dtwclipper
Posts: 6668
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 3:17 am

Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 1:16 pm

Metro growth vision cloudy
Light rail isn't needed, says Northwest exec
November 6, 2007

BY MARGARITA BAUZA

FREE PRESS BUSINESS WRITER

With the number of passengers at Metro Airport expected to grow 67% within the next 20 years, the Wayne County Airport Authority says it needs a new runway, light-rail system and expanded terminals to handle the increased traffic.

Officials from the airport authority outlined the projected long-range development plan during a meeting with the Free Press last week.

Metro Airport's largest carrier says some components of the plan -- particularly the rail system -- are a waste of money.

The light-rail system would connect the McNamara Terminal with the new North Terminal, which is to open in fall 2008.

"We don't believe there is ridership for it," said Andrea Fischer Newman, Northwest's vice president of government affairs. "Money raised is better used for runways, taxiways or terminals, which benefit the largest number of passengers."

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...AID=/20071106/BUSINESS05/711060305
Compare New York Air, the Airline that works for your Business
 
NwAflyer07
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:00 pm

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 1:48 pm

Pretty much anyone flying into DTW on NW is gonna end up going somplace else on NW. Even if there was a light-rail system they wouldnt have too many people wanting to go through all that just to save a few bucks and take different airlines. But why is the traffic expected to grow that much? Maybe Delta's gonna move in?? haha jk jk But in all seriousness are they predicting a revival of Detroit as a city itself?
 
bennett123
Posts: 7442
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 12:49 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 1:54 pm

Clearly NWA want the money spent airside.

If the number of passengers increases at that rate then provision will need to be made for getting them to/from the airport.

The question is does that mean a train link, (to where?) or more parking. Neither of these are cheap options.

David
 
flyinryan99
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2001 6:54 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 1:57 pm

Maybe the airport board should talk to Toledo city council members. Every once in a while the idea of "light rail" connecting downtown Toledo to Metro Airport gets kicked around. With gas prices continuing to climb and lack of flight options out of TOL, I am kind of favoring that. I wouldn't mind driving 10 minutes to catch a train up to DTW to fly out. Just my humble opinion.
 
User avatar
United787
Posts: 2197
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:20 pm

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 2:11 pm

It sounds like they are only talking about a light-rail system that connects the terminals.

Did you really think that Motor City would think of building a real public transportation link from the airport to downtown or anywhere else?

Don't forget, it is GM that destroyed the public transportation system (street cars) in this country, including the one in Detroit. Ironically, downtown Detroit now has the most depressed downtown in the country, serves them right, they created their own nightmere.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_streetcar_conspiracy (not the best source but the Cliff Notes version)

Even if they did build a light-rail to downtown, there is hardly anyone down there to use it. Do you really think all of the people working in the auto industry would use a rail line?
 
PSU.DTW.SCE
Posts: 6106
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 11:45 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 2:23 pm

Quoting United787 (Reply 4):
Even if they did build a light-rail to downtown, there is hardly anyone down there to use it. Do you really think all of the people working in the auto industry would use a rail line?

The problem is that Metro Detroit business centers & communities are all very dispersed and a light rail system would be difficult to effectively connect high-traffic corridors. There is so much suburb-to-suburb commuting, to far-flung areas that that people would still face substancial commutes to/from the trains.

NW is right that a terminal-to-terminal train would be a waste at this point when a shuttle bus can handle the low demand as it is right now.

I'm interested to see where they are getting that 67% growth rate number from.
 
gigneil
Posts: 14133
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 10:25 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 3:51 pm

Quoting Bennett123 (Reply 2):
If the number of passengers increases at that rate then provision will need to be made for getting them to/from the airport.



Quoting Flyinryan99 (Reply 3):
Every once in a while the idea of "light rail" connecting downtown Toledo to Metro Airport gets kicked around.



Quoting United787 (Reply 4):
It sounds like they are only talking about a light-rail system that connects the terminals.

United787 is correct, the light rail is to connect the terminals. If Northwest doesn't see a need for it, it must not exist - they would have visibility into most interline connecting passengers, those that have at least bought it on one record.

I would imagine that whatever existing service they have - is it a bus? - is probably sufficient.

NS
 
helvknight
Posts: 784
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:35 pm

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 3:58 pm

Isn't there talk of commuter rail from Ann Arbor to Detroit with the line going close to DTW?

A link from a station on the rail line at the edge of the airport to Macnamara and North then to the rental cars and long term parking ala the EWR monorail might work.

Also an easy connection between Macnamara (NW and other Skyteam) and North (non-Skyteam such as *A and WN) is hardly going to be in NW's best interests.
I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member - Groucho Marx
 
dtwclipper
Posts: 6668
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 3:17 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:01 pm

Quoting Helvknight (Reply 7):
Isn't there talk of commuter rail from Ann Arbor to Detroit with the line going close to DTW?

There is no rail service to DTW.
There is a line that goes from Detroit to Chicago that stops in Dearborn and Ann Arbor along the way, but that is not near DTW.
Compare New York Air, the Airline that works for your Business
 
bond007
Posts: 4423
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 2:07 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:04 pm

Quoting United787 (Reply 4):
Do you really think all of the people working in the auto industry would use a rail line?

"all of the people working in the auto industry", won't be a very large figure in a few years time.

Jimbo
I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!
 
helvknight
Posts: 784
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:35 pm

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:09 pm

Quoting Dtwclipper (Reply 8):
There is no rail service to DTW.
There is a line that goes from Detroit to Chicago that stops in Dearborn and Ann Arbor along the way, but that is not near DTW.

I think this is what they're talking about. http://www.metrotimes.com/editorial/story.asp?id=9543

There are other links suggesting start in 2009 or 2010.

[Edited 2007-11-06 08:10:34]

[Edited 2007-11-06 08:11:07]
I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member - Groucho Marx
 
ContnlEliteCMH
Posts: 1376
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:19 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:13 pm

Quoting United787 (Reply 4):
Don't forget, it is GM that destroyed the public transportation system (street cars) in this country, including the one in Detroit. Ironically, downtown Detroit now has the most depressed downtown in the country, serves them right, they created their own nightmere.

This is absolutely ridiculous.

What could *possibly* be the relevance of this point to the topic at hand? Since GM killed off light rail, there won't be a light rail connecting terminals at DTW -- which is an AIRPORT, not a road.

The conspiracy to which you refer ended (as in, activity stopped) in 1950. That's 57 years ago. Nothing like living in the past, no?

No wonder rail freaks have no credibility. Pulling out stuff like this is case-in-point.
Christianity. Islam. Hinduism. Anthropogenic Global Warming. All are matters of faith!
 
dtwclipper
Posts: 6668
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 3:17 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:21 pm

Quoting Helvknight (Reply 10):
suggesting start in 2009 or 2010.

One word: NEVER


It ain't gonna happen here.
Compare New York Air, the Airline that works for your Business
 
SRT75
Posts: 204
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:42 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:25 pm

Quoting DTW.SCE" class=quote target=_blank>PSU.DTW.SCE (Reply 5):
NW is right that a terminal-to-terminal train would be a waste at this point when a shuttle bus can handle the low demand as it is right now.

I would like to know where the got the prediction of 67% growth in the future? If NW were to expand, I could see the need to move some of the other SkyTeam members currently using McNamara to the new Smith. In that case, there would be a need for a fast link between terminals.

Is NW basically saying they will never expand DTW to the point where they will outgrow McNamara?
 
apodino
Posts: 3027
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 2:11 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:25 pm

As someone who often flies through DTW and does the terminal to terminal shuffle, I hope that this does happen. I also heard that this would be an airside connection, meaning you can transfer between McNamarra and North without having to reclear TSA (Which is very crowded as it is now in the Smith terminal). Here is the other thing that NW forgets about. In the case of irregular operations (which are regular operations these days), if you have to reaccomodate passengers, often times this happens on other airlines. I think its good customer service for these people to go catch their flight without having to do the TSA thing again.

The reason I travel through DTW and have to do the terminal shuffle is because ATW does not have USAirways service, and I often jumpseat on either Pinnacle or Mesaba to DTW in order to get to a US or ZW flight. The one bad thing is that they have an awesome shuttle driver, who is so well liked that people who fly NW often park in the Smith terminal just to ride the shuttle bus with her.
 
NASCARAirforce
Posts: 2452
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 7:27 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:35 pm

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 6):
I would imagine that whatever existing service they have - is it a bus? - is probably sufficient.

They have shuttle busses that run back and forth between the Mac and the Smith, most of the riders are airport employees - such as skycaps, TSA etc that work out of both terminals.

Quoting Helvknight (Reply 7):
Isn't there talk of commuter rail from Ann Arbor to Detroit with the line going close to DTW?

The rail line that goes from Ann Arbor to Detroit is the old Conrail Line that also Amtrak uses, it passes about 4-5 miles north of DTW in Wayne, Inkster, Dearborn etc. There is a rail line that is on DTW's north perimeter, but that goes well south of Ann Arbor and is used by Norfolk and Southern.


I attended one of those meetings last fall. It was put on by Jacobsen Daniels and HTNB I believe - planners for the airport. There was talk about adding the fifth parallel runway to the east of the other runways, which would close Middlebelt Rd, or cross it - and go right thru a neighborhood along Eureka Rd. They also talked about extending the McNamara terminal to the north and possibly closing Runway 9L/27R - don't think that would work though

Better to build an additional terminal between 4L/22R and 4R/22L like the Mac and either have road access or a subway that travels between the Mac and new terminal.
 
flyinryan99
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2001 6:54 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:08 pm

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 6):
United787 is correct, the light rail is to connect the terminals. If Northwest doesn't see a need for it, it must not exist - they would have visibility into most interline connecting passengers, those that have at least bought it on one record.

I would imagine that whatever existing service they have - is it a bus? - is probably sufficient.

I understand it would be connecting the two terminals. I was just saying if there were to be a light rail between downtown Toledo and Metro, it would need to connect both terminals so it could be used as a dual purpose if planned right.

I agree with above posters 67% increase? What do they know we don't? Are they planning on having TOL, FNT, and Windsor closed to passenger traffic?
 
toltommy
Posts: 2487
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2003 9:04 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:37 pm

Quoting Flyinryan99 (Reply 3):
I wouldn't mind driving 10 minutes to catch a train up to DTW to fly out.



Quoting Dtwclipper (Thread starter):
With the number of passengers at Metro Airport expected to grow 67% within the next 20 years, the Wayne County Airport Authority says it needs a new runway, light-rail system and expanded terminals to handle the increased traffic.

FlyinRyan.... I expected better out of you.....  boggled   boggled 

Wouldn't TOL be able to reduce some of the possible congestion? Geez, NW could at least drop in a MSP-TOL flight or two. Don't jump on the train! Of course, it would have to stop in Bedford, Luna Pier, Monroe, etc..... At that point every one is back in the car, racing up 75.

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 6):

United787 is correct, the light rail is to connect the terminals. If Northwest doesn't see a need for it, it must not exist

OTOH, if NW doesn't see a need for it, they might see that a need does exist. Wouldn't want to make it any easier to change carriers at DTW, right?  stirthepot 
 
DCA-ROCguy
Posts: 3890
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2000 5:03 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:08 pm

From the information given in the article and the discussion, I'd side with Northwest on this one. Keeping airport costs manageable is absolutely vital. Aren't all SkyTeam carriers at the McNamara now? If and when the MacNamara needs to be expanded beyond what its space footprint can handle, the airport can consider options. But why build a costly interterminal rail system now?

Apodino, the circumstances you mention could IMO be covered by airside shuttle buses. I don't think one can generalize from your experience as an aviation-employee jumpseater to saying the traveling public needs costly interterminal rail to a terminal NW's alliance doesn't use. Also, reaccomodations are a small enough percentage of pax as to not require a rail infrastructure either.

67 percent is probably a reasonable growth estimate over 20 years; DTW is well located in the country, has one of the best runway layouts in the country, and a big local population base (however weak its economy). It won't go the way of PIT and STL. It's reasonable to think DTW will remain a hub whatever happens in the industry. But even so, it's not clear to me why the non-SkyTeam North Terminal would need to be linked to the MacNamara by costly rail.

Jim

[Edited 2007-11-06 10:10:35]
Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
 
michman
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:51 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:41 pm

Quoting Flyinryan99 (Reply 3):
Maybe the airport board should talk to Toledo city council members. Every once in a while the idea of "light rail" connecting downtown Toledo to Metro Airport gets kicked around. With gas prices continuing to climb and lack of flight options out of TOL, I am kind of favoring that. I wouldn't mind driving 10 minutes to catch a train up to DTW to fly out. Just my humble opinion.

Instead of lobbying for light rail, maybe they should lobby the Michigan Flyer service -- www.michiganflyer.com -- to add some runs down to Toledo. They've got free WIFI onboard and it's a heck of a lot cheaper than building a light rail line.
 
deltairlines
Posts: 6876
Joined: Mon May 24, 1999 4:47 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:43 pm

There's still plenty of room for the McNamera terminal to be expanded. Concourse B can easily continue south, adding another 14-18 gates that could handle most narrowbody equipment quite easily. And if they wanted to, they could extend the C concourse out to add another 10 parking spots or so for CRJs and Saabs. Plenty of room for development there.
 
ORDagent
Posts: 580
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 6:24 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:53 pm

NW is simply trying to guard thier DTW fortress. If PFC taxes are bumped up to cover the construction of the rail line the NW tarriff would be inherantly higher due to the taxes and in order to stay competitive they would have to cut prices by the level of the new taxes.

I find it a pitty that the U.S. airports can't or won't embrace land side public transportation a la many of the airports in Europe. Fortunately NYC is getting JFK integrated into the subway system. Here in Chicago both of our airports are at the terminous of a subway line. I don't have the exact numbers but every time I take the train to ORD it is amazing how many travelers and employees take the train to ORD. MDW appears to be crowded but there are multiple bus lines that terminate at MDW so it is a bit harder to tell how many are actually going to the terminal.
 
flyinryan99
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2001 6:54 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:05 pm

Quoting TOLtommy (Reply 17):
FlyinRyan.... I expected better out of you.....

Wouldn't TOL be able to reduce some of the possible congestion? Geez, NW could at least drop in a MSP-TOL flight or two. Don't jump on the train! Of course, it would have to stop in Bedford, Luna Pier, Monroe, etc..... At that point every one is back in the car, racing up 75.

Yeah...well when you're told things are going well out there and Delta cuts another flight you lose faith and interest in things going on out there.

I wouldn't say stop all of those places...just have a stop in downtown and then Monroe and call it good. People would have to drive a short distance either way.

Quoting Michman (Reply 19):
Instead of lobbying for light rail, maybe they should lobby the Michigan Flyer service -- www.michiganflyer.com -- to add some runs down to Toledo. They've got free WIFI onboard and it's a heck of a lot cheaper than building a light rail line.

Now that is interesting...I haven't heard/seen this. Good idea.
 
BA
Posts: 10133
Joined: Fri May 19, 2000 11:06 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:15 pm

Quoting ORDagent (Reply 21):
I find it a pitty that the U.S. airports can't or won't embrace land side public transportation a la many of the airports in Europe.

I completely agree. There is nothing like arriving in Zurich Airport and hopping on one of more than 300 trains daily to points all over Switzerland.

Quoting ORDagent (Reply 21):
Fortunately NYC is getting JFK integrated into the subway system. Here in Chicago both of our airports are at the terminous of a subway line. I don't have the exact numbers but every time I take the train to ORD it is amazing how many travelers and employees take the train to ORD. MDW appears to be crowded but there are multiple bus lines that terminate at MDW so it is a bit harder to tell how many are actually going to the terminal.

It's good that more and more airports in the US are making efforts to connect themselves to some form of rail system.

Here in Denver, they are going to build an electric rail line connecting the airport with Union Station in downtown. It should be completed by 2015.
"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
 
flyf15
Posts: 6633
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 11:10 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:18 pm

Does anyone know where I can obtain a copy of the DTW master plan?
 
toltommy
Posts: 2487
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2003 9:04 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:30 pm

Quoting DeltAirlines (Reply 20):
Concourse B can easily continue south, adding another 14-18 gates that could handle most narrowbody equipment quite easily. And if they wanted to, they could extend the C concourse out to add another 10 parking spots or so for CRJs and Saabs.

They can expand the B concourse, but C is at it's end. There's a major taxiway right behind those gate (to the north). I don't know if A concourse can be expanded, but I think there's room to the south to do it.

Quoting Flyinryan99 (Reply 22):
I wouldn't say stop all of those places...just have a stop in downtown and then Monroe and call it good. People would have to drive a short distance either way.

In theory, I agree. But any rail service would require a major subsidy. You know Mayor Finkenstein would want more than one stop in Toledo (better to campaign on), and if Monroe County is paying into the subsidy, they'll want more than a Monroe area stop.

Quoting Flyf15 (Reply 24):
Does anyone know where I can obtain a copy of the DTW master plan?

Try the airport website www.metroairport.com
 
bobnwa
Posts: 4464
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2000 12:10 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:37 pm

Quoting BA (Reply 23):
completely agree. There is nothing like arriving in Zurich Airport and hopping on one of more than 300 trains daily to points all over Switzerland.

As has been pointed out several times, the rail in question is between terminals only, not to anywhere else. NWA does not see a need for it. Rail travel between the airport and points in the mid-west is not the issue and has not been proposed.
 
N1120A
Posts: 26467
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:44 pm

Quoting United787 (Reply 4):
Do you really think all of the people working in the auto industry would use a rail line?

They do in Europe.

Quoting ContnlEliteCMH (Reply 11):

This is absolutely ridiculous.

Why?

Quoting ContnlEliteCMH (Reply 11):

No wonder rail freaks have no credibility. Pulling out stuff like this is case-in-point.

No credibility? It is absolutely true.

Quoting ContnlEliteCMH (Reply 11):
That's 57 years ago. Nothing like living in the past, no?

Here is L.A., that past haunts our present.
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
 
NW748i
Posts: 235
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:40 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:46 pm

Quoting NwAflyer07 (Reply 1):
But in all seriousness are they predicting a revival of Detroit as a city itself?

I grew up there and they've been predicting that since I was a kid...

Quoting PSU.DTW.SCE (Reply 5):
I'm interested to see where they are getting that 67% growth rate number from.

Most likely the FAA forecast. IAD has a similar number for 20 years out.
Hail! to the victors valiant, Hail! to the conqu'ring heroes, Hail! Hail! to Michigan the leaders and best! Go Blue!
 
BA
Posts: 10133
Joined: Fri May 19, 2000 11:06 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:47 pm

Quoting Bobnwa (Reply 26):
As has been pointed out several times, the rail in question is between terminals only, not to anywhere else. NWA does not see a need for it. Rail travel between the airport and points in the mid-west is not the issue and has not been proposed.

Read my post again.

I was responding to ORDagent's comment about airport rail lines. I was not talking about the proposed inter-terminal rail link being proposed at DTW.
"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
 
N1120A
Posts: 26467
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:49 pm

Quoting BA (Reply 23):

Here in Denver, they are going to build an electric rail line connecting the airport with Union Station in downtown. It should be completed by 2015.

It is going to be electric now? I thought they were going DMU
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
 
BA
Posts: 10133
Joined: Fri May 19, 2000 11:06 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 pm

Quoting N1120A (Reply 30):
It is going to be electric now? I thought they were going DMU

They were considering both diesel and electric. Back in July, RTD directors rejected diesel in favor of electric:

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_6456288
"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
 
N1120A
Posts: 26467
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 5:40 pm

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:08 pm

Quoting BA (Reply 31):

They were considering both diesel and electric. Back in July, RTD directors rejected diesel in favor of electric:

Pretty cool. It makes sense as fuel costs rise, though the availability of bio fuels should help that. Still, good forward thinking.
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
 
burnsie28
Posts: 5035
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 1:49 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:35 pm

A train connecting the two terminals would be a waste of money, all of NW's partners are in the McNamara terminal, few if any customers are split between airlines in seperate terminals.
 
hjulicher
Posts: 656
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 2:26 pm

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:55 pm

Quoting Helvknight (Reply 7):
Isn't there talk of commuter rail from Ann Arbor to Detroit with the line going close to DTW?

I think that if a rapid rail link were built connected downtown detroit and ann arbor with the airport would be one of the best ways to invest money in southeastern michigan. It dramatically makes Detroit as well as Ann Arbor, well connected with the rest of the world. Taking a train that anyone can get on, not only shows forward thinking in an automotive landscape, but also makes Detroit and Ann Arbor much more viable for hosting large events. It will also reduce traffic on the I-94 corridor. Last year, I flew home to Detroit, and no one (absolutely no one) could pick me up from the airport, so I decided to take the bus. I live in Bloomfield Hills, and the closest line without transferring would take me to Orchard Lake and Lone Pine. Needless to say, I waited an 1.5 for the bus which never came. At that point, my dad was done with his doctor's appointment and he just came to the airport to pick me up. We really need a reliable and rapid transit system. I think that connecting Washtenaw and Ann Arbor would be worthwhile as i'm sure the demand from Ann Arbor to the airport is high enough to warrant it's own service if rail were built considering the Ann Arborites and their preferences.
LH 442
 
flyf15
Posts: 6633
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 11:10 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Tue Nov 06, 2007 10:17 pm

Seems to me like the ideal plan would be to connect the two terminals via bus within security. I'm guessing there aren't too many pax making these connections... and maybe some employees.

Run a bus from within security on one terminal to within security on the other one. Maybe just a large van... every 15 minutes or so. Leaving security, going to ground transportation, riding the bus, entering the new terminal, and going through security again is too much. (thats what it looks like they do now, from their website)
 
PSU.DTW.SCE
Posts: 6106
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 11:45 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:36 am

Quoting SRT75 (Reply 13):
I would like to know where the got the prediction of 67% growth in the future? If NW were to expand, I could see the need to move some of the other SkyTeam members currently using McNamara to the new Smith. In that case, there would be a need for a fast link between terminals.

Is NW basically saying they will never expand DTW to the point where they will outgrow McNamara?

The Worldgateway was built for the future with ample capacity as it is now. It is well below its maximum capacity.

Quoting TOLtommy (Reply 25):
They can expand the B concourse, but C is at it's end. There's a major taxiway right behind those gate (to the north). I don't know if A concourse can be expanded, but I think there's room to the south to do it.

A & C are max'ed out in the current airfield layout. 9R/27R is near the southern end of A, and 9L/27R is at the north end. Despite how rarely used 9L/27R is used, it is still very necessary to have crosswind runways for extreme weather conditions. 27L gets used on a regular basis, as an alternative to 21L.

Quoting Burnsie28 (Reply 33):
A train connecting the two terminals would be a waste of money, all of NW's partners are in the McNamara terminal, few if any customers are split between airlines in seperate terminals.

Agreed. Will it would be cool, it is not cost-effective. NW & everyone else for that matter doesn't want landing fees & rent to increase.

Quoting Hjulicher (Reply 34):
I think that if a rapid rail link were built connected downtown detroit and ann arbor with the airport would be one of the best ways to invest money in southeastern michigan.

Agreed it would be cool, but doesn't appear to be financially viable at this point.
It is kind of chicken or the egg situation - do you build ahead of the demand, or do you wait for the demand?

Quoting Flyf15 (Reply 35):
Seems to me like the ideal plan would be to connect the two terminals via bus within security. I'm guessing there aren't too many pax making these connections... and maybe some employees.

The need inside security is very little - except for rebook situations to other airlines. Most people transiting terminals are either employees or headed for the parking garage(s).
 
ContnlEliteCMH
Posts: 1376
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:19 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Wed Nov 07, 2007 2:47 am

Quoting N1120A (Reply 27):
Why?

It's ridiculous because it is an interesting historical note, but hardly an explanation for why Detroit cannot or will not implement rail TODAY.

"Will Detroit ever implement rail for mass transit?"

"No, because GM and the oil companies banded together to kill it off 57 years ago."

Oh, okay.

This is clearly the spirit in which it was offered, which was far more than an historical note. No, it's offered as the *reason* why Detroit won't do it today. That's ridiculous -- and smacks of hopelessness. We learn from our past and if it haunts us, we work to exorcise the ghosts. When those ghosts are incorrectly cited as the cause for today's failures (or in the case of rail, a lack of progress as defined by rail advocates), that's the playground of the weak-minded conspiracy theorist, and that's a blow to credibility.
Christianity. Islam. Hinduism. Anthropogenic Global Warming. All are matters of faith!
 
Super80DFW
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 10:03 pm

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Wed Nov 07, 2007 2:55 am

Quoting United787 (Reply 4):
Do you really think all of the people working in the auto industry would use a rail line?

HAA!!!!! That's funny! Big grin
"Things change, friends leave, life doesn't stop for anybody." -- EAT'EM UP EAT'EM UP KSU!!
 
LHboyatDTW
Posts: 764
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 12:53 pm

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:55 am

It's funny. Many Detroiters like myself constantly complain about the need for better public transportation, but deep down inside we know we'd never use it.

So if this comes to reality, does this mean that Detroit will have two mugger movers?  duck 
The air in the clouds is very pure and fine, bracing and delicious because it's the same the angels breathe.
 
hjulicher
Posts: 656
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 2:26 pm

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:14 am

Quoting LHboyatDTW (Reply 39):
So if this comes to reality, does this mean that Detroit will have two mugger movers?

I call it the people shooter, but mugger movers also works. Actually I think there is huge potential to using light rail to and from the airport. Whether or not people would use it who already live here is questioned, however connecting to downtown detroit on rail would be valuable for businesses needing links to the airport, and it also makes viable the growth which Downtown Detroit is trying to get. I think this route, as well as one to Ann Arbor, are really viable, and i actually do no think that there is any contention from the big three anymore, as the light rail system would replace cars, but would in fact just minimize their use.

It's hard to justify and large amount of government spending, so of course this project is going to be investigated for viability, however, if any public transportation does get built in Detroit, it will be to and from the airport.

Take the SouthEastern Pennsylvania Transit Authority... It is highly criticized for its untimeliness and disorganization, but the system works, and people's utility from riding SEPTA is higher than driving. I'm not saying that Detroit will have a similar system, but it goes to show that light rail can be built and be beneficial for the city. By having light rail in the city, it makes Urban living more feasible and thus encourages individuals to move downtown for the merits.
LH 442
 
NW748i
Posts: 235
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:40 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:42 pm

Seems that NW plans to use those profits for things other than a new rail system: http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll...e?AID=/20071107/BIZ/711070345/1001

Excerpt: "At Detroit Metro, one of Northwest's major hubs, the airline will build a new cargo hangar and upgrade its WorldClub lounge, among other things."

Is a lounge upgrade necessary for a terminal that is still classified as "new?" Certainly, spending money on planes is a good move (even if it does rack up debt for the next downturn)... Honestly, I think the best investment for NW is in its employees (good job on that)!
Hail! to the victors valiant, Hail! to the conqu'ring heroes, Hail! Hail! to Michigan the leaders and best! Go Blue!
 
iflyswa
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:09 am

RE: Light Rail Isn't Needed At DTW Says NW

Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:57 pm

Quoting Flyf15 (Reply 24):
Does anyone know where I can obtain a copy of the DTW master plan?

How about Northwest's Airport Use Agreement with the WCAA? How much authority over capital investment projects is NW given as majority-in-interest?

iflyswa
Opinions expressed by "iflyswa" are not those of Southwest Airlines Officers, Directors, or Employees.