ACFA
Topic Author
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:41 pm

Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:58 pm

Found this neat little picture showing a downstairs galley and lav as well as crew rest unit.

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0540142/L/

Is Lufthansa the only carrier that has the aircraft configured this way? How much space does this take up? I would think that it would take up a lot of valuable space for cargo. Pretty neat way of expanding the main cabin nonetheless.
 
LY777
Posts: 2269
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 6:58 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:35 pm

Yes, it is very interesting, I am not sure LH is the only carrier that configures their A346 that way. I wish I could fly once on LH A346. A shame there are no PTVs in Y, though
Flown:A3B2,A320,A321,A332,A343,A388,717,727,732,734,735,738,73W,742/744/748,752,762/2ER/763/3ER,772/77E/773/77W,D8,D10,L
 
flyinTLow
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:40 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:44 pm

Don't know the exact figures, but taking the lavs from the upstairs to the downstairs allows for more seats that can be sold. Also, the A346 is one long plane. There is a large cargo capacity downstairs in the first place. So I don't think it is that much of a factor.

Cheers,

Thilo
- When dreams take flight, follow them -
 
columba
Posts: 5045
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:12 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:45 pm

Quoting LY777 (Reply 1):
A shame there are no PTVs in Y, though

This will not be forever  Wink and besides PTV´s should not be the option of whether to choose a flight or not but if you definitely want to fly on an A346 with PTV fly Virgin instead
It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
 
DALCE
Posts: 1614
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:45 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:02 pm

AFAIK LH is the only one who has both the galley and lavs on the LD.
Y-seats do have space to install PTV's which will probably be done after the EIS of the A380 at LH.
flown: F50,F70,CR1,CR2,CR9,E75,143,AR8,AR1,733,735,736,73G,738,753,744,77W,788,319,320,321,333,AB6.
 
LXA340
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 11:55 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:04 pm

How come that LH didn't introduce PTV's in Y class, at least on all the new planes they received over the past few years. A330 / A346?
 
User avatar
PM
Posts: 4821
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:05 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:24 pm

I just got off an A346 this morning - VS900 LHR-NRT. That was my fifth A346 flight (3 x LH and 2 x VS) and I continue to be impressed.

Yes, the downstairs Lav in LH in Y is amusing. Not sure if VS have it in Y. LH have windows in Lavs in C but VS don't.

The VS C product is certainly better than LH.
 
musapapaya
Posts: 990
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 10:02 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:24 pm

Quoting LXA340 (Reply 5):
How come that LH didn't introduce PTV's in Y class, at least on all the new planes they received over the past few years. A330 / A346?

As far as I remember, their boss said in public once that the weight of the PTV system makes the airline less profitable. Well this is what he said, but they could still keep the plane full. If the load on a plane is not going to change with or without the PTV, then somehow there is no point for them to get the PTV on Y. But I am sure they will get it installed soon. Hope they choose a good system, and a system that matches their Recaro seats!
Lufthansa Group of Airlines
 
jfidler
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 3:32 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:43 pm

I flew on LH FRA-CAN-MNL and back a few weeks ago, on an A346. I was disappointed with the lack of PTVs in Y, and would have chosen another carrier who did offer PTVs in Y if the price were somewhat similar and it was a Star Alliance carrier (I am a Star Alliance Gold member and lounge access is very valuable when faced with long layovers). For such long trips, I really do feel the PTVs add to the trip. For getting from TLL to MNL, LH was the only viable option with Star Alliance. I believe SQ and TG both fly to MNL, but it was impossible to get a full itinerary starting from TLL on that route. In the past, I have specifically avoided LH on trips where I had other viable options (trans-Atlantic flights mostly) because there was no PTV in Y. In this day, I think PTVs in Y should be standard equipment for long-haul aircraft.

Back to the topic. Other than the lack of PTVs, I found the LH A346 very comfortable. I had read that the seat pitch in Y was poor, but I found it quite reasonable (I am of average height). The plane was quite new and clean, and the Recaro seats are comfortable and look good too. I had a seat at the very last row of the plane (58K I think it was), and I think many pax did not realize there were lavs downstairs, so there was a long queue to use the lavs at the rear of the plane.

