planemaker
Posts: 5411
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 12:53 pm

FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:13 am

Check out FI's Feb. 8th issue...

Sukhoi is about to start assembling Russia's most ambitious airliner ever. In this 22-page special we explain the drivers behind the Superjet 100's creation, talk to international suppliers about what motivated them to be on board, describe technical and production details and ask whether Sukhoi really can deliver on its promise of securing orders from overseas



Next month, final assembly will begin of the most advanced Russian subsonic airliner ever produced, and arguably the most ambitious - the Sukhoi Superjet 100 (SSJ). The first Russian airliner designed from scratch to meet Western certification standards, it boasts an unprecedented number of international suppliers, incorporates fly-by-wire flight controls and an advanced flightdeck with side-stick controllers. The twinjet is powered by an all-new engine being developed by the Franco-Russian joint venture PowerJet, and is about to land a major European partner in the form of Italy's Alenia Aeronautica, which is taking a 25% stake for $250 million.

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...11988/sukhoi-superjet-special.html
Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
 
PlanenutzTB
Posts: 220
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 11:29 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:58 am

Good to see the rebirth of the Russian commercial aircraft industry. IIRC Boeing is a partner in this project as long as Sukhoi limits size to 110 seats. With the Boeings partnership, I wonder what the chances are of this plane flying domestic regional routes in the USA at some point in the future?

A question I have is why no winglets on this new design?
I am extraordinarily patient, provided I get my own way in the end.
 
planemaker
Posts: 5411
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 12:53 pm

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:45 pm

Quoting PlanenutzTB (Reply 1):
IIRC Boeing is a partner in this project as long as Sukhoi limits size to 110 seats.

It is a popular misconception that Boeing is a "partner" on this project - when they are in fact consultants...

The US airframer came on board on a consultancy basis in 2001 to provide advice on the programme management and aircraft definition, says SCAC president Victor Subbotin. "We have been in constant contact with Boeing," he says. Subbotin says that "Boeing never tells you what to do - rather it advises how to do it".

Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
 
karan69
Posts: 2699
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:57 pm

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:10 pm

I saw the mock up of it at the BLR Air Show--Aero India 2007 yesterday--there was even a vabin mock up looked real impressive--but when i asked about fuel burn and payload capabilities the reply i got was "we have still not made the aircraft yet"---he could have atleast given me an estimate.

Karan
 
User avatar
SOBHI51
Posts: 3715
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 1:32 pm

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:43 pm

Doesn't that plane looks like a copy of A318?
I am against any terrorist acts committed under the name of Islam
 
uzzzer
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 5:24 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:43 pm

Its gonna be an interesting contest of 3 post Soviet producers with similar products. This year Antonov starts serial production of 148, Antonov plant also assembles the Russian Tupolev-334 and Sukhoj announcing RRJ for next year.

It's clear who will win Russia (of the 3), and it's clear who will win non-Russian CIS-Middle East-Africa. I wounder whether any of them will succeed to get some big clients, which are currently using Emb or CRJs.
 
Lumberton
Posts: 4176
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:34 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:57 pm

Quoting Uzzzer (Reply 5):
Its gonna be an interesting contest of 3 post Soviet producers with similar products.

Quite right, and the Russians (and French) are in a distant third place. I can't see where all the growth is going to come unless they feel that they're going to saturate China and India with RRJ's. How many "thin routes" are out there to service? The bad news for Embraer and Bombardier is that there will be more price competition; just what they needed!
"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
 
planemaker
Posts: 5411
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 12:53 pm

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:52 am

Quoting Lumberton (Reply 6):
The bad news for Embraer and Bombardier is that there will be more price competition; just what they needed!

Nothing for EMB to worry about... for a while at least.  Smile

Eventually, yes, but not in any significant form, especially for EMB, for at least the next 5 years. Just look at the SSJ EIS, production rate, and backlog.
Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
 
User avatar
RayChuang
Posts: 7982
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2000 7:43 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:22 am

I believe that the SSJ could find a market in the USA with a couple of airlines.

And yes, it's time to dig up that old chestnut about replacing Northwest Airlines' very large DC-9 fleet again.  Wink While the DC-9 has done yeoman service for NW, especially since the massive rebuild program NW did during the 1990's, the increasingly high cost of fuel and the sheer age of the DC-9 airframes makes them quite expensive to run in terms of Cost per Available Seat Mile (CASM) compared to more modern airliners. Unlike the Embraer 190/195 series, the SSJ's initial upfront cost per plane could be much lower, which makes it far more attractive to NW as a DC-9 replacement.

If Suhkoi can design the plane to withstand frequent takeoff and landing cycles, another airline that could buy the SSJ is Aloha Airlines to replace AQ's rapidly aging 737-200 fleet. Sukhoi could design the SSJ so it sports an extra-large upward-hinging side door and quickly removable seats, making it useful as a small-package/small-pallet cargo airliner in Hawaiian inter-island service.
 
