juventus
Posts: 2017
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:12 pm

Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:59 am

Possibilities of Finnair or SAS landing at LAX in the not so distant future?????
 
copaair737
Posts: 3571
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:00 am

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:03 am

Quoting Juventus (Thread starter):
SAS landing at LAX in the not so distant future?????

With SAS starting SFO next year, I wouldn't bet on SAS showing up at LAX.
Livin' on Reds, Vitamin C, and Cocaine
 
Bicoastal
Posts: 2446
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 1999 5:56 am

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:04 am

SAS just announced they'll be flying to SFO (a larger United/Star Alliance hub than LAX) in 2008. Finnair would do better flying to DFW or ORD...both hubs for Oneworld member, American Airlines.
Airliners.net has many forums. It has spell check and search functions. Use them before posting!
 
MAH4546
Posts: 24522
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 1:44 pm

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:10 am

Quoting Bicoastal (Reply 2):
Finnair would do better flying to DFW or ORD...both hubs for Oneworld member, American Airlines.

Finnair will resume Miami flights when/if they add another U.S. destination. Miami was halted in 2006 as they needed planes to build-up Asia (it was re-started, ironically, in 2003 because of a heavy drop in Asia travel due to SARS). Useless fact, and not much to build a profitable flight on, but South Florida has the world's largest Finnish ex-pat community outside of Stockholm.

As for why SAS and Finnair will likely not be seen in LAX in the near or long-term future: too long, too thin, too low-yielding. I was a little surprised SAS is giving SFO a shot. Hopefully it works better for them than it did for Icelandair.

[Edited 2007-11-12 18:11:59]
a.
 
juventus
Posts: 2017
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:12 pm

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:11 am

Quoting Copaair737 (Reply 1):
With SAS starting SFO next year, I wouldn't bet on SAS showing up at LAX.

I know, that's why I'm asking. Why SFO and not LAX?? just curiosity
 
MAH4546
Posts: 24522
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 1:44 pm

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:12 am

Quoting Juventus (Reply 4):

I know, that's why I'm asking. Why SFO and not LAX?? just curiosity

SFO provides much better connecting opportunities.
a.
 
JRDC930
Posts: 882
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:36 am

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:21 am

For some reason, i dont think the LA area has a very large Nordic population, and there just doesn't seem to be much of a tourist demand for LA either. Though I really wish LAX would get Nordic service, so i didn't have to connect 1000 times just to get to CPH or Stockholm, but with SFO starting up which i was unaware of, it likely wont happen. I guess when i finally take my trip to Scandinavia ill just have to put up with the connection times.
U.S. Legacy carriers,STILL leaders in lowering industry standards...
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18838
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:05 am



Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 5):
Quoting Juventus (Reply 4):

I know, that's why I'm asking. Why SFO and not LAX?? just curiosity

SFO provides much better connecting opportunities.

Ironically, CPH-LAX-CPH was the first scheduled direct route between the West Coast of North America and Europe when SAS DC-6Bs commenced service in November, 1954 with fuel stops in Greenland and YWG. The route became nonstop a couple of years later when DC-7Cs replaced the DC-6Bs, followed not long after by DC-8s, DC-10s and 767s. SAS served LAX continuously for almost 40 years, dropping the route in August 1995.
 
Boeing744
Posts: 1735
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 1:27 pm

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:52 am

I also wonder why Austrian Airlines doesn't fly to LAX or SFO. I know they have some issues at the moment, but you'd think that one of those routes would be a no-brainer for them. There are no cities anywhere near Vienna with direct service to LAX (to be convenient I mean), so travellers are forced to fly through IAD, ORD, JFK, etc. I think Vienna could easily sustain a flight, especially with SFO being a big star hub.

On a slightly related note, there were LOTS of passengers on my flight in the summer from VIE-YYZ who started their trip in Copenhagen. My seat mate was one of them, and there were many other people I noticed speaking Danish. I wonder why this was? I didn't hear anything about any delays or re-routings, so why did all these Danes fly to Toronto through Vienna (when LHR or FRA would make much more sense)?
 
MAH4546
Posts: 24522
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 1:44 pm

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:57 am



Quoting Boeing744 (Reply 8):
I also wonder why Austrian Airlines doesn't fly to LAX or SFO. I know they have some issues at the moment, but you'd think that one of those routes would be a no-brainer for them. There are no cities anywhere near Vienna with direct service to LAX (to be convenient I mean), so travellers are forced to fly through IAD, ORD, JFK, etc. I think Vienna could easily sustain a flight, especially with SFO being a big star hub.

Same exact reasons that many other European airlines don't: yield. Yield on California-Europe is weak outside of the traditional markets, and it typically requires two dedicated aircraft. When you can make significantly more money on passengers and cargo flying to Asia with the same utilization, or make roughly the same or more money flying to the East Coast (and have the added bonus of only using up one air-frame instead of 1.5), it is a no-brainer for smaller European airlines to ignore the California market.
a.
 
GARUDAROD
Posts: 1136
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2000 4:39 am

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:04 am



Quoting JRDC930 (Reply 6):
For some reason, i dont think the LA area has a very large Nordic population

Actually there is a large Norwegian population in LA. There is a monument to Norwegian seaman in
San Pedro, I believe. In the past, SAS, Finnair, Lauda Air all had flights to LAX as well as numerous
charters, Unfortunately changing economic conditions forced the airlines to change their route
structures and resulted in the LAX flights being cancelled.
Cargo doesn't whine, moan, or complain
 
Boeing744
Posts: 1735
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 1:27 pm

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:07 am



Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 9):
Same exact reasons that many other European airlines don't: yield. Yield on California-Europe is weak outside of the traditional markets, and it typically requires two dedicated aircraft. When you can make significantly more money on passengers and cargo flying to Asia with the same utilization, or make roughly the same or more money flying to the East Coast (and have the added bonus of only using up one air-frame instead of 1.5), it is a no-brainer for smaller European airlines to ignore the California market.

OK, that makes sense. Thanks for the quick answer!
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18838
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:37 am



Quoting Boeing744 (Reply 8):
There are no cities anywhere near Vienna with direct service to LAX (to be convenient I mean), so travellers are forced to fly through IAD, ORD, JFK, etc.

MUC, ZRH and FRA aren't far from VIE (192, 327, 337 nm respectively) and all have daily LH or LX Star Alliance nonstops to LAX with good connections from VIE. I would much rather connect at any of those points (especially MUC or ZRH) than at IAD/ORD/JFK. Also good connections on KL via AMS, AF via CDG, and BA via LHR.

As already mentioned, OS would also have the problem of needing more than one aircraft to operate a daily nonstop to LAX which they'd need to have any hope of being competitive. I'm sure OS has many much more lucrative potential markets for their limited longhaul fleet than the US west coast.
 
pgtravel
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:04 am

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:36 pm



Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 7):
Ironically, CPH-LAX-CPH was the first scheduled direct route between the West Coast of North America and Europe when SAS DC-6Bs commenced service in November, 1954 with fuel stops in Greenland and YWG. The route became nonstop a couple of years later when DC-7Cs replaced the DC-6Bs, followed not long after by DC-8s, DC-10s and 767s. SAS served LAX continuously for almost 40 years, dropping the route in August 1995.

And there is a little plaque dedicated to SAS' inauguration of service on the Polar Route that you can see when you go to LAX. On the lower level roadway, go to the northern end of the Bradley terminal, just as it starts curving toward Terminal 3. There you'll see the plaque on a rock in a small grassy area.
 
as739x
Posts: 4993
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 7:23 am

RE: Why The Absence Of Nordic Carriers At LAX

Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:43 pm



Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 9):

Well explained

ASSFO
"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"