nycfly75
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:38 pm

MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:07 am

 
Longhornmaniac
Posts: 2960
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:33 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:08 am

They've obviously never been to Austin.  Silly

Cheers,
Cameron
Cheers,
Cameron
 
SQno1
Posts: 678
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 10:41 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:16 am

HEATHROW!!

My god, i guess the people at MSNBC just simply don't see reality!

Alex  wave 
 
goldorak
Posts: 1359
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 5:29 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:23 am

Amazing to see LAX & LHR in this top ten list  Confused  Confused  Confused
 
User avatar
yowza
Posts: 4275
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:01 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:25 am

1. Aéroport de St. Jean: More of an airfield really.
2. Amsterdam Schiphol Airport: Agreed! The Dutch have AMS under control.
3. Calgary International Airport: Bland
4. Changi Airport: Can't argue, Changi run like clockwork.
5. Heathrow Airport: In a word... No.
6. John F. Kennedy International Airport: Depends on the terminal and time of day

I bet whoever wrote this has not been to all ten aiports. So it's really just a content quota piece. Not to mention the fact that they are comparing apples and oranges, Aéroport de St. Jean is an airfield really. Not really too sure how Heathrow made the list. Maybe they meant LHR without Terminal 1 and 3?

YOWza
 
RIXrat
Posts: 670
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:20 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:48 am

This is a disgrace! I would like to know how many people they interviewed -- 1,004 usually. Heathrow is at the bottom of my list. JFK, depending on the terminal, but, but to mention of all the tax-free goodies should only apply to those living outside the EU. I would rate Copenhagen with it's shopping mall-sized terminal as No. 1, where you can get all of those mani-pedi-cures.

Yet, of course you have to realize that this is not an objective survey. Sherman's, from where this all originated, is a travel agency and they are pushing their destinations and trying to cash in on them.
 
vega
Posts: 1161
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 8:56 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:50 am

Actually you need to read the rationale for most of the picks - e.g.. JFK because of Jet Blue - a relatively minor player in the scheme of the overall environment, LAX because of high celebrity sighting potential, etc.. Some are accidentally correct, AMS, SYD, etc.. Note the current Low reader evaluation of this article at the end of the 2nd page.
We are but a moment in this vast Universe and when gone we will never have existed.
 
flydreamliner
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:05 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:54 am

LAX is on their list?

wow, that's pretty funny.... likewise, JFK.

there seems to be little rhyme or reason to their lists.

DTW's airport isn't bad, MSP is nice, clean, and modern.

If LAX and JFK are there, I have a hard time imagining ORD not being.
"Let the world change you, and you can change the world"
 
planenutz
Posts: 1156
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 1999 5:50 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:57 am

Unbelievable. Much, much more research needed. Its laughable that LHR and LAX would be included in any Top 10 list.

What the article neglects to mention is that many of the amenities available to AMS depend on destination, i.e. Schengen departures dont have use of the transit hotel or other services located beyond passport control).
Not all who wander are lost....
 
Tom in NO
Posts: 6725
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 1999 10:10 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:58 am

MSNBC must be smoking some serious stuff.....we can all shoot enough holes in their list. And basing their rankings on one small facet of that airport (ie JFK, LAX) is in no way indicative of the airport as a whole.

Tom at MSY
"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
 
redflyer
Posts: 3881
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:30 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:19 am

Quoting YOWza (Reply 4):
I bet whoever wrote this has not been to all ten aiports

I bet whoever wrote this had too much spiked egg-nog over the holidays.
My other home is a Piper Cherokee 180C
 
runway23
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:12 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:22 am

"The long, glossy promenades in Terminals 1 to 4 are lined with stores, restaurants, bars, pubs, and cafés vying for your attention"

Sounds more like Terminal 4 than any other to me. If you try to fit Terminal 2 in there it should read "your head hitting the ceiling [in what used to be a parking lot], carpets so torn that people stumble upon them, outdated infrastructures, etc...

Clearly, whoever did this survey was on some very powerful drugs. No way should LAX, JFK or LHR, St Jean be in the top 10.
 
centrair
Posts: 2845
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 3:44 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:25 am

Quoting RedFlyer (Reply 10):
I bet whoever wrote this had too much spiked egg-nog over the holidays.

No crap....where are HKG, DXB, and ICN? How did these people choose LAX? Smoking something they shouldn't have?
Yes...I am not a KIX fan. Let's Japanese Aviation!
 
jm017
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2002 6:47 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:30 am

I cannot believe YYC made the list. As Yowza said, it is bland. Not bad, but not thrilling.

JFK? I mean it's pretty good and much better than it was in the 90's (and it really depends on the terminal). But I wouldn't say top ten. My personal top ten, yeah probably. But not "world top ten." You got Singapore, Amsterdam, Hong Kong, and several others that I think would top JFK.

LAX? Are you kidding me?
"It's okay to cheat, if you just really don't like to lose."
 
ikramerica
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 9:33 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:36 am

What a useless article.

What I love is their praise for B6 at JFK, as if they invented the on-line bag drop counter. The writer is a B6 fan, and that's why JFK gets on the list???

Article obviously written by someone who's only been to the ten airports on the "list"  Wink
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
 
supa7E7
Posts: 1360
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 2:05 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:48 am

Nicest ones I know of

MUC !!
NRT
HKG
AMS
TYS - beautiful, well done Knoxville!
DXB
DCA
DTW - NW facility
PDX - nice
BUF - new terminal
PMI - so huge
HEL
PVG
ANC
BZN
DEN


Worst:
SJO - overcrowded!
LAS - ditto
HNL - too busy, hectic, but cool
SXM - until it was replaced
SBP - too small
PHL
MIA
ATL - too big
CDG - needs some refurb on original 1974 structure
SLC - ditto
"Who's to say spaceships aren't fine art?" - Phil Lesh
 
ikramerica
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 9:33 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:53 am

Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 15):
Worst:
SJO - overcrowded!
LAS - ditto
HNL - too busy, hectic, but cool
SXM - until it was replaced
SBP - too small
PHL
MIA
ATL - too big
CDG - needs some refurb on original 1974 structure
SLC - ditto

Can't agree with that list. Not the best, but certainly many are not the worst.

As for nice airports, I'd have to add CVG to the list (at least Terminal 3). I hadn't been there in a while, and while it was nice before, seems as if they made it even nicer! If only Concourses A and B were dedicated to a better airline than Delta...
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
 
Garri767
Posts: 2207
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 2:00 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:55 am

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 1):
They've obviously never been to Austin

Of course they have! They are busy creating their "Worst 10 airports'' list as we speak  Wink
Two wrongs may not make a right, but three lefts do!
 
itsjustme
Posts: 2727
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 6:58 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:17 am

Quoting JM017 (Reply 13):
LAX? Are you kidding me?

I think the fact that they mentioned "celebrity sightings" is proof enough that whoever wrote the article has their priorities screwed up when rating airports. I don't go to an airport to see a "celebrity". I go there to catch a plane. The least amount of time I spend in an airport, the better, far as I am concerned. As long as the security personnel are competent, the bathrooms are clean, and I can get a decent cup of coffee somewhere, color me happy.
 
steeler83
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:06 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:36 am

Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 15):
Nicest ones I know of

I am surprised that KIX isn't on that list. That is a neat facility. Not that I have seen it in person or anything, but I have seen it on the Discovery and TLC channels... At least DTW is mentioned regarding the NW facility. I would throw in PIT and DEN for that matter for having modern and navigable facilities, 100+ shops, eateries and amenities, etc. PIT is always near the top of the list of US Airports for this, despite having a scaled back US operation, but we won't go there  Smile

Worst airports, add MEM to that list. From what I have seen of that airport through various pics and text regarding the facility, it makes PHL look like the Sydney Opera House!
Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
 
nateDAL
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:38 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:43 am

They are right about SBH. I love that island and it's airport.