Lumberton
Posts: 4176
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:34 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:34 am

Despite the overall upbeat tone of the spread on this aircraft, FI still notes the largest stumbling block to western sales:

Quote:
But doubts may remain: the absence of a truly comprehensive aftersales and support network outside Russia may be harder for potential customers to ignore, he warns. While competitors Bombardier and Embraer are able to provide spare parts to aircraft worldwide within tight timescales, Salvadori is "not sure the Russians will be able to - this will be one of the main concerns". But with firm Russian political support for the venture, none of these political difficulties are insurmountable.

http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...rt-driven-the-sukhoi-superjet.html
"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
 
TheCol
Posts: 1857
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:30 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:44 am

Why is it more difficult for Sukhoi to provide effective support services to international customers, then the rest of the industry?
No matter how random things may appear, there's always a plan.
 
ceo@afg
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 2:32 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:20 am

According to the article, the SSJ will be certified by the Russian Aviation Authorities first, then EASA of Europe. To be allowed to certify the aircraft according to FAA rules, there was a requirement by FAA authorities to have a US airline with interest in the aircraft.

According to Sukhoi, the FAA certification was put on hold, but recent interest by Pinneacle Airlines have brought FAA certification back on the agenda.

The SSJ clearly has a market, Embraer is the only manufacturer catering to the 75-110 seat with a complete model range. Until Bombardier decides to build the C-series, they are only competing in half the segment, and some would argue on a slightly different level than Embraers spacious E-jets.

With Sukhois SSJ, there finally is a worthy replacement for the Fokker 70/100. With airlines like Air France/KLM, SAS and Alitalia on the advisory board, there is clearly a market for this plane. When you factor in Russian aviation workers payscales in relation to the final selling price of this bird, and top of the line western avionics and systems, this is a serious contender for at least half the future orders in this segment.
"Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue." Steven McCroskey, Airplane!
 
PPVRA
Posts: 7864
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:48 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:46 am

Quoting CEO@AFG (Reply 11):
With Sukhois SSJ, there finally is a worthy replacement for the Fokker 70/100.
The -75 seems like it was "left behind" by Sukhoi. It is much like the F70 - same wings as its larger variant.

The -95 seems much better proportioned to take on Embraer/Bombardier.

As mentioned, Boeing suggested to keep the design simple. It seems they went too far to me, unless we don't ever see the -75 fly and they go for a larger variant instead (IMO, based on E195 sales, it would need to go beyond the Boeing size cap - and that's A319/B73G territory). Although they should probably have a significant price advantage, and also availability (unlike Boeing it seems).

[Edited 2007-02-12 03:13:12]
"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
 
User avatar
RayChuang
Posts: 7982
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2000 7:43 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:40 pm

Quoting PPVRA (Reply 12):
As mentioned, Boeing suggested to keep the design simple. It seems they went too far to me, unless we don't ever see the -75 fly and they go for a larger variant instead (IMO, based on E195 sales, it would need to go beyond the Boeing size cap - and that's A319/B73G territory). Although they should probably have a significant price advantage, and also availability (unlike Boeing it seems).

I believe most of the SSJ sales will be the 95 seat and maybe 110 seat variant. And it is smart to keep the plane fairly simple, since that cuts both production and maintanence costs. I would like to see Sukhoi look at offering either the Pratt & Whitney PW6000 or GE CF34 engine on this plane, though.
 
User avatar
airbuseric
Posts: 3560
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:24 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:50 pm

Quoting CEO@AFG (Reply 11):
With Sukhois SSJ, there finally is a worthy replacement for the Fokker 70/100. With airlines like Air France/KLM, SAS and Alitalia on the advisory board, there is clearly a market for this plane.

Indeed. With KLM/Air France closely following this project, this aircraft may become the successor of the F70/100's in KLM cityhoppers fleet.
"The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going"
 
User avatar
Aeroflot777
Posts: 2959
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 2:19 pm

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:25 pm

If all goes well after this, the aircraft should be a sucess both domestically in Russia and Internationally with other carriers. It will be interesting ow all this plays out...

Aeroflot777
 
columba
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:12 pm

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:29 pm

Quoting Planemaker (Thread starter):
.

On that picture the plane really looks like an A320.
It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
 
User avatar
Aeroflot777
Posts: 2959
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 2:19 pm

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:33 pm

Quoting Columba (Reply 16):
On that picture the plane really looks like an A320.



Quoting SOBHI51 (Reply 4):
Doesn't that plane looks like a copy of A318?

In the 21st century, there are only so many ways to design a new, efficient aircraft. Expect all aircraft from now on to look similar to some other plane. Doesn't mean that teh desing was copied.

Aeroflot777
 
User avatar
solnabo
Posts: 5005
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:53 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:50 pm

Quoting SOBHI51 (Reply 4):

"Doesn´t that plane looks like a copy of A318?"

 checkmark 

Micke//  Smile
Airbus SAS - Love them both
 
columba
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:12 pm

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:54 pm

Quoting Aeroflot777 (Reply 17):
In the 21st century, there are only so many ways to design a new, efficient aircraft. Expect all aircraft from now on to look similar to some other plane. Doesn't mean that teh desing was copied.

Did not want to imply that the design was copied. It was only an observation.
In a few years watching airliners at most airports will become very boring since all aircraft will look the same. I became interested in aviation as a kid standing at TXL and FRA watching all the different looking aircraft 727s, A310s, 707s 747s, Dc 10s, L1011s, Bac 1-11s, Dc 9s, 737-200s and it was their different looks that fascinated me and wanting me to know more about them.
It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
 
PEET7G
Posts: 468
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:00 pm

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:34 pm

I really wish a great future for this project and if they can get everything together it really will be a success! I simply keep my fingers crossed for a commercial aircraft manufacturer to rise again from Russia. They have the know how, they have the skills, all they need is financial backing, and a corruption free marketing, and of course a western style approach to the product! I think the government should endorse a merger between all the commercial producers, back them in standardizing the production, supplies and voila they could have a modern family of planes in all size categories from the SSJ to the IL96... perhaps not the most economical in their classes, but way cheaper than their counterparts and perhaps with well financed testings and upgradings those numbers could improve. I would also keep the setting up of a world wide supply-chain a priority. The lack of well maintained supplies and availability of spare parts was always a big issue for Russian planes to step out into the free market.
Peet7G
 
FriendlySkies
Posts: 3540
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:57 pm

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:03 am

The only thing I'm wondering is why they didn't use a western engine. Back in Soviet days I could understand, but why does Sukhoi feel the need to use some no-name engine maker to power the SSJ? The PW6000 or CF-34 would be great options on this, and may help bolster western sales.
 
Lumberton
Posts: 4176
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:34 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:09 am

Quoting FriendlySkies (Reply 21):
. Back in Soviet days I could understand, but why does Sukhoi feel the need to use some no-name engine maker to power the SSJ?

SNECMA is a player in the Powerjet engine consortium, which is a good move IMO for marketing and logistics. Here's a link.
http://www.powerjet.aero/
"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
 
eraugrad02
Posts: 657
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 6:12 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:24 am

How much does boeing have in this? could they make a model number for this too? like the ford/mercury/lincoln all have versions of the same car?
Desmond MacRae in ILM
 
uzzzer
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 5:24 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:52 am

Quoting ERAUgrad02 (Reply 23):
How much does boeing have in this?

Boeing is a consultant under condition that the plane stays under 110 seat capacity. I doubt that Boeing would be willing to provide its model numbers to something that was not created and manufactured by Boeing, even if the product is good.

Quoting FriendlySkies (Reply 21):
why they didn't use a western engine

Russians and Ukrainians try to keep their both airframe and engine productions alive and this is absolutely right. Then they'll have a chance of developing competitive products. The other option is to give up, do nothing and wait to die.

Having and engine option for the airlines that want to have PW or RR might be a good idea, but that wouldn't happen soon, as the first customers for the plane will be local Russian companies.
 
PDPsol
Posts: 1109
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 5:09 am

RE: FI:Sukhoi Superjet 22-page Special Feature

Tue Feb 13, 2007 1:11 am

Quoting ERAUgrad02 (Reply 23):
How much does boeing have in this?

Well, Boeing is a "consultant" on the project. I would not say they are "merely" are consultant as their role is very important. However, they have ZERO, nada, zilch in equity on the SSJ project. On the other hand, Finmeccanica's Alenia division is acquiring a 25% direct equity interest in the SSJ project.

In addition, Safran SA's SNECMA jet engine division is an equity partner in the Powerjet consortium, which is providing the engines.

Safran SA has a lot invested in this project, as its Messier Dowty division is providing the landing gear and SAGEM is also a key supplier.

The SSJ is hoping Finmeccanica's vast experience in marketing the ATR program to carriers around the world will provide potential customers with sufficient confidence to place orders. The decision to seek FAA certification using the stated interest from NW/Pinnacle is a very smart move.

Nonetheless, SSJ will face an unhill battle in competing with Embraer and Bombardier's global support and marketing network. Embraer has invested over three decades in developing its marketing network and has spent untold resources in establishing its reputation as a trusted airframe manufacturer for carriers around the globe.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: alggag, atlflyer, Baidu [Spider], camdawg, EXMEMWIDGET, flyboy80, GCT64, georgiabill, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], lancelot07, mouha777, msycajun, n471wn, Okie, PM, Polot, reidar76, seahawk, seat1a, StTim, tcaeyx, unusualattitude and 323 guests