SailorOrion
Topic Author
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2001 5:56 pm

MUC-DEN And MUC-ICN/PUS Load Factors

Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:08 pm

According to data from the German Statistical Agency (sorry I lack better word for "Statistisches Bundesamt") the load factor on MUC-DEN has been 87% and on MUC-ICN/PUS 86% of the seats have been sold. All data for April 2007.

Even though the data is (afaik) not fully accurate, it doesn't look bad ...

SailorOrion
 
PanHAM
Posts: 8533
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:44 pm

RE: MUC-DEN And MUC-ICN/PUS Load Factors

Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:14 pm

Quoting SailorOrion (Thread starter):
I lack better word for "Statistisches Bundesamt") the

"Buddhistisches Standesamt"  Wink - (Federal) Statistics and Census Office should be right.

Quoting SailorOrion (Thread starter):

Even though the data is (afaik) not fully accurate, it doesn't look ba

I would consider that an understatement. 86/87 % are bloody well for a full service carrier.
powered by Eierlikör
 
flyyul
Posts: 4394
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2000 11:25 am

RE: MUC-DEN And MUC-ICN/PUS Load Factors

Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:34 pm

Are these stats available online? How did MUC-YUL do in relation, as well as MUC-BOS/CLT?
 
SailorOrion
Topic Author
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2001 5:56 pm

RE: MUC-DEN And MUC-ICN/PUS Load Factors

Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:41 pm

Same source:

MUC-YUL: 81%
MUC-BOS: 83%
MUC-CLT: 89%
MUC-JFK: 90%
MUC-LAX: 92%
MUC-SFO: 94%

Please note that the original data states only the number of passengers, load factor are computed by someone on the MUC-Forum using normal equipment. Thus equipment changes can distort the data.

SailorOrion
 
airfrnt
Posts: 2002
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:05 am

RE: MUC-DEN And MUC-ICN/PUS Load Factors

Tue Jul 31, 2007 2:37 am

Quoting SailorOrion (Thread starter):
According to data from the German Statistical Agency (sorry I lack better word for "Statistisches Bundesamt") the load factor on MUC-DEN has been 87% and on MUC-ICN/PUS 86% of the seats have been sold. All data for April 2007.

Strangely enough I was talking with a friend who worked at the Airport yesterday about this. What I heard from him was that LH was ecstatic about how well their routes have been doing, but are not happy with the hot/high performance of the A343 on the route. The 346 and the 744 seem to be okay.
 
SailorOrion
Topic Author
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2001 5:56 pm

RE: MUC-DEN And MUC-ICN/PUS Load Factors

Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:50 am

Quoting AirFrnt (Reply 4):
The 346 and the 744 seem to be okay.

Good, then they can upgrade the route to a 346 :P

SailorOrion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: aflyingkiwi, Alexdk, Baidu [Spider], Bostrom, jhdk, kaichinshih, KarelXWB, migair54, qf789, qvb222, sandyb123, smi0006, soundmind, StTim, SuperSix2, usflyer123, Wingtip1005, XaviClot and 240 guests