes it even better.

2. A380, lots of them are already sold, and besides that its the only plane of its class (sorry 747-8 doesn't even come near) , its a plane with lots of new technology wich makes it efficient and popular with airlines.

3. Although Airbus miss-calculated on the A350, im sure it will be a succes again after airbus updated it (i think at this point they have no choice)

Quote:
What race? It does take 2. Boeing chose not to proceed. They had at their disposal double decker designs for the MD-12 and the 747 and that's probably not all of their options.

Probably the planes weren't good enough or Boeing thought it would be a succes, so yes you can call that a big fault from boeings side.

Owh, and in case you didn't notice, the MD-12 wasn't designed by Boeing.


Further more i think its sad that people are bashing down Airbus all the time. I didn't see that much topics 2 a 3 years ago when Airbus absolutely ruled out Boeing.
 
jacobin777
Posts: 12262
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:29 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sat May 06, 2006 11:29 pm

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 38):

What was the price of oil when LH placed their last A340-600 order?

LH put its first flight in to service on December 15,2003 when oil was $30-$33 per barrel....

They were a launch customer for the A346 when it was launced in 1997, I don't have the price of oil at the time, but in 1999, oil was at $12/barrel....
"Up the Irons!"
 
co7772wuh
Posts: 381
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 7:13 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sun May 07, 2006 9:12 am

Quoting PlaneHunter (Reply 40):
The A346 is still a fuel efficient airliner even under the today's circumstances. Unlike the belief of certain members of that board, the A346's operating costs don't explode while other types remain unaffected.

A346 still a fuel efficient airliner , hah ?

Not accourding to Emirates !

Quoting Halibut (Thread starter):
http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...+integrate+A350+technology+on.html

Flight HomeSubscribeYou are in: Home ?News Article
DATE:05/05/06
SOURCE:Flight International

Emirates pushes Airbus to integrate A350 technology on A340-600
By Murdo Morrison in Dubai

Dubai carrier wants airframer to migrate technology from A350 to improve -600 or face losing its deferred order

Airbus is being warned that it must take steps to adapt technologies developed for the A350 to dramatically improve the A340-600 if it is not to lose Emirates?deferred order for up to 18 aircraft.
 
BoomBoom
Posts: 2459
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 2:26 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sun May 07, 2006 11:01 am

Quoting MauriceB (Reply 41):

1. A340-500/600 did sell well for its class, and airlines like LH/VS are happy with them, and there are still many updates wich makes it even better.

According to our favorite analyst, Richard A.

Quote:
"The A340 is dying slowly and horribly," Mr. Aboulafia said. "It is one of the more colossal failures in aviation. With higher fuel prices, no one wants four engines."

The 777 has captured about 70 percent of all orders in its market since the A340 made its debut in 1997.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/07/bu...&en=2b1315cf5e480897&ex=1147060800
Our eyes are open, our eyes are open--wide, wide, wide...
 
trex8
Posts: 4606
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2002 9:04 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sun May 07, 2006 2:40 pm

Quoting BoomBoom (Reply 44):
The 777 has captured about 70 percent of all orders in its market since the A340 made its debut in 1997.

1997??????
 
slz396
Posts: 1883
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 7:01 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sun May 07, 2006 5:26 pm

Just interested to hear what the CASM and more importantly the fuel/pax/hour is on the A346 vs 744 for instance.....

If the A346 is indeed such a bad plane, not capable of generating any profit for the airlines flying it, I do wonder where the desert is where we can visit the entire production of the 747-400 which must have been parked there for several months already then?

Not to mention they'd have to lock up CEO's of airlines like AY, LH etc which are almost desperately seeking even more inefficient planes like the MD-11 for some of their long haul (cargo) operations!

Come on guys, any person making propaganda-like remarks like:
the A346 is one of the more colossal failures in aviation,
prove either 1 of these 2 things:

-) the person making them isn't capable of looking much broader than a simplified A vs. B comparison and is thus an very poor market analyst of the global aviation industry which is a thousand times more complex than that.
-) the person is so utterly biased he doesn't want to look much broader than the simplified model we see demonstrated here and has some sort of hidden agenda which runs his show.

With Mr A. I have a feeling he is on the pay roll of Boeing, or at least hoping to end up on it some day. Anybody quoting him as a 'neutral source' to proof a point of his automatically gives himself away as being very weak in defending his case himself and has a hard time gaining my respect let alone convincing me. I think many NEUTRAL readers will agree with me that by now, a single quote of this gentlemen is about all it takes to make us start doubting the case you want to make, thus achieves exactly the opposite of what you want to achieve: Mr A. is a liability more than an asset to any discussion really!

Another question:
How do you die slowly and horribly at the same time?
With an arrow in your hart, bleeding to death on the medieval battlefield of chivalry rivalry?
Sometimes Mr A. sounds as if he is the director of some passion play of Shakespeare really, rather than a cool-harted financial analyst he pretends to be.

[Edited 2006-05-07 10:34:15]
 
PlaneHunter
Posts: 6512
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 3:17 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sun May 07, 2006 5:38 pm

Quoting Co7772wuh (Reply 43):
A346 still a fuel efficient airliner , hah ?

Not accourding to Emirates !

EK operate the B777-300ER which is more fuel efficient than the A346, therefore it's just logic they concentrate on the B777 and try to get rid of the A340 order. But all that doesn't automatically mean the A346 is not a fuel efficient airliner. Better try to find some more convincing arguments or a source which actually proves your claim...  Yeah sure


PH
Nothing's worse than flying the same reg twice!
 
andessmf
Posts: 5689
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:53 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sun May 07, 2006 6:06 pm

Quoting Slz396 (Reply 46):
If the A346 is indeed such a bad plane, not capable of generating any profit for the airlines flying it, I do wonder where the desert is where we can visit the entire production of the 747-400 which must have been parked there for several months already then?

The 727 was not as efficient as other airliners for a long time, but it didnt mean that they were all going to be parked at once. There are other considerations regarding the operation of an airplane and when to park it. The 744s that were parked had already flown for many a years. How long since the first flight of the A346?

Quoting PlaneHunter (Reply 47):
But all that doesn't automatically mean the A346 is not a fuel efficient airliner.

Of course it doesnt. But it is not the most fuel efficient. And the operating cost of an airliner fuel keeps going up.
 
PlaneHunter
Posts: 6512
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 3:17 am

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sun May 07, 2006 6:22 pm

Quoting AndesSMF (Reply 48):

Of course it doesnt. But it is not the most fuel efficient. And the operating cost of an airliner fuel keeps going up.

Just because it's not the MOST fuel fuel efficient doesn't mean airlines are seeking to replace it. It's not like the A340 wastes twice as much as the competition. What a tiring discussion.  Yeah sure


PH
Nothing's worse than flying the same reg twice!
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

RE: Airbus In Bigger Pickle With A350-A346 & A380

Sun May 07, 2006 7:03 pm

Quoting Slz396 (Reply 46):
If the A346 is indeed such a bad plane, not capable of generating any profit for the airlines flying it, I do wonder where the desert is where we can visit the entire production of the 747-400 which must have been parked there for several months already then?

First, I haven't noticed anyone suggesting that the A340-600 is so bad that airlines can't generate any profit flying it. Second, the B747-400 has a lower CASM than the A340-600, though a higher trip cost, of course.

Quoting Slz396 (Reply 46):
Not to mention they'd have to lock up CEO's of airlines like AY, LH etc which are almost desperately seeking even more inefficient planes like the MD-11 for some of their long haul (cargo) operations!

Not at the prices that MD-11s are going for!

Quoting Slz396 (Reply 46):

Come on guys, any person making propaganda-like remarks like:
the A346 is one of the more colossal failures in aviation,
prove either 1 of these 2 things:

Again, I haven't seen anyone suggest that the A340-600 is "one of the more colossal failures in aviation." Quite the contrary, compared to the A340-500, the A340-600 has been a great success.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexdk, Ammad, Andy33, Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], drew777, FAST Enterprise [Crawler], flyguy89, flyingclrs727, fraspotter, gstpa, JJV, LAX772LR, pdx, ra132914, RJBingham, robsaw, SCQ83, StTim and 254 guests