leelaw
Posts: 4520
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 4:13 pm

BAE’s Long Journey To An Airbus Exit Strategy

Mon Jul 10, 2006 11:58 pm

The UK was involved in the Airbus programme at a national level from day one as a leading proponent in the efforts to set up a pan-European collaborative civil airliner venture. So why did the UK end up as a minority stakeholder in today’s Airbus as the country’s national aerospace company prepares to extinguish the last embers of a nation’s once proud involvement in the civil aircraft business?

http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...ey+to+an+Airbus+exit+strategy.html

Quite informative article, at least for me it was, from Mr. Kingsley-Jones of FI.
Lex Ancilla Justitiae
 
astuteman
Posts: 6341
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:50 pm

RE: BAE’s Long Journey To An Airbus Exit Strategy

Tue Jul 11, 2006 3:35 am

Quoting Leelaw (Thread starter):
Quite informative article, at least for me it was, from Mr. Kingsley-Jones of FI.

Was for me too, LeeLaw. Thanks for starting the thread

Regards
 
leelaw
Posts: 4520
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 4:13 pm

RE: BAE’s Long Journey To An Airbus Exit Strategy

Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:06 am

Quoting Astuteman (Reply 1):
Was for me too

The reporter did a nice job of providing some historical context to the current controversy.

"Flight" also has a good article this week reviewing the status of BAE's disposal plan/strategy regarding Airbus:

http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...n/177/207760/BAE+starts+again.html
Lex Ancilla Justitiae
 
User avatar
VirginFlyer
Posts: 3942
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2000 12:27 pm

RE: BAE’s Long Journey To An Airbus Exit Strategy

Tue Jul 11, 2006 12:26 pm

Thanks for posting this Leelaw. While there will still be an Airbus operation in the UK after the sale of the BAE stake, I think it is quite sad that this effectively spells the end of British involvement in airliner production.

I guess it was inevitable - aircraft manufacturing was always going to be a cottage industry in the UK compared to what was possible in the USA, or in a wider pan-European effort. But years of political interference did nothing to help the situation - promising projects such as the VC-10 and the Trident were crippled by being tied to the specifications of airlines who didn't even really want the aircraft. Projects like the BAe 146/Avro RJ and the Jetstream 61 were left to whither and die.

After the great hope that was offered by the Comet, 60 years later there is nothing. Geoffrey de Havilland and his contemporaries would be spinning in their graves.

I do wonder whether things would have been different had the UK not withdrawn from the A300 project in 1969...

V/F
"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alcaeus, angusjt, Baidu [Spider], deltal1011man, euroflyer, hayzel777, KarelXWB, keesje, sassiciai, scbriml, speedygonzales, strfyr51, tnotten and 236 guests