In hindsight, there may be some merit to that.
I really think the 777 cabin width is pretty sweet for the PAX load they carry. I buy'em!
This is why I think a T7ish barrel in a Y3 should be done, it would be good ot see the T7
go out on top, manufactured discontinued with Y3 for sale.
Exactly, I prefer to spend my money on the T7
size fuselage on the hub 2 hub thing, can't wait to fly more p2p as B787 promises. signed, educated consumer. As an a.nutter, I'd prefer to see the 781 and larger become part of Y3
Another posted, diferentt thread said that it is "bleedless", but named something else. It will be interesting to see if true. I started a thread last year if they would be forced to go bleeedless. I doubt that the marketeers can use that term, let's wait and see what A is showing EK
but not to a.net. It will be nice to see some real program data!
I worked on early military aircraft composite panels including radomes (with a frigging speed handle) but not on this scale. This may not end up to be an advantage, just a process, starting at manufacturing then dowm the road.
I continue to hate seeing the 787-10 posted. Another poster called it the SardineLiner, I'd tend to agree.