IADLHR
Topic Author
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:25 pm

Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:40 pm

I have debated if this should be in the trip reports or here. However, in the end I thought it was best to post my experience here. On Monday Aug. 15, I was a pax on UA Flight 484 DEN-DCA. I was sitting in the third row of the Economy Plus Section . One of the very last pax to board in DEN was a man carrying a cat in a carrying case. He took his seat and put the carrying case, with cat, under his seat. However, the cat srated to meow, meow unlike anything I have ever heard. It was truly nervewhacking. At that moment the pax put the carryiing case on his lap and talked to the cat. I immediataley heard a pax tell the FA, who was all taken and enthralled with the cat, that he had a nasty, nasty allergy to cats. I heard him say that if the cat was under the seat he,(the pax) would be ok. Otherwise he would have a severe allergy attack.

The FA in a very, very, dismissive attitude, and a look on her face that could kill, said the cat would not come out of the case but the carrying case could stay on the pax lap .She also told the pax that the cat was in distress. The pax again told the FA about his allergy. She offered to move him one row back. I can tell you , my wife and daughter have a terrible allergy to cats and one row back would never, ever solve the problem for them. It would have to be several rows back that would solve that problem.

Anyway the carrying case was put under the seat for take off and it remained there until about 45 min outr from DCA. At that time the pax picked up the carrying case and took it into the lavatory . As soon as the pax was walking to the restroom. a few pax started to sneeze etc. etc. etc. All the time the cat was meowing, meowing as loud as it could. Anyway the pax finally retunred to his seat and the pax who told the FA about his allergy was starting to really sneeze etc. etc. etc. We landed at DCA without things getting worse and the cat in the carrying case under the pax seart.

Now, as I said, my wife and daughter have an horrific allergy to cats. Often times we travel together. if they would have been with me, they could have had a problem along with the pax who told the FA about his severe allergy. The FA was so, so dismissive and lacking in understanding about the pax allergy. I did hear her say that she was a cat lover herself. . It was obvious that she had more concern for the cat than perhaps the pax. After all if there was need for an emergency evacuatrion, wouldnt the cat have to be left onboard? Would the FA have givcen preference for the cat over a pax who was having a severe allergy to cats?

So the question is, under the circumstances and with no tolerance. these days. for pax who assert themselves to a crew member, how far can a pax assert themselves and demand that they be moved several rows away from a pax who is carrying a cat? iIf not an inflight medical emergency is not out of the question as some people, my wife and daughter included, have an very, very, very bad allergy to cats.

I am a 1K flyer with UA. If I was not a seasoned flyer with UA, I would have really, really have second thoughts about flying with UA again as the FA was just so dismissive. However, it is my experience that she was indeed the rarity of UAs FAs and employees. Still though the question remains, how far can one pax assert himself when it was obvious the FA was 100% unconcerned and dismissive to the possible medical issue of the pax.
 
AirTranTUS
Posts: 3313
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 9:12 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:05 pm

Where was this passenger sitting in relation to the cat originally?
I love ASO!
 
IADLHR
Topic Author
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:25 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:14 pm

Quoting AirTranTUS (Reply 1):
Where was this passenger sitting in relation to the cat originally?

Pax with allergy was sitting in first row, an emergency row, of Economy Plus on the aisle. Pax with cat was sitting in same row, acorss the aisle in middle seat. Based on my wife and daughters allergy, much too close for comofrt.
 
drewwright
Posts: 530
Joined: Tue May 15, 2001 3:51 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:02 am

Ever notice how when someone farts, you can't smell it forward of their row (unless it is a really toxic one)? On most pressurized aircraft, air flows from front to rear, so you would be better off sitting well forward of someone with a cat. I believe most flight attendants would be accommodating of someone with cat allergies, at least as accomodating as they are with the peanut allergies. Although to some, saying you are allergic to cats is like saying you're allergic to babies.  Yeah sure
 
rikkus67
Posts: 1152
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2000 11:34 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:36 am

As a pet owner of 2 dogs and (previously @ the same time, 2 cats), I would never subject my pet to a pressurized confined space. Animal ears in general are much more sensitive than ours. This was probably the reason for the cat wailing, on top of probably being scared....

