AFa340-300E
Topic Author
Posts: 2115
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 3:49 am

US Airways At Charlotte

Mon Jul 10, 2000 8:49 pm

Hello,

What are the int'l plans of US Airways at Charlotte please?

Thank you,

Best regards,
Alain Mengus
 
Guest

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Mon Jul 10, 2000 9:33 pm

Sorry, I can't be sure cos I'm Aussie, but my friend went there on Boeing 737, and he said the flight was hell!!!!!

best wishes
Qantas 747
 
US521
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 1999 9:15 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Mon Jul 10, 2000 9:51 pm

They operate a 737 to Bermuda and a 767 to CDG or FRA. I keep getting those two flights messed up.  
US521
 
MD 11
Posts: 188
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 1999 10:10 pm

Fra!

Mon Jul 10, 2000 10:39 pm

They started service to Frankfurt, Germany last may!
Defenitlely! (Saw the advertising of US Airways at Frankfurt).
Interessting flight, hope it will survive the US/UA merger.
Bye
 
Adam T.
Posts: 796
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2000 7:01 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Mon Jul 10, 2000 11:02 pm

They serve Paris and Frankfurt,Germany.And I remember seeing on the news here in Charlotte about them starting service to London Gatwick on U.S. Airways and not British Airways. Out of Charlotte they also fly to carribean destinations like Jamaica,etc. And they also fly to Cancun,Mexico. As far as future plans, I don't know. United has said something about what they would like to do at Charlotte if the merger between U.S.Airways and United goes through, they would extend European service and offer service to South America as well. And one-stop flights to Asia and Australia. At least thats what they said on the news . But who knows?
 
cedarjet
Posts: 8101
Joined: Mon May 24, 1999 1:12 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Tue Jul 11, 2000 2:16 am

The London flight has been going (except for a brief, BA-inspired hiccup) for fifteen years, having been opened by Piedmont. It will be A330s soon. Other than that I think US will keep expanding there, it's a great hub and a very important business destination (IBM, First National Bank are all headquartered at Charlotte, among others) and US have it all to themselves. Great airline.
fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
 
Guest

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Tue Jul 11, 2000 4:37 am

The Charlotte hub will be replaced by Southwest, with United flying MD80's
on shuttle routes to Atlanta.
 
desertjets
Posts: 7574
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2000 3:12 pm

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Tue Jul 11, 2000 4:51 am

The Charlotte Hub was picked up by USAir with the Piedmont merger and they have been developing it ever since.

In the UA/US merger news release they outline what they plan to do with CLT after the merger. It will become a major mainline hub with one-stop service to pretty much anywhere. I assume that the international routes would remain. CDG makes a lot of sense b/c United has been expanding service from US gateways to Paris. And I would imagine the Frankfurt service would remain... seeing as all East Coast United gateways have service to Frankfurt either on UA or a Lufthansa codeshare. United claims to want to make Charlotte a real competitor to Delta's Atlanta operation.
Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
 
User avatar
drerx7
Posts: 4223
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2000 12:19 am

UA One-stop Intl Service

Tue Jul 11, 2000 4:54 am

I don't think that the acquired US hubs ould receive the one-stop Asian destinations literally. I believe they will jst carry the same flight numbers. It makes no sense to go CLT-ORD-NRT with a 744. I think that you will see the flight carry the same flight number all the way through with a scheduled change of aircraft.
Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
 
D L X
Posts: 11663
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Wed Jul 12, 2000 1:59 am

I think the one-stops to Asia and Oz would in fact be the same plane. UA has a lot of widebodies flying domestically, especially between hub airports. If the merger goes through (doubtful) expect to see these domestic widebody flight continue, especially to PHL and CLT. (IMO, PIT will be hurt a little if the merger occurs, however, it won't be closed. That would be really poor management.)
 
Lear777
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 1999 7:20 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Wed Jul 12, 2000 3:29 am

A 747-400 from CLT to anywhere? I don't see it happening. The one stop service will indeed be same flight number but with a change of plane. Airlines have really stretched the definition of one stop service to make it seem like you don't have to get off then plane, but that isn't the case here.

Brian
Go Astros!
 
D L X
Posts: 11663
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

Lear777

Wed Jul 12, 2000 4:02 am

And your explanation for why that is so incredulous is...

CLT is a major US hub. (Actually, one of the busiest.) Its called connections. Yes, a 744 can be filled from CLT to the West coast, and on to Australia.
 
Ryefly
Posts: 1324
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2000 7:56 am

RE: Lear777 & US Airways At CLT

Wed Jul 12, 2000 7:29 am

I remember seeing Lufthansa 747-400's in Charlotte several years ago to compete against US Air. It has been done before so it could happen again.

I cant see much more international service until they expand the terminal D. If the merger goes through, there will be a lot more flights internationaly, if it doesn't flights abroad will still grow but not at a drastic level.
 
Skyteam
Posts: 703
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:50 pm

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Wed Jul 12, 2000 1:02 pm

I agree wit Brian, I dont see 747 service at CLT.

SKYTEAM
 
Lear777
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 1999 7:20 am

RE: Lear777

Wed Jul 12, 2000 1:22 pm

I have no concrete facts to back me up, but I think I'm just being realistic. I asked a friend that works for UA about this, and when I mentioned 744s flying to CLT, PHL, or PIT he laughed. He said that PHL is likely to be the only hub to see new UA widebodies. But he's no high up at UA, so he can't be considered concrete info.

Well, whatever happens, my opinion is simply that the one stop service will be same flight number, change of plane, and that CLT won't be seeing any UA 777s or 744s any time soon.

Brian

Go Astros!
 
D L X
Posts: 11663
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Wed Jul 12, 2000 1:31 pm

Well, let's see. CLT currently has 330 service, has supported 747 service, and then 777 service before. (US, LH, BA) CLT is a large metropolitan area with a LOT of money. (Bank central.) Comparing CLT to other airports with 747/777/330/340 service:

CLT ~10,000,000 enplanements
IAD ~ 6,000,000 enplanements
IAH ~ 12,000,000 enplanements

As you can see, CLT is quite a viable city/airport for widebody ops. It has the facilities, the population, and the industry to support it. Most importantly, it is a LARGE hub city. UA flies widebodies between ALL of its hubs. 767s, 777s, and 747s are flown regularly between IAD,SFO,ORD,LAX,DEN, and even MIA. If CLT becomes the Latin focus that UA wants it for, you bet your butt you'll see a great widebody presense there, and onestop service to Asia and Australia is a given.
 
Ryefly
Posts: 1324
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2000 7:56 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Wed Jul 12, 2000 1:53 pm

I failed to mention that if United wants to compete againt Delta in ATL, with out a doubt CLT will be greatly expanded in the future and offer plenty of widebodies. I don't buy that CLT would be a bad market for very large planes and long international flights. As several people have said before Charlotte is a huge banking capital. But what people failed to mention is that Charlotte residents are not the only ones to originate in Charlotte. Winston Salem, Greensboro and even Raleigh residents not to mention smaller cites in both NC and SC currently drive to Chrarlotte to catch a flight. If international service is expanded, this traffic would also increase dramatically. if all this does happen and thats a big if, I am betting American will increase international service from RDU to get a piece of the pie. I am really surprised they already havn't. Their London flight has an increadable load figures. One of their most profitable international flights.
 
Lear777
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 1999 7:20 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Wed Jul 12, 2000 3:50 pm

Yes, maybe in the long run we'll see UA widebodies at CLT. However in the immediate future- I'm thinking along the lines of the one stop routes UA touted in their press releases- those flights will be change of plane, same flight number. There's no way, merger or otherwise, that the CLT market can just explode exponentially overnight in that it would warrant 747s and 777s right off the bat. There will have to be a lot of route growth before that happens...keep in mind that between CLT and UA's five hubs, UA and US only have a combined 29 flights, 12 of which go to ORD. More frequencies will come before larger aircraft.

It all depends on what UA does with CLT. There's a lot of talk, but who's to say what will happen if things do go their way. Airlines are one group that I would trust as far as I could throw them....past experience shows that what they say is not necessarily what they will do. I personally hope they build CLT into one hell of a hub- I don't particularly like Atlanta.

Brian
Go Astros!
 
travelin man
Posts: 3198
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2000 10:04 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Wed Jul 12, 2000 4:22 pm

Just because United may make CLT a hub doesn't mean you'll be seeing 747-400s cruising off to Sydney in the near future. There probably will be an increase in wide body flights if the merger goes thru (I agree with DLX -- doubtful). However, an increase in international service? Look at poor Denver. It's a major United hub and I think the only international service Denver can boast is a couple of flights to Canada. And Denver is the home to several major corporations...

I'm not quite sure why UA would shift its Latin American operations from MIA (lots of O/D traffic) to CLT (very little Latin O/D traffic). But it's an interesting theory...
 
Adam T.
Posts: 796
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2000 7:01 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Wed Jul 12, 2000 11:24 pm

I am pretty sure as well that the One-Stop flights to Asia and Australia they were talking about is a change of aircraft. Like that UA flight that goes from Chicago to Sydney with a stop in Los Angeles. From Chicago to Los Angeles it is on a 757, and from Los Angeles to Sydney it is on a 747-400. So of course it would be a change of aircraft. 
 
D L X
Posts: 11663
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Thu Jul 13, 2000 12:26 am

What people fail to see is that CLT is a hub. Just for a second, put away your bias that CLT is not a major city like NY and LA. Think about it as a major hub, in line with other hubs that have widebody/international service. CLT is big because it serves a HUGE market. Everyone from Miami to Birmingham to Washington, DC can find an easy connection at CLT, or its main competitor, ATL. Currently, all these people who want to go to Asia or Australia either have to catch one of the few nonstops to LA or SF in order to get a single connection to Asia/Australia. These people would instantly gain not only widebody service to the west coast (and you're nuts if you think people won't flock to that over 738 service on AA) but also the opportunity to sit on just two planes the whole trip. (These flights also show up sooner in the reservations list because of that fact.)

I'm not saying that this is a given, but it is more than just a possibility. The market absolutely can support it, and UA will do it. Why do you think UA wants to buy US? Just for kicks? It's because US has a lock on this underserved market.


UA has rather few flights to South America from MIA compared to AA there and CO at IAH. Putting the LatAm flights at a megahub would allow them to have feed from all over the country, not just one city.
 
Guest

Lear777

Thu Jul 13, 2000 3:57 am

Whats wrong wit Atlanta?
 
Lear777
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 1999 7:20 am

RE: Lear777

Thu Jul 13, 2000 4:28 am

Grin.

Just a little animousity (sp?) on my part. ATL tends to get the routes that I'd like to see CO fly out of Houston. I've flown about a dozen times through Atlanta over the past ten years, and it's been just fine, except for one flight to London where they kept moving the gate around, and boy, ATL is one hell of an aiport to have that happen in. Lots of walking, let me tell you...

Anyways, in regards to Charlotte. Somewhere down the road we might see widebodies flying domestic hub routes. I can't tell the future so I won't refute your statements as being wrong. However in the immedaite future I don't care how large CLT is....for widebodies to fly hub routes right off the bat traffic would have to increase by thousands of pax that simply don't exist. Once UA develops their route network and really integrates CLT into their system...who knows? But route growth with come first, more than likely in the form of additional frequencies to UA's five hub airports.

Brian
Go Astros!
 
vincent32
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2000 7:40 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Thu Jul 13, 2000 11:52 am

I flew from Charolette to CUN, (I guess their only INT'L flights are to mexico and the carribean. I was on a 737/300-400, and yes the flight was hell going into CUN.
 
"If it was cool to be a fool, I'd be the hippest guy around"
 
vincent32
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2000 7:40 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Thu Jul 13, 2000 11:56 am

I flew from Charolette to CUN, (I guess their only INT'L flights are to mexico and the carribean. I was on a 737/300-400, and yes the flight was hell going into CUN.
 
"If it was cool to be a fool, I'd be the hippest guy around"
 
vincent32
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2000 7:40 am

NWA Question?

Thu Jul 13, 2000 12:04 pm

Next Saturday I'm flying NWA from ALB to SEA. I'm going to be on DC-9's and DC-10's. I have never flewn NWA and I'm curious of what I'm in for. How are their DC-10's, Detroit Hub, and other things I need to know. Thanks for the help.


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © AirNikon




Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © David Aaron



"If it was cool to be a fool, I'd be the hippest guy around"
 
Guest

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Thu Jul 13, 2000 12:28 pm

In a swiss spotter magazine it was reported that US Airways has a applied for CLT-ZRH. Very much swiss companies have their american headquarters in CHarlotte (for example Nestle, Worlds biggest food maker, etc.)

Thats all i can think of.

reno_air
 
nwa man
Posts: 1752
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 1999 3:24 am

RE: DLX

Thu Jul 13, 2000 12:56 pm

DLX--
Regarding your comment:
Currently, all these people who want to go to Asia or Australia either have to catch one of the few nonstops to LA or SF in order to get a single connection to Asia/Australia.

Do the people of Charlotte not see that they can take a one/two hour flight to Detroit, Chicago, or Minneapolis, and get the one-stop connections to Asia that they are looking for? They can sit on two planes and get service to NRT, KIX, NGO, PEK, or SHA via Detroit, and other cities like SEL and HKG via Chicago.

I'm not saying that Charlotte isn't a major hub, but let's face facts. Charlotte is roughly the 30th largest metro area in the United States. The O and D traffic at CLT simply cannot support a 747-400 to the West Coast!
Create your own luck.
 
nwa man
Posts: 1752
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 1999 3:24 am

A Few More Points Of Interest...

Thu Jul 13, 2000 1:14 pm

1999 ACI Data for CHARLOTTE, NC (CLT)

Rank City Passengers Percent Change
39 CHARLOTTE, NC (CLT) 21'449'392 -6.6

Hmmmm, the 39th busiest airport in the world, traffic declining at a rate of 6.6 percent last year (more than a million less passengers!), traffic worse than non-hub airports like SEA and BOS, 1.5 million in the metro area, but they deserve 747-400 service to the West Coast??? Maybe when the Panthers win the Super Bowl...
Create your own luck.
 
D L X
Posts: 11663
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Fri Jul 14, 2000 2:26 am

First off, you note CLT as 39th in the world in terms of traffic. Why is that relevant? Why are we comparing CLT to KIX? A relevant comparison would be between two east coast airports, like CLT and IAD.

Yes, a person in CLT can get a single connection at ORD to the Pacific Rim today. (MSP and DTW are not relevant; US is not merging with NW.) But, we're not just talking about the people of Charlotte, but the people who connect at CLT. That's a whole heluva lot of people, considering CLT serves the entire South, and then some. And unlike the west coast, or even the western midwest, the South, and the rest of the east coast is a very densely populated area with many smaller Charlotte sized cities very close together. Simply the states of FL, GA, SC, NC, and VA account for 35 million people that can connect in CLT. Do you still think that that entire area can't fill a 744 to another HUB?
 
Guest

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Fri Jul 14, 2000 2:31 am

DLX is very a rude dude.
 
Guest

RE: Lear777

Fri Jul 14, 2000 2:57 am

Jealousy Huh. LOL. IAH is a good airport! Atlanta is the worst airport to connect through if you only have 20 minutes, or if they change your gate.

 
imkeww
Posts: 676
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2001 1:48 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Fri Jul 14, 2000 4:13 am

The west coast not a very populated area, eh? I beg to differ, buddy! The population in those 5 SE seaboard states is still less than that of California.
 
nwa man
Posts: 1752
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 1999 3:24 am

RE: DLX #2

Fri Jul 14, 2000 4:18 am

D L X said--
You note CLT as 39th in the world in terms of traffic. Why is that relevant?

That statement is relevant to prove your desires for 747-400 service at Charlotte are grandiose. Larger airports like CVG, BOS, and even JFK do not have 747-400 service to the West Coast. Answer me this: Why does an airport where the traffic is declining at 6.6 percent deserve three times more seats anywhere?

Also, I didn't compare CLT to IAD because the circumstances are so different. IAD deserves the international traffic because it is the largest airport primarily serving the Washington, DC area. Also, the reason IAD has smaller traffic numbers is that DCA is primarily for short-haul traffic, and IAD is primarily for long-haul traffic. Charlotte only has one airport, while the DC area has 2 (3 if you include BWI), so of course Charlotte will have more traffic.

Next, why would John Doe in Atlanta connect through Charlotte to get to SFO? Why would anybody in Miami go to Charlotte to get to Los Angeles? People have the nonstop options on Delta, United, and other carriers that make a CLT connection a bad idea.

One final question. If this market is really there, why doesn't US utilize their A330s and 767s on their CLT-West Coast routes, instead of 320s, 319s, and 757s? Why don't they have 9 flights a day to LAX on these aircraft? The market doesn't need 747-400s to LAX/SFO!
Create your own luck.
 
Ryefly
Posts: 1324
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2000 7:56 am

NWA MAN

Fri Jul 14, 2000 7:41 am

US Airways doesn't fly to LAX with A330 or 767's because they don't have enough of them yet and they serve mainly international markets. Its not that they couldn't fill them up if they had them. A several years back when the 767 wasn't needed as badly as it is today, I flew the 767 fully packed to Miami, and to Orlando. I am not positive, but I believe they had 767 service to LAX as well out of CLT. Somehow this topic got on the subject of United flying jumbos out of CLT. It all depends how much United is going to expand CLT or not if there is a take over. At first I agree, I doubt they will fly 747's out of CLT. 777's, 767-300's with out a doubt will show up at first (BA already flies 777's & 767-300's into CLT). Once United settles in and gets figures back on how well the hub is working, then thats when you will either start seeing 747 service out of CLT or not. I think it will be a sucess from the start and will not take too long, as United will really try to give ATL heavy competition.
 
D L X
Posts: 11663
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

NWA MAN And Imkeww

Fri Jul 14, 2000 3:01 pm

You're not getting it.

The issue is, if UA merges with US, then will there be 744s from CLT to the west coast? The answer is a clear yes. Besides the fact that UA has said they would do this, it simply makes sense.

SFO and LAX are hubs for UA. If the merger occurs, CLT will also be a hub for UA. UA is a great example of an airline that flies its widebody fleet between its hubs. Name a hub pair, and you will find that there are currently 744s (and 767s and 777s and others) running between them. Although PIT may be, CLT would be no exception. This is not just serving the specific market of CLT-LAX or CLT-SFO, it is US Southeast - California, US Southeast - Pacific Rim, etc. Sure, people in Atlanta and Miami have nonstops to SF and LA on smaller jets. What's the difference? ATL-SFO/LAX and MIA-SFO/LAX are not hub to hub flights. CLT-SFO would be.
Also, don't forget that there are more people in the southeast that do not live in Atlanta and Miami that are going to have to connect somewhere anyways. If they connect in ATL, UA loses to Delta. If they connect in MIA, AA loses to American. You bet UA needs those widebody flights and onestops to the Pacific Rim from CLT to keep from losing out to AA and DL in the southeast.

Hub to hub flights are why the comparison to IAD is more relavant than to CVG, and certainly BOS and JFK. No one has more than an international gateway at BOS and JFK. Speaking of CVG, where do you see that CVG is larger than CLT? I'm not so sure of your numbers. Mine come from the FAA.


One last note for Imkeww: no, the west coast is not very densely populated, no matter how Hollywood wants you to believe. Have you ever driven from LA to Las Vegas? Or San Francisco to Sacremento? Fact is, California is the largest state in the Union, but not because it is dense, but because it is spacious. It takes up 3/4s of the west coast, but only has 25 Million residents. Comparatively, the states I mentioned, FL, GA, SC, NC, and VA take up about half of the east coast, and contain 35 Million. On top of that, the northeast is more densely populated than the South. This is why US Airways has been able to support the three closely positioned hubs for so long.
 
nwa man
Posts: 1752
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 1999 3:24 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Fri Jul 14, 2000 4:05 pm

DLX...Here is my point. You said these yourself:

"Name a hub pair, and you will find that there are currently 744s running between them."

"Hub to hub flights are why the comparison to IAD is more relevant..."

Here is UA's schedule from IAD-SFO. (I just picked 7/18)

UA 857 IAD-SFO 710A-945A A320
UA 805 IAD-SFO 905A-1135A 757
UA 239 IAD-SFO 1115A-141P 757
UA 209 IAD-SFO 205P-433P 757
UA 215 IAD-SFO 340P-611P A320
UA 971 IAD-SFO 440P-726P 767-300ER
UA 947 IAD-SFO 535P-810P 757
UA 225 IAD-SFO 749P-1019P 757
UA 203 IAD-SFO 950P-1220A 767-200ER

So, I counted 9 hub-to-hub flights (These are all the ones that operate on 7/18, I wasn't being selective), 2 widebodies, 0 747-400s, 0 747-200s, 0 DC-10s, and 0 777s. I think this makes it clear that we won't be seeing 747-400s flying CLT-West Coast routes anytime soon.

BTW, my numbers come from Airports Council International, the world governing body of airports. My numbers are for 1999. I already cut and pasted CLT's stats for 1999. Here are CVG's.

Rank Airport Passengers Percent Change
37 CINCINNATI, OH (CVG) 21'771'689 2.8

I think I get it now! Do you?

NWA Man


Create your own luck.
 
imkeww
Posts: 676
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2001 1:48 am

DLX

Fri Jul 14, 2000 4:14 pm

Hey... I *LIVE* in California. And there is no need to patronize me, duuude. I've driven all over the state, and yes, it is not very *densley* populated. However, the metropolitan areas are. The San Francisco Bay Area has more than 7 million people alone. Don't try to prove me wrong on this one, DLX-- I LIVE there.

I suppose you meant California is the most *populated* state in the nation, and not the largest. Of course the largest states are going to be spacious... And it takes up 2/3 of the west coast. I would venture to say from the tip of FL up to VA is more than 50%- 2/3 as well even. Take a look at a map of the US in the atlas. It's not the skewered world you made it out to be.

At last count, the population of California in 1996 was around 36-37 million. Check your facts.

The reason why I nitpick like this is that I think facts should be correct and not merely spit out cheaply. I also felt your "east coast mentality" in your posts were too abrasive. It's not like the west coast is some sparse wasteland. We are dense were we need to be, that's why we have so much service by multiple low-fare carriers, and also two hubs of United in the same state.
 
D L X
Posts: 11663
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

NWA Man And Imkeww

Sat Jul 15, 2000 1:11 am

Well, I stand corrected on the flying of 744s between all the hubs. I've actually flown 744s and 777 domestically on UA between hubs across the country very recently, so this may b a new change. Asia is bouncing back, and perhaps UA is finding use for them there more often now. Also, note that CLT would be a bigger hub than IAD would be, with more feed to fill the jet.

It does not however prove me wrong that 744 flights from CLT are just inherently inviable. With feed on both ends, if you can't see that UA could fill a 744 between CLT-SFO and CLT-LAX, then I'm done trying to convince you. It is a huge market, and UA does not want DL and AA to take it from them.

However, your numbers from the ACI are in direct contradiction with my numbers from the FAA. Granted mine are dated 1997, but I somehow doubt that CVG and CLT both doubled their passengers carried in 10 years. How does the ACI measure passengers? I have 11.2 Million enplanements in 1997 for CLT, and 9.5 Million for CVG.

Imkeww,
when officials talk of a large state, or a large metro area, they are talking about its population, not its area. TO be fair, I compared 1990 censuses for both California and the southeast states. California had 29 Million. (I read the wrong line last time. mea culpa.) The southeast totalled to about 35 Million. Since then, both areas have grown, but you'd be surprised to know that the Southeast has grown faster than California.
Yes I know that Cali has some big metro areas, but that further strengthens my point. Some people only want to talk about the population of Charlotte and how small it is, but they fail to see that CLT is a connection point to get to all of the South, where there are more people that are not concentrated on three little areas. You can't say the CLT market is small because it serves a population greater than that of California as a whole.

BTW, I grew up in VA. I went to university in Mass. I've been to California, Washington State and Oregon many times, and in fact, my new residence is in San Mateo County, CA. I'm sorry if you were put off by my "east coast mentality" (whatever that is) but facts are facts. The west coast is much more sparsely populated than the east.
 
Lear777
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 1999 7:20 am

RE: NWA Man And Imkeww

Sat Jul 15, 2000 6:05 am

I don't think there's much point in stating anything more to prove DLX is wrong, because it's obviously not getting anywhere. As for me I think I'll just wait and see...if UA/US goes through and in fact we see A320s and aircraft of that size flying on DLX's supposed 747 flights, and we will, I'll just have the satisfaction of knowing I was right.

Bowing out of this argument....

Brian
Go Astros!
 
D L X
Posts: 11663
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Sat Jul 15, 2000 7:43 am

The point is not that UA will or will not use 744s. The point is that CLT can support that sort of jet flying in. It has in the past, it has 330s now, and if UA places 744s on the routes like they are insinuating they will, they will find that the feed is adequate to support them. If I can quote my own earlier post, "I'm not saying that this is a given, but it is more than just a possibility." People who just assume that Charlotte is a small city with an inviable hub are mistaken.

But, this argument is moot anyways, since UA and US will not get approval for their merger. (Sorry, hadn't given my official position in a while.  )


BTW, the San Francisco Bay Area has a population of about 6.5 Million (1995 Estimate), supported by three large commercial airports.
 
nwa man
Posts: 1752
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 1999 3:24 am

RE: US Airways At Charlotte

Sat Jul 15, 2000 11:08 am

DLX...
Maybe ACI counts deplanements as well as enplanements for their statistics. That could explain why the two groups of statistics differ so vastly.

I'll end my posts on this topic with your quote, which I also agree with...
"This argument is moot anyways, since UA and US will not get approval for their merger."

NWA Man
Create your own luck.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 747fan, aflyingkiwi, ASMD11, Baidu [Spider], georgiabill, haggis73, hOMSaR, josciak, nzrich, runway23, SFOtoORD, Whiteguy and 241 guests