od-bwh
Posts: 308
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2002 6:25 pm

What becomes of B6's Ops on T6 @ JFK When T5 Reopens?

Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:29 am

I know that this question might have been asked a 100 times, but I didn't do my homework, and No i didn't check other threads...  Smile

What is jetBlue going to do with T6 when the new T5 is ready? I beleive that T5 will be pretty enough for their requirements. Will it keep operating from T6? Or would it be handed over to the port authority?

Thanks anways...
OD-BWH
A300, A319, A320, A321, A332, A333, A343, A346, A388, B734, B738, B744, B772, B773, B788, F70, MD11, CRJ700
 
phatfarmlines
Posts: 1231
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2001 12:06 pm

RE: What Becomes Of

Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:57 pm

I reckon the master plan calls for its demolition. The new T5 should be able to expand into the former T6 area should the need arise.
 
qqflyboy
Posts: 1615
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 1:47 pm

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:30 am

I asked my roommate the other day this very question. He works for B6. He wasn't sure, but he thought it might remain in operation. Apparently the new terminal only has 26 gates, roughly what B6 has now at T6 with the temporary satellite terminal. He thought it would be torn down to make room for a T5 expansion, or closed and renovated to open at a later date. He said B6 needs more room now, so who knows. With another year to go before the new T5 opens a lot could change between now and then. Nonetheless, it's a good question and I've been curious too.
The views expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect my employer’s views.
 
rjpieces
Posts: 6849
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 8:58 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:54 am

Quoting QQflyboy (Reply 2):
Apparently the new terminal only has 26 gates, roughly what B6 has now at T6 with the temporary satellite terminal.

More like ~20 if I'm not mistaken (B6's current setup).
"Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon"
 
san747
Posts: 4344
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:03 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 7:15 am

Why would they get rid of T6? I'm sure someone can find a use for it once B6 moves, can't they?
Scotty doesn't know...
 
User avatar
STT757
Posts: 13174
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 1:14 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 7:26 am

The Port Authority owns T-6, so it's up to them. They could either demolish it to make room for hardstand parking, or more likely totally renovate it for Domestic US carriers such as UAL, CO, NWA and US Airways or even WN.

I don't think B6 has any say on the disposition of Port Authority property, they were only leasing space. So theoretically the Port Authority would want to go out and "land" so more leases to maximize the revenue potential, otherwise tearing it down is lost revenue for the Port Authority.

T-6 is domestic only, adding a FIS would add considerable cost to a T-6 makeover and possibly lure carriers away from higher rents at T-4 or T-1. Pulling CO, NWA, and US Airways out of T-4 creates more room for International carriers, and BA is in the process now of developing a trans-Atlantic operation out of JFK beyond the UK thanks to US/EU open skies. They will need some extra room at T-7, with UAL no longer in the International Business at JFK they could move their Trans-Con operations back to T-6. Then there's Virgin America, they might want a few of those gates.

So I highly doubt T-6 is going away, the Port Authority is going to further realize it's revenue potential through new leases.
Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
 
eyflyer88
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:48 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:50 am

Quoting STT757 (Reply 5):
UAL, CO, NWA and US Airways or even WN.

I dont think UA/CO/NW/WN would be requiring their own terminal at JFK. But given US having taken on HP, I wouldnt be surprised (if T6 was vacant) if US took it.
There is no sport equal to that which aviators enjoy while being carried through the air on great white wings. - Wilbur
 
User avatar
STT757
Posts: 13174
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 1:14 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:54 am

Quoting EYFlyer88 (Reply 6):
I dont think UA/CO/NW/WN would be requiring their own terminal at JFK. But given US having taken on HP, I wouldnt be surprised (if T6 was vacant) if US took it.

I did not mean they would have it to themselves, I said CO, UAL, NWA, US would all move to T-6 since none are International from JFK but are currently operating out of International Terminals. T-6 is domestic, no FIS. Perfect place to consolidate Domestic carriers togther (CO,UAL,NWA, US, Virgin America and even WN).
Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
 
DL777LAX
Posts: 489
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:45 pm

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:12 pm

Quoting OD-BWH (Thread starter):
What becomes of B6's Ops on T6 @ JFK When T5 Reopens?

My guess is that B6 will decide to renovate T6 and expand out of T6 when renovation is completed, giving themselves a two terminal system with the potential to have up to 50 gates.
Blindly following anything is bad, unless of course your blind and your following a guide dog.
 
JetBlueAUS
Posts: 852
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:15 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:20 pm

Quoting DL777LAX (Reply 8):
My guess is that B6 will decide to renovate T6 and expand out of T6 when renovation is completed, giving themselves a two terminal system with the potential to have up to 50 gates.

That is what I was was thinking.
Not all of us can be heroes, some of us can only stand on the sidewalk and clap as they go by.
 
User avatar
STT757
Posts: 13174
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 1:14 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:24 pm

Quoting DL777LAX (Reply 8):
My guess is that B6 will decide to renovate T6 and expand out of T6 when renovation is completed, giving themselves a two terminal system with the potential to have up to 50 gates.

LCC's don't need as many gates as legacies because they get more turns per gate than legacies because of their faster turn arounds. At WN's largest airports they don't have more than 25-30 gates, B6 does not need 50 gates. Besides there's plans to further expand T-5 beyond the 25 gates being built, should demand warrant expansion.
Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
 
COERJ145
Posts: 1140
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:22 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:26 pm

Quoting STT757 (Reply 7):
I did not mean they would have it to themselves, I said CO, UAL, NWA, US would all move to T-6 since none are International from JFK but are currently operating out of International Terminals.

NWA will be operating an AMS flight for KLM soon, so NWA would probably stay in T4 with KLM.

[Edited 2007-08-06 05:27:06]
 
JetBlueAUS
Posts: 852
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:15 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:32 pm

Quoting STT757 (Reply 10):
LCC's don't need as many gates as legacies because they get more turns per gate than legacies because of their faster turn arounds. At WN's largest airports they don't have more than 25-30 gates, B6 does not need 50 gates. Besides there's plans to further expand T-5 beyond the 25 gates being built, should demand warrant expansion.

While this is true... Southwest does not have a "main" airport of operations, like JetBlue. While JetBlue does have heightened service from BOS and FLL, it definitely doesn't compare to their JFK hub. JetBlue has Terminal 6 which has 17 gates, plus their temporary terminal which has 7 gates. If the new terminal only has 25 gates, then they only have one extra gate to add flights, and will not be able to expand JFK like they want to.

Correct me if my analysis is incorrect. I am not implying that "this is the way" its going to be. Its only my perception.

[Edited 2007-08-06 05:35:43]
Not all of us can be heroes, some of us can only stand on the sidewalk and clap as they go by.
 
User avatar
STT757
Posts: 13174
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 1:14 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:38 pm

Quoting JetBlueAUS (Reply 12):
Correct me if my analysis is incorrect. I am not implying that "this is the way" its going to be. Its only my perception.

How much more growth do you see from B6 at JFK, another 250 flights? They are looking at their current network for places they might cut, PIT is heavily rumored as being axed all together. With the escalating delays at JFK, I don't see them needing 50 gates. They are not going to double their operation, the airport cannot handle the additional flights nor do I think it's economical to B6 since some of the current routes they are flying might be axed soon.

B6 is going to start diversifying their operations, this Winter's ground delay fiasco proved to B6 they needed to be a little less JFK centric. Not to say it's not going to be their largest base, it is. Just look for more growth away from JFK in the future so that delays at JFK don't shut down their entire network.
Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
 
JetBlueAUS
Posts: 852
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:15 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:48 pm

Quoting STT757 (Reply 13):
How much more growth do you see from B6 at JFK, another 250 flights? They are looking at their current network for places they might cut, PIT is heavily rumored as being axed all together. With the escalating delays at JFK, I don't see them needing 50 gates. They are not going to double their operation, the airport cannot handle the additional flights nor do I think it's economical to B6 since some of the current routes they are flying might be axed soon.

B6 is going to start diversifying their operations, this Winter's ground delay fiasco proved to B6 they needed to be a little less JFK centric. Not to say it's not going to be their largest base, it is. Just look for more growth away from JFK in the future so that delays at JFK don't shut down their entire network.

Well, they won't have 50 gates. 17 + 25 = 42. Temporary terminal is gone after Terminal 5 is complete. While they are looking to other cities to add flights, and getting away from the JFK business, they still have cities they need to add. And yes, I know they aren't added 16 cities like they did in 2006, only 2-4. I also know that it will take possibly four to six years to open up as many cities as they did in 2006, I'm just wondering where they will grab the gates once they are at the max again..

I know they are definitely not adding 250 flights from the JFK region anytime soon, but despite what they do, it will be for the best. Personally, I hope they start expanding FLL, though, that isn't on topic.
Not all of us can be heroes, some of us can only stand on the sidewalk and clap as they go by.
 
jetbluefan1
Posts: 2854
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 8:39 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:01 pm

Quoting JetBlueAUS (Reply 14):
Well, they won't have 50 gates. 17 + 25 = 42.

The current Terminal 6 has 13 gates. The future Terminal 5 will have 26 with options to add another 10. However, I think this option includes knocking down Terminal 6 (which will result in not only more gates, but also more hardstand space).

JetBluefan1
 
tymnbalewne
Posts: 714
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:06 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 7:40 pm

I think the current plan is for T6 (originally National Airlines "Sundrome") to be demolished.

It would be a pity if that were to come to pass. The terminal was designed by reknowned architect IM Pei, who also designed structures such as the pyramied in front of the Louvre Museum.

C.
Dewmanair...begins with Dew
 
werdywerd
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:40 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 8:09 pm

Internally, the ideas (a.k.a rumors) that are being thrown around are

1. Tear down T6 and expand the new T5 over to the side where T6 used to reside. This - I think - is the more plausible idea. Here is a really bad drawing I did so you can have a visual of what I am talking about.




2. Tear down T6 and build a parking garage

3. Tear down T6 and use it for hard stands

4. Tear down T6 and build a Hotel.
 
InTheSky74
Posts: 427
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:25 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:23 pm

B6 is keeping T6. They will expant T5 into the area the T6 is currently in.

They are not giving up the area - they already have plans for it.
 
richierich
Posts: 3282
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2000 5:49 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:19 am

Quoting DL777LAX (Reply 8):
My guess is that B6 will decide to renovate T6 and expand out of T6 when renovation is completed, giving themselves a two terminal system with the potential to have up to 50 gates.

The word I heard on the street is that JetBlue is going to continue some operations from T6 indefinitely. It's not that their new terminal is going to be too small - it will likely be underused for several years - but the reality is that JetBlue still wants to grow at JFK.

The cost of tearing down and rebuilding T6 (such as the example in Reply 17) would probably be cost prohibitive. JetBlue's financial situation right now makes it unlikely that this will happen. I agree with DL777 that it will probably be remodeled for some use by JetBlue, which may or may not include the demolition of part of the structure. As it is right now, when T5 is fully up and running, some of the current gates at T6 will have to be permanently closed anyway, so at most JetBlue might be able to salvage only 8-10 of the gates at that facility. If somebody from JetBlue knows more than this, please fill in some of the blanks.

My guess is that it could be used as an international wing (instead of using T4). This would involve the adding of INS and Customs, which is no mean feat, but this could facilitate future B6 growth into Caribbean and Mexican markets.

Quoting Werdywerd (Reply 17):
1. Tear down T6 and expand the new T5 over to the side where T6 used to reside. This - I think - is the more plausible idea.

2. Tear down T6 and build a parking garage

3. Tear down T6 and use it for hard stands

4. Tear down T6 and build a Hotel.

(1) Possible, but expensive option
(2) Unlikely
(3) More likely than #2, but unlikely
(4) I highly doubt it... nobody would want a hotel right at the terminal areas.

I think that (2) and (3) are unlikely because the revenue potential from these scenarios is quite small, compared to operating a functioning terminal.

Quoting STT757 (Reply 5):
The Port Authority owns T-6, so it's up to them. They could either demolish it to make room for hardstand parking, or more likely totally renovate it for Domestic US carriers such as UAL, CO, NWA and US Airways or even WN.

Yes, technically the Port does own the terminals but JetBlue is the tenant calling the shots at the moment. Unless JetBlue vacates T6, no other airline can come in and use the facility. This reason alone is enough to believe that JetBlue will continue some operations from the old terminal - they wouldn't want Virgin America or, worse, Southwest to set up shop there, would they??!!

Quoting JetBlueAUS (Reply 14):
I know they are definitely not adding 250 flights from the JFK region anytime soon, but despite what they do, it will be for the best.

And this poses a real problem. Strategically JetBlue would love to expand from JFK and increase their base. But operationally, it is very very difficult right now, as anybody who has flown to/from JFK recently will attest to.
None shall pass!!!!
 
JetBlueAUS
Posts: 852
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:15 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:53 am

Quoting JetBluefan1 (Reply 15):
The current Terminal 6 has 13 gates. The future Terminal 5 will have 26 with options to add another 10. However, I think this option includes knocking down Terminal 6 (which will result in not only more gates, but also more hardstand space).

Ah, okay. I misread their terminal map on their website. Sorry for my ignorance.
Not all of us can be heroes, some of us can only stand on the sidewalk and clap as they go by.
 
B6JFKH81
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:35 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:04 am

Quoting Richierich (Reply 19):
(1) Possible, but expensive option

True, however the new T5 is designed to continue its expansion into the T6 area if T6 is demolished. Don't be surprised to see a "wing" added on. T6 is very outdated, requires a HUGE amount of maintenance to keep it going, and doesn't have the space needed to deal with all the current day security measures that didn't exist decades ago when it was contructed. After all, how many pounds of $h*t are you going to shove into a 5 lb bag before it bursts LOL!

That expansion wing off of the new T5 could be for the international flights where customs could have a home. It would make more sense than continuing to use T4 for the international flights...especially if B6 is looking to expand further into the Caribbean or South America.

Quoting Werdywerd (Reply 17):
2. Tear down T6 and build a parking garage

Parking garage is already going up in the T5/6 parking area (which is why everyone has to go to T4 parking right now). Hopefully the current one will support the demand. I don't think the PA will want to take a cut out of AOA space to put up a parking garage...but you never know with the PA!!

Overall, the entire project is coming along and is expected to have an earlier opening than what was originally scheduled so long as there aren't any major glitches.

Just my  twocents 
"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
 
od-bwh
Posts: 308
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2002 6:25 pm

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:11 am

Quoting Werdywerd (Reply 17):
Tear down T6 and expand the new T5



Quoting B6JFKH81 (Reply 21):
T6 is very outdated, requires a HUGE amount of maintenance to keep it going, and doesn't have the space needed to...

First, I don't think the NY Port Authority is ready to give up space like that... I beleive other airlines are dying to get a dedicated terminal or a room to expand (I'm not aware of JFK's status in fact, but this is my perception about all large hubs). And why would they build an extension to T5 in T6's place when T6 is already there? From an engineering point of view, I don't think upgrading this terminal will be a real problem for the authority. A live example is what is going on in T5.

Quoting Werdywerd (Reply 17):
2. Tear down T6 and build a parking garage

3. Tear down T6 and use it for hard stands

4. Tear down T6 and build a Hotel.

Make no sense at all... I don't think a hotel will fit nicely between terminals. Think about the noise there! It has to be located remotely to avoid such issues. Besides, it's not wise to build a hotel in an area that can be utilized for airside ops.
A300, A319, A320, A321, A332, A333, A343, A346, A388, B734, B738, B744, B772, B773, B788, F70, MD11, CRJ700
 
incitatus
Posts: 2691
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 1:49 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:28 am

How about Virgin America comes in and takes over T6?
Stop pop up ads
 
richierich
Posts: 3282
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2000 5:49 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:34 am

Quoting Incitatus (Reply 23):
How about Virgin America comes in and takes over T6?

I'm going to go on a limb here and say that JetBlue will do anything it can to make sure that doesn't happen. This is why I believe they will continue to use the space at T6 one way or another.
None shall pass!!!!
 
aajfksjubklyn
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:46 pm

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:13 am

I beleive T6 may be up for landmark review as well! Built in 1970 for IM Pei, it is actually an architectural gem and was designed and rated the best and most visually simple building at JFK. I do not think it's going anywhere and if it does it is a shame, same with AA's T8 stain glass! In architecture school I built models of T5 & T6. I nearly slit my wrists trying to build terminal 5!!
 
aajfksjubklyn
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:46 pm

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:15 am

here are some pictures of when it opened for you to enjoy!
Big version: Width: 452 Height: 590 File size: 45kb
Big version: Width: 590 Height: 514 File size: 79kb
 
jfk69
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 3:04 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:22 am

Maybe B6 will hold onto it and lure in International carriers to partner up with. Obivously it would take a fair amount of renovations to make it an International terminal, but it could give B6 that Int'l partnership to make them a feeder airline.
 
rampart
Posts: 1798
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:58 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:28 am

Quoting JetBlueAUS (Reply 12):

While this is true... Southwest does not have a "main" airport of operations, like JetBlue. While JetBlue does have heightened service from BOS and FLL, it definitely doesn't compare to their JFK hub. JetBlue has Terminal 6 which has 17 gates, plus their temporary terminal which has 7 gates. If the new terminal only has 25 gates, then they only have one extra gate to add flights, and will not be able to expand JFK like they want to.

According the WN's website (http://www.southwest.com/about_swa/press/factsheet.html#Top%20Ten%20Airports), their top 3 "hub-like" (my quotes) airports exceed 200 flights per day. LAS uses 21 gates for 231 flights, MDW uses 29 gates for 223 flights, and PHX uses 14 for 206 flights. All of those are in the ballpark, slightly less, of B6's planned volume and gate count at JFK. So in that sense, B6 and WN are comparable. Do you mean that B6 needs more capacity because they are focused so strongly on one hub? Well, that may be the case, but I can't claim to know that much about the needs. I would guess that WN's system won't collapse if one of its "hubs" shuts down.

-Rampart
 
lowecur
Posts: 512
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:18 pm

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:35 am

Quoting STT757 (Reply 5):
So I highly doubt T-6 is going away, the Port Authority is going to further realize it's revenue potential through new leases.

Until JFK get's more airspace, I just don't see it being used to any degree. It will probably remain idle for a few years until someone wants to invest to build a new terminal.
 
mtb555
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:01 pm

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:46 am

I work at B6, and according to what's being said around town, B6 will keep T6, but close it for renovation after T5 is open and running 100%.

There was a post in another thread a few weeks back saying that they may relocate the satellite gates to where T6 is to operate gates there while T6 is renovated. That is not going to happen, since some of T5's bridges are on the satellite gates.

What I can't get an answer on is what T6 will have once it's reopened (I heard it will be closed for about a year). Maybe T6 will be just for Florida flights? This is all up in the air, of course, since nothing is set in stone, or everyone would know it. Just wanted to share the most consistent ideas of what's happening, maybe it will be true?  Big grin
 
InTheSky74
Posts: 427
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:25 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:16 am

A terminal 5 extention over to the current Terminal 6 (which will be torn down apparently) is currently already being planned. It will take several years though.
 
jetbluefan1
Posts: 2854
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 8:39 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:49 am

Is it just me, or is the ticketing hall in Terminal 6 a piece of art? The marble floors, the enormous windows...I think that it should be used. I'm not quite sure how it could be used...anyone with any ideas?

As far as the actual terminal with the boarding bridges...it's a piece of crap. That can go.

JetBluefan1
 
cloudboy
Posts: 972
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 12:38 pm

RE: What Becomes Of

Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:25 am

I have never been outside the secured area at T6, but I kind of like it. It certainly can't handle the kind of traffic Jet Blue puts thorugh it, and it really needs some renovation, bad. But from a design standpoint I kind of like it - not only is it interesting, it seems kind of efficient to me for small planes. Perhaps they will put some of the E-Jet flights over there, where they don't need as much waiting room.

I have always found the NYC terminals interesting, but never got to experience them outside the gates. Is there a good book or website that goes into all the different terminals and their history?
"Six becoming three doesn't create more Americans that want to fly." -Adam Pilarski
 
apodino
Posts: 3025
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 2:11 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:40 pm

Quoting Rampart (Reply 28):
LAS uses 21 gates for 231 flights,

Southwest uses a lot more than just 21 gates in LAS. I believe they have C gates primarily to themselves, with Aloha or ATA having an occasional departure. If memory serves me correctly, there are about 27 gates on the C concourse. That, plus during the day time when US operations are less frequent, Southwest also uses about 4 gates on the B concourse. So they use about 30 gates total, and probably a little more than that.

Quoting Rampart (Reply 28):
and PHX uses 14 for 206 flights.

Southwest uses a lot more here too. They have all the C gates, which I believe there are 20 of. There are some gates on the international pier that they use, I think they have about 4 or 5 here. Then there is the D concourse, which i believe is all Southwest, and uses 8 gates. So they use at least 30 here too.

Quoting Werdywerd (Reply 17):
1. Tear down T6 and expand the new T5 over to the side where T6 used to reside. This - I think - is the more plausible idea. Here is a really bad drawing I did so you can have a visual of what I am talking about.

Getting back to the original topic, if what you have posted is accurate, the planned extension of T5 if necessary, only covers a small footprint on the east side of the existing terminal 6. One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is the fact that could leave room for a Terminal 7 extension from the other way. You could make this domestic, and move CO, NW, US, and UA into this part of the terminal. Or you could build a new terminal 6 as a Star Alliance Terminal and move ANA, Air Canada, United, and US into the terminal (LH is entrenched in 1 for now I believe). Given the lack of room, I would see an expansion of Terminal 7, but not as domestic, but as duel purpose, giving Star Alliance more room. Only issue then becomes British Airways, the only non star alliance airline in 7, but also its primary tenant. I could see them staying easily, but I also think its important for them to have seamless connections with AA in the airport as one world partners.

As for the thought of a domestic terminal with CO and NW moving as well, I think a better scenario would be for them to move into 2 and 3 after a Worldport rebuild which is desperately needed, and I think Delta should have poured money into this instead of the half empty terminal in BOS. People have suggested WN. I think thats a non started, I don't see them ever serving JFK as its presently constructed. I think that if they go anywhere else in the NYC area, I would think their next city could well be SWF, which to me seems like a perfect airport for them.
 
DiscoverCSG
Posts: 517
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:22 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:54 pm

Quoting STT757 (Reply 5):
Pulling CO, NWA, and US Airways out of T-4

I thought USAirways is in T7 with UA, where the old HP was. And doesn't CO use T3 with SkyTeam partner DL?
 
rampart
Posts: 1798
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:58 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:19 am

Quoting Apodino (Reply 34):
Quoting Rampart (Reply 28):
LAS uses 21 gates for 231 flights,

Southwest uses a lot more than just 21 gates in LAS. I believe they have C gates primarily to themselves, with Aloha or ATA having an occasional departure. If memory serves me correctly, there are about 27 gates on the C concourse. That, plus during the day time when US operations are less frequent, Southwest also uses about 4 gates on the B concourse. So they use about 30 gates total, and probably a little more than that.

Quoting Rampart (Reply 28):
and PHX uses 14 for 206 flights.

Southwest uses a lot more here too. They have all the C gates, which I believe there are 20 of. There are some gates on the international pier that they use, I think they have about 4 or 5 here. Then there is the D concourse, which i believe is all Southwest, and uses 8 gates. So they use at least 30 here too.

That's interesting. I thought I remembered more gates at PHX, too. But what I gave above was a direct quote from WN's own website. I don't know what they rationalize for counting gates. Owned/leased vs. borrowed??

-Rampart
 
rjpieces
Posts: 6849
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 8:58 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:15 am

Quoting DiscoverCSG (Reply 35):
I thought USAirways is in T7 with UA, where the old HP was. And doesn't CO use T3 with SkyTeam partner DL?

HP/US is in T7. CO was in T2 but is now in T4.
"Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon"
 
elmothehobo
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:10 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:42 am

Quoting OD-BWH (Reply 22):
Make no sense at all... I don't think a hotel will fit nicely between terminals. Think about the noise there! It has to be located remotely to avoid such issues. Besides, it's not wise to build a hotel in an area that can be utilized for airside ops.



Quoting Richierich (Reply 19):
(4) I highly doubt it... nobody would want a hotel right at the terminal areas.

Tell that to the folks who built the Hyatt at Terminal D in Dallas. Building hotels right next to terminals is becoming more attractive, particullarly for business travellers, the real bread and butter of the hotel and airlines.
 
brilondon
Posts: 3014
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 6:56 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:51 am

Quoting Richierich (Reply 19):
) I highly doubt it... nobody would want a hotel right at the terminal areas.

does't YYZ, DTW, CDG, all have hotels in the terminal area?
Rush for ever; Yankees all the way!!
 
apodino
Posts: 3025
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 2:11 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:00 pm

Quoting Brilondon (Reply 39):
does't YYZ, DTW, CDG, all have hotels in the terminal area?

And MCO
 
richierich
Posts: 3282
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2000 5:49 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:52 pm

Quoting ElmoTheHobo (Reply 38):
Tell that to the folks who built the Hyatt at Terminal D in Dallas. Building hotels right next to terminals is becoming more attractive, particullarly for business travellers, the real bread and butter of the hotel and airlines.



Quoting Brilondon (Reply 39):
does't YYZ, DTW, CDG, all have hotels in the terminal area?

Different airport, different set of issues at JFK. I highly doubt anybody is interested in building a high-end hotel at a largely O&D airport on one of the most expensive airport properties in the USA.

As I say with a lot of things, anything is possible, but I personally think the hotel option is a reach, at best.
None shall pass!!!!
 
jetbluefan1
Posts: 2854
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 8:39 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:22 am

Quoting Richierich (Reply 41):
As I say with a lot of things, anything is possible, but I personally think the hotel option is a reach, at best.

Nonetheless, if it were to be built, it would be packed with a.netters everyday doing some serious spotting!
 
richierich
Posts: 3282
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2000 5:49 am

RE: What Becomes Of

Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:11 am

Quoting JetBluefan1 (Reply 42):
Nonetheless, if it were to be built, it would be packed with a.netters everyday doing some serious spotting!

Indeed you are correct.
My heart says that a hotel would be an awesome idea; my brain (as small as it is) says that it is highly unlikely if not impossible. We can always dream.
None shall pass!!!!