Posts: 756
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 1:07 pm

On The Horizon Of Aviation 'On-Duty' Time Limit?

Fri Feb 23, 2007 1:12 pm

The following thread got me to thinking:

The last few replies (thusfar) are just shocking that it is acceptable for flight crews (not to mention mechanics, ATC, and other people who are in direct connection with the operation of an airplane) to work on such less sleep. Could aviation learn something from medicine?

The year is 1984. An 18 year old college student named Libby Zion is admitted to Cornell's New York Hospital for a high fever. Dr. Gregg Stone, a junior medical resident who had been on duty for 18-19 hours, gives Ms. Zion a drug called Demerol (meperidine) for "shaking" episodes, overlooking the fact that there is a fatal interaction with a medication that Ms. Zion is already on. Eight hours later Ms. Zion is dead, purportedly because of a simple medication interaction. At the trial, blame is placed on Dr. Stone but what comes to light is the fact that Dr. Stone, like all other resident doctors, was overworked, sleep deprived, and virtually impaired. A commission was set-up and in 2003 the sweeping 80-hour work-week for resident physicians was implemented nationwide (USA). [Note - this is a grossly abbreviated version of the case, Libby Zion may have, by some accounts, died of cocaine overdose, but it has become widely accepted that it was likely a simple drug interaction that killed her.]

The basic premise of how it works is simple. 12 hours on, 12 hours off, with (on average) one 24-hour period "off" within a 7 day period. While many people would find this to be a gruelling schedule (72 hours a week), it is actually much more human than a typical "old-school" call schedule of 12 on, 12 off, 36 on, 12 off, 12 on, 12 off, 36 on, etc. When I started residency before the 80-hour thing was started, we were pulling 100-120 hours "on-duty" in a week. Making potentially life-saving decisions at 3am on 2 hours of sleep was, well, scary. Simply put, do I want a pilot risking both my life and his flying on little or no rest?

There are laws about truck drivers and bus drivers and how long they can work for. There are laws for doctors. There are even laws in some states that ban drowsy-driving; in New Jersey if you (everyday Joe) are involved in a crash that lead to anybody's death and you were found to not have had adequate sleep before you got behind the wheel (you worked a "double shift" at the Duncan Donuts that day), you can be charged with vehicular homicide, get prison time, and even be charged with a $100k fine. Even if laws (or rules/regs) exist for the airline industry, are they adequate enough to ensure the public's safety?

So should pilots, FA's, mechanics, rampers, ATC, and any other personnel who have anything to do related to the safety of the plane and its passengers be more limited as far as work hours?
You land a million planes safely, then you have one little mid-air and you never hear the end of it - Pushing Tin
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 1:08 am

RE: On The Horizon Of Aviation 'On-Duty' Time Limit?

Sat Feb 24, 2007 1:29 am

FAR Part 121 lists all of the duty time limitations for pilots and mechanics in the United States.

The problem is that the FAA can mandate a required rest period for flight crews, but they can't force flight crews to actually sleep during the mandated rest period. It's the same with controllers. It's up to the individual to get enough rest to be mentally focused enough to execute their duties.
Posts: 6633
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 11:10 am

RE: On The Horizon Of Aviation 'On-Duty' Time Limi

Sat Feb 24, 2007 2:01 am

Quoting AirportSeven (Reply 1):
FAR Part 121 lists all of the duty time limitations for pilots and mechanics in the United States.

The problem is that the FAA can mandate a required rest period for flight crews, but they can't force flight crews to actually sleep during the mandated rest period. It's the same with controllers. It's up to the individual to get enough rest to be mentally focused enough to execute their duties.

The problem with these rest requirements is that they are totally inadequate for how airlines operate now versus when they were first written. I am legally allowed to get as little as 8 hours "rest" between duty periods. But, due to how the rules are written, my rest starts 15 minutes after the door opens (usually I'm still on the airplane by this point) and starts 30 minutes before the door closes in the morning (am already onboard getting it ready by then).

So thats 8 hours from leaving the airplane to being back on the airplane. In that 8 hours I have to get transported to and from the airport (up to 30 minutes each way), I have to go through security, if its a Canada layover (which we do many of) I have to go through customs, I have to eat dinner in the evening and breakfast in the morning, I have to shower, get dressed, unpack and pack my things, and so on and so on. Then I have to fall asleep in an unfamiliar hotel room / unfamiliar bed. As you can see, those 8 hours of "rest" get eaten away by a lot of things that have nothing to do with sleeping very quickly. I usually subtract 4 hours from how much rest I'm allotted to how much sleep I can expect... so, for that 8 hour rest period, I'm expecting about 4 hours of sleep.

Additionally, there is nothing that says when this 8 hour rest period has to occur. There have been times where one day my rest period has been normal at night and the following day, my rest period has been from 10am to 8pm and then expected to be on duty 8pm to 9am the following morning. That is a complete night and day shift in when I am supposed to "rest" in the course of one day. So even if you did have an adequate rest period scheduled, say.. 12 hours, there is no guarentee that it matches up with your internal clock and you're going to be able to get any worthwhile sleep.

I just checked my next trip, during the whole trip, my shortest duty day is 12h43m and my longest rest period during the whole trip is 10h17m. So, the absolute shortest day I will work will be a nearly 13 hour day (163% longer than a normal 8 hour work day) with 5 legs and it will be preceeded by 4 hours of sleep and followed by my "long" overnight where I will expect about 6 hours. I'm scheduled to fly 27.8 hours and 18 legs in a 3.5 day period.

If you had any idea of the number of mistakes make in cockpits across the country every day due to sleep deprivation, you and the rest of the general public would be horrified. They happen many times on every single flight, every single day. Luckily our system is built with a very large amount of checks and balances... we have lots of people and lots of systems all watching over the flight making sure things are going properly, and 99.9% of the time, something catches the error and it is corrected, but it is very unnerving that the errors occur in the first place.

Sadly, in the airline industry, time is money, and crews "resting" takes a lot of time and costs a lot of money. The airlines are able to lobby the FAA to keep things the way they are... fatigue usually gets swept under the carpet in crash investigations....a great deal of crashes, I believe, would've been prevented if the crews were not fatigued but were caused by something else.... ie: the crew probably could've reacted to the emergency better if they were rested and handled it better or not let things get out of hand.

I am a big proponent of getting more rest. It is not out of personal desire, but pure necessity for safety and my own body's sake (this has got to be one of the reason airline pilots have a short life expectancy). The FAA isn't going to do anything about it, so I'm actively trying to get better than FAA required minimums written into our contract with our airline, but it is an uphill battle and probably will not be successful.

So, next time you get on an airplane, ask the crew how much sleep they got the night before and how long they've been on duty... Sorry for the long post, this is a big issue for me and, obviously, I have a lot to say about it.  Smile

[Edited 2007-02-23 18:05:36]
Posts: 535
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 8:05 pm

RE: On The Horizon Of Aviation 'On-Duty' Time Limit?

Sat Feb 24, 2007 9:12 am

quite interesting to me that no one on this board seems to want to discuss about this..... it's certainly a more serious topic than the 1001st AvB war....
300 310 319/20/21 332/3 343 AT4/7 143 B19 732/3/4/5/G/8/9 742/4 752/3 763/4 77E/W CR2/7/9 D95 E45/70 F50 F70 100 M11 M90

Popular Searches On

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos