abletofly
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:55 pm

Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:01 pm

I just caught myself wondering that, when reading the topic FedEx and the 757.
How come the 757 has become such a succesfull cargoplane? Also the DC-10's, MD-11's, 727's and not to forget the DC-8's? How come cargo companies tend to choose theese old planes? I don't really get it. Need some help understanding.  Smile

Regards.
 
bennett123
Posts: 7456
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 12:49 am

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:05 pm

Is that all one question?.
 
abletofly
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:55 pm

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:15 pm

Sorry, actually just asking for the 757. The other planes where just something that came up my mind while writing..  Yeah sure
 
okie73
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 11:09 pm

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:01 pm

Quoting AbleToFly (Thread starter):
Also the DC-10's, MD-11's, 727's and not to forget the DC-8's? How come cargo companies tend to choose theese old planes?

can't answer on the 757 specifically, but the reason many cargo companies go with older airplanes is the low acquisition cost. It's not that an older airplane can't still fly for a passenger airline, it's that it can't fly profitably. The time spent on maintenance becomes the issue. Partially because of the direct cost of doing the maintenance, but partially because of the indirect cost. Which is to say the lost revenue during the down time. That's not so much of an issue with many cargo carriers, who do not put the same number of hours on an airplane as a passenger carrier would.
 
kiwiandrew

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:08 pm

don't forget that cargo doesn't care about flying on narrowbodies for hours , or going on an 'old' plane .

In any event , the 757 is still a relatively efficient design - just as it was a natural successor to the 727 in pax duty it is not surprising that further down the track it is seen as a natural successor to it for cargo . A lot of cargo ops are night time based and the 757 is a pretty quiet plane for its size
 
bennett123
Posts: 7456
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 12:49 am

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:12 pm

No need to apologise.
 
abletofly
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:55 pm

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:25 pm

Right. Thanks for the answers. I see the point though.

 Smile

Regards.
 
Bongodog1964
Posts: 3087
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:29 am

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:07 am

One major reason is the utilisation of planes for the overnight parcel carriers.

Typically when working for UPS, Fed Ex etc a plane will complete only one or two rotations per night; as the first rotation time is dictated by when the packets are ready for shipment, with typical last collection times being 18.00 from the customer, the packet needs to get to the warehouse and then to the airport. The packet then needs to get from the airport to the warehouse, and on to the delivery van for about 06.00 then next morning.

Thus the plane is unlikely to fly for more than 6 hours/night 5 nights/week. Compared to a passenger plane which might do 10 hours/day 7 days/week.

Thus fuel economy is not so important.

Specifically mentioning the 757, when looking at it compared to a 737, doesn't it look like a truck compared to a family saloon. I assume that its heavier build makes it able to carry far more both in weight and volume.
 
mpdpilot
Posts: 695
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 6:44 am

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:21 am

Isn't another upside to the 757 being that it can haul a lot and still have a fairly decent range. cargo typically weighs more than passengers and limits the amount of fuel, the 757 would still be able to perform quite well even with a large cargo load. I have heard that 757 wing is one of the most powerful wings out there for its size.
One mile of highway gets you one mile, one mile of runway gets you anywhere.
 
milesrich
Posts: 1508
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 2:46 am

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:25 pm

The 757 has plenty of cargo capacity for a narrow body airplane, is very fuel efficient, and is overpowered. Just as the 727 lives on as a widely used cargo carrier, the 757 will do so as well, although very few have been retired by the passenger carriers.
 
moek2000
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:37 am

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:45 pm

The 757 will be a successful cargo aircraft. I'm guessing probably in the next 10 to 15 years or so, the cargo 727's currently flying will be replaced by 757's. DL, NW, US, UA, AA, CO all fly 757's and they will eventually make their way into the cargo market someday
 
BA787
Posts: 2381
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:40 pm

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:50 pm

This may be bullshit, but do Cargo planes have to be quite as safe as passenger a/c due to the low numbers of people on board. I know nothing about the cargo business, so don't flame me fot that Big grin
 
Alessandro
Posts: 4962
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2001 3:13 am

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:58 pm

Only 2 crew needed, compared with the 3 crew on bigger planes like the DC-10 and Tristar, many pilots around with B757/767 ratings. Spareparts are plenty and easy to get hold on.
From New Yorqatar to Califarbia...
 
captainsimon
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:24 am

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:22 pm

As already said the main factors are the payload it can carry for a narrow body also the 757 is overpowered with the RR RB211 engines.
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:04 pm

Quoting AbleToFly (Thread starter):
How come cargo companies tend to choose theese old planes

We operate B732SF & B752SF.The Advantage being compatiable Pallets for both Aircraft.
The B752SF being overpowered helps too.A huge fleet helps with stores Inventory beng less too.
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
diesel1
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 9:11 am

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Mon Dec 04, 2006 7:08 pm

Quoting BA787 (Reply 11):
This may be bullshit, but do Cargo planes have to be quite as safe as passenger a/c due to the low numbers of people on board.

Yep, you're right, the flightdeck crew of a cargo aircraft are considered more 'expendable' than flightdeck crew on passenger aircraft, so the aircraft are less well maintained and not as safe. Also, if a cargo aircraft falls out the sky, it matters less if it lands on an inhabited area than if it is a passenger aircraft.

Hope this helps...  biggrin 
I don't like signatures...
 
Bongodog1964
Posts: 3087
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:29 am

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:35 pm

Quoting Diesel1 (Reply 15):
Yep, you're right, the flightdeck crew of a cargo aircraft are considered more 'expendable' than flightdeck crew on passenger aircraft, so the aircraft are less well maintained and not as safe. Also, if a cargo aircraft falls out the sky, it matters less if it lands on an inhabited area than if it is a passenger aircraft.

I do not for one minute believe that there is even a single grain of truth in this statement; I am sure that the airworthiness requirements are exactly the same for both passenger and freight variants except for roles specific ones e.g cargo planes have a requirement for strengthened front bulkheads or aload restraining net to prevent freight moving forward during hard braking, whilst passenger planes have to satisfy passenger evacuation standards.
 
FriendlySkies
Posts: 3540
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:57 pm

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:46 am

@Bongodog1964

I think he was being sarcastic...
 
User avatar
HAWK21M
Posts: 29867
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:05 pm

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:04 am

True.Apart from the more peacefull environment of Cargo operators.The rest is the same Mx wise.
regds
MEL
I may not win often, but I damn well never lose!!! ;)
 
DABZF
Posts: 1063
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 10:25 pm

RE: Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane?

Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:47 am

Quoting BA787 (Reply 11):
his may be bullshit, but do Cargo planes have to be quite as safe as passenger a/c due to the low numbers of people on board. I know nothing about the cargo business, so don't flame me fot that

...yes it is b*shit!

Quoting Diesel1 (Reply 15):
Yep, you're right, the flightdeck crew of a cargo aircraft are considered more 'expendable' than flightdeck crew on passenger aircraft, so the aircraft are less well maintained and not as safe. Also, if a cargo aircraft falls out the sky, it matters less if it lands on an inhabited area than if it is a passenger aircraft.



Quoting FriendlySkies (Reply 17):
I think he was being sarcastic...

... I sure hope he was being sarcastic!


What makes 757 so successful cargo plane? Well, can you actually say already that it does??? I think that the integrators (FedEx, UPS, DHL and guys) can make any plane successful for their needs... carrying envelopes doesn't really need that much. Yes, yes I know they carry lot of "hard cargo", to fill up the planes, as well but they are flying mainly envelopes and small parcels at least in Europe.

As far as I have understood the cargo 75's are not the easiest to balance on heavier loads... only what I have always thought. Someone correct me if I'm wrong!  Smile
I like driving backwards in the fog cause it doesn't remind me of anything - Chris Cornell