With allergies becoming more common, there should be some better common sense when dealing with pet transport. I have a close friend with severe cat dander allergies. When he and his family have visited, I would have to cage the cats and put them in another room. A thorough vacuuming would then follow, and the friend had to have allergy meds readily available.
In a confined space with limited airflow, it is imparative that both passengers and the occasional pet are properly looked after. As much as I love my animals, a human life is a bit more important.

Pet transport by the airlines is a PRIVILEDGE, not a RIGHT.

[Edited 2007-08-16 01:01:13]
AC.WA.CP.DL.RW.CO.WG.WJ.WN.KI.FL.SK.ACL.UA.US.F9
 
2175301
Posts: 817
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 11:19 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:54 am

A cat in the passenger cabin...

If it was near me and they did not immediately seat me as far away of the cat as possible and forward.... (and hope that works) It would be likely that they would have a medical divert on their hands.

What is the airline even thinking about with allowing cats in the cabin?

I expect cat free flights.

There are more people severely allergic to cats than their are to peanuts.
 
AirTranTUS
Posts: 3313
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 9:12 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:10 am

Quoting 2175301 (Reply 5):
What is the airline even thinking about with allowing cats in the cabin?

I expect cat free flights.

Animals that are emotional companions are allowed in the cabin. Within certain size constraints of course, can't bring your goat with you.
I love ASO!
 
mattnrsa
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 12:27 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:19 am

Quoting AirTranTUS (Reply 6):
Animals that are emotional companions are allowed in the cabin

Small dogs, cats, and household birds are allowed in the cabin as long as their carrier can fit under the seat. Customers will be moved around the cabin if there are allergy issues.
 
Speedbirdie
Posts: 873
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 5:11 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:43 am

Quoting Mattnrsa (Reply 7):
Small dogs, cats, and household birds are allowed in the cabin as long as their carrier can fit under the seat. Customers will be moved around the cabin if there are allergy issues.

They are? What about Quarantine rules?
I dont think any animal is allowed on aircraft over in the UK (cabin that is).
Never give up..
 
LAXdude1023
Posts: 4496
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:16 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:44 am

I always thought the policy was that Cats can fly in cabin, but that they had to remain in their container.

Quoting 2175301 (Reply 5):
I expect cat free flights.

Dont think there is an airline that wont allow cats period in the US. I think they all allow cats, dogs, and other tiny animals that fit into containers.

I have a cat. And I wouldnt subject him to flying unless I absolutely had to.

[Edited 2007-08-16 01:45:21]
It is what it is...
 
mattnrsa
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 12:27 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:58 am

Quoting Speedbirdie (Reply 8):
What about Quarantine rules

I was referring to US domestic flights. International quarantine rules would apply.
 
RDUDDJI
Posts: 1717
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:42 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA

Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:08 am

Now I see the cat meowing and the person being allergic as two mutually exclusive events...

Four things

A) I don't think people who care about their animals should take them on a flight (checked or not).

B) If someone is that allergic to cats (or dogs), they should avoid public spaces where the same air is shared.

C) I hate cats.

D) As I unfortunately learned a few months ago, I have developed a severe allergy to fire/red ants (see anaphylactic shock). Therefore, I do all possible to avoid being bitten by them (i.e. I no longer wear open toed shoes when walking outside in S.E. NC). I am also equipped with an epi-pen just in case. My ppint being: If you are aware of a certain allergy, take all precautions.

On the other subject: A meowing or aggressive cat should not be allowed on the flight whether it's checked or in the cabin.

Quoting Mattnrsa (Reply 10):
I was referring to US domestic flights.

Minus Hawaii.
Sometimes we don't realize the good times when we're in them
 
jimbobjoe
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 2:04 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:46 am

Quoting Rikkus67 (Reply 4):
Pet transport by the airlines is a PRIVILEDGE, not a RIGHT.

Technically it's neither. It's a circumstantially permissible condition of contract. Right or privilege really doesn't enter in here (and besides, my legal dictionary considers the two words to be synonymous. They are used colloquially to refer to a concept that really doesn't exist, at least, not the way people think it does.)

Quoting Speedbirdie (Reply 8):
I dont think any animal is allowed on aircraft over in the UK (cabin that is).

UK carriers seem to not like animals in the cabin. British Airways, Ryanair and Easyjet don't allow it, and Virgin Atlantic does, but only on certain international routes. But Iberia, Alitalia, Lufthansa and Air France allow animals in pretty much the same way the US carriers do.

Guide dogs are allowed by all carriers however.
 
workflyer
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:49 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:43 pm

Quoting RDUDDJI (Reply 11):
B) If someone is that allergic to cats (or dogs), they should avoid public spaces where the same air is shared

My brother is allergic to Cats. He suffers whenever he comes to our house as we have one. However he knows there is a cat in our house and takes care to avoid it when he comes over (he still puffs up and wheezes a bit though). In the case of the pax above, he had no choice as he was seated across the aisle from the cat. You can only mitigate your exposure to allergens you cannot eliminate them. However in this instance the pax was not really given the option to mitigate his exposure. A one row move would not have helped at all.

The cat should have been below with the bags.

Only Guide dogs and assistance animals should be in the cabin. A cat is NOT and assistance animal.
 
NorthstarBoy
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:53 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:00 pm

cats and travel don't mix, period. my cats don't even like riding in the car. Trying to take them on an airplane would be like dante's ninth hell for me, the cats, and my fellow passengers.

as for the guy with the cat, unless he was relocating, he should have left the cat at home with an ample supply of food and water, or given a neighbor kid a key and 20 bucks to check in on it every couple of days. I guess i just don't get some people's obsession with taking their pets on trips with them. Cats take care of themselves very well, and for dogs there are lots of kennels/doggie camps/doggie daycares that do a marvelous job. there's no need to bring the family pet on the trip with you.

as for the situation mentioned above, someone is going to be unhappy no matter what the F/A does, if she offloads the cat, the cat's owner is not going to be happy, but, by allowing the cat to stay, she possibly jeopardized the health of the guy allergic to it, so she should have politely, sympathetically off loaded the cat and handed it over to a gate agent for placement in the pressurized area of baggage for the sake of the other man's health. She may have to put up with four hours of dirty looks from the cat owner, but if the guy who was allergic had some kind of serious reaction and died, god forbid, she'd have to live with that for the rest of her life.
Yes, I'd like to see airbus go under so Boeing can have their customers!
 
57AZ
Posts: 2371
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:55 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:20 pm

Quoting Jimbobjoe (Reply 12):
Technically it's neither. It's a circumstantially permissible condition of contract.



Quoting Jimbobjoe (Reply 12):
Guide dogs are allowed by all carriers however.

Not entirely. Animals that are certified either as service animals or companion animals must be accommodated by common carriers as a matter of United States Code (Americans with Disabilities Act). This can include a wider list of animal types than dogs, though they are probably the most common. If an airline were to refuse to carry the animal, they would be bound by the contract of carriage to either transport the passenger and animal on a later flight or compensate the passenger accordingly. Refusing the passenger transportation because of the animal or refusing to accommodate the animal would be grounds for a civil suit in federal court. If the animal is a certified companion animal or service animal, removing the animal from the passenger cabin would possibly result in a lawsuit as well, so as far as the carrier is concerned it's basically a no win situation.

As for animals and travel, whether or not to take them along depends on the particular animal. I have had cats for years and presently have two. Dale is somewhat odd in that he doesn't mind riding in the car or getting in the carrier. I can set it right down and he'll go right in on his own. Kyerlie hates the carrier and with her, getting her in it is a fight. Traveling by car is one thing, but the high frequency noise produced by aircraft is something that I would not subject my animals to unless relocating a long distance.

[Edited 2007-08-16 08:21:02]
"When a man runs on railroads over half of his lifetime he is fit for nothing else-and at times he don't know that."
 
LAXdude1023
Posts: 4496
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:16 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:36 pm

Quoting 57AZ (Reply 15):
As for animals and travel, whether or not to take them along depends on the particular animal. I have had cats for years and presently have two. Dale is somewhat odd in that he doesn't mind riding in the car or getting in the carrier. I can set it right down and he'll go right in on his own. Kyerlie hates the carrier and with her, getting her in it is a fight. Traveling by car is one thing, but the high frequency noise produced by aircraft is something that I would not subject my animals to unless relocating a long distance.

My cat Toby, actually travels very well. He is the most chill animal ive ever encountered (but hey were from California, so what do you expect?  Wink ). Hes fine in the carrier, he would be fine in an airplane. But the only possible scenario I can think of to take him on one would be overseas relocation. Im moving from Los Angeles to Chicago in 2 weeks and im still driving with him as opposed to flying with him. He would be a nightmare for to fly with for people with allergies. He sheds like crazy. And he likes to talk so it might be annoying much to the extent a crying baby is.

As for this particular scenario, I think the middle ground is correct. For those who say that certain small pets shouldnt be allowed on board, I disagree. Cats, dogs, and other animals that can fit in a carrier under the wieght restrictions should be allowed. But I dont think under any circumstances (unless its life threatening to them) that they should be let out of their carrier. And if a traveler has allergies to the animal, the FA should do what ever possible to set them as far from the animal as possible (perhaps asking someone who doesnt mind to change seats with them). Yesterday I flew DFW-LAX on UA and I swear there were 6 or 7 babies on the flight that screamed like crazy. I for one would rather sit next to a cat that is meowing than a screaming baby. But I also love cats and dont care much for kids, whereas most people are the other way around.  Wink
It is what it is...
 
tdscanuck
Posts: 8572
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:25 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:06 pm

Quoting Drewwright (Reply 3):
On most pressurized aircraft, air flows from front to rear, so you would be better off sitting well forward of someone with a cat.

Although there is some front-to-rear flow, the major flow is from center to outside. If you're stuck in the same row, sit inboard of the offending critter if you can.

Quoting Rikkus67 (Reply 4):
In a confined space with limited airflow, it is imparative that both passengers and the occasional pet are properly looked after.

Slight diversion of topic, but why do you consider it limited airflow? The airflow in an airliner is way higher than any residence or commercial building.

Tom.
 
LH459
Posts: 793
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 2:41 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:28 am

On those rare occasions I've found it necessary to fly with a cat, I have ALWAYS sedated the cat before getting on the plane. That way, the cat wasn't meowing and shedding, and the people sitting next to me hardly knew she was there. I thought that was common practice recommended by veterinarians, and it certainly would've made for a more pleasant situation on the OP's flight (allergies notwithstanding).
"I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is temporary; the evil it does is permanent" - Ghandi
 
iairallie
Posts: 2326
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 5:42 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Fri Aug 17, 2007 2:31 pm

Quoting 2175301 (Reply 5):
There are more people severely allergic to cats than their are to peanuts.

Not saying it doesn't happen but I've never heard of someone going into anaphalxis due to a cat allergy. Peanut allergies are often severe enough that even slight exposure can cause an anaphalatic reaction. Which untreated can lead to death.

Quoting NorthstarBoy (Reply 14):
I guess i just don't get some people's obsession with taking their pets on trips with them.

Most people don't arbitrarily bring pets with them. Except for the accessory dog crowd. This just my observation from conversations with pax carrying pets over the last 6 years as an FA.
Enough about flying lets talk about me!
 
Type-Rated
Posts: 3901
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 1999 5:18 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Fri Aug 17, 2007 2:40 pm

Well, did your family get off the plane at DCA wheezin and a sneezin'?

Now that you have learned that there may be cats and "cat people" on board any aircraft at any given time, you may want to consider bringing some Benedryl with you on your next flight, just in case.
Fly North Central Airlines..The route of the Northliners!
 
D328
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:50 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Fri Aug 17, 2007 3:48 pm

Some people as in F/A's Just dont give a crap anymore, sad but customer service in the US is going down the drains....
 
57AZ
Posts: 2371
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:55 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Fri Aug 17, 2007 3:59 pm

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 16):
And he likes to talk so it might be annoying much to the extent a crying

Dale likes to talk a fair amount as well. As for sedating, I would avoid that-in fact, I believe that it is NOT a recommended practice as cats, due to their small body size and weight can very easily develop sudden respiratory problems and die if the amount of sedative administered is too great. As for personal experience, I've only carried a cat twice on board our own airplane-he did NOT like the high pitched noise.

