BoomBoom
Topic Author
Posts: 2459
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 2:26 am

Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Sun Aug 06, 2006 12:40 am

Quote:
Boeingis shifting engineers from other Everett-based airplane programs to do work on the 787.

"There's some reallocation of resources going on, to meet our weight and time targets," said spokeswoman Yvonne Leach.

Boeing wouldn't comment on the number of engineers involved. Leach said the total is fluctuating.

Last week, Boeing chief executive Jim McNerney told Wall Street analysts that the company was beefing up its 787 engineering corps to ensure that the plane won't come in late or overweight.

Boeing plans to spend an additional $300 million for research and development for the 787 and other programs. That's on top of $2 billion already budgeted.

The plan is for "more engineers and overtime" and is "not at all unanticipated," McNerney said.

"I'd rather be paranoid now than deeply disappointed later."

For its part, Boeing has "aggressive commitments for certification and for entry into service," McNerney said. "We're attacking the weight issues aggressively and the associated schedule issues."

The increased spending for engineering help is not a sign of trouble, he added. "We still see the plane delivered on time, within the performance commitments we've made to our customers."
http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/06/...1.cfm
Our eyes are open, our eyes are open--wide, wide, wide...
 
gearup
Posts: 514
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2000 9:23 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:57 am

I would imagine this is standard practise at this point in a project. When one thinks of a new airliner, it's natural to consider the aircraft design and test people and all the other folks needed for the new airplane. Sometimes we can forget about the manufacturing engineers, the folks that have to build the thing and design all the tooling and production equipment. I would say that things are ramping up for those folks as the prepare for mass production of the 787.

GU
I have no memory of this place.
 
brons2
Posts: 2462
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2001 1:02 pm

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:02 am

Good on Boeing for dedicating the necessary resources before these issues become bigger problems than they are now.

I'm sure the Airbus fanbois will have a negative spin on this...
Firings, if well done, are good for employee morale.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 13749
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:34 pm

I'm not an airbus fanboy, but it is an engineering truism that adding people to a late project only makes it later, because the old engineers spend a lot of time ramping up and otherwise interacting with the new engineers. It's all explained in "The Mythical Man-Month" by Fred Brooks...
Inspiration, move me brightly!
 
Ruscoe
Posts: 1577
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 1999 5:41 pm

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:22 am

Boeing have been quite clear on this. Thye extra engineers are there to tackle the weight & entry into service date problems.

It wil be nteresting to compare the way Boeing handles this problem compared to the way Airbus handled similar problems.

Ruscoe
 
hb88
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 1:25 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:23 am

Quoting Brons2 (Reply 2):
Good on Boeing for dedicating the necessary resources before these issues become bigger problems than they are now.

I'm sure the Airbus fanbois will have a negative spin on this...

Why should it be necessary to put any negative spin on this news? (or start an A v B flamewar?)

There's not enough information to say whether this is a reaction borne of anticipated delays/problems, or just routine reallocation of resources. My guess is probably the former mainly because it seems quite late in the industrial ramp-up to be moving around and reallocating significant resources. The test/manufacturing gates and the resources required are usually set a long time before now. So, it seems likely the reallocation wasn't anticipated and it's in response to something 'unforseen'.
 
777ER
Crew
Posts: 9853
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2003 5:04 pm

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:33 am

Quoting Hb88 (Reply 5):
Quoting Brons2 (Reply 2):
Good on Boeing for dedicating the necessary resources before these issues become bigger problems than they are now.

I'm sure the Airbus fanbois will have a negative spin on this...


Why should it be necessary to put any negative spin on this news?

Well knowing some members they will easily think of something.

