YULYMX
Topic Author
Posts: 734
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:53 pm

Air Canada YVR-HNL-SYD A333

Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:51 am

Could the A333 of Air Canada do that Route YVR-HNL no problems but the HNL-SYD ????

[Edited 2006-09-11 21:06:43]
 
YULYMX
Topic Author
Posts: 734
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:53 pm

RE: YVR-HNL-SYD A333

Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:54 am

It is 4403 nm HNL-SYD it probably could be done, but AC never use it on that route always been B767-300 with A343 on occasion and very rare B744 in years past?

Is the A333 configure for only north atlantic route??? less Etops???

Thanks
 
9252fly
Posts: 814
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 7:19 am

RE: Air Canada YVR-HNL-SYD A333

Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:58 am

AC likes to keep it's A330 aircraft on the trans-Atlantic flights. For a very brief period AC had loaded the A330 into it's schedule between YVR-NRT. I don't know if the aircraft ever operated the route,perhaps someone else may know more. I suspect the A330 has the same ETOPS limits as they B763.
 
aircanada014
Posts: 1224
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 2:24 pm

RE: Air Canada YVR-HNL-SYD A333

Tue Sep 12, 2006 7:01 am

A330-300 can do both routes as far as I know. If you look at the fleet info on AC's website it shows A330-300 range of 6562mi.

Here's the link. http://www.aircanada.com/en/about/fleet/a330-300.html
 
CPDC10-30
Posts: 4681
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2000 4:30 pm

RE: Air Canada YVR-HNL-SYD A333

Tue Sep 12, 2006 7:17 am

Quoting AirCanada014 (Reply 3):
A330-300 can do both routes as far as I know. If you look at the fleet info on AC's website it shows A330-300 range of 6562mi.

I think the figures on AC's website are a bit optimistic. I remember hearing of payload restrictions on YVR-LHR and YYC-FRA which are shorter routes and have much less flight time in ETOPS territory. The range of the A330-300 is just barely enough for HNL-SYD, taking into account ETOPS reserves. Most likely there would have to be fairly signifigant payload restrictions. Unless there was overwhelming demand, the 767-300 can comfortably operate the route, as can the A340-300 if more capacity is needed. No sense pushing an aircraft to its limits when you have better suited aircraft already in the fleet.

Don't get me wrong, the A333 fits very well in AC's fleet and is quite highly regarded as having a high dispatch rate, just that it would be fairly poorly suited for such a flight. The A332 would fare quite a bit better.
 
Carpethead
Posts: 2566
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 8:15 pm

RE: Air Canada YVR-HNL-SYD A333

Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:11 am

Quoting 9252fly (Reply 2):

Yes, it has shown up on the NRT-YVR run on occassions but only in the summer schedule.
 
jfk777
Posts: 5866
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

RE: Air Canada YVR-HNL-SYD A333

Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:52 am

AC runs to Sydney seen to be a low prioity, always the left over airplane. Never an A345 YVR-SYD nonstop. I know AC only had 2 but, they runs all these international routes with 767, YVR-ICN or KIX or NGO; is that reaaly the best plane for a transapcific route ?
 
CPDC10-30
Posts: 4681
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2000 4:30 pm

RE: Air Canada YVR-HNL-SYD A333

Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:57 am

Quoting Jfk777 (Reply 6):
I know AC only had 2 but, they runs all these international routes with 767, YVR-ICN or KIX or NGO; is that reaaly the best plane for a transapcific route ?

It is not the best, but its the best AC can do at the moment. The 767 is an unusual choice for those routes but must fit the bill fairly well as they have been run like this for years. Once the 777s and 787s start coming online I don't think we'll have complaints about their product over the Pacific anymore.