There isn't even a security checkpoint. Unfortunately, we can't get away with that away from paradise
Set Love Free
 
kulatict
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 9:20 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:05 am

good god.... the only reason LAX is up there on the list because its a mecca to spot celebrities & lots of eateries? is this guy go to airport to hang out or to catch a flight? LAX is a zoo. PERIOD!!!!!
 
LAXdude1023
Posts: 4431
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:16 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:11 am

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 1):
They've obviously never been to Austin.

This is true. Both AUS, IAH, and DFW are great airports. Texas knows somthing we dont.

Quoting Vega (Reply 6):
LAX because of high celebrity sighting potential,



Quoting FlyDreamliner (Reply 7):
LAX is on their list?

wow, that's pretty funny.... likewise, JFK.



Quoting Planenutz (Reply 8):
Its laughable that LHR and LAX would be included in any Top 10 list.



Quoting Runway23 (Reply 11):
No way should LAX, JFK or LHR, St Jean be in the top 10.



Quoting JM017 (Reply 13):
LAX? Are you kidding me?

No kidding!!!!! This list is a joke. I love LAX because of all the different airlines you see there and that I live in El Segundo, but LAX is a model for inefficiency.
It is what it is...
 
mkorpal
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:47 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:15 am

LAX is a joke, the only good thing about it is the vast amount of planes there are to see. But it is good for people viewing. Last week I was there the Basketball player Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. But that was just after I spent an hour in a line for booking at United. There were about 20 people in front of us, and only about 2 of them were helped during that hour. Needless to say, I gave up on flying back to DEN. Speaking of DEN, it should be on the list unless if you look at it this week.
 
Mir
Posts: 19092
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:55 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:48 am

Quoting Planenutz (Reply 8):
Its laughable that LHR and LAX would be included in any Top 10 list.

Except if it's the Top 10 Worst Airports List.

I'm happy that JFK made the list and all, but let's be serious here - while T6 is excellent, T2/3 and T8 easily make up for it. That's two of the three main carriers at the airport operating out of terminals that are awful on a good day.

LHR and LAX are two of the worst airports there are, and putting St. Jean and Keflavik on the list just because they serve nice places is pure idiocy.

-Mir
7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
 
codc10
Posts: 1750
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2000 7:18 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:28 am

Not for nothing, but the list is a complete joke. Terminal 6 isn't even the best at that airport, let alone "widely regarded as the best of all three NY-area airports". Terminal 4 thoroughly kicks the shit out 6, without question, and Terminals 1, 7, and 9 all are deserving of serious consideration. Hell, even T5 is cooler than T6, and it's friggin closed!

Continental offers the same amenities (spa services, OLCI bag drop, unique food choices {Gallagher's, anyone?}, and live music) in their Terminal C, many having come on line before JetBlue's time. Plus, I would argue that the terminal is far less crowded, stuffy, and offers more amenities than JetBlue does at JFK T6. Then again, I am a Continental guy, so what do I know? Big grin

LAX, in general, is pretty dumpy and certainly not in the same category as some of the cities on that list. The Encounter restaurant is great, however, and I am glad to see it mentioned.

Keflavik? Who goes there? Who cares? Why not put Atlantic City on the list, too! The newer section of the terminal is fairly modern, has a nice gift shop, and I never have to wait on lines there...

Madrid, before the opening of the new OneWorld facility, was a total disgrace. Easily my least favorite airport in all of Europe, by a long shot.

The ShermansTravel journalist has written a poor article, more than likely from anecdotal evidence based on limited experience. Where is HKG, NGO, KIX, MUC, DEN, DTW, TPA, MCO, HNL, PVG, or ICN on that list?
 
Longhornmaniac
Posts: 2960
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:33 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:41 am

Quoting Garri767 (Reply 17):
Of course they have! They are busy creating their "Worst 10 airports'' list as we speak

LOL I hate you Shannon!

Cheers,
Cameron
Cheers,
Cameron
 
User avatar
United_fan
Posts: 6358
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 11:11 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:42 am

LAX? What are they smoking? Other than stupid 'celebrity' sightings,LAX is a dump. I was there over the Summer,and DL's terminal is nice,but DL ticketing is hopelessly depressing. SNA,ORD,FLL,LAS' D-terminal,SEA and ATL are nicer than LAX IMHO.
Champagne For My Real Friends,and Real Pain For My Sham Friends
 
Mir
Posts: 19092
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:55 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:47 pm

Quoting CODC10 (Reply 25):
Terminal 6 isn't even the best at that airport, let alone "widely regarded as the best of all three NY-area airports". Terminal 4 thoroughly kicks the shit out 6, without question,

I wouldn't say without question. Yes, the architecture is nicer, and it does have some nicer shops, but T6 has hands-down the best selection and quality of food at JFK, an area in which T4 is sorely lacking.



-Mir
7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
 
manny
Posts: 480
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 8:59 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:57 pm

I cannot believe DEN, MUC, HKG did not make the list. These are the ones i know of.
 
Eagle11
Posts: 163
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:43 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:42 pm

How can you put airports with such old and deteriorated terminals ahead of those that have built (and are still building) brand new facilities within the last five years? (i.e. DTW)

Not a very good list in my opinion.
"The Eagle has landed"
 
Flyboy14295
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 6:20 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:50 pm

Quoting Garri767 (Reply 17):

Of course they have! They are busy creating their "Worst 10 airports'' list as we speak Wink

Of course they will get this list right! This is despicable. I will admit I am a little biased to JFK being it's my home airport but not 6. quality. Maybe terminal 4(intl.)
Greetings from New York. "Take It to the limit." -Eagles
 
User avatar
RedTailDTW
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:08 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:52 pm

I bet you that once the new North Terminal at DTW opens, they should be on that list...


Mason
Airlines Flown: AA, CO, HP, MQ, NW, RP, UA, US, WN, YX / Aircraft Flown: 737-200/300/700/800, 757-200/300, 777-200, A319/A320/A321, DC-9-30/50, DC-10-40, ERJ 140/145, E170, MD80/83/90
 
User avatar
RedTailDTW
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:08 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:53 pm

Thr problem with DTW is the Smith Terminal.....what a dump that place is...
Airlines Flown: AA, CO, HP, MQ, NW, RP, UA, US, WN, YX / Aircraft Flown: 737-200/300/700/800, 757-200/300, 777-200, A319/A320/A321, DC-9-30/50, DC-10-40, ERJ 140/145, E170, MD80/83/90
 
ikramerica
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 9:33 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:16 pm

Quoting CODC10 (Reply 25):
Continental offers the same amenities (spa services, OLCI bag drop, unique food choices {Gallagher's, anyone?}, and live music) in their Terminal C, many having come on line before JetBlue's time. Plus, I would argue that the terminal is far less crowded, stuffy, and offers more amenities than JetBlue does at JFK T6. Then again, I am a Continental guy, so what do I know?

That was kind of my point. CO at EWR is just one example but they have had the online checkin with bag drop forever, and the options in C are extensive to say the least.

CVG is also a fine airport, at least the DL area.

TPA ranges from good to great depending on the concourse and has free WiFi, and MCO may not be perfect, but it's way above airports on his list.

Internationally, I was impressed with HAM's airport two summers ago, if he likes shopping, the shopping mall at NRT with observation deck is nice for killing time, and PER (domestic) was nice for a terminal with only 3 jetways and some regional parking spots.
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
 
ordryan28
Posts: 963
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:24 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:18 pm

Their ratings were based on...what...?
Whoever said winning is not everything never fought cancer.
 
irobertson
Posts: 409
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:35 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:24 pm

Maybe its not big enough to hit top 10, but YHZ has been winning awards left right and center over the past five years, including best airport of its class worldwide. Pretty impressive for a mid-sized international airport.
 
tcfc424
Posts: 444
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:56 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:14 pm

I agree that this list is pure crap, but listening to you guys has made it clear that people like/dislike different airports based on different criteria. I would doubt if the membership of this board, as silled as many are, would not be able to agree on a "top 10 list" for airports. That said...

I think for a business-based entity like MSNBC, their criteria should be geared towards business pax, not leisure pax. Since when is a road warrior interested in taking a jaunt into Iceland for 3-7 days over getting home in a secent time frame. (realizing there are exceptions to every rule) They should gear THEIR basis of the top ten on things near and dear to business travelers: time needed to traverse the check-in line or automated kiosks; the availability of internet or wireless access; time to clear security; time to clear customs (if applicable); conference facilities; etc.

The way they constructed their list is simply ridiculous. They should hire one of us (or an army of us) to evaluate each airport around the world based on a set criteria. LAX because its a celebrity hotspot? Come on!

My personal best:
1. Austin (home airport...local flavor)
2. DEN (efficient, pleasing)
3. MCO (efficient, plenty of spotting opportunities)
4. LAS (gambling...need I say more)
5. HNL (I like the open-air feel and looking at a B777 nose up close!)
6. IAH
7. DFW

worst:
1. MEM (At least last I was there...undergoing renovations)
2. LAX (Who created this airport design???)
3. OGG (it may be paradise, but it is difficult to traverse and time consuming)
4. ATL (wayyyy tooo big...Terminal E is nice though)
 
777fan
Posts: 2256
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:09 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:16 pm

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 1):
They've obviously never been to Austin



Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 14):
What a useless article.

What I love is their praise for B6 at JFK, as if they invented the on-line bag drop counter. The writer is a B6 fan, and that's why JFK gets on the list???

Article obviously written by someone who's only been to the ten airports on the "list"

What a bunch of dumbasses. Seriously. JFK?! What a dump! LAX?! Yeah, it has nine terminals but seven of them are crapholes! They tout LHR for its duty free shopping, pubs and restaurants - have they ever traveled internationally?!

Good thing they didn't mention KIX, ICN or HKG - those airports suck, right?

While I'm at it, DEN is probably the one airport I wouldn't mind being snowed in at; it has a buttload of places to eat, shop, etc. AUS is arguably the best mid-sized airport in the US and I'd even take SEA, ORD or SFO over the jokes they promote in that article.

777fan
DC-8 61/63/71 DC-9-30/50 MD-80/82/83 DC-10-10/30 MD-11 717 721/2 732/3/4/5/G/8/9 741/2/4 752 762/3 777 A306/319/20/33 AT
 
hz747300
Posts: 1906
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 11:38 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:29 pm

Quoting Irobertson (Reply 36):
Maybe its not big enough to hit top 10,

Well, if St. Bart's made the list, size certainly does not matter. LAX, JFK, and LHR are certainly bad additions to any great list. I would include JFK if it was possible to stroll terminal-to-terminal as I think it has the most variety in planes and airlines. The jetBlue terminal does not get me excited.

HKG, where I live now, is a great airport - decent variety and great views, good for strolling. I thought CPH was good for shopping, especially dirty magazines.

Ironically, SYD was on the list. After living there for the last 17 months, I found it to be awful on the non-Qantas international side, and not a whole lot better on the Qantas side. But it was chosen because you can take an outdated train into the city.

PHX was not on the list, at least they got that right! But we are talking about their article, which in reality, the authors could not ask for more....
Keep on truckin'...
 
Longhornmaniac
Posts: 2960
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:33 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:31 pm

Quoting 777fan (Reply 38):
While I'm at it, DEN is probably the one airport I wouldn't mind being snowed in at; it has a buttload of places to eat, shop, etc. AUS is arguably the best mid-sized airport in the US and I'd even take SEA, ORD or SFO over the jokes they promote in that article.

I'm right there with you. AUS is nice because of the focus on the city. You arrive in the Austin airport, you get a great feel (as good as one can at an airport) as to how the town feels. The home grown restaurants and occasional live music (yes, we have a stage in an airport) makes AUS a really neat place. DEN is very nice, though I've only been there 4 or 5 times. I agree, ORD is leaps and bounds better than an airport like LAX.

Cheers,
Cameron
Cheers,
Cameron
 
AVinutso
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:34 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:31 pm

LAX is a mega dump and............... I haven't seen any "celebs" every time I was there, but then again, who gives a damn about that. DEN is my home base airport and I find it easy to get through that airport in a short amount of time. My wife was stranded there one time and they did not do much to accomodate her so it lost some points there. AUS would have to be my favorite.
Maybe we shoulda thought of that FIRST
 
TSS
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:52 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:35 pm

Of the ten airports listed in the article, the only one I've been in was LAX. If it is one of the "top ten" in the world, I shudder to think what the bottom ten are like. To me, not one single "You Are Here" map in oddly-shaped terminals and having to go through separate security checkpoints every time you go from one terminal to another when changing planes do not a great airport make.

I couldn't help but notice that the article focused on the amenities that were available in the selected airports, not on the overall efficiency or convenience of those airports. In my mind, a good airport is one where you can get in and get where you're going with a minimum of fuss. A choice of good and inexpensive restaurants is nice, and attractive artwork is always a plus, but I'm (hopefully) not going to be spending more than a couple of hours in any airport, so all that other stuff is just useless fluff to me.
Able to kill active threads stone dead with a single post!
 
GECMD11
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:43 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:39 pm

wow, LHR,JFK an LAX !!
i'd hate to see there 10 worst list........what a joke

why didn't ATL and IAD get on there list while there at it?
 
EK345
Posts: 126
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 5:12 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:50 pm

wow... interesting list. that's all i have to say.

EK345
"and miles to go before I sleep..."
 
Longhornmaniac
Posts: 2960
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:33 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:08 pm

Well guys, I just send them (shermanstravel.com) an email expressing my displeasure at the list, and offering a suggestion, similar to:

Quoting Tcfc424 (Reply 37):
I think for a business-based entity like MSNBC, their criteria should be geared towards business pax, not leisure pax. Since when is a road warrior interested in taking a jaunt into Iceland for 3-7 days over getting home in a secent time frame. (realizing there are exceptions to every rule) They should gear THEIR basis of the top ten on things near and dear to business travelers: time needed to traverse the check-in line or automated kiosks; the availability of internet or wireless access; time to clear security; time to clear customs (if applicable); conference facilities; etc.

I essentially said that because airports are so complex, and geared for different purposes (a la St. Barts vs. LHR), it is nearly impossible to compare them without some specific, detailed criteria. I suggested they have several lists, such as business, leisure, shopping, food, ease of use, best small airports etc... The more specific the criteria, the more accurate the lists will be.

Cheers,
Cameron
Cheers,
Cameron
 
thegooddoctor
Posts: 418
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 8:12 am

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:38 pm

Quoting KULatICT (Reply 21):
LAX is a zoo. PERIOD!!!!!

Come now! A zoo is organized, with all the animals limited to their respective cages... Maybe a better comparison would be to the Wild Animal Park in San Diego - spread out, lots of animals running about with no particular organization - some parts of it look like the most untamed parts of Africa!

Ditto on everyones comments on LHR.
The GoodDoctor
 
Aviator3b2
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:36 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:58 pm

BOS has to be one of the worst airports I have flown in and out of. Baggage can some times take an hour to come out. The Big Dig has created headaches for the past 10 years at and around the airport. Things are finnally starting to clear up a little with that. As for the best, I love flying into CLT. PVD and JAX are up there too. I just like simple airports with little congestion and short lines at the security checkpoint. That's all I'm asking for!!  Angry  stirthepot 
 
Kangar
Posts: 362
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2000 8:11 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:33 pm

Am I blind , or is HKG missing from the list? Heathrow is possibly the most comprehensive dump I have ever been in, I can't believe they even thought about it and best in the same sentence.
 
emalad
Posts: 365
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:51 pm

RE: MSNBC's Top 10 Airports

Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:37 pm

The best airports i have been to are Kuala Lumpur and Sydney. They put Heathrow in the shade!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: b377, BAeRJ100, Baidu [Spider], BrianDromey, heyjc99, justplanesmart, kimshep, MattSYD, MKEdude, msycajun, N62NA, smi0006 and 171 guests