UAEflyer
Topic Author
Posts: 1054
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:29 pm

Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 1:12 am

Emirates' chief Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed Al Maktoum has dismissed rumours that the Dubai carrier plans to launch a budget operation.

"At the moment, we are not growing into the low-cost market," EK chairman said.
To those who said Emirates Express, forget it please  Smile
it seems that he know where to send all those A380s
http://www.arabianbusiness.com/index...com_content&view=article&id=495661
 
redflyer
Posts: 3882
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:30 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 1:17 am

Quoting UAEflyer (Thread starter):
To those who said Emirates Express, forget it please

"At the moment, we are not growing into the low-cost market." [emphasis added]

I don't think his comment necessarily lays any rumors to rest.
My other home is in the sky inside my Piper Cherokee 180.
 
User avatar
lightsaber
Crew
Posts: 12249
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:55 pm

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 1:47 am

From the article:

Quote:

However, Sheikh Ahmed admitted there is now little difference between budget and 'full cost' carrier services.

Unfortunately true in Y.

To me, this means that EK won't have all Y planes for a bit. Now take a step back... Due to the worldwide demand for business class seats (J), they'll keep that section.

Quote:
"It's part of Emirates plan to make Dubai really well connected to more points over the globe."

Ahhh... now we have the real reason. More destinations... Can we interpret that to mean more frequency (better hubbing at DXB/JXB)?  scratchchin 

I also take this little quote to mean that EK will fill up DXB with higher yield passengers. Thus, we'll have to wait for JXB for the LCC operation.

I also have no doubt the 2 year delay in A380 deliveries has crimped EK's plans a bit. They should be operating nearly 10 A380's by now.

Now to see what new bilaterals they can sign...  Wink

Lightsaber
"They did not know it was impossible, so they did it!" - Mark Twain
 
ikramerica
Posts: 13878
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 9:33 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:10 am

Quoting UAEflyer (Thread starter):
Emirates' chief Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed Al Maktoum has dismissed rumours that the Dubai carrier plans to launch a budget operation.

It's not a rumor if your own company is the one creating the news. EK executives are the ones who first talked about the whole idea. It wasn't something thrust upon them.

So it's not a rumor in any way. It's a business decision.
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
 
UAEflyer
Topic Author
Posts: 1054
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:29 pm

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:39 am

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 3):
So it's not a rumor in any way. It's a business decision.

But he clarify it now  Smile
 
AEROFAN
Posts: 1478
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 9:47 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:48 am

has ek rolled out a timeline for the flat beds in the J cabin on its 777s? will the A345 get them as well?
 
ikramerica
Posts: 13878
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 9:33 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:06 am

Quoting UAEflyer (Reply 4):
But he clarify it now

No, actually, they were pretty clear before. They PLANNED on doing it. Now, it sounds like a reversal of course, a business decision leading to a change in direction.

But because they leave some weasel words in there, as quoted above, there is still a chance they will revisit the idea in the future.
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
 
Ozair
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:38 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:16 pm

Quoting Lightsaber (Reply 2):
I also have no doubt the 2 year delay in A380 deliveries has crimped EK's plans a bit. They should be operating nearly 10 A380's by now.

I agree, having just booked a flight from the UK back to Australia for my wife, the DXB to SYD/MEL legs are full for over a two week period. The A380s will make a big difference to this leg.
 
User avatar
lightsaber
Crew
Posts: 12249
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:55 pm

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 1:11 pm

Quoting Ozair (Reply 7):
I agree, having just booked a flight from the UK back to Australia for my wife, the DXB to SYD/MEL legs are full for over a two week period. The A380s will make a big difference to this leg.

Does anyone happen to have a link to the Dubai-Australia bilateral? Thanks in advance.

Lightsaber
"They did not know it was impossible, so they did it!" - Mark Twain
 
UAEflyer
Topic Author
Posts: 1054
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:29 pm

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 1:45 pm

Quoting Aerofan (Reply 5):
has ek rolled out a timeline for the flat beds in the J cabin on its 777s? will the A345 get them as well?

maybe 2 to 3 years i guess

Quoting Lightsaber (Reply 8):
Does anyone happen to have a link to the Dubai-Australia bilateral?

hmmm it is known that EK is flying from next year 84 flights as they asked, but i dont know EY. But no QF flying DXB and it is not in their radar for the mean time

[Edited 2007-07-05 06:47:34]
 
aminobwana
Posts: 923
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:32 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:20 pm

Quoting Ozair (Reply 7):
having just booked a flight from the UK back to Australia for my wife, the DXB to SYD/MEL legs are full for over a two week period. The A380s will make a big difference to this leg.

If so, how can it be explained that as discussed on the Forum, Tim Clark stated a few weeks ago that even if Airbus could deliver the first A380 Jan/Feb 2008 and the second a few months later, EK would not accept them until October 2008 ??

He justified this saying that the interval to train personnel and to test the Aircraft This, inspite that FLUG REVUE was told by Airbus that Captains and maintenance personnel will be trained in Toulouse already End 2007 and attendants beginning 2008. and of course, if Airbus delivers the aircraft in February, it is implied it will be already tested

We all rememberr that previously, Emirates was stating that each day further delay in deliveries would cost EK a lot of money

By the way, in which class your booking was attempted ??

Comments ??

aminobwana
 
CrazyHorse
Posts: 316
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:16 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:34 pm

Quoting UAEflyer (Thread starter):
"At the moment, we are not growing into the low-cost market," EK chairman said.
To those who said Emirates Express, forget it please

EK will not operate a low cost division in the near future, but EK had to operate many flights with some very cheap fares to fill their A380. For EK and their pax this is not really bad, the pax will fly to dumping fares and EK could show this new pax, that their service is outstanding and on their next flight this pax will book EK again.
It could work.
 
aminobwana
Posts: 923
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:32 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:03 pm

Quoting CrazyHorse (Reply 11):
EK will not operate a low cost division in the near future, but EK had to operate many flights with some very cheap fares to fill their A380. For EK and their pax this is not really bad, the pax will fly to dumping fares and EK could show this new pax, that their service is outstanding and on their next flight this pax will book EK again.
It could work

You are assuming here several things:

*
That the fare dumpimg, I assume you refer to the low end economy class, will not be matched by other, lets say at least SQ and QR
*
that the service within such a gigantic enviroment will be better at ER
*
that this type of pax, which accept the inconveniences of lay overs and longer trip times, care for much else than the price, and next time, if the price is not more the promotional, will accept to pay more

aminobwana
 
nzrich
Posts: 1100
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:51 pm

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:38 pm

Quoting Aminobwana (Reply 12):
that the service within such a gigantic enviroment will be better at ER

I think EK now seem to have a problem in the staffing as the airline has grown so big so quickly that there has become inconsistency in the inflight service .. The bigger and faster the airline grows the harder it is too keep standards to a certain level ... Also just how many types of business class seats are there on EK !!! EK is a great airline but its grown so quick that some of its product has not kept up .. As in any big airline it takes time to renovate a fleet .. This is where the smaller airlines may actually benefit by being able to be nimble and do things quickly where EK along with many other big major airlines will take longer to impliment things fleet wide ..
"Pride of the pacific"
 
EI321
Posts: 4788
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:43 pm

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:51 pm

I suspect that he fears a price war among the emerging lo-cost l/h carriers, similar to the situation among european carriers. There will also be a degree of cannibalising the normal Emirates economy class. I dont think we should dismiss the possibility of Emirates No Frills in the long term.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23715
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:04 pm

The 600+ seat two-class configuration they're planning for at least some of the fleet will enable them to act like an LCC/LFC (Low Fare Carrier), so it's probably just semantics...  Smile

Quoting Aminobwana (Reply 10):
If so, how can it be explained that as discussed on the Forum, Tim Clark stated a few weeks ago that even if Airbus could deliver the first A380 Jan/Feb 2008 and the second a few months later, EK would not accept them until October 2008?

DXB-SIN/MEL is a longer stage length then SIN-SYD, so I imagine that even if he had two birds, he could only do a single flight each direction and if one of them had a mechanical on either end, they'd suddenly have ~450 people stranded that they needed to accommodate on other carriers or scramble to get additional lift out to bring them home, disrupting other operations.

So I expect they do not want to launch services to LHR and SYD until they have at least a half-dozen A388s in the fleet, so I can see them interested in deferring deliveries until they can get that many "in a row", so to speak.
 
ekskycargo370
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:46 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:29 am

Thank god,is all I can say,this would have seriously tarnished our reputation.I would hate to be working for a company likened to such carriers like Ryanair,Easyjet etc.
 
incitatus
Posts: 2810
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 1:49 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:12 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 15):
The 600+ seat two-class configuration they're planning for at least some of the fleet will enable them to act like an LCC/LFC (Low Fare Carrier), so it's probably just semantics...

Agreed. 10-abreast coach on 777s is a budget operation.
Conservatives against Trump
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23715
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:22 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 15):
So I expect they do not want to launch services to LHR and SYD until they have at least a half-dozen A388s in the fleet, so I can see them interested in deferring deliveries until they can get that many "in a row", so to speak.

I need to revise my remarks. WINGS was nice enough to provide me with Clark's actual quote in another thread, where he noted he'd take the A388s in early 2008 if Airbus was ready, but he'd use them for crew training and familiarization instead of putting them immediately into service. This way, when the next set of planes start coming, he can put them into service quicker.

So what I thought was an actual deferment ("I won't take them before October even if they were ready earlier"), was actually just a desire to keep to the scheduled service launch in October, but using the planes earlier arrival to help train crews to speed up the EIS of the follow-on frames.
 
aminobwana
Posts: 923
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:32 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:53 am

[

Quoting Stitch (Reply 15):
DXB-SIN/MEL is a longer stage length then SIN-SYD, so I imagine that even if he had two birds, he could only do a single flight each direction and if one of them had a mechanical on either end, they'd suddenly have ~450 people stranded that they needed to accommodate on other carriers or scramble to get additional lift out to bring them home, disrupting other operations.



Quoting Stitch (Reply 18):
I need to revise my remarks. WINGS was nice enough to provide me with Clark's actual quote in another thread, where he noted he'd take the A388s in early 2008 if Airbus was ready, but he'd use them for crew training and familiarization instead of putting them immediately into service. This way, when the next set of planes start coming, he can put them into service quicker.

Quoting Lightsaber (Reply 2):
I also have no doubt the 2 year delay in A380 deliveries has crimped EK's plans a bit. They should be operating nearly 10 A380's by now.

So what I thought was an actual deferment ("I won't take them before October even if they were ready earlier"), was actually just a desire to keep to the scheduled service launch in October, but using the planes earlier arrival to help train crews to speed up the EIS of the follow-on frames.

I referred in my former message to the same as WINGS provided you. But the same arguments would apply even more for SQ, which plans to initiate service with only the MSN 3

I read an post in the Forum (I do not find it now, was it eventually deleted ?), where it was stated that EK, even without any E380 flying, is not keeping their personnel capabilities pari passu with their expansion, with a certain deterioration
of the service. This could be a reason, but obviously Tim Clark was aware of this when he urged Airbus to deliver a.s.a.p.

What would have happened with the "keeping pace" problems if Airbus had no problems and by now Emirates would operate 10 A380s ??

But anyhow, deferring the initiation of A380 operations is not the way an airline which needs the capacity acts !! And I recall what AIRBUS stated to FLUG REVIEW (July edition) that the EK flying personnel will be trained by early 2008,

aminobwana






[

[Edited 2007-07-05 18:55:35]
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23715
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:58 am

Quoting Aminobwana (Reply 19):
I referred in my former message to the same as WINGS provided you. But the same arguments would apply even more for SQ, which plans to initiate service with only the MSN 3

But SQ can fly an A388 from SIN to SYD and back to SIN in a "day". I am not sure EK can do that from DXB.

Quoting Aminobwana (Reply 19):
I read an post in the Forum (I do not find it now, was it eventually deleted ?), where it was stated that EK, even without any E380 flying, is not keeping their personnel capabilities pari passu with their expansion, with a certain deterioration of the service...What would have happened with the "keeping pace" problems if Airbus had no problems and by now Emirates would operate 10 A380s ??

They would not have ordered and leased additional 777-300ERs last year...
 
Ozair
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:38 am

RE: Emirates Confirmed "No Low-cost For Us"

Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:21 am

Quoting Aminobwana (Reply 10):
By the way, in which class your booking was attempted ??

Booking was in Y, in the end we got a seat on the non-stop leg which is a plus.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 15):
DXB-SIN/MEL is a longer stage length then SIN-SYD

If I remember correct the A380s for the SYD/MEL routes will have 510 seats for direct flights. I think we will see these replace the current A345 services and the 77W services will stay, unless demand for the one stop routes also increase. The J class is continually booked weeks in advance and some extra J seats would really reap the revenue.

Quoting Incitatus (Reply 17):
10-abreast coach on 777s is a budget operation.

Having flown the EK 77W numerous times I actually enjoy the 10-abreast, the extra legroom more than compensates for the closer neighbour.

Quoting Aminobwana (Reply 19):
What would have happened with the "keeping pace" problems if Airbus had no problems and by now Emirates would operate 10 A380s ??



Quoting Stitch (Reply 20):
They would not have ordered and leased additional 777-300ERs last year...

EK expands in a very funny way, perhaps we would have seen expanded USA service earlier? The additional 77W would have come anyway, it's the perfect sized aircraft for them.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos