starstream707
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 1:01 pm

Update On AA And Others @DAL?

Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:31 am

Anyone have any info or how loads and yields are going? For both AA and WN?

Seems like there was talk about NW and B6 wanting into DAL has anyone else heard anymore about this?

Thanks!
 
UAL747
Posts: 6725
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 1999 5:42 am

RE: Update On AA And Others @DAL?

Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:35 am

You wanting to know how loads are on WN at DAL? Ummm, it's basically their fortress....and I'd say loads are extremely high.

Don't know about AA and others, but WN....come on, no brainer there.

UAL
"Bangkok Tower, United 890 Heavy. Bangkok Tower, United 890 Heavy.....Okay, fine, we'll just turn 190 and Visual Our Way
 
nateDAL
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:38 am

RE: Update On AA And Others @DAL?

Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:04 am

Quoting UAL747 (Reply 1):
You wanting to know how loads are on WN at DAL? Ummm, it's basically their fortress....and I'd say loads are extremely high.

It is actually the opposite, the loads are very low at DAL.

For example, flights to LBB typically go out only half full.
Set Love Free
 
atrude777
Posts: 4258
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 11:23 pm

RE: Update On AA And Others @DAL?

Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:57 am

for MCI/STL specifically, in April of 2006....

MCI-DAL AA carried 5,283
MCI-DAL WN carried 11,544


STL-DAL AA Carried 6,082
STL-DAL WN Carried 11,080

While not recent, shows you how much better WN is doing then AA on the new DAL routes.

Alex
Good things come to those who wait, better things come to those who go AFTER it!
 
TeamAmerica
Posts: 1540
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:38 am

RE: Update On AA And Others @DAL?

Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:35 am

Quoting UAL747 (Reply 1):
You wanting to know how loads are on WN at DAL? Ummm, it's basically their fortress....and I'd say loads are extremely high.

Don't know about AA and others, but WN....come on, no brainer there.

Wrong. DAL is Southwest's home, but it is neither their largest nor best performing hub. The loads are not good, which was a major factor in SW moving against the WA after years of complacency.

Gotta watch out for those no brainers.  Smile
Failure is not an option; it's an outcome.
 
bnamaxx
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 11:34 pm

RE: Update On AA And Others @DAL?

Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:39 am

Assuming Congress allows the changes and eventual dropping of the Wright Amendment, there will be what, only 2 or 3 unclaimed gates at DAL? I doubt we'll see many new carriers there. AA and WN both got what they wanted, effectively shutting out any competition forever.
 
ssides
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 12:57 am

RE: Update On AA And Others @DAL?

Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:45 am

Quoting UAL747 (Reply 1):
You wanting to know how loads are on WN at DAL? Ummm, it's basically their fortress....and I'd say loads are extremely high.

Don't know about AA and others, but WN....come on, no brainer there.

The other posters are correct -- loads at DAL are relatively low for WN, which also has one of the lowest load factors in the industry.

Quoting Atrude777 (Reply 3):
While not recent, shows you how much better WN is doing then AA on the new DAL routes.

Actually, those numbers are better than I expected. AA has less capacity than WN on its routes to Missouri, and virtually no connecting opportunities. I thought their numbers would be a tenth of WN's, not half.
"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
 
txagkuwait
Posts: 1388
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 1999 7:39 am

RE: Update On AA And Others @DAL?

Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:35 am

Quote:
Wrong. DAL is Southwest's home, but it is neither their largest nor best performing hub. The loads are not good

Before we start suggesting they abandon DAL, you might want to look at the yields in and out of there.

It is almost all business traffic and a huge number of seats are sold at fulll fare.

First Qtr 06 Houston was back up to 4467 psgrs per day at an average fare of $101 with WN carrying 66% market share. That's about a 42 or 43 cent yield.

WN has 83% of the LBB market (>800 psgrs per day), average fare $90 for a 289 mi hop....what's that....a 32 cent yield or thereabouts?

You don't have to have every flight filled to the rafters with yields like that.

Quote:
Actually, those numbers are better than I expected. AA has less capacity than WN on its routes to Missouri, and virtually no connecting opportunities.

I'm sure someone will correct me if O am mistaken, but I think that's O&D traffic not on board psgrs. And AA's capacity is not that far behind WN's before the recent increase in # of flights - the MD80s are a little bigger than 735s.

Who is online