Oh, and when the curtains between sections are not drawn, it's a pretty cool sight to look down the aisle from the very last row and not be able to see the front of the plane as it's so far away  Big grin

Justin
 
musapapaya
Posts: 990
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 10:02 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:14 pm

Quoting PM (Reply 6):
The VS C product is certainly better than LH.

Hello!

I have not flown on both C class but I heard that LH's new C class is superb. Just want to know, having flown on both VS and LH, why would you think the VS C class is better? I would be glad if you could tell me more.

Regards
William
Lufthansa Group of Airlines
 
Rj111
Posts: 3007
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:02 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:39 pm

Quoting ACFA (Thread starter):
Is Lufthansa the only carrier that has the aircraft configured this way?

If i remeber correctly MYT actually has some of their A330s set up similarly.
 
cy319
Posts: 368
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:42 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:06 pm

Quoting RJ111 (Reply 10):
If i remeber correctly MYT

You do remember correctly. i flew on those 330s of Airtours back in 2000 and they did have 4lavatories below the pax cabin.
wanna be travel buddies ,sex buddies .. or both ?
 
User avatar
Qatara340
Posts: 1539
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 2:07 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:15 am

Quoting ACFA (Thread starter):
Found this neat little picture showing a downstairs galley and lav as well as crew rest unit.

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0540142/L/

Is Lufthansa the only carrier that has the aircraft configured this way? How much space does this take up? I would think that it would take up a lot of valuable space for cargo. Pretty neat way of expanding the main cabin nonetheless.

So, with the toilets downstairs, it makes LH's A346, a passenger double decker!! (if the PAX is in the toilets)  Wink
Looks very chic, but what if there is a disabled passenger in Y; how can he or she go to the toilet if they cant ride the stairs?

As far as I know, VS lavatories are on the main deck, as well as QR's A346's.
لا اله الا الله محمد رسول الله
 
Lumberton
Posts: 4176
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:34 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:26 am

Obviously I'm not an expert, but isn't the reason for the lavatories being placed on the passenger deck so that the holding tank for the waste can be placed in the lower compartments? If the lavs are located on the lower deck, where is the placement of the holding tanks?
"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
 
sandrozrh
Posts: 2420
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:19 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:27 am

Quoting QatarA340 (Reply 12):
but what if there is a disabled passenger in Y; how can he or she go to the toilet if they cant ride the stairs?

An F/A will carry him/her down  bigthumbsup 
 
Gr8Circle
Posts: 2382
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 11:44 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:40 am

Quoting LY777 (Reply 1):
Yes, it is very interesting, I am not sure LH is the only carrier that configures their A346 that way. I wish I could fly once on LH A346. A shame there are no PTVs in Y, though

I flew on the LH 346 couple of years back and thought it was really cool to go down the stairs to use the lavs below deck....once you're down there you can't really tell that you're in the lower part of the plane, except for the lack if windows....also, it ensures that no pax is seated close to the lav doors in an already congested Y class....

Didn't really miss the PTV's....enjoyed a long and peaceful sleep during the flight as a result Big grin
 
fraspotter
Posts: 1972
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 8:12 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:18 am

Quoting QatarA340 (Reply 12):
what if there is a disabled passenger in Y; how can he or she go to the toilet if they cant ride the stairs?

I was just looking at a seat map on seatguru.com and it looks like at the back of the plane around row 58 there is one bathroom. The staircase to go to the lower deck is around row 40 with 5 toilets below.
http://www.seatguru.com/airlines/Luf...sa/Lufthansa_Airbus_A340-600_A.php
"Drunk drivers run stop signs. Stoners wait for them to turn green."
 
awthompson
Posts: 481
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:59 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:25 am

I flew Lufthansa A340-600 in 2005 Frankfurt - Guangzhou - Manila (D-AIHD) but coming back the -600 (D-AIHK) went tech before leaving FRA and they sent a -300 instead (D-AIGD). That was not so nice since the Guangzhou - Frankfurt leg was 14 hours in the air exactly. Since I could not leave the plane at Guangzhou, that meant you were on board for around 18 hours in total:



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Adrian Thompson




If you are worried about the flight map, at least they put that up on the main screen in between entertainment items so at least you know where you are. On the outbound trip I got enough information to be able to spot Mount Everest from somewhere between Katmandu and Dhaka.

Here are more photos of the downstairs toilet area and the seating etc:



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Yoshiaki Hoshina
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Yoshiaki Hoshina





View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Konstantin von Wedelstaedt
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ralf Stöckner

 
rootsair
Posts: 4012
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 3:25 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:44 am

Quoting LY777 (Reply 1):
Yes, it is very interesting, I am not sure LH is the only carrier that configures their A346 that way. I wish I could fly once on LH A346. A shame there are no PTVs in Y, though



Quoting LXA340 (Reply 5):
How come that LH didn't introduce PTV's in Y class, at least on all the new planes they received over the past few years. A330 / A346?

WOW.
This has turned into a WHY LUFTHANSA NO PTV thread !!!!
A man without the knowledge of his past history,culture and origins is like a tree without roots
 
ordryan28
Posts: 963
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:24 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:49 am

Quoting RootsAir (Reply 18):
This has turned into a WHY LUFTHANSA NO PTV thread !!!!

Don't they always  Wink
Whoever said winning is not everything never fought cancer.
 
User avatar
n229nw
Posts: 2026
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 4:19 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:55 am

Quoting SandroZRH (Reply 14):
An F/A will carry him/her down

Only if it is Ralph Fiennes!  wink 
All Glory to the Hypnotoad!
 
workhorse
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:35 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:32 am

One month ago, I have flown an LH A340-600 (was lucky enough to get the Star Alliance one for my first 346 flight!) and I must say those lower deck lavs are a great idea.

First, this avoids people queuing in the aisle and makes life much easier to FA's and everybody. Second, this solves the problem of pax complaining about "being seated near the toilets". This definitely takes out some cargo space, but also helps to put in more seats, so I guess LH have done their maths and found that those extra seats bring them more money then cargo.

Generally speaking, I have found LH to be an excellent airline (smooth on-time operations, immaculate clean planes, friendly and caring FA's...) except for one thing: their seat pitch sucks!

I was seated in economy near the window and there was some sort of IFE box under every window seat (what the hell an IFE box is doing there??? they don't even have PTV, so what is it for?) so at the end of 11h-long flight my legs did really hurt...

If they added 1 more inch to every row (or took out those damn boxes), they'd be perfect...

[Edited 2007-02-20 22:34:14]
 
22886
Posts: 387
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2001 6:50 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:40 am

I flew MUC-PVG on Lufthansa's A340-600 (D-AIHK) last week. The downstairs toilets are pretty cool. The toilets themselves are nice too with sensored taps and nice lighting, quite spacious aswell.
Another down side to flying Y in LHs A346s is they never displayed the image from tail camera thoughout the entire flight. I have flown on China Eastern's A340-600 where they did show this and its well impressive.
 
easyfriday2000
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:08 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:37 am

I was told the main reason lh put the lavs downstairs was because the space would have been wasted anyway. When they stretched the plane they did make more room for cargo in the hold but they plane cannot lift all that cargo and a full pax so they figured that they might as well put the lavs down in the space that would not be used for cargo. That is what one of there pilots told me anywho. When i flew from fra -den it was totally full and i honestly didnt know if we would get off the ground. It took forever. Seemed very underpowered to me
 
kaitak744
Posts: 2086
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 1:32 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:56 am

Here is a another question. Which aircraft is this downstairs lav. feature offered on? I only know of the A340-600 and the 777-300ER. Any other plane?
 
User avatar
PM
Posts: 4821
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:05 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:00 am

Quoting Musapapaya (Reply 9):
I have not flown on both C class but I heard that LH's new C class is superb. Just want to know, having flown on both VS and LH, why would you think the VS C class is better? I would be glad if you could tell me more.

Several things, really.

VS have a flat horizontal bed which is excellent. LH have a flat but angled seat. One is a bed; the other is still a seat, any way you look at it.

VS have passengers in individual 'pods' which gives much more privacy that the traditional LH arrangement.

Essentially, VS is 1 - 1 - 1 in C whereas LH is 2 - 2 - 2. In other words, every VS seat is on the aisle.

VS has a much better (i.e. far more programmes) AVOD system.

The lighting on VS is clever and stylish.

VS give out 'sleep suits' for travel which are very comfortable.

Neither airline can boast much in terms of food. The service on each was comparable though I think VS was a little better.

I really liked the courtesy limo on VS at either end of the flight and the dedicated Upper Class check-in at LHR was a nice touch. You don't really enter the terminal till after you've checked in.

The LH lounges in FRA are very poor whereas the VS lounge in LHR is stunning.

Yes, of the two I'd take VS any day.
 
shane
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 2:38 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:03 pm

I ride this thing regularly SFO-MUC & back and let me tell ya it's damn cramped in the back if you're over 6'1".
 
brons2
Posts: 2462
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2001 1:02 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:27 pm

Quoting Shane (Reply 26):
I ride this thing regularly SFO-MUC & back and let me tell ya it's damn cramped in the back if you're over 6'1".

bummer. I'm 6'7", guess I'll go with BA again when I head over to the Continent this summer. BA has been very accommodating in the past with the exit row on the 772ER! LH would be convenient though as they're bringing the A346 to IAH. I can park with friends in Houston or Dallas so no difference there. Houston is closer. I have lots of miles on AA. Maybe that's option #3, but I sure do prefer flying the foreign carriers over the pond.

How does the pricing on C with LH compare to other carriers?
Firings, if well done, are good for employee morale.
 
EBGflyer
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:05 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:14 pm

Quoting Shane (Reply 26):
it's damn cramped in the back if you're over 6'1

oops.. I'm doomed. Doing FRA-CAN-MNL next Thursday. I'm so going to pray for an upgrade!
Future flights: CPH-BOS; CPH-SVG; CPH-PVG-HKG-MNL-DVO; CPH-CDG; CPH-NRT; CPH-MIA; CPH-PVG
 
awthompson
Posts: 481
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:59 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:59 pm

Quoting EBGflyer (Reply 28):
oops.. I'm doomed. Doing FRA-CAN-MNL next Thursday. I'm so going to pray for an upgrade!

Hey, be positive, you will enjoy it. Sit on the left hand side and if you get the regular route, watch out for Mount Everest as you pass near Kathmandu! Even you don't fly so close to Kathmandu, Everest can be seen from a long distance.

The stop at Guangzhou is also interesting. I took the following shots from LH A340-642 D-AIHD. I


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Adrian Thompson




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Adrian Thompson
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Adrian Thompson

 
rabenschlag
Posts: 1011
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 10:28 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:36 pm

Quoting Shane (Reply 26):
I ride this thing regularly SFO-MUC & back and let me tell ya it's damn cramped in the back if you're over 6'1".



Quoting Workhorse (Reply 21):
Generally speaking, I have found LH to be an excellent airline (smooth on-time operations, immaculate clean planes, friendly and caring FA's...) except for one thing: their seat pitch sucks!

According to seat guru, LH is worst but many competitors are quite close when it comes to pitch. However, there is definately a better way to fly when pitch and width are of interest.

Seat pitch/width in Y:

LH 340-600: 31.0" 17.0"
BA 777-200: 31.0" 17.5"
KLM 777-200: 31.0" 17.5"
CO 777-200: 31.0" 17.9"
UAL 777-200: 31.0" 18.0"
DL 777-200: 31-33.0" 17.0"
AF 777-300: 32.0" 18.0"
SAS 340-300: 32.0" 17.7"
SWISS 340-300: 32.0" 17.3"
NWA 330-300: 31-33.0" 17.5"
AA 777-200: 32.0" 18-18.5"
VS 340-600: 32.0" 17.5"
SIA 777-300: 32.0" 18.0"
Thai 340-600: 32-34.0" 17.0"
CX 340-600:32.0" 17.5"
US 330-300: 33-34.0" 17.0"
 
mk777
Posts: 888
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:48 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Thu Feb 22, 2007 11:22 pm

Will IAD ever see the LH A346 instead of the usual A333-A343/B744??
come fly with me
 
columba
Posts: 5045
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:12 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Thu Feb 22, 2007 11:38 pm

One question that is a little bit off topic but I don´want to open a new thread for this:

Any idea when we can expect a decision for the A340-300 replacement. LH said that this will be in spring 2007 is there any board meeting scheduled in March or April which can be an indication on the announcement day ?
It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
 
chrisMUC
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 7:47 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Thu Feb 22, 2007 11:59 pm

Quoting QatarA340 (Reply 12):
Looks very chic, but what if there is a disabled passenger in Y; how can he or she go to the toilet if they cant ride the stairs?

There are two Y-Toilets on the main deck at the very rear, one quite spacious (accessible with the onboard wheelchair).
 
workhorse
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:35 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Fri Feb 23, 2007 6:06 am

Quoting Rabenschlag (Reply 30):
According to seat guru, LH is worst but many competitors are quite close when it comes to pitch. However, there is definately a better way to fly when pitch and width are of interest.

Seat pitch/width in Y:

Oh, that's interesting. I had forgotten about seatguru.  Smile

During last years, I have flown longhaul with AF, DL, AC, UA and recently LH (I have also flown SU but that was too long time ago, when I was smaller  Smile ).

AF, DL and AC were OK and seatguru says they're 32'".

But, my last trip was UA 744 on the way there and LH 346 on the way back, and my legs definitely felt better after 11 hours onboard UA's 744. However, seatguru says they're both 31". So, it's probably all the fault of LH's IFE box.

I still don't understand what's it for and why they've put it under the window seat. After all, if it was under the aisle seat, it would be less disturbing since people in the aisle seat can stretch their legs elsewhere.  Smile

It's really a pity about LH's seat pitch because, as I said, this point apart, they're really a great airline!

And the 346 is a great plane (at least when you don't see the fuel bill  Smile ), it feels so majestic with its long fuse and flexible wings, and it's so incredibly silent (you almost hear the air conditioning system more then the engines)!
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18971
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:05 pm

Quoting Rabenschlag (Reply 30):
According to seat guru, LH is worst but many competitors are quite close when it comes to pitch. However, there is definately a better way to fly when pitch and width are of interest.

Seat pitch/width in Y:

LH 340-600: 31.0" 17.0"
BA 777-200: 31.0" 17.5"
KLM 777-200: 31.0" 17.5"
CO 777-200: 31.0" 17.9"
UAL 777-200: 31.0" 18.0"
DL 777-200: 31-33.0" 17.0"
AF 777-300: 32.0" 18.0"
SAS 340-300: 32.0" 17.7"
SWISS 340-300: 32.0" 17.3"
NWA 330-300: 31-33.0" 17.5"
AA 777-200: 32.0" 18-18.5"
VS 340-600: 32.0" 17.5"
SIA 777-300: 32.0" 18.0"
Thai 340-600: 32-34.0" 17.0"
CX 340-600:32.0" 17.5"
US 330-300: 33-34.0" 17.0"

You can't rely on that seat width information in sites such as Seat Guru. There are various ways of measuring seat width (e.g. width of the seat cushion, or width between armrests etc.) The information is probably based on what the carrier supplies. There is far more to seat comfort than half an inch of width which may be meaningless anyway depending how it's measured. For example, it is highly unlikely that AA's 777 seats are really 1.5 inches wider than DL's, when both are 9-abreast. If measured consistently they are probably almost identical.

Seat pitch is more objective but even there the specific seat used can make a big difference. Some seats at 31 inch pitch have more effective leg/kneeroom than other seats at 33 inch pitch due to the way the seat is designed and the thickness of the frame, seatback, where the seat pockets are located etc.
 
EBGflyer
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:05 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:20 pm

Quoting Awthompson (Reply 29):
Sit on the left hand side and if you get the regular route, watch out for Mount Everest as you pass near Kathmandu! Even you don't fly so close to Kathmandu, Everest can be seen from a long distance.

