eaglewarrior
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 9:54 pm

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:55 am

Will ATL ever be able to handle the A380?
 
gr8slvrflt
Posts: 1449
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2002 10:53 pm

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:57 am

Unless Delta or AirTran order it, very unlikely.
I work for Southwest, but the views expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent those of Southwest.
 
DILF
Posts: 97
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:44 am

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:29 am

My god - iimagine how hideous that thing would look in AirTran colors! Blechhh!!
NO MORE Trip Reports about SQ First Class! Or TG, CX or MH! E-N-O-U-G-H !!
 
Alitalia744
Posts: 3777
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2000 8:22 am

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:50 am

Quoting Eaglewarrior (Thread starter):
Will ATL ever be able to handle the A380?

The airport is not currently, nor will it be A380 ready.
Some see lines, others see between the lines.
 
srbmod
Posts: 15446
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 1:32 pm

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:12 pm

The only A380 I could ever see @ ATL is the A380-800F, and the chances of FX or 5X ever bringing them in to ATL are slim and none. None of the other current airlines that have cargo flights into ATL have ordered the A388F, so I doubt we'll ever see a pax one here, as AF, LH, and KE really don't have the loads to justify flying the A380 on the route, which is why the airport doesn't intend to make any A380 related improvements.
 
Cubsrule
Posts: 11508
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:13 pm

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:25 pm

Bag claim from a 380 at Terminal E? The thought of it increases my blood pressure...
I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 
mpdpilot
Posts: 695
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 6:44 am

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:35 pm

Quoting Srbmod (Reply 4):
which is why the airport doesn't intend to make any A380 related improvements.

if you go on to the airport website they have or had a plan to extend rwy 9L/27R to 13,000' or longer to accomodate the A380. they also mentioned that the length would be useful for other aircraft on long routes, but it did at least have blurb about it. I think it was meant more as a divert airport or something of that sort.
One mile of highway gets you one mile, one mile of runway gets you anywhere.
 
goldorak
Posts: 1363
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 5:29 am

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 6:02 pm

Quoting Srbmod (Reply 4):
as AF, LH, and KE really don't have the loads to justify flying the A380 on the route

Don't know about LH or KE loads, but AF has clearly loads on CDG-ATL which can justify A380. There are 4 daily flights between the 2 cities (DL & AF) and they are "always" full. So it makes sense to have an A380 on this route, at least during the summer season.

The only pb is that the director of ATL has said last year that there's no plan and there will be no plan for ATL to be A380-ready. How can you manage the 1st world airport and say such stupid things like your facility will never welcome the biggest bird. I hope a more competent person will soon change this stupid statement.
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 6:31 pm

Quoting Goldorak (Reply 7):
How can you manage the 1st world airport and say such stupid things like your facility will never welcome the biggest bird. I hope a more competent person will soon change this stupid statement.

There is nothing stupid about it at all. There is no rational basis to believe that there will ever be enough WhaleJets flying to recoup through landing fees the costs of upgrading the infrastructure. This is all about costs and benefits. Pride does not count as a benefit.
 
DAL767400ER
Posts: 5084
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 2:47 am

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 8:33 pm

Quoting Goldorak (Reply 7):
Don't know about LH or KE loads, but AF has clearly loads on CDG-ATL which can justify A380.

Is that why AF only operates one of the 4 flights on the route  Wink ?

Quoting Goldorak (Reply 7):
How can you manage the 1st world airport and say such stupid things like your facility will never welcome the biggest bird. I hope a more competent person will soon change this stupid statement.

Um, because you are responsible for managing your airport's resources and consider what multi-million dollar investments are worthwhile for the future. As has been stated in previous replies, the chances that the A380 are slim and none, and slim just took the last flight out. But to make it even clearer so it is fully understandable, let's look at the carriers with A380s on order that serve ATL:
Air France - No point here. Thanks to their close cooperation, AF and DL can coordinate their schedules, which meant DL went to 1 JFK-CDG flight, while AF went to 1 ATL-CDG flight. And even with 4 flights per day, this route is all about inter-hub frequencies, to allow as much connection opportunities on both sides. And for 1 single flight per day, AF sure as hell is not gonna waste an A380.
Korean - Only has ordered a rather small number of A380s anyway to begin with which will all be required for LAX, NRT and JFK anyhow. Even if they had more, DL will soon be entering the ICN-ATL market, which eliminates any need for an A380 for the foreseeable future, and if even if demand grows, this route would see a 3rd or even 4th flight before the A380 would even be considered.
Lufthansa - One single A340 to FRA. Been that way more or less for the past years, and doesn't appear to change. Even if LH were to grow at ATL, they would add a flight to MUC or a second flight to FRA before they would even consider sending the A380 there.
UPS/FedEx: ATL-SDF/MEM with A380Fs? Hell no, they wouldn't be wasting their precious large longhaul planes for such a short stint.
So once again, clear and simple:
A380 at ATL won't happen within the next decade, if even at all ever.
 
goldorak
Posts: 1363
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 5:29 am

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 10:53 pm

Quoting DAL767400ER (Reply 9):
Is that why AF only operates one of the 4 flights on the route

AF used to operate 2 of the 4 flights, and, as you said, it decreased to 1 in "exchange" of one of the DL flights JFK-CDG. This may change again in the next years. Nobody knows.

Quoting DAL767400ER (Reply 9):
And even with 4 flights per day, this route is all about inter-hub frequencies, to allow as much connection opportunities on both sides. And for 1 single flight per day, AF sure as hell is not gonna waste an A380.

Just because it's a very important route between 2 of the biggest Skyteam hubs, with a very strong traffic, in my opinion, it could whithout doubts sustain an A380 on one of the daily flights, at least in summer
 
phollingsworth
Posts: 635
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:05 am

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:19 pm

Quoting Goldorak (Reply 10):
Just because it's a very important route between 2 of the biggest Skyteam hubs, with a very strong traffic, in my opinion, it could whithout doubts sustain an A380 on one of the daily flights, at least in summer

It could? No-one has posted any evidence that indicates the increase in capacity achieved by changing the one daily AF 772 flight to a 380 would profitable. You would most likely see a shift in that flight to a 773 if the numbers made sense. Also, neither ATL or CDG is particularly movements constrained another flight could always be added (though I think the time geometries make this undersirable).

Hell, I am not even sure why AF intends to use the 380 out of CDG which is pax constrained. The only rational is constraints on the frequencies or slots at the airports on the other end.
 
jfk777
Posts: 5861
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:43 pm

Air France would be the most likely to operate a passenger A380 at ATL. Because of the alliance with Delta, they operate 4 daily trips together to CDG, in a few years I could see demand for a A380. JFK will most likey be the first US AF A380 city, AF has during the summer peak 5 or 6 daily trip to CDG.
 
georgiaame
Posts: 951
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 7:55 am

A380 At ATL?

Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:56 pm

The thought might raise Cubsrule's blood pressure, I think it would drop mine to zero in a flash. Concourse E at 5PM is a horror. The thought of the regular crowd plus 500+ is not my idea of a good time. (The trick is to arrive around 1-2PM and it's a delight.)

You have to realize that only Korean flies a 747 in and out of Hartsfield. JAL used to, I think Lufthansa did for a while, but we just don't see aircraft of that capacity here. I don't really understand why. That being said, AF would be an interesting candidate. I really miss the 4PM 340 out to CDG, but the 9:30 flight continues to be a 777, and it always seems full. That single 380 flight would significantly add capacity that I am sure would be utilized, at Delta's expense, and still turn a profit. But of course, the arrival would be a horror, and I have no idea if Concourse E or the pending Concourse F would handle the aircraft.
"Trust, but verify!" An old Russian proverb, quoted often by a modern American hero
 
RiddlePilot215
Posts: 280
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:19 pm

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:41 am

Quoting Eaglewarrior (Thread starter):
Will ATL ever be able to handle the A380?

Why?

Getting THAT airport of all places ready for anything is nothing short of a complete nightmare....just due to all the logistics involved with setting up construction, and the progressive closure/opening of multiple runways....It would be an airport director's NIGHTMARE. Plus, there is no need for that jet at ATL just yet. IMO there isn't the traffic (I know that sounds a bit retarded, but I have my reasons), the kind of O&D traffic required per day to slam some 600 people in an a/c and call it a day.
God is good, all the time. All the time, God is good.
 
goldorak
Posts: 1363
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 5:29 am

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 1:35 am

Quoting Phollingsworth (Reply 11):
Hell, I am not even sure why AF intends to use the 380 out of CDG which is pax constrained

CDG is not pax constrained. You're probably referring to a statement from a former very bad transport minister we had in France some years ago who said that he'll limit CDG to 55 millions pax/year to calm down some neighbors who were protesting against aircraft noise. Hopefully, this has been forgotten as soon as this guy left the government and everybody came back to reason.
 
DAL767400ER
Posts: 5084
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 2:47 am

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 1:36 am

Quoting Jfk777 (Reply 12):
Because of the alliance with Delta, they operate 4 daily trips together to CDG, in a few years I could see demand for a A380.

Demand, yes, but still no reason to justify spending millions of dollars on runway extensions, taxiway widenings and gate modifications. It is simply not economical for ATL, or any airport for that matter, to spend of millions of dollars for 1 single A380 flight that might happen 5 years from now, period.
 
phollingsworth
Posts: 635
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:05 am

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 1:55 am

Quoting Goldorak (Reply 15):
CDG is not pax constrained. You're probably referring to a statement from a former very bad transport minister we had in France some years ago who said that he'll limit CDG to 55 millions pax/year to calm down some neighbors who were protesting against aircraft noise. Hopefully, this has been forgotten as soon as this guy left the government and everybody came back to reason.

You are right, though it is still listed in some places as a limit, we shall see what happens when CDG starts reporting consistently above 55 million pax.

Quoting GeorgiaAME (Reply 13):
I really miss the 4PM 340 out to CDG, but the 9:30 flight continues to be a 777, and it always seems full. That single 380 flight would significantly add capacity that I am sure would be utilized, at Delta's expense, and still turn a profit.

The problem is that the capacity would more than double on the one flight. It would be much more economical, and revenue neutral, to spread out the capacity increase over the course of the 4 flights, e.g. move the 763s to 764s (find a way to keep one of the 772s), and move the AF 772 to a 773. JFK already has larger aircraft, so upsizing to the A380 makes more sense. I still think that AF-KL should have an airicraft positioned between the 773 and the 388 to maximize flexibility, but I am not in the postion to see their numbers to really know if it makes sense.

Quoting DAL767400ER (Reply 16):
Demand, yes, but still no reason to justify spending millions of dollars on runway extensions, taxiway widenings and gate modifications. It is simply not economical for ATL, or any airport for that matter, to spend of millions of dollars for 1 single A380 flight that might happen 5 years from now, period.

The runway extensions will probably happen even without the A380 as other aircraft missions will justify them (think 772LR in the summer). The geometries on a couple of the E gates can fit a 380 at the expense of a/c size on the adjoining gates. The big issue is the Custioms and Immigration and taxiways.
 
gkirk
Posts: 23347
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2000 3:29 am

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:01 am

Quoting MPDPilot (Reply 6):
if you go on to the airport website they have or had a plan to extend rwy 9L/27R to 13,000' or longer to accomodate the A380

Why? I thought the A380 could operate from airports that can ahndle the B747?
Obviously not? Can Airbus get things right?
When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
 
User avatar
United787
Posts: 2205
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:20 pm

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:03 am

Quoting GeorgiaAME (Reply 13):
You have to realize that only Korean flies a 747 in and out of Hartsfield. JAL used to, I think Lufthansa did for a while, but we just don't see aircraft of that capacity here.

I just looked at Google Maps and there is a South African 747 there but I know that they are switching their service from ATL to IAD since they joined Star Alliance.
 
goldorak
Posts: 1363
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 5:29 am

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:14 am

Quoting Phollingsworth (Reply 17):
You are right, though it is still listed in some places as a limit, we shall see what happens when CDG starts reporting consistently above 55 million pax.

belive me, this limit has been officially "erased" ! And this number will be probably reached this year as in 2005, ADP had 54 millions pax in CDG (+25 millions in ORY). And with the construction (or reconstruction !) of terminal 2E and S3, it's clearly to go above 55 millions !
 
YULWinterSkies
Posts: 1266
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 11:42 pm

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:24 am

Quoting DAL767400ER (Reply 9):
Air France - No point here. Thanks to their close cooperation, AF and DL can coordinate their schedules, which meant DL went to 1 JFK-CDG flight, while AF went to 1 ATL-CDG flight. And even with 4 flights per day, this route is all about inter-hub frequencies, to allow as much connection opportunities on both sides. And for 1 single flight per day, AF sure as hell is not gonna waste an A380.

It is not because the rules are frequency that the A380 will never been introduced at ATL : some hours are more popular than others, and if demand justifies it, one flight could easily be an A380 while all the others will be a 767. For example YUL gets (with AF) both the 744 and 332 depending on the times of the day, which has a capacity difference of about 2 vs 1.


I guess ATL would be A380 compatible when (or if):
1. someone has the serious intention of flying it there, or :
2. they will build an international concourse from nothing (if this happens, it will sure be A380 ready)

However I think they are right to not spend the money now as 1. it does not seem there is an immediate need for it and 2. the Whale is still a while away from its EIS, particularly within AF who is not among the early customers.

Quoting Goldorak (Reply 15):
CDG is not pax constrained. You're probably referring to a statement from a former very bad transport minister we had in France some years ago who said that he'll limit CDG to 55 millions pax/year to calm down some neighbors who were protesting against aircraft noise. Hopefully, this has been forgotten as soon as this guy left the government and everybody came back to reason.

And fortunately, so has been Paris third airport...
When I doubt... go running!
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:31 am

Quoting Gkirk (Reply 18):
Why? I thought the A380 could operate from airports that can ahndle the B747?
Obviously not? Can Airbus get things right?

The WhaleJet can land and takeoff from any airport that can accommodate the JumboJet. The problem is that it may not be able to taxi or to fit at a gate.
 
goldorak
Posts: 1363
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 5:29 am

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:35 am

Quoting YULWinterSkies (Reply 21):
And fortunately, so has been Paris third airport...

Absolutely ! and I hope it's forgotten for long !!
 
srbmod
Posts: 15446
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 1:32 pm

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:12 am

Quoting MPDPilot (Reply 6):
if you go on to the airport website they have or had a plan to extend rwy 9R/27L to 13,000' or longer to accomodate the A380. they also mentioned that the length would be useful for other aircraft on long routes, but it did at least have blurb about it. I think it was meant more as a divert airport or something of that sort.

Actually, the lengthening has nothing to do with the A380. LH and AF do fly the A340 into ATL, and in the summertime, they use up most of 9L/27R to take off. The extra length gives a measure of safety so that in case of an aborted takeoff, there would hopefully be enough. In fact, the ATL Master Plan site from which you got your information is way out of date, as the part you mention says nothing about the A380. In fact, when the Master Plan Recommended Plan was published, the A380 was still being called the A3XX and was several years away from even getting the green light.

Quote:
The plan features other airfield improvements. One major improvement is the extension of Runway 9L-27R. Presently 11,889 feet in length, Runway 9L-27R will be extended 500 feet to the east and 911 feet to the west to bring the total runway length to 13,300 feet. On very hot days, some international aircraft cannot depart fully loaded due to inadequate runway length. An extension will ensure that the airport has the necessary runway length to serve very distant destinations on all days.


[Edited 2006-10-08 21:13:56]
 
bhmbaglock
Posts: 2489
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 7:51 am

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:55 am

Quoting Goldorak (Reply 7):
The only pb is that the director of ATL has said last year that there's no plan and there will be no plan for ATL to be A380-ready. How can you manage the 1st world airport and say such stupid things like your facility will never welcome the biggest bird. I hope a more competent person will soon change this stupid statement.

The airport gets one 747 and maybe 3-4 A340s per day typically. That doesn't strike me as a good case for really needing the A380. And no, I don't believe that "IF you build it they will come." A person who recommended spending millions for a meaningless and useless upgrade to facilitate an a/c that is clearly not coming to ATL anyway would be the very definition of incompetent. A380 flights mean nothing as far as being number one.

Quoting GeorgiaAME (Reply 13):
You have to realize that only Korean flies a 747 in and out of Hartsfield. JAL used to, I think Lufthansa did for a while, but we just don't see aircraft of that capacity here

Correct. If it comes to a point where 4-5 747s per day are coming in with good loads then it would be time to consider preparing for A380. Until then, just a waste of $. Not that they aren't good at that in ATL at times.
Where are all of my respected members going?
 
MD-90
Posts: 7835
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2000 12:45 pm

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:39 am

Quoting GeorgiaAME (Reply 13):
You have to realize that only Korean flies a 747 in and out of Hartsfield.



Quoting United787 (Reply 19):
I just looked at Google Maps and there is a South African 747 there

Last time I had a connection in ATL and was walking around passing some time, I noticed that the only 747 I could see was a SAA 744.
 
srbmod
Posts: 15446
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 1:32 pm

A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:04 am

Quoting United787 (Reply 19):
I just looked at Google Maps and there is a South African 747 there but I know that they are switching their service from ATL to IAD since they joined Star Alliance.

Even before SA dropped ATL, they had been sending the A340-600 for a few years.

BTW, the Google Maps photo for ATL is about 5 years out of date.
 
dairy
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 8:07 pm

RE: A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:34 am

Lufthansa uses 744 when very big (medical) congresses take part in ATL and loads are high. Unfortunatly Luftis 744 is no regular visitor to ATL Sad

In 2006 this happend twice:
- in March for The ACC and
- in June for the ASCO.
A318/A319/A320/A321 AB3/A306/A310/A333/A343/A346 732/733/735/736/744/752/763/764/772/773 DH3 F70 F100 CR2 CR1 CR7 ATR42
 
af773atmsp
Posts: 2039
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:37 am

RE: A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:34 am

It seems like the A380's first US destination would be ATL, but there have been many posts that the A380 will never come to ATL. Only a A380 diversion to ATL would be possible.
It ain't no normal MD80 its a Super 80!
 
LAXdude1023
Posts: 4460
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:16 pm

RE: A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:49 am

Quoting BHMBAGLOCK (Reply 25):
The airport gets one 747 and maybe 3-4 A340s per day typically. That doesn't strike me as a good case for really needing the A380. And no, I don't believe that "IF you build it they will come." A person who recommended spending millions for a meaningless and useless upgrade to facilitate an a/c that is clearly not coming to ATL anyway would be the very definition of incompetent. A380 flights mean nothing as far as being number one.

Very well said. The A380 can only be justified in markets that see multiple 747's daily (JFK, LAX, SFO, MIA). As its been pointed out ATL sees one. I would think that KE (if they get the A380) would use it if they had more than one flight to ATL a day.

That being said, I think that AF should increase their CDG-ATL to twice daily on a 777 and/or A340, but the A380 is a no go. It makes more sense to have 4 flights a day to CDG from ATL on 767's and 777's then to have one on an A380.

Quoting Af773atmsp (Reply 29):
It seems like the A380's first US destination would be ATL

No, ATL wont see it for a long time. I would be more opptimistic if KE or AF had more frequencies to ATL, but one or even two isnt enough to justify it. Now I agree with Jfk777 that JFK will be the first to see a 380 from Air France.
Just like LAX would be the first to see one from NRT or SYD.
It is what it is...
 
deltairlines
Posts: 6877
Joined: Mon May 24, 1999 4:47 am

RE: A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:33 am

Quoting Af773atmsp (Reply 29):
It seems like the A380's first US destination would be ATL, but there have been many posts that the A380 will never come to ATL. Only a A380 diversion to ATL would be possible.

No way it would even make the top 5, let alone number 1. JFK, LAX, SFO and MIA are all going to see the A380, as SQ, AF, LH, etc. will send it those ways due to high demand and a lot of O&D traffic. As has been said, there are 4 primary international flag carriers at ATL (AF, BA, KL, LH), of which 2 have the A380 on order - LH could go to a 346 or 744 first; AF would probably add another flight, or better yet, have DL add another CDG-ATL (and keep in mind, with DL's Euro expansion, it is much easier to bypass the stop in CDG for connections).
 
phollingsworth
Posts: 635
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:05 am

RE: A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:24 pm

Quoting YULWinterSkies (Reply 21):
I guess ATL would be A380 compatible when (or if):
1. someone has the serious intention of flying it there, or :
2. they will build an international concourse from nothing (if this happens, it will sure be A380 ready)

ATL is building an international concourse, and new terminal, as we speak. There is currently no reason to fit out the new facility for the A380, though it could easily be retrofitted if the demand arises.

Quoting Goldorak (Reply 20):
belive me, this limit has been officially "erased" ! And this number will be probably reached this year as in 2005, ADP had 54 millions pax in CDG (+25 millions in ORY). And with the construction (or reconstruction !) of terminal 2E and S3, it's clearly to go above 55 millions !

Good, though CDG is still not realy operations constrained, at least phyically. The current ATL-CDG flights depart over a 5 hour period, it would easily be possible to add another flight.

Quoting Gkirk (Reply 18):
Why? I thought the A380 could operate from airports that can ahndle the B747?
Obviously not? Can Airbus get things right?

The two big issues have to do with gate geometry and taxiway fillets (at intersections). The taxiways are a track length and track width issue. I don't know about the taxiway issue at ATL but there are a few gates where the geometry works, with limitations on the size of adjoining aircraft.

ATL also has several taxiways that cannot handle larger aircraft, but this applies to MD-11 and larger so ground control already knows how to take this into account.
 
zvezda
Posts: 8891
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:48 pm

RE: A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:20 pm

Quoting Phollingsworth (Reply 32):
The taxiways are a track length and track width issue.

Don't forget spacing between taxiways, which is dictated by wingspan.
 
phollingsworth
Posts: 635
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:05 am

RE: A380 At ATL?

Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:29 pm

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 33):
Don't forget spacing between taxiways, which is dictated by wingspan.

This is already an issue at ATL and could be delt with for a few A380 ops a day. One this is for sure, ATL will not be moving taxiways appreciably anytime in the near future

Who is online