1011
Topic Author
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2001 11:30 am

Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:18 am

SAN was closed last night for a good period of time because of FOG. I don't know how many planes made it in. The Chargers coming back from playing Denver on Sunday Night had to divert to ONT and bus down getting to San Diego at 4am. The Chargers were on DL 9820 and on 757. I had a family member going from DIA to SAN on Frontier 563 last night and had to divert LAX. I don't know how many flights had to divert but I am sure that flight crews and planes are at the wrong airports today so a lot of the SAN outbounds would be delayed.

This time of year sometimes sucks to fly into SAN. The weather last night was weird. The fog bank seemed to just hang over the airport, I live near the water about 10 miles north of SAN and it was clear most of the night.
 
IAHFLYR
Posts: 3943
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:56 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:27 am

So you're saying the airport was closed or that the weather was below landing minimums? Airport authority closes an airport but not being able to fly the approach due to weather doesn't close that airport.
Being picky, maybe, but different phrases sure have different meanings.
Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
 
LAXintl
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:37 am

SAN was below landing mins since about 8pm last night.

With the warm 80+ degree temps we are enjoying, cool marine fog has been getting pulled in at most coastal airports. LAX was down to single 1 runway Cat-3 ops on Saturday for a couple hours, while both LGB and SNA also have experienced fog during the last week.

According to the latest forecast SAN could experience similar repeat from about 9pm tonight.

[Edited 2006-11-20 19:42:39]
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
OPNLguy
Posts: 11191
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 1999 11:29 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:42 am

Last night was indeed a weird one, as one would normally expect to see CRQ and NKX also have fog (just as NZY did), but the temp/dewpoint spreads were good there, and all the way north to LAX. Looking at the forecasts for tonight (11/20), I don't think that'll be the case again--it's forecast to be foggy all over.

One of my SJC-SAN flights got into SAN just before they dropped, and I had three others that I held on the ground at SJC. We waited to see if there was some improvement, but after a couple of hours, the flights were cancelled.

There was a recent thread here on Anet concerning an election there in SAN related to using NKX for commerical flights, and last night's fog (hardly an uncommon event during this time of year) makes using NKX a good idea, assuming folks in the area want reliable airline service.

Most people think that an airport is an airport, and that there are no diiferences between them, but that's not the case. The landing minimums required to get into SAN when it's foggy are so much higher than someplace like LAX. At LAX, the normal CAT-I ILS minimums are 200-1/2 (200 foot ceiling and 1/2 mile visibility) and a RVR (runway visual range, a measurement of visibilility epressed in feet) of 1800. LAX also has CAT-IIIa ILS, and you need RVR 700 to shoot that. At SAN, the ILS to runway 9 has minimums of 355-1 (355 foot ceiling and 1 mile visibility) and a RVR of 5000.

As you can see, one could have exactly the same weather at LAX and SAN, and at LAX, you'd be landing (especially if your airline was CAT-IIIa equipped) and at SAN you'd be below minimums and diverting to someplace like ONT or LAX and bussing to SAN. The terrain and obstacles around the SAN airport preclude installation and use of a CAT-IIIa approach, or even a CAT-I that has standard minimums, but that's not the case at NKX. If NKX was used for commerical flights and had a CAT-IIIa approach installed, the local area would see more reliable operations.

[Edited 2006-11-20 19:44:24]
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
OPNLguy
Posts: 11191
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 1999 11:29 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:57 am

Quoting Iahflyr (Reply 1):
So you're saying the airport was closed or that the weather was below landing minimums? Airport authority closes an airport but not being able to fly the approach due to weather doesn't close that airport.
Being picky, maybe, but different phrases sure have different meanings.

Not being picky at all in my book, and absolutely correct. It's only "closed" in the general context that you want to land there but can't because it's below landing minimums.

I once had a crew roll-up on their destination and tell me that the airport was "closed" due to fog and they wanted to divert. Turns out that one side of the airport had a fogbank over it, and while the approach on that side was indeed below minimums, using the back course approach to the reciprocal runway (winds calm) was a viable option, which we used and landed. I don't know if the crew chose to use the word "closed" or was told that by ATC, but it certainly didn't reflect the overall operational situation.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
isitsafenow
Posts: 3413
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2004 9:22 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:17 am

Quoting Iahflyr (Reply 1):
Iahflyr

Yeah I think you're right, but I take his post to say in a round-about-way, that SAN was below minimums therefore is was shut to arrivals
Is that too much for me to read into his post?
safe  boggled 
If two people agree on EVERYTHING, then one isn't necessary.
 
