Tangowhisky
Topic Author
Posts: 665
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:26 am

B757 Engines: LCC Differences PW And RR

Tue Jul 25, 2006 12:08 pm

The PW 2000 and RB21-535 series engines were both offered on the B757. in terms of reliability, maintenance costs, and sfc, does anyone know where each engines stands? and does one have a better resale value over the other for an older 757?
Only the paranoid survive
 
worldtraveler
Posts: 3417
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 6:18 am

RE: B757 Engines: LCC Differences PW And RR

Tue Jul 25, 2006 12:11 pm

What do LCCs have to do with 757 engine types? Perhaps you can clarify your title.
 
Tangowhisky
Topic Author
Posts: 665
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:26 am

RE: B757 Engines: LCC Differences PW And RR

Tue Jul 25, 2006 12:17 pm

Quoting WorldTraveler (Reply 1):

WorldTraveler, I mean Life-Cyle-Cost. Never striked my mind that LCC also stands for low cost carriers (who happen to care dearly about life cycle costs).
Only the paranoid survive
 
tepidhalibut
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:19 pm

RE: B757 Engines: LCC Differences PW And RR

Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:11 pm

Quoting Tangowhisky (Thread starter):
terms of reliability, maintenance costs, and sfc, does anyone know where each engines stands?

I believe that PW2037 has a better "Brand New" SFC, but that advantage is quickly lost through deterioration.
In terms of reliability, mx costs and on-wing life, I believe that the RB211-535E4 is the hands-down winner.

As an aside, I've often wondered why the Tu204 hasn't picked up more western operators. A comparable aircraft to the B757, but at half the price.
 
User avatar
kc135topboom
Posts: 10997
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:26 am

RE: B757 Engines: LCC Differences PW And RR

Tue Jul 25, 2006 5:36 pm

The RR RB-211 series offered on the B-757s do have a much lower maintenance cost and can stay on the wing much longer than the PW engines can. The RRs also have a higher thrust rating.

The PW 2037 and 2040 series offered on the B-757 cost less and have a lower SFC than the RRs. But they also offer less thrust and higher maintenance costs.

Now LCCs that have operated these engines on B-757 models include ATA (RR RB-211s on both the -200 and -300), Song (PW 2040 on the -200), and National (RR RB-211s on the -200). There may be others, but those are the first LCC operators of B-757 models that crossed my mind.

I might add that UPS operates B-757-200PFs with both engines. IIRC the first 20 or so B-757s they bought are equipped with PW-2042s, and the last 20-25 airplanes they bought came with RR RB-211-535E2s.
 
PM
Posts: 4818
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:05 pm

RE: B757 Engines: LCC Differences PW And RR

Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:43 pm

1049 757s of all models were built. 617 (59%) had RR and 432 (41%) had PW. RR therefore outsold PW 3:2.

Of the 56 original customers, 4 ordered both engines, 40 chose RR and 12 chose PW.

Each engine has its advantages but it seems that the market preferred RR.
 
User avatar
kc135topboom
Posts: 10997
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:26 am

RE: B757 Engines: LCC Differences PW And RR

Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:02 pm

Quoting PM (Reply 5):
1049 757s of all models were built. 617 (59%) had RR and 432 (41%) had PW. RR therefore outsold PW 3:2.

Higher thrust and lower maintenance costs are a big seller.
 
Tangowhisky
Topic Author
Posts: 665
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:26 am

RE: B757 Engines: LCC Differences PW And RR

Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:51 pm

Does the PW 2000 series have FADEC? I know that the RB-211-535 does not have a FADEC, but has an EEC and a hydromechanical FCU. It is amazing that even without the FADEC, the RB211-535 Mx costs are lower. Where and what are the high Mx cost items of the PW2000?
Only the paranoid survive
 
KL808
Posts: 1534
Joined: Thu May 20, 1999 3:49 am

RE: B757 Engines: LCC Differences PW And RR

Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:59 pm

Why is it that we don't see a GE powered B752?

If there where plans which engine would it have been? CF6?

Drew
AMS-LAX-MNL
 
Alitalia744
Posts: 3777
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2000 8:22 am

RE: B757 Engines: LCC Differences PW And RR

Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:06 pm

Quoting KL808 (Reply 8):
Why is it that we don't see a GE powered B752?

If there where plans which engine would it have been? CF6?

Drew

GE was originally developing an Engine for the 757, I believe AA and AZ were on board at the time.
Some see lines, others see between the lines.
 
PM
Posts: 4818
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:05 pm

RE: B757 Engines: LCC Differences PW And RR

Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:08 pm

Quoting Alitalia744 (Reply 9):
GE was originally developing an Engine for the 757, I believe AA and AZ were on board at the time.

It was even ordered - I believe by one of the Hawaiian airlines? But I think I read somewhere that it wasn't really optimised for the 757 and neither Boeing nor GE could see much future in it so it was dropped.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 777PHX, AS512, BobbyPSP, cc47, Cubsrule, FlyHossD, Google Adsense [Bot], hkcanadaexpat, keesje, lostsound, Oceanic, Ropsten, Thenoflyzone, usxguy, xms3200, Yahoo [Bot], zkncj and 280 guests