flyf15
Posts: 6633
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 11:10 am

So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 12:28 am

I think this probably conclusive proof that the CRJ-900 is not a regional jet... and many of the routes it flies should be flown by mainline with mainline equipment.

Delta / Skywest's YYZ-SLC flight. Yesterday it blocked 5 hours and 2 minutes and routinely blocks over 4 hours. Can you imagine that? Over 5 hours in a CRJ.... I have trouble being comfortable in a 757 for 5 hours!

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/SKW4004
 
eraugrad02
Posts: 658
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 6:12 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 12:40 am

No. i'm 6'1 175 and im fine in the CRJ. The problem i hae is that these e-190/crj-900's need t's or at least power ports for your laptop.
Desmond MacRae in ILM
 
planemaker
Posts: 5411
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 12:53 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:09 am

Quoting Flyf15 (Thread starter):
I think this probably conclusive proof that the CRJ-900 is not a regional jet... and many of the routes it flies should be flown by mainline with mainline equipment.

Why should it be flown by "mainline" equipment? That flight only sits 70. Assuming even a LF of 80% on the CRJ900, are you suggesting that a DL MD80 with 142-seats be put on the route? What sense does that make?
Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
 
flyf15
Posts: 6633
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 11:10 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:16 am

Quoting Planemaker (Reply 4):
Why should it be flown by "mainline" equipment? That flight only sits 70. Assuming even a LF of 80% on the CRJ900, are you suggesting that a DL MD80 with 142-seats be put on the route? What sense does that make?

5 hour flights should be flown with aircraft with full ammenities. Although a reduced seating CRJ-900 is coming close, I'm still talking about full galleys, more than two underpaid overworked flight attendants, full room for the passengers, ability for them to take on their carry-ons, a true first class, etc. Additionally, this route is by no means "regional" and shouldn't be flown by regional airlines... the crews onboard should be paid a descent salary to operate such a flight.

This is a transcontinental flight flown between two major cities. If this is a "regional" route flown by a "regional" aircraft, that makes it so that essentially all flights within north america are worthy of this type of substandard service. The only exemptions would be such extreme examples as JFK-LAX.

But then again, this is all just my opinion, and you have yours as well. I'm sure we can both agree that 5 hours is a long long CRJ flight.  Smile
 
FlyDeltaJets
Posts: 1631
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 4:24 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:51 am

Then routes like JFK-MIA (BTW was switched over to mainline on the 15th) JFK-DTW, JFK-CVG, JFK-ATL (2 mainline 2 DCI), NYC-ORD, JFK-CLE
All routes between two major cities
All operated by DL Connex
All not steady yeilding enough for mainline a/c.

[Edited 2006-12-18 17:51:33]
The only valid opinions are those based in facts
 
planemaker
Posts: 5411
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 12:53 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:52 am

Quoting Flyf15 (Reply 5):
But then again, this is all just my opinion, and you have yours as well.

But you haven't answered the over 100% seating discrepency between the CR9 and the MD80... just think of the trip cost differential versus the revenue with only 56 pax!!! That is not open to opinion.  Smile
Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
 
Boston92
Posts: 2553
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:56 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:59 am

Quoting Naritaflyer (Reply 3):
Not only one, but two mispelled posts.

 laughing   laughing   laughing 

Quoting Flyf15 (Thread starter):
I think this probably conclusive proof that the CRJ-900 is not a regional jet

Proof? Proof is fact; as in what "CRJ" stands for, "Canadair REGIONAL JET". It is a Regional Jet, no matter how long its flights are.
"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
 
VEEREF
Posts: 560
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 12:55 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:04 am

I think what the original poster is getting at is the fact that, particularly in coach, the product offered on the RJ is nowhere near that of a "traditional" larger mainline aircraft.
Even two hours in the back of an RJ is an all out assault on the senses, let alone 5.
Just wait, those E-190 flights to Hawaii are coming..

Though I fly cargo, I position quite a bit on airlines and for trips longer than 2 hours I will usually go out of my way to avoid RJ flights of any longer than that if possible.
Airplanes are cool. Aviation sucks.
 
AirWillie6475
Posts: 2372
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 1:45 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:07 am

Quoting Flyf15 (Reply 5):
5 hour flights should be flown with aircraft with full ammenities. Although a reduced seating CRJ-900 is coming close,

And what is full amenities these days?