MDW22L31C
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:03 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:21 am

Listening to channel 9 last night on UAL 543 into SNA the air traffic control was diverting AA flights to LAX and Southwest flights to LAS. The ATC said their no aircraft where holding to land at SAN and the airport had been closed for 2 hours.
 
Silver1SWA
Crew
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 6:17 am

Quoting 1011 (Thread starter):
This time of year sometimes sucks to fly into SAN. The weather last night was weird. The fog bank seemed to just hang over the airport, I live near the water about 10 miles north of SAN and it was clear most of the night.

Yeah last night was definitely interesting at SAN. When I got off at 11:30 last night, it was so bad that I couldn't see the end of our J-lines at the gates. Got in my car, went up the hill on Laurel St. to get onto I-5 and it was clear. I didn't encounter any fog on my drive home. It really did just sit on top of the airport.

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 2):
SAN was below landing mins since about 8pm last night.

The last arrival was around 6:30pm.

Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 3):
One of my SJC-SAN flights got into SAN just before they dropped, and I had three others that I held on the ground at SJC. We waited to see if there was some improvement, but after a couple of hours, the flights were cancelled.

I spent a lot of time in Operations last night listening to all the action in the Coordinator's room. Was your voice one that I heard communicating with the holding flights? haha

[Edited 2006-11-20 22:25:24]
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
OPNLguy
Posts: 11191
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 1999 11:29 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 6:36 am

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 7):

I spent a lot of time in Operations last night listening to all the action in the Coordinator's room. Was your voice one that I heard communicating with the holding flights?

Naw, wasn't me.. I gave 2677 a couple of updates via ACARS on the way down from SJC, and he got in just before the ceiling and viz cratered. Everyone else I held at SJC. I think 291 from ABQ was the last of ours to make it in.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
Silver1SWA
Crew
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:16 am

Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 8):
I think 291 from ABQ was the last of ours to make it in.

I believe 291 diverted to SJC. The flight goes ABQ-SAN-SJC, but the aircraft bypassed SAN as the SAN-SJC portion was cancelled.

Lets hope we don't see a repeat tonight...
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
OPNLguy
Posts: 11191
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 1999 11:29 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:48 am

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 9):
I believe 291 diverted to SJC. The flight goes ABQ-SAN-SJC, but the aircraft bypassed SAN as the SAN-SJC portion was cancelled.

Guess mine was the last one in then... BUR was kicking my butt with weight issues, so as soon as 2677 landed I held the others at SJC and focused on BUR...

Looks like another night of fun...

KNRS 202155Z 23010KT 7SM FEW002 17/14 A2998 RMK VIS S-SW 1

KNZY 202155Z 19010KT 7SM SKC 22/16 A2996

KSAN 202151Z 18011KT 10SM CLR 20/14 A2998

AMD KSAN 202221Z 202218 19009KT P6SM FEW003 TEMPO 0002 2SM HZ BKN002
FM0200 17005KT 1SM BR BKN002
FM0400 VRB04KT 1/2SM FG VV001

The amended TAF puts it in there about 6pm local, and it's that deck at 200 feet, and later, 100 feet that's gonna get you (in addition to the visibility) because the ILS to 09 has such a high decision altitude (355 feet versus the normal 200 feet).
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
skyharborshome
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 11:19 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:55 am

On average, how many nigts a year does this affect landing at SAN. I fully expect this at SFO but not at SAN. I fly in there about 3 times a month so I guess I am just lucky to have missed one of these fog-out nights.
Fly CHD!
 
HikesWithEyes
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 10:54 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:34 am

Quoting SkyHarborsHome (Reply 11):
On average, how many nigts a year does this affect landing at SAN. I fully expect this at SFO but not at SAN. I fly in there about 3 times a month so I guess I am just lucky to have missed one of these fog-out nights.

Ballpark guess: 15 nights a year.
First, benzene in my Perrier, and now this!
 
Goldenshield
Posts: 5008
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 3:45 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:42 am

Good thing I didn't work last night. I would've been doing a lot of cancellations.
Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
 
davestanKSAN
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:32 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:06 am

Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 3):
Last night was indeed a weird one, as one would normally expect to see CRQ and NKX also have fog (just as NZY did), but the temp/dewpoint spreads were good there, and all the way north to LAX.

Indeed. Well visually around NKX I didn't think it was so foggy. I'm don't know about WN, but I know if the wx conditions were border line, AS would fly a holding pattern around Catalina Island and attempt to land here at SAN when the wx cleared a bit. Most of the time however, they couldn't get in and went to LAX.

Fog can be quite nasty this time of year. It sucks too. Usually flights (well AS is who I worked with) would divert to LAX and the pax were bussed down, or other accomidations were made. Made for a late night. Although we didn't have to clean the RON's that couldn't come in, we had to wait for the busses to arrive at the airport, and take the luggage off of them. And then morning ops would be messed up, and a/c would have to be ferried (or with pax from the flight that couldn't get in the previous night) in.

See http://www.airnav.com/airport/KSAN for more info. The number is listed to hear the ATIS if you're so inclined.

Dave
Yesterday we've sinned, today we move towards God. Touch the sky....love and respect...Safe Star!
 
gocaps16
Posts: 4138
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2000 9:14 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:11 am

I was suppose to be flying from SAN-ATL last night's redeye flight but I didn't make it out to SAN. Luckily I stayed in VA, otherwise, I would've been in big trouble if my redeye flight was cancelled.
 
walter747
Posts: 1379
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 9:49 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:18 am

My dad was on DL Flight 444 from ATL. he didn get into his hotel till 1AM when they were due to arrive a 7p.m.
Hussel, Hussel, Husel, Grind, Grind, Grind
 
OPNLguy
Posts: 11191
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 1999 11:29 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:28 am

Quoting DavestanKSAN (Reply 14):
The number is listed to hear the ATIS if you're so inclined.

The ASOS might be a little better source, since the ATIS normally comes out once an hour ( :50-:55 past) with an occasional update if conditions change radically. The ASOS will give whatever ceiling, visibility, and winds are occuring at the time you call.

WX ASOS: PHONE 619-296-8934

Quoting DavestanKSAN (Reply 14):
I'm don't know about WN, but I know if the wx conditions were border line, AS would fly a holding pattern around Catalina Island and attempt to land here at SAN when the wx cleared a bit.

We try to launch when we can as well, but there are times when you can't. The lack of a CAT-IIIa or CAT-II, or even a standard CAT-I ILS approach really hampers the place...
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
Cessna057
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:24 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 11:35 am

KSAN 210213Z 210224 VRB04KT P6SM FEW004
FM0330 VRB04KT 4SM HZ SCT004
FM0430 VRB04KT 2SM BR BKN002
FM0500 VRB04KT 1SM BR OVC002
TEMPO 0507 1/2SM FG VV001
FM0700 VRB03KT 1/2SM FG VV001
FM1500 VRB03KT 1SM BR BKN002
FM1600 VRB05KT 3SM BR SCT007
FM1800 21006KT P6SM SKC
FM2000 26008KT P6SM SKC

Looks like another night of fun...
Hold it . . . Hold it . . . HOLD THE FREAKIN NOSE UP!!
 
Max Q
Posts: 5644
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 12:40 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:20 pm

VV100 is vertical visibilty and has no bearing on 121 operations.
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
 
AirTranTUS
Posts: 3313
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 9:12 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:21 pm

Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 3):
There was a recent thread here on Anet concerning an election there in SAN related to using NKX for commerical flights, and last night's fog (hardly an uncommon event during this time of year) makes using NKX a good idea, assuming folks in the area want reliable airline service.

Although the ballot measure would not have taken effect immediately, they should use this as their announcement:

"Attention passengers on Southwest XXX to San Diego, this flight is going to be canceled due to fog over the airport in San Diego. We are sorry for the inconvenience. If the citizens of San Diego had approved a measure in the recent election to allow operations at Miramar MCAS, we would be able to get you to San Diego tonight, but unfortunately we cannot. While you are in San Diego, be sure to thank one of their citizens for not allowing you to get there tonight."
I love ASO!
 
OPNLguy
Posts: 11191
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 1999 11:29 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:30 pm

Quoting Max Q (Reply 19):
VV100 is vertical visibilty and has no bearing on 121 operations.

Sorry, misread it as the ceiling... They went back and forth last night...

KSAN 200351Z 00000KT 1/4SM FG VV001 16/15 A3002 RMK AO2 SLP165 T01610150 $
KSAN 200312Z 00000KT 1/4SM FG BKN001 BKN005 16/15 A3002 RMK AO2 $
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
swadispatcher
Posts: 420
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 9:12 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:49 pm

I hear it's rolling in again.. it's at the approach end of runway 9 and North Island NAS is at 1/4 FG.
Maintain 2300 until Boiler, cleared for the VOR-A approach, report BATLE inbound..
 
Coronado990
Posts: 1312
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 2:12 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 2:09 pm

Quoting AirTranTUS (Reply 20):
Although the ballot measure would not have taken effect immediately, they should use this as their announcement:

"Attention passengers on Southwest XXX to San Diego, this flight is going to be canceled due to fog over the airport in San Diego. We are sorry for the inconvenience. If the citizens of San Diego had approved a measure in the recent election to allow operations at Miramar MCAS, we would be able to get you to San Diego tonight, but unfortunately we cannot. While you are in San Diego, be sure to thank one of their citizens for not allowing you to get there tonight."

Oh give me a break. Is it our fault the Marines will not move? Their motto is "we take land away, not give it up". That seems to apply in our own country as well. Once that changes, then we'll get a move on.
Uncle SAN at your service!
 
AirTranTUS
Posts: 3313
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 9:12 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 2:15 pm

Quoting Swadispatcher (Reply 22):
I hear it's rolling in again.

Some flights have departed with the last half hour but many are delayed and en route flights are beginning to circle.

http://flightaware.com/live/airport/KSAN

The latest hourly weather on the page shows visibility at 1/8 SM and ceiling BKN at 100 ft.
I love ASO!
 
Silver1SWA
Crew
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 5:00 pm

Tonight wasn't quite as exciting. Fog rolled in much later. Most outbounds made it out. I think we only cancelled 3 departures. All inbound RON's were again cancelled tonight. The decision was made early, so...I got to go home early.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
Boeing7E7
Posts: 5512
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 9:35 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 5:59 pm

Quoting SkyHarborsHome (Reply 11):
On average, how many nigts a year does this affect landing at SAN. I fully expect this at SFO but not at SAN. I fly in there about 3 times a month so I guess I am just lucky to have missed one of these fog-out nights.

SAN is below landing minimums about 3% of the time, or 186 hours a year. However, you have to consider "when" this happens. Usually the last 3-4 hours at night or in the morning. So you're talking at least 30 days a year, but more like 40. If you lose the airport at night, you are not only losing flights that night, but also the next morning because aircraft that were supposed to arrive are not in position for the first bump in the morning. GPS will do nothing to improve this siutation because the issue is obstruction avoidance not vertical accuracy and as growth increases, so to will this problem.

Quoting Max Q (Reply 19):
VV100 is vertical visibilty and has no bearing on 121 operations.

It does if your DH is 355' (or 700 for RWY 27) and 100' is your tops as is often the case. That's the comedy of this whole thing. The airport is in a bowl adjacent a body of water which is cooler than the ground the airport rests on. The airfield bakes all day, the air cools, the moisture is sucked in from the water. Instant fog party. Go anywhere above 300-400' and it's clear for miles.

[Edited 2006-11-21 10:07:51]
 
N1120A
Posts: 26468
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:02 pm

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 2):
With the warm 80+ degree temps we are enjoying, cool marine fog has been getting pulled in at most coastal airports. LAX was down to single 1 runway Cat-3 ops on Saturday for a couple hours, while both LGB and SNA also have experienced fog during the last week.

I really don't get why every runway at LAX isn't CAT III equipped. It would certainly have made sense to equip 25R as such prior to shutting down 25L for reconstruction.

Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 3):
As you can see, one could have exactly the same weather at LAX and SAN, and at LAX, you'd be landing (especially if your airline was CAT-IIIa equipped) and at SAN you'd be below minimums and diverting to someplace like ONT or LAX and bussing to SAN.

I suppose this is a bit nitpickey, but 24R/6L at LAX is equipped with CAT IIIb
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
 
davestanKSAN
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:32 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:43 pm

Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 17):

Very cool, thanks a lot for the info Big grin

Dave
Yesterday we've sinned, today we move towards God. Touch the sky....love and respect...Safe Star!
 
IAHFLYR
Posts: 3943
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:56 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:39 pm

Quoting N1120A (Reply 27):
I really don't get why every runway at LAX isn't CAT III equipped

It's all about $$.....many of them.
Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
 
Goldenshield
Posts: 5008
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 3:45 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:31 am

Quoting N1120A (Reply 27):
I suppose this is a bit nitpickey, but 24R/6L at LAX is equipped with CAT IIIb

Nitpicky as it is, many aircraft, and many airlines, aren't certified for CAT IIIb operations.
Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
 
Max Q
Posts: 5644
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 12:40 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:55 am

In our operation, the cloud ceiling can be below DH, as long as you have the required visibility, that is all that is needed to start the approach (we go down to Cat 111B)

After intercepting the final approach segment the visibility can go below what is required and we can still continue for a 'look see'

With a DH we have to see enough to assure landing in the touchdown zone. With CAT111B and using an alert height and autoland we do not have to see ANYTHING prior to touchdown as long as we have no warning lights or flags at the AH and are stabilized on the GS and lOC.

Vertical visibilIty is often not reported, and while interesting is not a requirement or limit of any kind for us.
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
 
Bicoastal
Posts: 2446
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 1999 5:56 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:23 am

My sister flew out yesterday morning. Extremely long lines of people needing to be rebooked due to few/no aircraft being on the ground overnight. People in the line she was in at United understood, however and were very patient. United Airlines served free coffee, muffins and water to the people in their line. Good move.
Airliners.net has many forums. It has spell check and search functions. Use them before posting!
 
LAXintl
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:29 am

Quoting N1120A (Reply 27):
I really don't get why every runway at LAX isn't CAT III equipped.

I would guess that its comes down to simply a cost-benefit analysis.

How many days/hours per year is LAX really at Cat-III mins? Remember 25R & 24L do have ILS themselves just not to Cat-III mins.

During ILS ops, the planned LAX arrival rate is 64-84 planes per hour (depending in configuration used) which is more than adequate as the hourly arrival flow peaks tend to hover at about 50 flights.

With the 25L/7R closed for construction the airport does loose a good chunk of its IFR capability, however then again such pain is for a relative short period with the runway and its landing systems planned for certification by April 2007.

Another bit of trivia, is that the Los Angeles region has actually experienced less and less days off fog since the late 1970s. Both the growth and heating effect of the metro area along with cleanup of the regions air quality have helped dissipate the fog that once was much more prevalent.
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
N1120A
Posts: 26468
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:18 am

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 29):
It's all about $$.....many of them.

Which LAWA and the FAA have lots of

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 33):
Remember 25R & 24L do have ILS themselves just not to Cat-III mins.

I know. They are CAT I

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 33):
Another bit of trivia, is that the Los Angeles region has actually experienced less and less days off fog since the late 1970s. Both the growth and heating effect of the metro area along with cleanup of the regions air quality have helped dissipate the fog that once was much more prevalent.

The steadily improving air quality has definately made a huge difference.
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
 
Boeing7E7
Posts: 5512
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 9:35 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Wed Nov 22, 2006 3:16 am

Quoting Goldenshield (Reply 30):
Nitpicky as it is, many aircraft, and many airlines, aren't certified for CAT IIIb operations.

Nor are airports able to accomodate CAT III approaches due to terrain, like Lindbergh.

Quoting Bicoastal (Reply 32):
My sister flew out yesterday morning. Extremely long lines of people needing to be rebooked due to few/no aircraft being on the ground overnight. People in the line she was in at United understood, however and were very patient. United Airlines served free coffee, muffins and water to the people in their line. Good move.

Is that your solution? Coffee and muffins? Now add about 40,000 more flights a year (50 departures a day) to the mix circa 2020 and UA will have those muffins shoved in orifice’s they didn't know existed.

Miramar… CAT III ready. Not that they would need it as often at 478' - above the marine layer.

[Edited 2006-11-21 19:18:32]
 
Tom in NO
Posts: 6725
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 1999 10:10 am

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:30 am

Quoting N1120A (Reply 34):
Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 29):
It's all about $$.....many of them.

Which LAWA and the FAA have lots of

The FAA funds all of their ILS/VOR, etc installations. Airport operators such as LAWA, as a general rule, do not fund that type of equipment.

Tom at MSY
"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
 
davestanKSAN
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:32 pm

RE: Fog Closes SAN Last Night

Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:15 pm

Quoting Boeing7E7 (Reply 35):
Is that your solution? Coffee and muffins? Now add about 40,000 more flights a year (50 departures a day) to the mix circa 2020 and UA will have those muffins shoved in orifice’s they didn't know existed.

Miramar… CAT III ready. Not that they would need it as often at 478' - above the marine layer.

   love it!!!!!!!!!! Well played  

Dave

[Edited 2006-11-22 09:16:31]
Yesterday we've sinned, today we move towards God. Touch the sky....love and respect...Safe Star!