I see this action by Boeing as totally worth it considering how much Boeing is investing in this, and because of all the airlines that are needing this airplane, due to sky high fuel prices which is affecting airlines profits.
 
hb88
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 1:25 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:49 am

Quoting 777ER (Reply 6):
I see this action by Boeing as totally worth it considering how much Boeing is investing in this, and because of all the airlines that are needing this airplane, due to sky high fuel prices which is affecting airlines profits.

 checkmark 

Exactly, although it essentially reduces to the same issues as for Airbus - Boeing can't afford (literally or metaphorically) to be excessively late with the 787 for the reason of penalty payments, delivering under-spec and the inevitable public flogging that accompanies any hint of a delay.

This action isn't just worth it, from a business point of view, it is probably absolutely vital to keep the 787 program moving on schedule.

[now if only my colleagues in Germany and France weren't taking their 2 month summer holidays and were hard at work on the 380 to recover the delays on that aircraft... hmf.]
 
Lumberton
Posts: 4176
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:34 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:46 am

Quoting Hb88 (Reply 7):
[now if only my colleagues in Germany and France weren't taking their 2 month summer holidays and were hard at work on the 380 to recover the delays on that aircraft... hmf.]

Pardon my naivete, but you're kidding of course?
"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
 
Halibut
Posts: 943
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:43 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:17 am

Quoting Revelation (Reply 3):
I'm not an airbus fanboy, but it is an engineering truism that adding people to a late project only makes it later, because the old engineers spend a lot of time ramping up and otherwise interacting with the new engineers. It's all explained in "The Mythical Man-Month" by Fred Brooks...

Revelation,
I am no engineer , trust me .  dopey  However , how would you compare how Boeing is handling there new a/c's [787] -weight/entry into service issue , to how Airbus handled the A380 ?

I do not see Boeing in a form of denial , which seemed to be the case with Airbus [A380]. Do you see any positives with Boeing's actions ?

Quoting BoomBoom (Thread starter):
For its part, Boeing has "aggressive commitments for certification and for entry into service," McNerney said. "We're attacking the weight issues aggressively and the associated schedule issues."

Could Boeing's aggressive actions with regard to the 787 , benefit any other a/c currently being designed ?

Halibut
6 million Jews were slaughtered-Do you see Jews flying planes into buildings in Germany to kill 1000s of innocent, NO !
 
JayinKitsap
Posts: 627
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:55 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:31 am

Quoting Revelation (Reply 3):
engineering truism that adding people to a late project only makes it later, because the old engineers spend a lot of time ramping up and otherwise interacting with the new engineers. It's all explained in "The Mythical Man-Month" by Fred Brooks...

Yes it isn't as efficient, but could Boeing just now be ready to accomdodate the added staff to finish final design of all of the parts. It has been some time since Boeing announced that 25% of the parts hit final release with no 50% release announcement. It is possible that just now they are bringing in the 777 staff responsible for the galley drains and cart stowage to complete the 787 items.

It is a lot easier to ramp up staff by 20% with 6 months to go when it is behind but not late, than to ramp up 40% with 6 weeks to go when it is really late. That is when the added $ are basically wasted or actually worsen the situation.
 
aerobalance
Posts: 4308
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:35 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:14 am

SOP
SOP
SOP
SOP

Typical
"Sing a song, play guitar, make it snappy..."
 
mspguy
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:49 pm

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:29 am

Quoting Halibut (Reply 9):
Could Boeing's aggressive actions with regard to the 787 , benefit any other a/c currently being designed ?

I think we'll see plently of the technology in their upcoming birds!!!

  

[Edited 2006-08-07 02:48:20]
If it ain't broke, DON'T touch it!!!!
 
RichPhitzwell
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:19 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:32 am

Quoting Revelation (Reply 3):
I'm not an airbus fanboy, but it is an engineering truism that adding people to a late project only makes it later, because the old engineers spend a lot of time ramping up and otherwise interacting with the new engineers. It's all explained in "The Mythical Man-Month" by Fred Brooks...

Nonav.com kinda like Whiners except the lights are on and the pimps been paid
 
flydreamliner
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:05 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:36 am

Boeing is being pro-active - good for them. Like a lot of programs, they hit crunch time, finding the means to deliver on all their promises on time. If there is one thing Boeing is very good at - it's product management. My hopes are that the extra staff provides the necessary push to get the project done on time and to spec. When I first read Boeing's time table for 787 development, I was sure they'd either revise it, or they'd never be able to meet it - seing how aggressive it is, but they earn serious kudos if they pull it off.

I'm sure when Airbus realized the A380 was going to be late and overweight, they reallocated resources away from somewhere else to work on it - Airbus' challenge however, is that they had troubles in both the A380 and A350 programs at the same time. At the moment, 787 is the only major project going on at Boeing (748 being far earlier in development, and far less ambitious than A350, A380 or 787).

Best of Luck Boeing.
"Let the world change you, and you can change the world"
 
RichPhitzwell
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:19 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:44 am

Boeing is a pain to work with....but I would rather they be a pain and get it right and on time than to not be and have certain subs on time but waiting for other subs to finally get there part right. The same would be for internal Boeing task that affect all subs.

Love the company though.
Nonav.com kinda like Whiners except the lights are on and the pimps been paid
 
WingedMigrator
Posts: 1767
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:45 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:49 am

Quoting Halibut (Reply 9):
how would you compare how Boeing is handling there new a/c's [787] -weight/entry into service issue , to how Airbus handled the A380 ?

I might be stating the obvious, but it's difficult to compare because the two programs are not anywhere near the same stage of development. We have yet to see if there will be any major weight / EIS issues with the 787, but one thing is for sure there's plenty of time left to screw it up. Not that they necessarily will... it's all about execution, execution, execution. Let's hope for Boeing it won't be the head-rolling kind, like it was for Airbus  Smile
 
art
Posts: 2665
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:46 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:59 am

Quoting Lumberton (Reply 8):
Quoting Hb88 (Reply 7):
[now if only my colleagues in Germany and France weren't taking their 2 month summer holidays and were hard at work on the 380 to recover the delays on that aircraft... hmf.]

Pardon my naivete, but you're kidding of course?

Slight exaggeration, it's more like 1 month holiday, not 2.

Some people go to church every Sunday. The French go on holiday every August. Come what may, one month's holiday starting 1st August is more or less sacrosanct. Factories close. Bars close. Shops close. Villages ship in emergency baguette supplies since the boulangerie is closed etc etc
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 13749
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:30 pm

Quoting Halibut (Reply 9):
I do not see Boeing in a form of denial , which seemed to be the case with Airbus [A380].

In Airbus's case, I doubt everyone was in denial. The magnitude of the issue had to be known at least by mid level engineering management. Also one would think they would have been monitoring it closely, since the same issue lead to the first six month slip also. I could see how the senior executives could be unaware of the issues, all that needs to happen is the mid level folss either don't communicate the issue at all, or understate it. Interestingly enough, it was the senior level guys who paid for the problems with their jobs, yet the mid level guys presumably are still on the job. It's probably like a sports team: when the team is in trouble, you fire the manager, because ultimately they are responsible, and it's too messy to fire individual team members.

Quoting Halibut (Reply 9):
Do you see any positives with Boeing's actions ?

As others have stated, if it's done early enough in the project, there is enough time to ramp up the new engineers, and once they work independently they add value to the project. One thing they also add is cost.

Quoting WingedMigrator (Reply 16):
I might be stating the obvious, but it's difficult to compare because the two programs are not anywhere near the same stage of development. We have yet to see if there will be any major weight / EIS issues with the 787, but one thing is for sure there's plenty of time left to screw it up. Not that they necessarily will... it's all about execution, execution, execution. Let's hope for Boeing it won't be the head-rolling kind, like it was for Airbus Smile

I'm kind of surprised Mr. Champion still draws an Airbus paycheck.
Inspiration, move me brightly!
 
787engineer
Posts: 545
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 5:08 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:47 am

Quoting Revelation (Reply 18):

As others have stated, if it's done early enough in the project, there is enough time to ramp up the new engineers, and once they work independently they add value to the project. One thing they also add is cost.

Agreed. About the cost issue, Boeing believes it is better to take the cost hit ourselves than to pass it on to the customer in the form of underperforming and/or late planes. The program may go overbudget but Boeing's reputation remains intact.
 
roseflyer
Posts: 9606
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:24 am

Quoting Gearup (Reply 1):
Sometimes we can forget about the manufacturing engineers, the folks that have to build the thing and design all the tooling and production equipment. I would say that things are ramping up for those folks as the prepare for mass production of the 787.

Many people don't realize how many problems can occur when designs begin manufacturing. I've worked on such problems. A design team might create a new design for a component that turns out to be difficult to make or manufacture. Also during the testing phase, problems are round with designs and redesigns have to happen. This requires a lot of coordination.

Another thing not to forget is that there are always ways to improve designs. I've seen this personally as an engineer. Sometimes it is worth it to put an engineer to work to lighten a component or to reduce manufacturing cost. Sometimes the effort doesn't make logical sense, but sometimes it does. A lot of work needs to happen as a design for a plane is completed and production is ramped up. Also the fact that there is a worldwide shortage on carbon fibre composites doesn't help anything.

In engineering, work is always done on the "hottest" projects. They take the resources. This is very normal procedure. Companies will skew resources towards programs that have the earliest deadlines. It is a viscious cycle since other programs can fall behind, but it is a fact of life. Having extra engineers sitting around without work isn't cost effective either.
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
 
airfrnt
Posts: 1992
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:05 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:03 am

Quoting Revelation (Reply 3):
I'm not an airbus fanboy, but it is an engineering truism that adding people to a late project only makes it later, because the old engineers spend a lot of time ramping up and otherwise interacting with the new engineers. It's all explained in "The Mythical Man-Month" by Fred Brooks...

Revelation I am familar with the Mythical Man Month, but I would also point out the opposite can be true. For example, One person can not always do a task faster then a whole nunch of people if the tasks are suitable and independently defined.

In this case, Boeing has a history of getting their engineering done right. I am sure that some of these people are coming in as independent auditing teams, some as refinements for problematic areas, and some for planning on the testing.

I highly recommend Joe Sutter's book on the 747 if you want to get a good view into what designing a building a plane looks like.
 
F14ATomcat
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 10:26 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Tue Aug 08, 2006 9:15 am

Quoting Revelation (Reply 18):
In Airbus's case, I doubt everyone was in denial. The magnitude of the issue had to be known at least by mid level engineering management. Also one would think they would have been monitoring it closely, since the same issue lead to the first six month slip also. I could see how the senior executives could be unaware of the issues, all that needs to happen is the mid level folss either don't communicate the issue at all, or understate it. Interestingly enough, it was the senior level guys who paid for the problems with their jobs, yet the mid level guys presumably are still on the job. It's probably like a sports team: when the team is in trouble, you fire the manager, because ultimately they are responsible, and it's too messy to fire individual team members.

You are right everyone probably wasn't in "denial". However mid-level management, who must have known about the problems, weren't willing to inform senior management that their (senior management) edicts for performance and internal cost for design couldn't be met. So senior management probably did know about the problem(s) and told mid-level to fix it within budget. They passed on the edict to their managers and told them get it done. No protest was made because it would have be futile to "argue with the boss".
 
Halibut
Posts: 943
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:43 am

RE: Boeing Switches Workers To 787

Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:04 am

Quoting F14ATomcat (Reply 22):
No protest was made because it would have be futile to "argue with the boss".

Are you insinuating that Noel Forgeard was as ruthless as the Borg ? Did he " Forgeard " just not want to hear about and/or accept the reality of the delays ?

Hhmm  scratchchin 

Resistance is futile ! You will all be asimilated ! hyper 

Halibut
6 million Jews were slaughtered-Do you see Jews flying planes into buildings in Germany to kill 1000s of innocent, NO !

Who is online