Quoting Flyf15 (Thread starter):
I think this probably conclusive proof that the CRJ-900 is not a regional jet... and many of the routes it flies should be flown by mainline with mainline equipment.

Delta / Skywest's YYZ-SLC flight. Yesterday it blocked 5 hours and 2 minutes and routinely blocks over 4 hours. Can you imagine that? Over 5 hours in a CRJ.... I have trouble being comfortable in a 757 for 5 hours!

I think people forget that the CRJ and other RJs for that matter has the same seat space as any other standard mainline aircraft. You're not going to get more seat space in a 757 than a CRJ. I don't really get what the complaint is looking at some of the mainline aircraft I'd much rather be in a CRJ.

Plus, the CRJ700/900 is one of the most comfortable aircraft out there, don't know if you have flown them.
 
flyf15
Posts: 6633
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 11:10 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:13 am

Quoting Boston92 (Reply 8):
Proof? Proof is fact; as in what "CRJ" stands for, "Canadair REGIONAL JET". It is a Regional Jet, no matter how long its flights are.

What I'm trying to say is that even though it is called a regional jet, that name started off when it was a 50 seat bird flying Cincinnati to Roanoke and Atlanta to Lexington. Now that it has evolved into a 90 seat transcontinental aircraft, it has outgrown its name and stigma as a "regional jet" and is now an aircraft flying true mainline routes, although not providing mainline service, comfort, etc. Although it may be called a "CRJ", it is by no means a regional jet.
 
LAXintl
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:16 am

Quoting Flyf15 (Reply 5):

While 5 hours might be long for what would be "Regional Jet" asserting that mainline aircraft should operate the routes is too simplistic of a view.

The very concept of smaller/cheaper regional jet flying is what allows carriers like DL and every other US carrier to provide routes to its customers that mainline aircraft simply could not support both from capacity needs and economics.

There is no question the RJ's have been a airline game changer allowing many more city-pairs to be serviced that prior simply would not exist. Definately a positive for the consumer.

If the choice was between a multi stop mainline jet, or a nonstop RJ particularly the latest generation of larger RJ's such as the CRJ900 or EMB170/190, I would happily take the nonstop RJ.
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
gh123
Posts: 645
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 10:09 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:29 am

Quoting Naritaflyer (Reply 3):
Not only one, but two mispelled posts

So what?!
 
planemaker
Posts: 5411
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 12:53 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:31 am

Quoting Veeref (Reply 9):
Just wait, those E-190 flights to Hawaii are coming..

Which will be alot more comfortable than any 737/757 flight to Hawaii!  Smile

Quoting AirWillie6475 (Reply 10):
You're not going to get more seat space in a 757 than a CRJ.

Shhhh, don't ruin another RJ myth!  Wink

Quoting Flyf15 (Reply 11):
is now an aircraft flying true mainline routes, although not providing mainline service, comfort, etc.

Like what? How is a 737/757 better "service" and "comfort"?
Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
 
HiFi
Posts: 189
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 5:36 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:44 am

Quoting Flyf15 (Reply 5):
5 hour flights should be flown with aircraft with full ammenities. Although a reduced seating CRJ-900 is coming close, I'm still talking about full galleys, more than two underpaid overworked flight attendants, full room for the passengers, ability for them to take on their carry-ons, a true first class, etc. Additionally, this route is by no means "regional" and shouldn't be flown by regional airlines... the crews onboard should be paid a descent salary to operate such a flight.

This is a transcontinental flight flown between two major cities. If this is a "regional" route flown by a "regional" aircraft, that makes it so that essentially all flights within north america are worthy of this type of substandard service. The only exemptions would be such extreme examples as JFK-LAX.

But then again, this is all just my opinion, and you have yours as well. I'm sure we can both agree that 5 hours is a long long CRJ flight

OK. So, we have 3 options...
1. Demand increases. Suddenly, everybody wants to get from YYZ to SLC and back, in order to fill a mainline equipment. I don't think this option is realistic.
2. Airline puts big plane to fly the route, asking for government subsidies in order to maintain reasonable prices. If you and half americans are willing to spend you tax money to make YYZ-SLC a mainline route, it's all set. Democracy, after all!
3. Airline puts big plane to fly the route and offers the ticket at twice the fare you paid, in order to maintain profit. Would you pay? Or would you chose the airline next door and fly an RJ? I bet U$100 that 99% of the clients would go for the airline next door. Consequence: airline bankrupts. And pilots and F/As who you wished made more money are not paid anymore. And some of them laid off.

Better service = more expensive. You chose.  Wink
Experience shows that the majority choses cheap fares.
no commercial potential
 
planemaker
Posts: 5411
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 12:53 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 3:54 am

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 12):
The very concept of smaller/cheaper regional jet flying is what allows carriers like DL and every other US carrier to provide routes to its customers that mainline aircraft simply could not support both from capacity needs and economics.

That is right... according to UD DOT O&D traffic data (2Q2005), over 90% of US domestic markets are less than 100 pax per day.

Quoting HiFi (Reply 15):
Or would you chose the airline next door and fly an RJ?

????  Wink

Have you forgotten that it is a much better travel experience flying an E170 than any 737 or 757!!
Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
 
CRJ900
Posts: 1937
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 2:48 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:32 am

Quoting Flyf15 (Reply 3):
5 hour flights should be flown with aircraft with full ammenities. Although a reduced seating CRJ-900 is coming close, I'm still talking about full galleys, more than two underpaid overworked flight attendants, full room for the passengers, ability for them to take on their carry-ons, a true first class, etc. Additionally, this route is by no means "regional" and shouldn't be flown by regional airlines... the crews onboard should be paid a descent salary to operate such a flight.

This is a transcontinental flight flown between two major cities. If this is a "regional" route flown by a "regional" aircraft, that makes it so that essentially all flights within north america are worthy of this type of substandard service. The only exemptions would be such extreme examples as JFK-LAX.

The CRJ900 is available with "full galleys" with hot-ovens, bun warmers, wine coolers, cappuccino machine etc if the airline wants to install those things. Comfy seats and PTVs are already flying on AC Jazz' CRJ705s.

Many 150-seat B737s and A319s have only 3 FAs - I'll bet they are even more overworked. 2 FAs on a 70-76 seat CRJ900 sounds quite alright, actually.

Airlines decide how they want to equip their airplanes, and if they want to make them cheap and people are still willing to pay to fly on them, then why should the airlines change that formula? The CRJ was a short-range jet until airlines asked Bombardier to squeeze more range out of them.

The CRJ900 is here to stay for the next 20 years. 36 more of them will grace the North American skies in NWA colours starting next year. I won't be surprised if SkyWest/DL orders more too.
Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
 
Boston92
Posts: 2553
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:56 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:39 am

Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 15):
Many 150-seat B737s and A319s have only 3 FAs

Very true.. and now B6's 320's too.
"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
 
We're Nuts
Posts: 4723
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2000 6:12 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:55 am

Quoting AirWillie6475 (Reply 8):
Plus, the CRJ700/900 is one of the most comfortable aircraft out there, don't know if you have flown them.

Hahahahahaha!

Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 15):
The CRJ900 is available with "full galleys" with hot-ovens, bun warmers, wine coolers, cappuccino machine etc if the airline wants to install those things. Comfy seats and PTVs are already flying on AC Jazz' CRJ705s.

The CRJ cabin is one of the worst designed I've ever seen as a flight attendant. Have you ever worked one? That stupid plane makes you work twice as hard as you should. And heaven forbid you are of average height, as I am: the galley left me with an aching neck every night. One look at the rear FA jumpseat should be enough to make you hate that plane, though. I really could go on and on.
Dear moderators: No.
 
Boston92
Posts: 2553
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:56 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:58 am

Quoting AirWillie6475 (Reply 8):
Plus, the CRJ700/900 is one of the most comfortable aircraft out there, don't know if you have flown them.

No airplane seat is "comfortable", especially the CR7 (except for the UA First Suite on the 772)!
"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
 
CRJ900
Posts: 1937
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 2:48 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:08 am

Quoting We're Nuts (Reply 17):
That stupid plane makes you work twice as hard as you should.

Why? Can you please elaborate?  Smile And no, I haven't worked one. LH and OS FAs I have spoken to were positive about their CRJs...
Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
 
ATCGOD
Posts: 517
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:24 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:27 am

Quoting Flyf15 (Reply 3):
If this is a "regional" route flown by a "regional" aircraft, that makes it so that essentially all flights within north america are worthy of this type of substandard service. The only exemptions would be such extreme examples as JFK-LAX.

In my opinion the definition of the regional aircraft has changed quite a bit in just the last 20 years. Remember when there were no regional jet aircraft and the definition was that you were basically flying a prop job. The definition is changing again and it's really not that big of a deal, but I guess you must get used to it.
 
Cubsrule
Posts: 11375
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:13 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:06 pm

Quoting FlyDeltaJets (Reply 4):
NYC-ORD



Quoting FlyDeltaJets (Reply 4):
All not steady yeilding enough for mainline a/c

The suggestion that NYC-ORD suffers from low yields is absurd. DL suffers from the inability (for reasons outside the scope of this thread) to divert sufficient traffic to warrant mainline from AA, UA, TZ, CO, and (soon) B6.

And more to the point, a 190 is far more comfortable than most mainline aircraft. Just because it's a "regional jet" does not mean it's uncomfortable. Sadly, the -705 is not a 190, but with comparable capacities, it's difficult to say that all 76 seaters are uncomfortable.
I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 
2H4
Posts: 7960
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:11 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:16 pm




Quoting Flyf15 (Thread starter):
I think this probably conclusive proof that the CRJ-900 is not a regional jet...

Nor are the -900 pilots, in practice, "regional" pilots. Talk about a term that's been absolutely raped of it's true meaning....


2H4


Intentionally Left Blank
 
FlyDeltaJets87
Posts: 4479
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:51 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:48 pm

Quoting Veeref (Reply 7):
I think what the original poster is getting at is the fact that, particularly in coach, the product offered on the RJ is nowhere near that of a "traditional" larger mainline aircraft.

Honestly, I couldn't tell you the difference. There's no meal service in coach on either flight. If you look at seatguru and compare the seat pitch and width of the RJ to a mainline Jet, they're comparable. Delta's Mad Dogs don't have any IFE (not that it matters to me anyway. My IFE is the window, but I know it does matter to some people) and neither do the CRJ's. So really, what is the difference in product? Plus, when I fly on an RJ, no middle seat, so that's a plus!
Second, even at 6'4", I find the RJ just as comfortable to fly on as a mainline jet (well, the CR7 and CR9 anyway.) Also, the deplaning process on an RJ takes about a third of the time because A) there are fewer people and B) those people can't bring the kitchen sink with them on the plane; it gets checked plane side.
"Let's Roll"- Todd Beamer, United Airlines Flight 93, Sept. 11, 2001
 
fjnovak1
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2000 2:23 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:35 pm

I recently flew SkyWest/DL Connection on MEM-SLC, a flight lasting a shade over 3 hours in the air, on the CRJ-900...it was nice, new, and pretty comfortable. Not that different from a MD-88...and the f/a's were very attentive, more so than mainline...granted, there was no meal or anything, but there wouldn't have been (at least in coach) on a MD-88 either.

It was a good flight...but for more than three hours...that seems a little long.
Go Blue!!
 
planemaker
Posts: 5411
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 12:53 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:42 pm

Quoting FlyDeltaJets87 (Reply 23):
Honestly, I couldn't tell you the difference.

You summed up the "facts" in your post and not perceptions or prejudices. The "travel experience" on an RJ is better than mianline NBs for the reasons you posted...

Quoting FlyDeltaJets87 (Reply 23):
no middle seat



Quoting FlyDeltaJets87 (Reply 23):
deplaning process on an RJ takes about a third of the time

You can add the "boarding process" as well.

Quoting FlyDeltaJets87 (Reply 23):
Delta's Mad Dogs don't have any IFE (not that it matters to me anyway.

That is an airline's choice... if they want, their CRJs and E-Jets can have IFE (e.g. AC and JetBlue have IFE on their E-Jets and AC on their 705s).

Quoting FlyDeltaJets87 (Reply 23):
If you look at seatguru and compare the seat pitch and width of the RJ to a mainline Jet, they're comparable.

The CRJ comparable, yes, but the E-jets are better. The seats are wider and the aisle is also wider.
Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
 
fspilot747
Posts: 3455
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 1999 2:58 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:51 pm

Quoting AirWillie6475 (Reply 8):
You're not going to get more seat space in a 757 than a CRJ.

Wow this is ridiculous that this is even being debated. I fly a lot between the midwest and the west coast, and having flown on several CRJ-200s and 700s and the normal mainline aircraft, I can say without a doubt that you'd have to be f---ing nuts to think that the seats and seat space is the same.

Have you even been on a CRJ-200? I'd shoot myself after 3 hours in that thing. The 700/900s are better, tolerable rather, for a few hours (SKW does the 700 from DTW to DEN for UA, 3hrs sometimes. OK in econ plus). As soon as I connect and get on the Airbus, it's a world of a difference. Much more comfortable, the seats are much better, the cabin is roomier, I can stretch my legs out, and I'm not crammed into a 1 inch thick flimsy seat.

I hate CRJs period. And to think that there is "no difference" is being overly sentimental towards those airplanes.
 
ikramerica
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 9:33 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:06 pm

Quoting FSPilot747 (Reply 26):
I fly a lot between the midwest and the west coast, and having flown on several CRJ-200s and 700s and the normal mainline aircraft, I can say without a doubt that you'd have to be f---ing nuts to think that the seats and seat space is the same.

Very blunt, but true.

Mainline has wider armrests, greater headroom (sitting and walking), wider aisles, more leg space at the window seats, real overhead bins to carry on items, larger bathroom.

The worst flight I ever had was sitting next to another tall person on a CRJ. ERJ's aren't as bad, though two larger people (not fat, just not petite) in B,C ends up hurting my back because I have to lean away so as not to be shoved into their shoulder. Either my right or left leg hurts being turned in for 3 hours on an ERJ if I sit at the window.

This just isn't the situation on mainline aircraft. They may not be luxurious, but mainline have more interior space per pax. E-jets are improving that part, but most regional jets are ERJ/CRJ right now.

Choice of flying a CRJ for 5 hours or connecting on two mainlines for 3 hours each, I'll take the connection. Heck, I'd happily connect if it was 1 mainline/1 RJ if the mainline flight was the longer one.
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
 
planemaker
Posts: 5411
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 12:53 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:44 pm

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 27):
They may not be luxurious, but mainline have more interior space per pax. E-jets are improving that part

The E-jets actually have more interior space per pax, in addition to having wider seats and a wider aisle (and no middle seat!)

Quoting FSPilot747 (Reply 26):
I can stretch my legs out

31" pitch is 31" pitch.

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 27):
Choice of flying a CRJ for 5 hours or connecting on two mainlines for 3 hours each, I'll take the connection. Heck, I'd happily connect if it was 1 mainline/1 RJ if the mainline flight was the longer one.

Choice is the point. The CRJ gives you that choice... between a non-stop and a connection(s).
Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
 
fspilot747
Posts: 3455
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 1999 2:58 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:59 pm

Quoting Planemaker (Reply 28):
31" pitch is 31" pitch.

Have you thought about the vertical seatback?

Those numbers don't account for the fact that unless you're in a bulkhead, you can usually easily slide your legs well underneath the seat in front of you, giving you much more legroom than a CRJ, in which you can't do that as well.

The CRJ would not be as bad if the seats were of better quality. Those are essentially padded fold-out seats. And the seatback sits so vertical that you cannot sit on that thing for more than a couple of hours without going a little nuts (the 200 is a real sucker to fly on, in this respect).

Never been on an E-Jet, but they do look better.
 
vfw614
Posts: 3168
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 12:34 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Wed Dec 20, 2006 12:33 am

The aircraft opens up nonstop markets that otherwise would not exist or only at a laughable frequency. That's the whole story. So the only choice is between no service at all and a CRJ service.
 
Cubsrule
Posts: 11375
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:13 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:51 am

Quoting FSPilot747 (Reply 29):

The CRJ would not be as bad if the seats were of better quality. Those are essentially padded fold-out seats.

That's a carrier issue. The DH seats were fantastic.
I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 
BCAInfoSys
Posts: 2617
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 11:09 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:07 am

My biggest gripe with the CRJ is the cabin height and the pathetically-small lavs. I'm a rather big guy at 6'4", and I hate having to bend over to walk down the aisle. And don't get me started about trying to fit into a lav on the CRJ2/7 to take a piss! I feel like a damned contortionist.

Will be flying the CRJ9 for the first time on Friday, I'll let you know if it's any improvement over the 2 smaller models.
Militant Agnostic - I don't know and you don't either.
 
Goldenshield
Posts: 5005
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 3:45 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:16 am

Quoting BCAInfoSys (Reply 32):
My biggest gripe with the CRJ is the cabin height and the pathetically-small lavs. I'm a rather big guy at 6'4", and I hate having to bend over to walk down the aisle. And don't get me started about trying to fit into a lav on the CRJ2/7 to take a piss! I feel like a damned contortionist.

The CRJ 7/900 for DL have two lavs. The one in the rear is the roomiest—assuming it's the same plug that they put into the UA birds. The E170's front lav is also fit for a contortionist, but to be fair, most narrowbody aircraft with lavs in the taper aren't exactly comfortable in the least.
Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
 
cltguy
Posts: 541
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:54 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:04 am

I recently flew a US CRJ900 from PHX-YVR. This is a 3 hour flight, and it was completely full. This was honestly one of the worst planes I have ever been on and that opinion is completely based on the fact of how small the plane was and how cramped it felt. Not that flying on a full 757, 737, A320, etc is a joyride but it is more comfortable than flying in a full CRJ900 due to the amount of space.
 
CRJ900
Posts: 1937
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 2:48 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:10 am

Will US Airways return the CRJs to their original role and fly them on 1-2-hour shuttle hops while the new E190s do 2-4-hour flights?

Low-MTOW one-class 88-90-seat CRJ900s for short hops and high-MTOW two-class 99-seat E190s for longer sectors ought to please bean counters, crews and especially pax...?
Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
 
ikramerica
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 9:33 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:43 am

Quoting Goldenshield (Reply 33):
most narrowbody aircraft with lavs in the taper aren't exactly comfortable in the least.

No doubt, but at 6'3", saying both are bad isn't a fair comparison. While the lav on a 757 isn't great, at least I can physically fit into the thing.

As for the seats, yes it does depend on the carrier. but, to save weight, most carriers equipped the regionals with flimsy seats that were only meant to be sat on for a short amount of time.

Which is the point. If RJs are going to be used on long routes, they should be fit with real appointments.

Long distance trains and subways are often the same size, but subways are fit with different interiors to meet the task. Using a CRJ interior designed for a 90 minute flight on a 5 hour flight is misusing the type, and the customer suffers.
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
 
fspilot747
Posts: 3455
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 1999 2:58 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:28 am

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 36):
Using a CRJ interior designed for a 90 minute flight on a 5 hour flight is misusing the type, and the customer suffers.

 checkmark 
 
User avatar
SLCUT2777
Posts: 3407
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 12:17 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:58 am

Quoting Cltguy (Reply 34):
I recently flew a US CRJ900 from PHX-YVR. This is a 3 hour flight, and it was completely full. This was honestly one of the worst planes I have ever been on and that opinion is completely based on the fact of how small the plane was and how cramped it felt. Not that flying on a full 757, 737, A320, etc is a joyride but it is more comfortable than flying in a full CRJ900 due to the amount of space.

And I thought 2 hours from SLC-YVR was bad on a DL CRJ-200! No wonder why I book the 738 flight when I can!  crowded 
DELTA Air Lines; The Only Way To Fly from Salt Lake City; Let the Western Heritage always be with Delta!
 
Boston92
Posts: 2553
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:56 am

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Wed Dec 20, 2006 5:02 am

Quoting SLCUT2777 (Reply 38):
And I thought 2 hours from SLC-YVR was bad

Thats what I think with me 3+ hour flight SBA-DFW on a CR7.
"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
 
Goldenshield
Posts: 5005
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 3:45 pm

RE: So The CRJ-900 Is A Regional Jet?

Wed Dec 20, 2006 5:02 am

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 36):
As for the seats, yes it does depend on the carrier. but, to save weight, most carriers equipped the regionals with flimsy seats that were only meant to be sat on for a short amount of time.

Write the companies if you think it's that bad. Dammit, Jim, I'm a dispatcher, not an interior decorator (and my wardrobe proves it.)
Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 817Dreamliiner, Baidu [Spider], Balerit, BlueSky1976, dubaiamman243, Ducari, FLJ, Google Adsense [Bot], GRJGeorge, kalvado, Majestic-12 [Bot], Razza74, rbrunner, RRTrent, timboflier215, VirginFlyer, webuser and 278 guests