Posts: 13760
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 9:33 am

Ridiculous Patents In Aviation

Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:51 pm

Ran across this one. Seems to have been granted, but it's ridiculous that the patent office would allow such a thing to be patented as there is nothing new in it.


It's basically a 767-200 with a smaller lower hold. How this is different than what was already built and/or marketed by other people is hard to understand, and considering the patent claims that "variations" are protected, why isn't this just considered a variation of the 767-200?

Maybe I'm missing what is so unique about this concept that it should be granted a patent in the 21st century. It's interesting it comes out of Seattle. I wonder if the patent holder works/worked for Boeing?

Anyone else know of less than innovative patents granted in aviation?
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 76er, ARNPEK, audidudi, Baidu [Spider], benjjk, cougar15, dk44, Google [Bot], hughnz, Rdeggendorfer, RickNRoll, scbriml, shamrock321, sjudfwmco, Spyhunter, steman, ThePointblank, ZK-NBT, zkncj and 212 guests