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 16):
But I also love cats and dont care much for kids, whereas most people are the other way around. Wink

Same here. I like my cats more than I like most people. One of my co-workers used to work for the county in Animal Control and if you ask her what the worst animals alive are, there's a 2/3 chance that she'll say humans. For the record, she has cats and has stated on numerous occasions that she likes her pets more than most people.
"When a man runs on railroads over half of his lifetime he is fit for nothing else-and at times he don't know that."
 
ADXMatt
Posts: 513
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:07 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:52 pm

Unless they recently changed their policy, Southwest is a cat free airline. In fact they don't allow any animals onboard.

If I had a sever allergy I would make sure before boarding that there were no cats, dogs, birds, peanut, etc before boarding and to bring medicine with me just in case.

Why should the cat owner who has done nothing wrong be inconvenienced?

Now on another note, since both were present the F/A could have made a better effert in reseating the allergic pax in the back of the plane furthest from the offending animal. I'm sure a cramped economy passenger wouldn't mind moving up to an aisle seat in economy plus.

Now the cat making alot of noise is similar to a screaming kid. Would you drug the kid?

I would like to see a no kid section of the plane.
 
RussianJet
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 4:15 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Fri Aug 17, 2007 6:01 pm

Quoting Jimbobjoe (Reply 12):
UK carriers seem to not like animals in the cabin. British Airways, Ryanair and Easyjet don't allow it

Ryanair is NOT a British carrier.

I love cats, but having them in the cabin just seems like a silly idea. People have allergies, the cat might wail all the time (as in this case), the cat may well crap during flight (great for the poor sod next to it) and it's also just horrible for the cat generally. .
✈ Every strike of the hammer is a blow against the enemy. ✈
 
IADLHR
Topic Author
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:25 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA

Fri Aug 17, 2007 6:55 pm

Quoting 2175301 (Reply 5):
If it was near me and they did not immediately seat me as far away of the cat as possible and forward.... (and hope that works) It would be likely that they would have a medical divert on their hands



Quoting ADXMatt (Reply 23):
Now on another note, since both were present the F/A could have made a better effert in reseating the allergic pax in the back of the plane furthest from the offending animal. I'm sure a cramped economy passenger wouldn't mind moving up to an aisle seat in economy plus.

Exactly. The affected pax was in the first row, which was also an emergency row exit. So there was plenty of leg room. I heard the affected pax say that he, if need be, he would have to be moved to the rear of the plane. It sounded pretty generous to me on the pax part to graciously give up a first frow exit seat to move to the "back of the bus'" Also, I never heard the affected pax try to deny the pax with the cat the right to carry the cat onboard.

As the pax, with the cat, was , in the middle seat, and one of the last to board perhaps that was the only open seat for him. I can think of some people who would have demanded that ther pax with the cat be moved so that the affected pax could have peace and quiet in the front , and emergency exit row. Instead the affected pax generously said he might have to be moved.

. I know pax carry pets but this is my first sighting of one in close to maybe 10-15 years and I easily fly 1k miles a year.
 
aamr
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:12 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:03 pm

Quoting IADLHR (Reply 2):
Pax with allergy was sitting in first row, an emergency row, of Economy Plus on the aisle. Pax with cat was sitting in same row, acorss the aisle in middle seat.

A pet in an emergency exit row? The issue doesn't come up often but at my position, I would need to reseat that passenger with the pet before boarding. I had assumed it was FAA regulation and not airline specific, so that in an emergency situation there would not be any fumbling around for a pet and focusing solely on the exit row responsibilities. Same reason that a passenger traveling with children under 15 should not be seated in an exit row.

A bit off topic, but if that were the case then the passenger with the cat should have been reseated elsewhere from the start.

If I can dig up some exit row seating requirements mentioning pets I'll repost.
 
FLYGUY767
Posts: 1441
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:26 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:31 pm

Quoting 2175301 (Reply 5):
A cat in the passenger cabin...

The situation should have been more properly handled. An announcement should have been made at the gate asking if anyone had allergies to cats, as their would be one aboard the aircraft. There should have been a second announcement aboard the aircraft to reiterate that their was a cat aboard, and if anyone has allergies to make themselves known to the Flight Attendants.

Why is it so hard to use common sense in the airline industry in 2007?

Quoting RussianJet (Reply 24):
Ryanair is NOT a British carrier.

They may not be British, but they sure love the money that their British Hubs garner them..

Quoting D328 (Reply 21):
Some people as in F/A's Just dont give a crap anymore, sad but customer service in the US is going down the drains....

Amen, Amen, Amen..

Their attitude now is "Who Cares & Get Them On Get Them Off"

Quoting RDUDDJI (Reply 11):
C) I hate cats

Oh Dear..

We have a new high on Airliners.net..
No longer do we have Airbus vs Boeing we now have Cats vs Dogs!

-JD
Summer Trip 2007: DEN HAAG>DUBAI>LONDON>VERONA>COSTA SMERALDA>CAPRI
 
aamr
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:12 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:33 pm

http://www.aa.com/content/agency/Boo.../Booking/exit_row_procedures.jhtml

In writing from AA's own documentation....

"Passengers traveling with pet in cabin may not be seated in exit seat, even if they meet all other exit seat criteria."


The passenger with a cat needed to be reseated period. The ticket counter agent, gate agent , and most importantly the flight attendant all seriously messed up. My flight attendants generally notify me if an exit row passenger even resembles some form of being unfit. This particular AA F/A needs to be retrained.
 
FLYGUY767
Posts: 1441
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:26 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:39 pm

Quoting Aamr (Reply 28):
The passenger with a cat needed to be reseated period. The ticket counter agent, gate agent , and most importantly the flight attendant all seriously messed up.

Not to be rude, and not to start anything. I have come to expect these kind of lack of concern attitudes from United Airlines in the past few years.

-JD
Summer Trip 2007: DEN HAAG>DUBAI>LONDON>VERONA>COSTA SMERALDA>CAPRI
 
RussianJet
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 4:15 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA

Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:57 am

Quoting FLYGUY767 (Reply 27):

They may not be British, but they sure love the money that their British Hubs garner them..

I had noticed - I see them every single day I go to work. But, I also see the Irish flags and reg.

Anyway.....in conclusion, cats are better than dogs.
✈ Every strike of the hammer is a blow against the enemy. ✈
 
EWRCabincrew
Posts: 4309
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 2:37 am

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:30 am

Cats (along with many other animals) can be considered emotional need animals (as well as companion animals) and are, therefore, allowed onboard. Federal law (the ADA (American with Disabilities Act)) protects the carriage of these animals. Allergies or not.

As for what to do with regards to people who have animal allergies and seating proximity, this is a good question. I would certainly do my best to accommodate and move people (full plane or not).

The thing is, the airline cannot guarantee dander (or fur) being left behind from an animal from a previous flight (no matter how clean the plane was), the fur or dander being brought aboard from a passenger who has it (dander) on their clothes, etc.. Just as an airline cannot guarantee a "peanut free" zone onboard (again, what is brought onboard by whom and the like), eventhough the airline can (and does) have control over what is served.
You can't cure stupid
 
aviationwiz
Posts: 882
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 7:20 pm

RE: Pax Allergies To Cat On UA Flight# 484 DEN-DCA.

Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:55 am

Reminds me of an issue I had on an NW flight from IAD-MSP about a year and a half ago. I wasn't feeling too well, had a bit of a headache and a runny nose. I went to the lav (after waiting an ungodly long time in my seat to go), and as I was walking up the aisle, noticed a dog in someone's lap, and was like "Oh! That'll explain it!" Sure enough, within 15 minutes of disembarking the cramped lil' CRJ, I felt fine.

Had I been the pax mentioned with the serious allergy, I would have contacted corporate and the authorities after the flight, along with anyone else I may have thought of about the issue. You never joke about or take medical circumstances lightly, especially at FL350!
Proudly from the Home of the Red Tail.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos