cumulus
Posts: 1003
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 4:39 pm

Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:03 pm

What Goes Up Must Come Down, Hopefully In One Piece!
 
Kevin777
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:36 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:59 pm

Quoting Cumulus (Thread starter):
Surely has to be the first LCC!!!

Oh no.... WN!

But still, first one to take up the battle over the Atlantic, and have to admire Sir Freddie Laker for his courage.

Didn't know they had 17 planes at the time - thought they were only half that size or something. They only had DC10s, right?

Well, Branson took up the legacy a year later and was more succesfull with his approach to Atlantic travel; however, he also had more luck with the politicians after it became evident that Laker was beaten under very unfair circumstances.

Btw, didn't Sir Freddie pass away quite recently?

Kevin777  Smile
"I was waiting for you at DFW, but you must have been in LUV" CPH-HAM-CPH CR9
 
BCAL
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:13 pm

25 years ago already? I can remember it as though it was yesterday. A sad time for UK Civil Aviation and a sad time for free enterprise.

Quoting Cumulus (Thread starter):
Surely has to be the first LCC

The early Skytrain flights cost GBP 59 for LGW-JFK and USD 90 for JFK-LGW, inclusive of all taxes and supplements. Meals had to be pre-ordered and cost GBP 5 for a main-meal and pre-landing snack, and there all drinks had to be paid for. The original licence for Laker Skytrain was that seats could only be sold on the day of travel. Initially, there were queues of hundreds waiting outside the Laker Sales Office at LGW and the tiny sales office at London Victoria Station when both opened at 07:30am, but they could only accept 345 pax per day so the flights were sold out by 10:00am.

Sadly Sir Freddie died last year. Like Prince Philip said of the tycoon during his life "Sir Freddie might be at peace with his maker but in IATA he is a person non-gratia!"


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Robinson

MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
BCAL
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:27 pm

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 1):
Oh no.... WN!

But still, first one to take up the battle over the Atlantic, and have to admire Sir Freddie Laker for his courage.

Sorry but you are incorrect there. Laker Airways was founded and airborne in 1966. Air Southwest's first flight was in the following year - 1967.

However, in its initial days Laker was a charter carrier but did accept ABC bookings for trans Atlantic travel. Sir Freddie had to fight the policiticians and UK and US Governments before he was given permission for Skytrain to operate, the first service taking to the air in 1977.

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 1):
Well, Branson took up the legacy a year later and was more succesfull with his approach to Atlantic travel; however, he also had more luck with the politicians after it became evident that Laker was beaten under very unfair circumstances.

Branson was lucky, rather than successful with his approach to Atlantic travel. The original VS that operated a fleet of 4 third-hand 747s was very close to shutting down and would never had survived had it not been for both the demise of British Caledonian, when VS was granted the licence to be the second UK carrier, and being granted access to LHR, something that had previously been denied to most independent airlines.

Sir Freddie operated when the airlines were mostly state-owned and heavily regulated and IATA set fares. Compared to the policitics of the air when Sir Freddie was around, Branson's problems are like a ride on a carousel at DisneyWorld.

[Edited 2007-02-05 13:27:55]
MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
Gr8Circle
Posts: 2397
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 11:44 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:05 pm

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 1):
Didn't know they had 17 planes at the time - thought they were only half that size or something. They only had DC10s, right?

At the time they went bust, Laker Airways had 3 A300 B4's on order....those three planes were subsuequently taken by AI and flown for almost 20 years before being gifted to Afghanistan by the Govt. of India.....


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Fred Seggie - WorldAirImages

 
BCAL
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:24 pm

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 1):
Didn't know they had 17 planes at the time - thought they were only half that size or something. They only had DC10s, right?

Laker operated 20 aircraft at the time of its collapse
  • 5 x DC10-30
  • 6 x DC10-10
  • 3 x A300 B4
  • 2 x 707-351B, and
  • 4 x BAC 111
The news article says that they owned 17, but presumably they excluded the DC10 that Laker had sub-leased to International Caribbean Airways and the 2 x 707-351Bs that were being phased out

Quoting Gr8Circle (Reply 4):
At the time they went bust, Laker Airways had 3 A300 B4's on order....

At the time they went bust Laker had 10 firm orders for the A300 B4 and options for another 20 aircraft (the plans being to have a "Skytrain" like service operating between all major European capitals). The airline took delivery of 3 aircraft that briefly flew in Laker colours. It remains a mystery how the under capitalised Laker Airways could have raised the necessary finance for the large (for an independent airline) A300 B4 order.
MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
1stfl94
Posts: 1082
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:33 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:33 pm

A sad day for British Aviation. Wonder if anyone will try and restart Laker Airways somewhere???
 
User avatar
OzarkD9S
Posts: 4796
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2001 2:31 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:36 pm

Quoting BCAL (Reply 3):


Sorry but you are incorrect there. Laker Airways was founded and airborne in 1966. Air Southwest's first flight was in the following year - 1967.

"Air Southwest" may have been formed in 1967, but it was renamed Southwest and began service in 1971.

http://www.southwest.com/about_swa/airborne.html

However, PSA beat them both:

http://www.jetpsa.com/index/history.html
Next up: STL-CVG-MKE-MSP-STL.
 
BCAL
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:37 pm

Quoting 1stfl94 (Reply 6):
Wonder if anyone will try and restart Laker Airways somewhere

Oasis Hong Kong has already started - initially offering flights between HKG-LGW but soon starting services between HKG and the USA.

Laker's vision was to take Skytrain further and make it "Globetrain" - offering low priced services round the world. If Oasis pulls off HKG - USA, it might almost succeed where Laker failed.
MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
Kevin777
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:36 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:44 am

Quoting BCAL (Reply 3):
Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 1):
Oh no.... WN!

But still, first one to take up the battle over the Atlantic, and have to admire Sir Freddie Laker for his courage.

Sorry but you are incorrect there. Laker Airways was founded and airborne in 1966. Air Southwest's first flight was in the following year - 1967.

Sorry, I stand corrected (and with the PSA-thing!). Didn't know he started that much before he started transatlantic

Quoting BCAL (Reply 3):
Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 1):
Well, Branson took up the legacy a year later and was more succesfull with his approach to Atlantic travel; however, he also had more luck with the politicians after it became evident that Laker was beaten under very unfair circumstances.

Branson was lucky, rather than successful with his approach to Atlantic travel. The original VS that operated a fleet of 4 third-hand 747s was very close to shutting down and would never had survived had it not been for both the demise of British Caledonian, when VS was granted the licence to be the second UK carrier, and being granted access to LHR, something that had previously been denied to most independent airlines.

That's exactly what I'm saying, too - I think it's just a choice of words; whether Branson was succesful or lucky with the authorities and the competition; either way the result was the same. Surely, VS wouldn't have survived if it hadn't been for new legislation and a tougher stand on predatory tactics on behalf of BA - brought on significantly by the demise of LAker.

Saying this, however, I still believe that Branson's business model itself had a better chance than Laker's. I don't believe in low-cost long-haul as such.

Quoting 1stfl94 (Reply 6):
Wonder if anyone will try and restart Laker Airways somewhere???

Freddie Laker continued a Laker Airways somewhere in the Bahamas with a couple of 727, at least untill around 2000 or so, but don't know if it's there anymore..

Quoting BCAL (Reply 8):
Oasis Hong Kong has already started - initially offering flights between HKG-LGW but soon starting services between HKG and the USA.

As I said, I personally don't believe in low-cost long-haul. And no, O8 has nothing to do with low-cost long-haul. O8 has better service onboard than many legacy competitors for instance, and just because you arenøt one of the legacy carriers and you aren't an IATA member it doesn't qualify for "low-cost" IMO. Laker was low-cost long-haul - and maybe a right product for the time - but for now the closest thing we have to low-cost long-haul is charters from Europe to Asia.

Kevin777  Smile
"I was waiting for you at DFW, but you must have been in LUV" CPH-HAM-CPH CR9
 
BCAL
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:03 am

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 9):
VS wouldn't have survived if it hadn't been for new legislation and a tougher stand on predatory tactics on behalf of BA - brought on significantly by the demise of LAker.

VS survived as after BA converted to a public limited company the UK government did not have any need to protect the state-owned airline like a mother hen protects her chicks. Consequently the UK independent airlines, which in previous years had been given chicken feed and denied access to LHR, were then allowed a bigger slice of the BA's exclusive network and access to LHR. The demise of Laker had little to do with VS's success.

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 9):
I still believe that Branson's business model itself had a better chance than Laker's

The original Branson module was based on Laker's low-cost concept, initially being a packbackers' airline, and Branson won much of his support on the promise that VS would offer fares cheaper than those offered by BA and the legacy carriers. Needless to say, once VS won the licences, the low-cost module was replaced by a legacy carrier with emphasis on premium travel.

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 9):
Freddie Laker continued a Laker Airways somewhere in the Bahamas with a couple of 727, at least untill around 2000 or so, but don't know if it's there anymore

Sir Freddie did form another airline in the Bahamas and called this Laker Airways (Bahamas). Initially he started in partnership and offered trans Atlantic flights between LGW-MIA, again on the DC10, with emphasis of full service and frills. This was not a success and he scaled the airline down to operating charter flights between Canada and Florida in 727 aircraft. As this business dried up, he flew gamblers to the Bahamas but in the end this airline also folded.
MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
Kevin777
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:36 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:14 am

Quoting BCAL (Reply 10):
The demise of Laker had little to do with VS's success.

I think we are misunderstanding eachother. What I mean is, that the demise of Laker woke up the UK authorities, which in turn made it easier for Branson and VS. Had you never had a LAker, and indeed not a Laker that went bust because of unfair practices (largely anyway), VS wouldn't have come far. That's why I think Laker's demise indirectly had very positive consequences for VS.

Quoting BCAL (Reply 10):
The original Branson module was based on Laker's low-cost concept, initially being a packbackers' airline, and Branson won much of his support on the promise that VS would offer fares cheaper than those offered by BA and the legacy carriers. Needless to say, once VS won the licences, the low-cost module was replaced by a legacy carrier with emphasis on premium travel.

But, also needless to say, VS went emphasizing on premium travel because this was probably where the money was.

Quoting BCAL (Reply 10):
Sir Freddie did form another airline in the Bahamas and called this Laker Airways (Bahamas). Initially he started in partnership and offered trans Atlantic flights between LGW-MIA, again on the DC10, with emphasis of full service and frills. This was not a success and he scaled the airline down to operating charter flights between Canada and Florida in 727 aircraft. As this business dried up, he flew gamblers to the Bahamas but in the end this airline also folded.

I read about his life in "No Frills" by SImon Calder; my God he has really made something of his time on earth. IIRC he met a young stewardess at an old age, and rounded off his life in the Bahamas with her and his 727-airline.. wonderful!

Kevin777  Smile
"I was waiting for you at DFW, but you must have been in LUV" CPH-HAM-CPH CR9
 
PanAmOldDC8
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:25 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:15 am

Quoting Cumulus (Thread starter):
Surely has to be the first LCC!!!

Laker /Caribbean Airways in BGI

The PM of Barbados and Sir Freddie Laker started an Airline called Caribbean Airways. Flew from Germany and also LGW back in the 70's. Flight was withdrawn when BWIA started serving London. Freddie started the LCC type airline and was giving BOAC hell. It is a shame he went under

[Edited 2007-02-05 17:16:05]
Barbados, CWC soon, can't wait
 
PanAmOldDC8
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:25 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:53 am

Quoting PanAmOldDC8 (Reply 12):
The PM of Barbados and Sir Freddie Laker started an Airline called Caribbean Airways. Flew from Germany and also LGW back in the 70's. Flight was withdrawn when BWIA started serving London. Freddie started the LCC type airline and was giving BOAC hell. It is a shame he went under

Another picture of Caribbean Airways
Big version: Width: 640 Height: 435 File size: 80kb
Caribbean Airway BGI
Barbados, CWC soon, can't wait
 
BCAL
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:57 am

Quoting PanAmOldDC8 (Reply 12):
Flew from Germany and also LGW back in the 70's.

It routed from Gatwick via Luxembourg to/from the Bahamas. It was something to do with the fact that Luxembourg did not come under IATA jurisdiction, in the same way that other non-IATA airlines (like Icelandair or what is was then called) routed through Luxembourg.

Sir Freddie only had arguments with BOAC in the days when he was joint chairman of BUA. His greatest achievement against BOAC was when BUA took over their loss-making South American routes and despite the odds, turned them into profitable routes for BUA. His arguments were with BA, Lord King of Wartnaby, Trade Minister Peter Shore and other government ministers, no to mention his next door neighbour at LGW - British Caledonian. Margaret Thatcher was a great fan of Sir Freddie - she often told the Commons that you only had to look at Laker to see how good competition and private enterprise was. Sadly, she could not help Laker when he needed it, as her government was committed to the successful flotation of BA.
MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
BCAL
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:07 am

Quoting PanAmOldDC8 (Reply 13):
Another picture of Caribbean Airways

And here is the Laker DC10 "Canterbury Belle" in the Caribbean Airways livery. In between flights to BGI, she operated on Laker's high-denisty European charter flights and I flew in this aircraft between LGW-Heraklion in the late 1970s


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bob Garrard

MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
User avatar
yyz717
Posts: 15699
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:26 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:14 am

Despite regulatory restrictions and "bullying" by BA and other EU sked carriers, I still place much of the blame on the failure of Laker directly on the airline itself. The #1 cause of Laker's demise IMHO was over-ambitious expansion. 5 DC-10-30's were added to serve the LAX route (eliminating the DC-10-10 stop at Bangor ME) and 10 A300B4's were ordered (of which 3 were delivered). Too many new widebodies at once, right before Laker's demise, left them vulnerable. The A300 order I never understood, since it represented a massive expansion of their shorthaul capacity.

Incidently, Laker Airways was common in YYZ with summer charters to LGW/MAN/PIK et al with their DC-10-10 fleet. Summer frequencies to YYZ peaked at 4-5 weekly. Main competitor for Laker was Wardair.
I dumped at the gybe mark in strong winds when I looked up at a Porter Q400 on finals. Can't stop spotting.
 
PanAmOldDC8
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:25 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:33 am

Quoting BCAL (Reply 14):
It routed from Gatwick via Luxembourg to/from the Bahamas. It was something to do with the fact that Luxembourg did not come under IATA jurisdiction, in the same way that other non-IATA airlines (like Icelandair or what is was then called) routed through Luxembourg

I worked in BGI at the airport and used to work the flight when it came in from Germany, nice girls on board. That ws when the Barbados Tourist Board spent a lot of time in Germany promoting BGI, it paid off, until Carribean Airways folded aftr BWIA took over
Barbados, CWC soon, can't wait
 
richierich
Posts: 3308
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2000 5:49 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:36 am

Quoting Yyz717 (Reply 16):
Despite regulatory restrictions and "bullying" by BA and other EU sked carriers, I still place much of the blame on the failure of Laker directly on the airline itself. The #1 cause of Laker's demise IMHO was over-ambitious expansion. 5 DC-10-30's were added to serve the LAX route (eliminating the DC-10-10 stop at Bangor ME) and 10 A300B4's were ordered (of which 3 were delivered). Too many new widebodies at once, right before Laker's demise, left them vulnerable. The A300 order I never understood, since it represented a massive expansion of their shorthaul capacity

Another contributing factor was the choice of the DC10 itself. Although Laker had never lost one, the high-profile DC-10 crashes in the 1970s and subsequent temporary grounding left a black mark on the type. And since it was the primary type Laker flew across the pond, the airline suffered tremendously.

I'm not going to debate whether or not the DC-10 was a good plane or if Laker could have survived had he flown the L-1011, for example, but I think it is fair to say that the grounding had a pronounced affect on Skytrain and added to its woes.

Quoting BCAL (Reply 2):
Sadly Sir Freddie died last year. Like Prince Philip said of the tycoon during his life "Sir Freddie might be at peace with his maker but in IATA he is a person non-gratia!"

Its kind of an odd thing to say about somebody posthumously, isn't it? I personally think that the Laker shutdown was just one of many sad, corporate failures from the UK during the late 1970s and early 1980s. Add it to the list of novel ideas that weren't executed very well.
None shall pass!!!!
 
PanAmOldDC8
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:25 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:08 am

Quoting BCAL (Reply 15):
And here is the Laker DC10 "Canterbury Belle" in the Caribbean Airways livery. In between flights to BGI, she operated on Laker's high-denisty European charter flights and I flew in this aircraft between LGW-Heraklion in the late 1970s

Thanks for that Photo, didn't have it and by the way the Air Canada aircraft is the 1011 that I flew on to BGI in the 1970's
Barbados, CWC soon, can't wait
 
BCAL
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:53 am

Quoting Yyz717 (Reply 16):



Quoting Richierich (Reply 18):

Sir Freddie was very much a gambler. He was prepared to take high risks as was evidenced by his decision to order 3 x DC10 aircraft before he had even obtained a preliminary licence to operate his Skytrain service. Pending Skytrain’s approval he put the aircraft to good use – flying the ABCs across the pond, supplementing his inclusive tour operation by using the aircraft on peak European holiday routes, and even sub-leasing an aircraft to Caribbean Airways. He had argued that if the licences were forthcoming, he had to be well-placed to take advantage of additional opportunities. He had even organised a good deal with Japanese backers and only paid leasing charges on his new DC10s when the aircraft were being used.

At the peak of Skytrain’s operations there were 3 x daily round trips to JFK from LGW, 2 x daily to LAX, 2 x daily to MIA and 3 x weekly services to TPA. In addition, there were 4 x weekly departures from MAN to JFK, 2 x weekly departures from MAN to LAX via PIK, and 4 x weekly round trips from MAN (one via PIK) to MIA.

There were several reasons for the bankruptcy, but the choice of the DC10 was not one of them. The aircraft suited Laker well, and its performance was as good as had been expected. Other airlines flew the DC10, and many still survive today.

Laker was an undercapitalised airline (GBP 10,000 according to some reports) and did not have adequate financial back-up to weather turbulent times. 90% of the share capital was owned by Sir Freddie and the balance by his first wife. The airline was incorporated in the tax-heaven of Jersey. All aircraft were leased, as was the Laker maintenance hanger at LGW. When interest rates rocketed, Laker was hurt. He did not have the funds available to “hedge” oil price increases as a result of which he was forced to pay high spot prices. He also gambled heavily on exchange rates by forward-purchasing his airline’s US dollar requirements at a fixed rate of exchange, and failed to anticipate the speed of sterling’s decline against the dollar. This caused a severe cash-flow problem at a time of acute financial crisis. The airline could achieve high loads but small returns in the summer months but the winter months resulted in heavy losses.

Laker upset the legacy carriers who did not feel that the origin concept of Skytrain – namely purchasing tickets on the day of travel - would affect their revenues. When the restrictions were lifted, the legacy carriers did see their revenues begin to suffer and fought back, using their substantial reserves, by offering a limited number of tickets at prices that compared favourably with Laker. However, Laker did not target the premium traveller where the legacy airlines made their profits until he introduced his Regency Class, aimed at the premium passenger. It was then that the legacy airlines commenced their merciless assault on Laker.

With his limited reserves, sky-high oil prices and cash flow problems, Laker was in extreme difficulties. He did succeed in obtaining finance – offered by none other than McDonnell Douglas, suppliers of the DC10 and backed by the US development bank. The legacy airlines then dug the knives in Laker – the America carriers by using their influence in the Senate to have the loans vetoed, and the European airlines by informing McDonnell Douglas that if they went ahead with their rescue deal, they would not order any more McDonnell Douglas aircraft. The lids were sealed and Laker was left with no choice other than to ask the bank to call in the receivers. Chapter 11 protection, and state aid, were both unavailable for Laker.

However, that was not the end. Laker sued the airlines for a conspiracy and the case was settled out of Court. As part of the deal, all Laker creditors were paid in full and Sir Freddie received a personal settlement, rumoured to be GBP 6 million.
MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
User avatar
yyz717
Posts: 15699
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:26 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:24 am

Quoting Richierich (Reply 18):
Another contributing factor was the choice of the DC10 itself. Although Laker had never lost one, the high-profile DC-10 crashes in the 1970s and subsequent temporary grounding left a black mark on the type. And since it was the primary type Laker flew across the pond, the airline suffered tremendously.

Not sure I agree with you. Most pax do not know what type they are flying on. I doubt many Britons carred about the D10 safety record.

Quoting BCAL (Reply 20):
Sir Freddie was very much a gambler. He was prepared to take high risks as was evidenced by his decision to order 3 x DC10 aircraft before he had even obtained a preliminary licence to operate his Skytrain service.

The DC-10 purchase was actually advantageous. ANA had ordered a small number of DC-10-10's to hedge against the RR bankruptcy which delayed the L10 EIS. These airframes were not taken by ANA and became available to Laker.

Quoting BCAL (Reply 20):
There were several reasons for the bankruptcy, but the choice of the DC10 was not one of them. The aircraft suited Laker well, and its performance was as good as had been expected. Other airlines flew the DC10, and many still survive today.

I agree. The D10 was the ideal aircraft for Laker.
I dumped at the gybe mark in strong winds when I looked up at a Porter Q400 on finals. Can't stop spotting.
 
GDB
Posts: 12680
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:50 am

This sort of thread makes me feel old.
A quarter of a century ago?

An aviation original, larger than life character, innovative, Laker however seemed to me maybe a bit too trusting of Thatcher-who was positive about Freddie when she was only the Leader Of The Opposition.
Even in their quite miminal 1979 election Manifesto, Thatcher's Tories made their intention clear to privatise large state corporations, two of them aviation related-BAe and BA.
Some three years before Laker went belly up.

Since HM Government would seek the greatest possible return from a sale-albeit not always realised, the idea that BA would be broken up, before and/or during privatisation, was absurd.
BCal made a case for it in 1984, the CAA backed it, before almost totally climbing down-presumably from political pressure.
BA lobbied true, but if HM Government saw an advantage, financial mainly in a break up, all the lobbying in the world would not change this.

Was he also wrong to bring in 'Regency Class' too?
He must have known the established airlines-by no means just BA, would see this as much more of a threat.
Of course, as a businessman he'd want to maximise revenue, expand his operation, but in this case, at what cost?

An aviation visonary to be sure, however, I note that apart from the odd examples already mentioned, LCC long haul has yet to take off, at least in the intial Skytrain model.
 
richierich
Posts: 3308
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2000 5:49 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:17 am

Quoting Yyz717 (Reply 21):
Not sure I agree with you. Most pax do not know what type they are flying on. I doubt many Britons carred about the D10 safety record.

Well, perhaps I overstepped my bounds by saying it "contributed" to Laker's demise.
But I do believe that the DC-10 crashes and groundings had an adverse affect on the airline's image. Britons don't care about the DC-10 safety record? Really? I disagree completely. Laker lost millions during the 2-3 week grounding, although I admit to not knowing if the company was insured or otherwise compensated. The public (British and otherwise) were slow to come back after the grounding and it definitely hurt the airline. I am not suggesting that this was the sole reason for the end of Laker Airways - but it didn't help. Laker was already in financial trouble by the time of the grounding....

Quoting Yyz717 (Reply 21):
I agree. The D10 was the ideal aircraft for Laker.

Maybe, maybe not. He definitely put his stock almost completely into one type (not counting the few BAC1-11s and aged 707s).
None shall pass!!!!
 
Door5Right
Posts: 691
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:29 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:49 am

Sir Freddie was a real character!

Before his DC 10s went into service on SkyTrain he flew them to various regional airports and invited the press and travel agents aboard for a flight. I was fortunate to enjoy a "jolly" from GLA which flew out over the Irish Sea, circled over the Isle of Man and then returned to Glasgow. We had, naturally, been plied with hospitality on the ground beforehand and then during the flight. I can clearly recall Sir Freddie walking round the plane having a word with everyone. "Get up and explore my plane," he said to us "enjoy yourselves and then be sure to tell everyone." It was a grand flight and my first experience on a wide body.

Two years later I flew off to New York. I, literally, popped down to his booking office at Victoria Station, asked if they had any seats, bought a o/w ticket for £59 (I still have the piece of cardboard) caught a train to Gatwick and three hours later was airborne. The ticket was charged to a charge card but has yet to appear on any statement. Magic.

If heaven exists I hope Sir Freddie is running an airline somewhere!
My soul is in the sky...
 
richierich
Posts: 3308
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2000 5:49 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:55 am

Quoting Door5right (Reply 24):
The ticket was charged to a charge card but has yet to appear on any statement. Magic

That explains a lot!
None shall pass!!!!
 
1stfl94
Posts: 1082
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:33 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:19 am

Other fact of interest

Laker had a near perfect safety record throughout its existence, 16 years without any major incident. Now how many other airlines can boast that even today?
 
richierich
Posts: 3308
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2000 5:49 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:29 am

Quoting 1stfl94 (Reply 26):
Other fact of interest

Laker had a near perfect safety record throughout its existence, 16 years without any major incident. Now how many other airlines can boast that even today?

While this is a good record, there are several carriers that come to mind.
Southwest, QANTAS, etc. And I'm sure both of these carriers have done a lot more flights than Laker ever did!
None shall pass!!!!
 
1stfl94
Posts: 1082
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:33 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:43 am

Quoting Richierich (Reply 27):
While this is a good record, there are several carriers that come to mind.
Southwest, QANTAS, etc. And I'm sure both of these carriers have done a lot more flights than Laker ever did!

Southwest-Midway Crash
Qantas- 747 that overran at Bangkok

Laker doesn't even register on the Aviation Safety Network
 
richierich
Posts: 3308
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2000 5:49 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 7:59 am

Quoting 1stfl94 (Reply 28):
Southwest-Midway Crash

Crash is a little bit of a stretch - nobody on the aircraft was hurt. Sadly, the boy in the car died.
After millions of flights, WN has proved it is safe.

Quoting 1stfl94 (Reply 28):
Qantas- 747 that overran at Bangkok

Not a crash. An incident. Again, after hundreds of thousands of flights going back decades, this is one safe carrier!

WN probably has more flights in six months than Laker Airways did over 16 years. I'm not disagreeing with you - Sir Freddie ran a very safe airline. But don't get fooled by statistics - they didn't have the volume of flights as compared to WN, Qantas, or even VS!
None shall pass!!!!
 
BCAL
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:16 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 8:12 am

Quoting Richierich (Reply 23):
Britons don't care about the DC-10 safety record?

You have to remember that many of Laker passengers were either first-time passengers, who would not have known the difference between a DC10 and a B707, or those on a tight budget. Yes, Laker was affected by the temporary grounding of the DC10 but Sir Freddie was instrumental in persuading the public that the DC10 was a safe aircraft and that Laker aircraft were maintained to the highest standards. IIRC, shortly after the aircraft's CoA was restored, he took his family on a DC10 flight to Crete, saying to the press that if it was safe enough for his family, then it was safe enough for everyone. The UK public then loved Sir Freddie and believed every word he said.
MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
 
gooner
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:34 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:11 am

The first flight i ever took was MAN-YYZ in Sept 1973 ,I flew on G-AZZC the Eastern Belle My only problem with Freddie Laker was he was a disciple of Thatcher ,if i am correct telling her to squeeze the working classes until the pips squeeked
 
GDB
Posts: 12680
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:38 am

Laker also had a firm background in aviation maintenance, and even in the late 1950's, built and flew a twin R/R Dart powered airliner-to compete with the Herald, the F-27, the HS.748-the regional aircraft of their day.
But it never made it to production.
His firms also carried out major mods on DC-4's, making them a sort of 'Mini Guppy' to carry the pax and their cars, to the European Continent.
This background could not have done Laker's flt ops and maintenance any harm.

http://members.fortunecity.com/gvanroy1/atl90.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_Traders_Accountant

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_Traders_Carvair

[Edited 2007-02-06 19:55:05]

[Edited 2007-02-06 20:00:39]
 
WesternA318
Posts: 4495
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:55 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:43 am

Quoting BCAL (Reply 3):
Laker Airways was founded and airborne in 1966. Air Southwest's first flight was in the following year - 1967.



Quoting OzarkD9S (Reply 7):
However, PSA beat them both:

 checkmark 

Quoting Door5right (Reply 24):
If heaven exists I hope Sir Freddie is running an airline somewhere!

 biggrin  He's probablyup inheaventhere with wings ofhis own, runnign another long gone airline by the name of Court Line...with all their pastel planes...
Check out my blog at fl310travel.blogspot.com!
 
AirCop
Posts: 5553
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:39 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:44 am

Back in Feb 1981, took Laker from LAX to LGW on the spur of the moment for a 5 day weekend. Had no complaints, although I wouldn't want to fly the plane when it was full (10 across seating in the DC-10). Remember that trip well, as I was in front of Buckingham Palace when the royal engagement was announced (Charles and Diana). Very cold there.
 
richierich
Posts: 3308
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2000 5:49 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:51 am

Quoting BCAL (Reply 30):
You have to remember that many of Laker passengers were either first-time passengers, who would not have known the difference between a DC10 and a B707, or those on a tight budget. Yes, Laker was affected by the temporary grounding of the DC10 but Sir Freddie was instrumental in persuading the public that the DC10 was a safe aircraft and that Laker aircraft were maintained to the highest standards. IIRC, shortly after the aircraft's CoA was restored, he took his family on a DC10 flight to Crete, saying to the press that if it was safe enough for his family, then it was safe enough for everyone. The UK public then loved Sir Freddie and believed every word he said

OK - I accept that answer. Thanks.
None shall pass!!!!
 
mutu
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:04 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Wed Feb 07, 2007 6:19 am

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 9):
That's exactly what I'm saying, too - I think it's just a choice of words; whether Branson was succesful or lucky with the authorities and the competition; either way the result was the same. Surely, VS wouldn't have survived if it hadn't been for new legislation and a tougher stand on predatory tactics on behalf of BA - brought on significantly by the demise of LAker.

Well you can add PAn AM and TWA to that too... But ironically the very freedom that gave LAker the right to set its own fares etc and thus set up the operation, applied to all other carriers so suddenly they too could lower their fares. His ambitious expansion plans for aircraft ownership created a huge financial burden at a time when many other carriers were adopting a lease model due to political and economic uncertainties in the world at that time
 
lincoln
Posts: 3133
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:22 pm

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Wed Feb 07, 2007 8:44 am

Coincidentally, Joe d'Eon (sp?)'s latest Fly With Me podcast includes a flight deck interview with Freddie Laker's son

My Mom's trip from LA to Europe shortly before I was born (and I guess near the end -- I was born in '84 and I know she went in the early 80s) was on the Skytrain.
CO Is My Airline of Choice || Baggage Claim is an airline's last chance to disappoint a customer || Next flts in profile
 
CV580Freak
Posts: 886
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:39 am

RE: Laker Airways Goes Bust This Day 1982.

Wed Feb 07, 2007 9:29 am

Quoting BCAL (Reply 2):
the tiny sales office at London Victoria Station when both opened at 07:30am

I worked for DHL at LGW when Laker agreed to handle our onboard couriers to JFK and LAX. I used to get in the queue at 03.30 each morning to buy the tickets for that days couriers. I used to get GBP15 a day exta which was a lot of money then.

The Laker staff treated the couriers very well as did the station staff at LGW.

Takes me back to the era when LGW as a villiage  Smile
One day you are the pigeon, the next the statue ...

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos