masonaries
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2000 11:10 pm

Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:35 am

foxnews.com reporting....
 
Boston92
Posts: 2553
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:56 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:38 am

I am guessing that "SEA-TAC" is referring to Seattle Tacoma and not "TAC" being a destination? Sorry, just a little confused.
"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
 
Boston92
Posts: 2553
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:56 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:39 am

Apparently, Northwest 980???
"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
 
Boston92
Posts: 2553
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:56 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:41 am

NW980, SEA-MEM, landed back at SEA over a half hour ago, per flightaware.
"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
 
dfwmzuri
Posts: 219
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 6:34 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:46 am

CNN reporting that a passenger who missed the flight made the threat. Not too bright.
 
User avatar
tjwgrr
Posts: 2010
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2000 4:09 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:47 am

Direct KNOBS, maintain 2700' until established on the localizer, cleared ILS runway 26 left approach.
 
Boston92
Posts: 2553
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:56 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:50 am

Quoting DFWMzuri (Reply 4):
Not too bright.

Not at all. Some people don't get it...but he/she will soon.
"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
 
ANCFlyer
Posts: 21391
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:51 pm

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:51 am

FOR THOSE THAT FOUGHT FOR IT, FREEDOM HAS A FLAVOR THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW OR UNDERSTAND
 
Boston92
Posts: 2553
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:56 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:59 am

Here is the SEA Tower ATC from 12:30-1:00pm PST, the landing should be there somewhere:

http://archive-server.liveatc.net/ksea/KSEA_TWR-Jul-25-2007-1930Z.mp3
"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
 
Boston92
Posts: 2553
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:56 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:19 am

Quoting Boston92 (Reply 8):
Here is the SEA Tower ATC from 12:30-1:00pm PST, the landing should be there somewhere:

http://archive-server.liveatc.net/ks...Z.mp3

I now understand that it did not land until 1:14pm, so ATC may be found here:

http://archive-server.liveatc.net/ksea/KSEA_TWR-Jul-25-2007-2000Z.mp3
"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
 
Boston92
Posts: 2553
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:56 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:30 am

Here is how it went:

NW980: Tower Northwest 980 visual approach for runway 34 center... and we're recommending that you please pull the aircraft up ahead of us off the approach.

TWR: Northwest 980 Seattle Tower cleared to land.

NW980: Cleared to land, 980.

HZN196: SEA tower, just checkin in.

TWR: Horizon 196, missed approach please.

HZN196: Missed approach for Horizon 196.

NW980: Can we get a confirmation of landing clearance?

TWR: Northwest 980 cleared to land 34 center, bird on final is missed approach, and in front of you is turning off...number 1 for landing.

NW980: Okay...we're planning on rolling to the end

TWR: They want you at November

NW980: Exit at November?

TWR: Exit where you can and proceed to Tengo-November.


I stopped listening then...it was about 1/3 of the way in on the most recent link in case you wanted to listen.
"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
 
AirframeAS
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 3:56 pm

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:35 am

A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
 
OPNLguy
Posts: 11191
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 1999 11:29 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:43 am

Quoting Boston92 (Reply 1):
I am guessing that "SEA-TAC" is referring to Seattle Tacoma and not "TAC" being a destination? Sorry, just a little confused.

You are correct...
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
Arcrftlvr
Posts: 393
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:30 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:53 am

Quoting DFWMzuri (Reply 4):
CNN reporting that a passenger who missed the flight made the threat.

If that's the case, then this individual should be forced to forfeit their right to ever fly. What an idiot.
 
bcoz
Posts: 193
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:00 pm

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:58 am

Just a knitpicky thing... The story on KING-TV's website indicates that the FAA stopped all inbounds. I don't think that's right as you can clearly hear clearencees being given for landing not long after 980 was down. And besides...what would the logic of that be?
 
AirframeAS
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 3:56 pm

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:02 am

If you look at the KING-5 towercam that I posted in reply 11, the busses arrived and seems like the NWA rampers are unloading the plane.
A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
 
AirframeAS
Posts: 9811
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 3:56 pm

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:52 am

I forgot to ask: Does anyone at NWA know the tail number of this aircraft?
A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
 
F9Animal
Posts: 3652
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:13 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:59 am

What a dummy. He will learn a valuable lesson from stupidity.
I Am A Different Animal!!
 
OPNLguy
Posts: 11191
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 1999 11:29 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:03 am

Quoting Bcoz (Reply 14):
The story on KING-TV's website indicates that the FAA stopped all inbounds. I don't think that's right as you can clearly hear clearencees being given for landing not long after 980 was down. And besides...what would the logic of that be?

I suspect it's just an assumption on their part, sort of similar to any aircraft making an emergency landing "dumping fuel" even though the aircraft involved are not even equipped with fuel dump systems.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
boeing743
Posts: 338
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:16 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:31 am

That is stupid for passengers to do that because of missing flight. He would be so sorry when he is throw into jail for said that words. So guess many passengers would sue him for emotion problem on that day.
 
acidradio
Crew
Posts: 1595
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2001 3:19 pm

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:19 pm

What a waste. Think of how many hundreds, if not thousands of people this effects. Then we could get to the secondary/tertiary effects... What if there were some eyeballs onboard going to meet someone for a transplant?
Ich haben zwei Platzspielen und ein Microphone
 
theflcowboy
Posts: 357
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 3:44 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:53 pm

Pilots sounded a little weary when they first checked in.

Its like MTV...some people just dont get it.
A318, A320, A332, A333, B1900, B722, B732, B733, B734, B735, B737, B738, B772, CR1, CR2, CR7, CR9, MD80, MD81, MD82, MD8
 
gunsontheroof
Posts: 3226
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:30 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am

Wow...I landed at SEA right before this happened yesterday. Hope the loser has his flying privileges revoked.
 
azjubilee
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2000 5:26 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:47 am

This idiot should be billed for all the extra expense that has occured. Crew, fuel and all the compensation due to the pax onboard. Then he ought to be brought up on federal charges and be forced to ride a 1978 moped where ever he needs to go in the future.


AZJ
 
visityyj
Posts: 380
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2000 7:23 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:24 am

Quoting Bcoz (Reply 14):
The story on KING-TV's website indicates that the FAA stopped all inbounds. I don't think that's right as you can clearly hear clearencees being given for landing not long after 980 was down.

The FAA issued a Ground Stop ("SECURITY/OTHER") for SEA arrivals, meaning that any flight not already departed for SEA had to stay where it was. GS was lifted about a hour later.
 
bcoz
Posts: 193
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:00 pm

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:38 am

Quoting Visityyj (Reply 24):
The FAA issued a Ground Stop ("SECURITY/OTHER") for SEA arrivals, meaning that any flight not already departed for SEA had to stay where it was. GS was lifted about a hour later.

Thanks for that. That makes a bit more sense than the way KING reported it.

bcoz
 
rlorenzo24
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:01 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:42 am

Those that choose to mix selfishness with stupidity usually end up paying the consequences. I hope he gets locked up for awhile. What did think was going to happen, that they were to let him on board after searching the a/c and discovering no bomb? I'm sure he manipulates his wife the same way.
 
ATCGOD
Posts: 517
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:24 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:02 am

Quoting Visityyj (Reply 24):
The FAA issued a Ground Stop ("SECURITY/OTHER") for SEA arrivals, meaning that any flight not already departed for SEA had to stay where it was. GS was lifted about a hour later.

I was wondering why they issued the ground stop. I heard SEA was in ground stop but CD/FD didn't give the reason...now I know. Hope all turns out ok.
 
Boston92
Posts: 2553
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:56 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:07 am

So for about 1 hour...SEA saw no arrivals at all. That 1 hour caused probably a day worth of trouble.
"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
 
ATCGOD
Posts: 517
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:24 am

RE: Flight Returns To SEA-TAC Bomb Threat.

Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:09 am

Quoting Boston92 (Reply 28):
That 1 hour caused probably a day worth of trouble.

Well O'Hare was stopped for a while yesterday for thunderstorms. Lot's of real bad delays lately.