carmenlu15
Posts: 4517
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 1:24 am

TA 320 Incident On The SAL-LAX Route

Fri May 19, 2006 12:03 am

(Article in Spanish, sorry.)

According to the article, a TA A320 flying SAL-LAX had to go back to SAL due to "problems with the hydraulic system". The a/c, which was already cruising over Mexican airspace when the pilot decided to return, spent two hours flying over Comalapa airport before being cleared to land (burning fuel, I assume?).

Anyone has more info about this incident?
Don't expect to see me around that much (if at all) -- the contact link should still work, though.
 
mt99
Posts: 6166
Joined: Wed May 26, 1999 5:41 am

RE: TA 320 Incident On The SAL-LAX Route

Fri May 19, 2006 12:46 am

Quoting Carmenlu15 (Thread starter):
spent two hours flying over Comalapa airport before being cleared to land (burning fuel, I assume?).

Yea... the other newspaper said that they were burning fuel to reduce the risk of an explosion during landing  banghead 

are there backup hydraulics systems? just asking.
Step into my office, baby
 
carmenlu15
Posts: 4517
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 1:24 am

RE: TA 320 Incident On The SAL-LAX Route

Fri May 19, 2006 4:32 am

Quoting Mt99 (Reply 1):
the other newspaper said that they were burning fuel to reduce the risk of an explosion during landing

Gotta love the media...  Yeah sure
Don't expect to see me around that much (if at all) -- the contact link should still work, though.
 
as739x
Posts: 5001
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 7:23 am

RE: TA 320 Incident On The SAL-LAX Route

Fri May 19, 2006 5:01 am

Yeah Carmen,we know how many planes have exploded on landing when they had a hydraulic issue  Smile In all seriousness it sounds like the Captain made a command decision for the safety of pax and it was the right one.

ASLAX
"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
 
adriaticus
Posts: 989
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 3:29 pm

RE: TA 320 Incident On The SAL-LAX Route

Fri May 19, 2006 11:51 am



What in the world was this a/c doing over MID (almost straight to the North of SAL, heading 358°) when the route to LAX is heading 315°??

About the two hours to dump fuel; it has to do more with reaching again the Maximum Landing Weight... The a/c was simply too heavy to land without causing damage to the undercarriage.

Journalists should contact knowledgeable people and verify their info before printing all this nonsense!!

__Ad.
A300/18/19/20/21 B721/2 B732/3/G/8 B741/2/4 B752 B762/3/4 B772/3 DC8/9/10 MD11 TU134/154 IL62/86 An24 SA340/2000 E45/90
 
carmenlu15
Posts: 4517
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 1:24 am

RE: TA 320 Incident On The SAL-LAX Route

Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm

Quoting AS739X (Reply 3):
Yeah Carmen,we know how many planes have exploded on landing when they had a hydraulic issue

LOL!  laughing 

Quoting Adriaticus (Reply 4):
What in the world was this a/c doing over MID (almost straight to the North of SAL, heading 358°) when the route to LAX is heading 315°??

No tengo ni la menor idea...

Quoting Adriaticus (Reply 4):
About the two hours to dump fuel; it has to do more with reaching again the Maximum Landing Weight... The a/c was simply too heavy to land without causing damage to the undercarriage.

Yes, I supposed it had to do something with the weight... thanks for confirming it.
Don't expect to see me around that much (if at all) -- the contact link should still work, though.
 
mt99
Posts: 6166
Joined: Wed May 26, 1999 5:41 am

RE: TA 320 Incident On The SAL-LAX Route

Sat May 20, 2006 12:24 am

Quoting Adriaticus (Reply 4):
What in the world was this a/c doing over MID (almost straight to the North of SAL, heading 358°) when the route to LAX is heading 315°??

Isnt Merida an ATC? How far does it reach. They may mean that they were in contact with Merida Center - not over the city of Merida.
Step into my office, baby