The stop at Guangzhou is also interesting. I took the following shots from LH A340-642 D-AIHD

Thanks for the advice! I'll take any seat 1A-9A Big grin

I notice those pics where taken from the right side.  wink 

BTW, aren't we supposed to turn off all electrical devices during takeoff?  angel 
Future flights: CPH-BOS; CPH-SVG; CPH-PVG-HKG-MNL-DVO; CPH-CDG; CPH-NRT; CPH-MIA; CPH-PVG
 
scouseflyer
Posts: 2165
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:02 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:24 pm

Quoting Columba (Reply 32):
Any idea when we can expect a decision for the A340-300 replacement. LH said that this will be in spring 2007 is there any board meeting scheduled in March or April which can be an indication on the announcement day ?

If this the 787/A350 decision - I expect it'll be after the A350 workshare mess is sorted.....
 
CXfirst
Posts: 2882
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:13 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:40 pm

Quoting Kaitak744 (Reply 24):
777-300ER

Who has downstair lavatories on the 777-300ER. I have never seen or even heard about this on their planes.

-CXfirst
 
awthompson
Posts: 481
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:59 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Sat Feb 24, 2007 12:34 am

Quoting EBGflyer (Reply 36):
I notice those pics where taken from the right side.

Hope you also got my instant message which explains how I got into business class for the last leg from Guangzhou to Manila and sat on the other side Wink This is seat 10K. I was back at seat 25A for the longer flight from Frankfurt.

Will check ACARS to see which plane you get. D-AIHC is in Star Alliance and you might even get one of the newer -642s recently delivered if you are lucky. I am not sure what config they have and who knows maybe they even have PTVs  Confused
The last few days have been HD/HK/HH/HI/HE.

The route I got was one of my most interesting: FRA - Bayreuth - Pizen - Brno - Cluj Napoca - Târgu Mures - Sevastopol - Tblisi - Baku - Ashgabat - Kabul - Lahore - Delhi - Kathmandu (saw Mount Everest) - Dhaka - Mandalay - Kunming - CAN!

Coming back was a similar route but we went further south into Iran in the last half.
 
LH459
Posts: 793
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 2:41 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:37 am

Quoting Easyfriday2000 (Reply 23):
When i flew from fra -den it was totally full and i honestly didnt know if we would get off the ground. It took forever. Seemed very underpowered to me

A de-rated takeoff, then. The 346 is definitely NOT underpowered! Now, the 343 on the other hand...
"I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is temporary; the evil it does is permanent" - Ghandi
 
awthompson
Posts: 481
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:59 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Sat Feb 24, 2007 8:58 am

Quoting LH459 (Reply 40):
A de-rated takeoff, then. The 346 is definitely NOT underpowered! Now, the 343 on the other hand...

I think you are right about a de-rated take off. With those large engines, there is plenty of power. You could say it about the -300 indeed.
 
EI321
Posts: 4788
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:43 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Sat Feb 24, 2007 9:18 am

Quoting Shane (Reply 26):
I ride this thing regularly SFO-MUC & back and let me tell ya it's damn cramped in the back if you're over 6'1".

But then what aircraft or airline is not on long haul in the back!
 
awthompson
Posts: 481
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:59 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Sat Feb 24, 2007 9:34 am

Just while we are on the subject, here are a few more pictures from my personal album which were not of sufficient quality to post on the site. LH 788 D-AIHD A340-642 Guangzhou, Enjoy !

Big version: Width: 1200 Height: 900 File size: 167kb
Big version: Width: 1200 Height: 900 File size: 192kb
Big version: Width: 1200 Height: 900 File size: 189kb
Big version: Width: 1200 Height: 900 File size: 178kb
Big version: Width: 1600 Height: 1200 File size: 244kb
Big version: Width: 1200 Height: 900 File size: 227kb
 
aircanada014
Posts: 1224
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 2:24 pm

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:46 am

Don't forget AC A340-500 have downstair crew resting area too. Very similar as to LH A340-600
 
Avianca
Posts: 5273
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:33 am

RE: Lufthansa Airbus 340-600

Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:39 am

Quoting FlyinTLow (Reply 2):
Also, the A346 is one long plane. There is a large cargo capacity downstairs in the first place. So I don't think it is that much of a factor.

well acutally the cargo capacity on the LH A340-300 are much bigger compared to the A340-600 due the gally and lav down there...
Colombia es el Mundo Y el Mundo es Colombia