phxmkeflyer
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 9:11 am

Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:35 pm

Simple question really...but I thought that there would be at least one carrier flying this route nonstop and was surprised to find that there isn't. Any explanation why not?

Thanks!
 
EXAAUADL
Posts: 1740
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:48 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:42 pm

the market is just large enough...barely...UA looked at it but here is the problem....BOS isnt a hub and isnt as large as say NYC. There are numerous connect points to NRT from BOS like JFK, EWR, IAD, DTW, ORD, MSP, LAX, SFO, SEA, YYZ.

While the market is just barely large enough, youd have to capture over 90% of the local market just to make a penny. Given BOS lack of hub status and ability to connect to NRT over nearly a dozen point, it is unlikely any nonstop would be able to get more than 75% of the market. If BOS then has large markets to points beyond NRT such as PEK, HKG, ICN, TPE, then perhaps there might be some possibility with UA, NW or JL.
 
commavia
Posts: 9629
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:30 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:46 pm

As Exaauadl said, the market simply isn't large enough. Connections - mostly on AA through ORD and JFK, UA through ORD, and CO through EWR - handle the market fine.

Back in 1999, AA applied for and received approval of a daily BOS-NRT MD11 flight. They were all set to go, and AA actively sought slots at Narita for the service, but it never materialized. After the tech bubble burst, the bottom fell out from under this route, which would have been very heavily run with tech- and research-related travel.
 
bobnwa
Posts: 4459
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2000 12:10 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:51 pm



Quoting Commavia (Reply 2):
As Exaauadl said, the market simply isn't large enough. Connections - mostly on AA through ORD and JFK, UA through ORD, and CO through EWR - handle the market fine.

The last figures I saw showed that NWA was the leader in the connecting market from BOS to NRT via DTW and MSP.
 
bagoldex
Posts: 269
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:33 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:00 pm



Quoting Bobnwa (Reply 3):
The last figures I saw showed that NWA was the leader in the connecting market from BOS to NRT via DTW and MSP.

Just off of personal experience traveling BOS-Asia on AA, UA and others I have a very hard time believing that.
 
commavia
Posts: 9629
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:30 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:02 pm



Quoting Bobnwa (Reply 3):
The last figures I saw showed that NWA was the leader in the connecting market from BOS to NRT via DTW and MSP.

Yep, they're big, too. All of these airlines are big in the market. The only U.S. legacies that aren't are US - obviously, because they don't even fly to NRT! - and DL because connecting from BOS to NRT over ATL is a bit out of the way.
 
A330323X
Posts: 2666
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:06 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:09 pm



Quoting Commavia (Reply 2):
Back in 1999, AA applied for and received approval of a daily BOS-NRT MD11 flight. They were all set to go, and AA actively sought slots at Narita for the service, but it never materialized.

BOS-NRT was also one of the routes promised (on projected route maps and the like) to start if the UA/US merger got off the ground, as then the combined carrier would have critical mass at both ends.
I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
 
commavia
Posts: 9629
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:30 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:11 pm



Quoting A330323X (Reply 6):
BOS-NRT was also one of the routes promised (on projected route maps and the like) to start if the UA/US merger got off the ground, as then the combined carrier would have critical mass at both ends.

Yeah, remember that, too.

Does anyone still have a copy of that route map they put out back then - May 24, 2000, if I remember correctly - with all the routes they said they'd start once the two merged? I haven't seen that in ages! (Probably good for a laugh now.)
 
A330323X
Posts: 2666
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:06 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:14 pm



Quoting Commavia (Reply 7):
Does anyone still have a copy of that route map they put out back then - May 24, 2000, if I remember correctly - with all the routes they said they'd start once the two merged?

I do, but it's on a different computer. Will look for it later if I get a chance.
I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
 
bobnwa
Posts: 4459
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2000 12:10 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:20 pm



Quoting BAGoldEx (Reply 4):
Just off of personal experience traveling BOS-Asia on AA, UA and others I have a very hard time believing that

Well, if you were on AA, UA and others, how would you know how many were on NWA? Also, the discussion is about BOS-NRT not Asia, even though I believe NWA would be the leader in the Asia category as well.
 
naritaflyer
Posts: 259
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 12:17 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:26 pm

I think BOS-NRT route would work even if BOS is not a hub but NRT must be a hub for the other airline. There may not be enough people going to NRT every day from BOS, nor to Seoul, Taipei, Hong Kong, Shanghai or so on. But put all those guys toghether on one flight and take them to NRT and then feed them through the system at NRT to their end destination, then it might work. I believe the problem with this is the slots. There are no slots available at reasonable times to allow for connections. There may be slots at 11 PM Narita time which shoots down my connection theory.
 
A330323X
Posts: 2666
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:06 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:26 pm



Quoting Commavia (Reply 7):
Does anyone still have a copy of that route map they put out back then - May 24, 2000, if I remember correctly - with all the routes they said they'd start once the two merged? I haven't seen that in ages!

http://www.airlinetimetables.net/images/intl.bmp


Quoting Commavia (Reply 7):
(Probably good for a laugh now.)

Actually, I'm a bit surprised at how many of the international routes ended up getting started anyway, the NRT routes being the obvious exceptions.
I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
 
commavia
Posts: 9629
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:30 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:36 pm



Quoting A330323X (Reply 11):
Actually, I'm a bit surprised at how many of the international routes ended up getting started anyway, the NRT routes being the obvious exceptions.

True, actually, and thanks for posting the maps!
 
B752OS
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:52 pm



Quoting Exaauadl (Reply 1):
the market is just large enough...barely...UA looked at it but here is the problem....BOS isnt a hub and isnt as large as say NYC. There are numerous connect points to NRT from BOS like JFK, EWR, IAD, DTW, ORD, MSP, LAX, SFO, SEA, YYZ.

While the market is just barely large enough, youd have to capture over 90% of the local market just to make a penny. Given BOS lack of hub status and ability to connect to NRT over nearly a dozen point, it is unlikely any nonstop would be able to get more than 75% of the market. If BOS then has large markets to points beyond NRT such as PEK, HKG, ICN, TPE, then perhaps there might be some possibility with UA, NW or JL.

I think with the 787 coming on line in the next couple of years, BOS will see non-stop service to Asia without a doubt. My money is on BOS-NRT by either JL or NH with a 787 eventually. I also believe that other U.S. cities such as MIA,PHL,DEN, etc. will also see service as well.

BOS-Asia is a pretty good sized market when you consider BOS is not a hub. It was mentioned that between BOS-PVG/PEK there are more than 50,000 annual pax. Add in the local BOS-NRT, ICN, SIN, HKG and I think it could be well for an NH or a JL to step in a run the route.
 
jfk777
Posts: 5816
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:14 pm

The Boston to Asia market should be good for 200 passengers daily via NRT. Any airline like AA ,with a 777, could make it work today. UA, NW and AA have all had international and large domestic operations in Boston, it is disappointing after all this time no one has tried to fly nonstop to Japan.
 
User avatar
chrisnh
Posts: 3329
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 1999 3:59 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:27 pm



Quoting Jfk777 (Reply 14):
I think with the 787 coming on line in the next couple of years, BOS will see non-stop service to Asia without a doubt. My money is on BOS-NRT by either JL or NH with a 787 eventually.

I agree 100%. First, the 787 will be the plane best-suited to the route. Up till now the planes have been too big and too expensive. Second, I believe it will be an Asian carrier that debuts the route rather than a domestic carrier. Since the route is a thin one, first one in will essentially have it to themselves. The only domestic carrier with a chance would be Northwest, because they'll have the 787 soonest.

Chris in NH
 
B752OS
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:37 pm



Quoting Jfk777 (Reply 14):
The Boston to Asia market should be good for 200 passengers daily via NRT. Any airline like AA ,with a 777, could make it work today. UA, NW and AA have all had international and large domestic operations in Boston, it is disappointing after all this time no one has tried to fly nonstop to Japan.

I would even venture to say that it is bigger than that, if we are talking about all of Asia, perhaps over 350-400. I also believe that Boston is going to be an increasing tourist destination for people from Japan thanks to Dice-k and Okijima. You can call it crazy, but Boston is getting a TON of exposure in Japanese media and it is going to and has helped bring Japanese people to the Boston area.

Quoting ChrisNH (Reply 15):
I agree 100%. First, the 787 will be the plane best-suited to the route. Up till now the planes have been too big and too expensive. Second, I believe it will be an Asian carrier that debuts the route rather than a domestic carrier. Since the route is a thin one, first one in will essentially have it to themselves. The only domestic carrier with a chance would be Northwest, because they'll have the 787 soonest.

It would be interesting to see NW do the route, they also have a large Asian network that connects out of NRT so that would help things out. It was rumored in another thread that NW is thinking about adding BOS-CDG with a 752, so I guess anything is possible.
 
Cubsrule
Posts: 11368
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:13 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Thu Nov 22, 2007 2:37 am



Quoting B752OS (Reply 16):
It would be interesting to see NW do the route, they also have a large Asian network that connects out of NRT so that would help things out.

NW also knows a thing or two about connecting small stations to NRT; they just don't have the aircraft to do it from anywhere besides the west coast right now. NW seems to do well with BOS-AMS; there's no reason that BOS-NRT couldn't work with the 787.
I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 
Carpethead
Posts: 2563
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 8:15 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Thu Nov 22, 2007 3:16 am



Quoting B752OS (Reply 16):
I would even venture to say that it is bigger than that, if we are talking about all of Asia, perhaps over 350-400. I also believe that Boston is going to be an increasing tourist destination for people from Japan thanks to Dice-k and Okijima. You can call it crazy, but Boston is getting a TON of exposure in Japanese media and it is going to and has helped bring Japanese people to the Boston area.

If we based it on your argument, JL or NH would have flown to SEA (due to Ichiro), but of course, this hasn't happened and nor will it happen anytime soon.
BOS is just too far in the corner of the US that major hubs have it covered easily. NH nor JL will not go into BOS anytime soon. As many have mentioned, NW is the glimmering hope, but it all comes down to availability of slots at NRT.
 
MAH4546
Posts: 24519
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 1:44 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Thu Nov 22, 2007 3:18 am



Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 17):
NW seems to do well with BOS-AMS; there's no reason that BOS-NRT couldn't work with the 787.

NW and KLM have 50/50 revenue sharing on AMS-USA. They fly BOS-AMS, SEA-AMS, etc. because of that, and the plane could just as well be a KLM plane.

I'm not saying Northwest can't do well on BOS-NRT, but the fact they do well on BOS-AMS is doesn't tell us much on how they would do on BOS-NRT.
a.
 
Cubsrule
Posts: 11368
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:13 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Thu Nov 22, 2007 4:24 am



Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 19):
I'm not saying Northwest can't do well on BOS-NRT, but the fact they do well on BOS-AMS is doesn't tell us much on how they would do on BOS-NRT.

Don't misunderstand me; I wasn't trying to imply a causal link there, simply pointing out that NW successfully runs a different aircraft across a different ocean to a VERY different station (BOS-AMS is probably <50% local AMS traffic; BOS-NRT would need to be more like 70-80% local NRT traffic).

But in light of the situation with international gate space at BOS, the fact that NW is running a flight to AMS (and thus uses Terminal E) may actually be key to their ability to start BOS-NRT at some point. More significantly, it's clear that NW has figured out a way to capture a healthy amount of local traffic in Boston in a fairly competitive TATL environment (you rightly point out that KL could fly the route, but in a lot of ways, the US-originating traffic is NW's to capture). If they can do that, there's no reason they can't fly plenty of folks from Boston to Asia if they're the only game in town.
I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 
sq452
Posts: 993
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 4:49 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Thu Nov 22, 2007 4:33 am

This thread has been discussed a number of times before but I'm glad it's been mentioned again. I heard once via some Massport official that Boston is the largest market/airport in the U.S. without non-stop service to Asia, and that daily a couple hundred passengers (I want to say around 200 roughly) depart for Tokyo from Boston (with connections elsewhere obviously).

While many have said above that the market for BOS>NRT is just barely large enough, the connections beyond NRT to places such as ICN, SIN, HKG, PVG, and PEK are what will undoubtedly fill the plane. You could probably even run 2 flights a day at some points during the year.

Korean Air operated BOS>ICN with a 747-400 but that route soon was gone around 9/11.

Bottom line: We need a non-stop to Asia without question, and Tokyo is the front runner, the connection opportunities to Asia from Tokyo are endless.
SIN > CVG > BOS
 
centrair
Posts: 2845
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 3:44 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Thu Nov 22, 2007 4:44 am

I would bet that the first flight to Asia from Boston will not be to NRT but ICN. KE is the most likely and the reasons are simple:

ICN doesn't have a slot problem.
KE has one of the largest networks in Asia.
KE will have the 787 and will use it to get to markets where their 777s are to big.

That being said, NW could start BOS-NRT when slots become available in 2009 at NRT. But then their might be a sacrifice of another route/slot for someplace else or just the movement of a one stop to a non-stop such as HKG.
Yes...I am not a KIX fan. Let's Japanese Aviation!
 
jjeff
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 11:52 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Thu Nov 22, 2007 4:51 am



Quoting Carpethead (Reply 18):
If we based it on your argument, JL or NH would have flown to SEA (due to Ichiro), but of course, this hasn't happened and nor will it happen anytime soon.

Sure except that SEA-NRT is already covered by 2 nonstops (UA 777 and NW 330) providing about 500 daily seats. BOS-NRT of course has none making it more attractive for JL or NH.
 
MAH4546
Posts: 24519
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2001 1:44 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Thu Nov 22, 2007 4:55 am

Quoting SQ452 (Reply 21):

Bottom line: We need a non-stop to Asia without question, and Tokyo is the front runner, the connection opportunities to Asia from Tokyo are endless.

Tokyo actually sucks as a connecting hub. The best connecting hub between the U.S. and Asia, offering the maximum amount of connections, is Seoul. No surprise that Korean Air serves more U.S. cities than other Asian airline and is planning on adding Houston and Miami, and maybe others such as Boston, in the next 2-3 years.

[Edited 2007-11-21 21:27:53]
a.
 
IAD787
Posts: 288
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 1:54 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:21 am

This should give a pretty solid answer:

http://www.boston.com/business/globe...t_to_help_bostons_dreams_take_off/

"Because of weight restrictions and the fact Logan's longest runway is just over 10,000 feet - 1,000 to 3,000 feet too short for a wide-body jet to take off fully loaded with people, cargo, and fuel - the Korean 747-400 had to leave Logan with empty seats. It made a stop at Dulles to pick up more passengers before returning to Seoul, which reduced the service's appeal for many Boston-based travelers."
Former FlightBlogger turned Wall Street Journal Aerospace Beat Reporter
 
Pellegrine
Posts: 1766
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 10:19 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:24 am

Whatever the carrier (KE, NH, JL, UA, NW), B787-800 will be the perfect plane for the route. Well actually NH, JL, and UA seem unlikely.
oh boy!!!
 
B752OS
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Thu Nov 22, 2007 12:35 pm



Quoting Carpethead (Reply 18):
If we based it on your argument, JL or NH would have flown to SEA (due to Ichiro), but of course, this hasn't happened and nor will it happen anytime soon.
BOS is just too far in the corner of the US that major hubs have it covered easily. NH nor JL will not go into BOS anytime soon. As many have mentioned, NW is the glimmering hope, but it all comes down to availability of slots at NRT.

I am not saying that having 2 top Japanese baseball players are automatically going to make the flight work. I was simply saying that thanks to them, Boston has gotten a great deal of exposure over in Japan and that more and more
Japanese tourists are going to and have been coming to Boston, which would help the flight out if it were to happen

Quoting SQ452 (Reply 21):
This thread has been discussed a number of times before but I'm glad it's been mentioned again. I heard once via some Massport official that Boston is the largest market/airport in the U.S. without non-stop service to Asia, and that daily a couple hundred passengers (I want to say around 200 roughly) depart for Tokyo from Boston (with connections elsewhere obviously).

And if you add in HKG, PEK, and PVG that's another 250-300 people.

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 20):
Don't misunderstand me; I wasn't trying to imply a causal link there, simply pointing out that NW successfully runs a different aircraft across a different ocean to a VERY different station (BOS-AMS is probably <50% local AMS traffic; BOS-NRT would need to be more like 70-80% local NRT traffic).

But in light of the situation with international gate space at BOS, the fact that NW is running a flight to AMS (and thus uses Terminal E) may actually be key to their ability to start BOS-NRT at some point. More significantly, it's clear that NW has figured out a way to capture a healthy amount of local traffic in Boston in a fairly competitive TATL environment (you rightly point out that KL could fly the route, but in a lot of ways, the US-originating traffic is NW's to capture). If they can do that, there's no reason they can't fly plenty of folks from Boston to Asia if they're the only game in town.

NW/KL must do pretty well on the BOS-AMS service as they have added a second daily flight. I wonder how feasible it would be to have NW do a BOS-ICN run to connect with the KE connections, taking into account if KE has no intentions of flying ICN-BOS.
 
bobnwa
Posts: 4459
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2000 12:10 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Thu Nov 22, 2007 1:05 pm



Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 20):
Don't misunderstand me; I wasn't trying to imply a causal link there, simply pointing out that NW successfully runs a different aircraft across a different ocean to a VERY different station (BOS-AMS is probably <50% local AMS traffic; BOS-NRT would need to be more like 70-80% local NRT traffic).

The BOS-AMS local market is quite a bit less than 50%. Why would BOS-NRT have to be 70-80% local traffic when you consider the connecting possibilities NWA has to itself in NRT? SIN,BKK, ICN,HKG,PEK etc. No other flights to NRT flown by NWA have even close to 70-80% local boardings, (except HNL and GUM) and BOS wouldn't either.
 
Cubsrule
Posts: 11368
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:13 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Fri Nov 23, 2007 8:26 pm



Quoting Bobnwa (Reply 28):
No other flights to NRT flown by NWA have even close to 70-80% local boardings, (except HNL and GUM) and BOS wouldn't either.

That's interesting; I had heard that a lot of the west coast flights were that high as well. I guess I heard wrong...
I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 
bobnwa
Posts: 4459
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2000 12:10 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Fri Nov 23, 2007 8:55 pm



Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 29):
That's interesting; I had heard that a lot of the west coast flights were that high as well. I guess I heard wrong

The West Coast flights on NWA out of Narita are connecting passengers from all over Asia to the flights thus insuring good loads. The majority are not local O&D NRT-West Coast, or West Coast-NRT. The majority are Asia-West Coast or West Coast-Asia via NRT. Narita is a hub for NWA and it works well that way.
 
Cubsrule
Posts: 11368
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:13 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:11 pm



Quoting Bobnwa (Reply 30):
Narita is a hub for NWA and it works well that way.

No question... some other carriers might say a little TOO well (vis a vis China frequencies).
I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 
bobnwa
Posts: 4459
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2000 12:10 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Fri Nov 23, 2007 10:16 pm



Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 31):
No question... some other carriers might say a little TOO well (vis a vis China frequencies).

That is the intention of any company isn't it, to make things work well. If NWA is able to make its China frequencies work well via Japan, then good for them. What carriers would say too well? AA and UA had LHR locked up for years and UA had the same rights as NW at NRT.
US was never in the ballgame until recently so I don't think they had any opinion on it.
DL and CO may have thought so but not too loudly.
 
Cubsrule
Posts: 11368
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:13 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Fri Nov 23, 2007 10:22 pm



Quoting Bobnwa (Reply 32):

That is the intention of any company isn't it, to make things work well. If NWA is able to make its China frequencies work well via Japan, then good for them.

Hey, I'm a proud NW elite... don't think I'm hating on NW (and don't think that the criticism is fair, but it was definitely leveled).
I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 
rwsea
Posts: 2422
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:23 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:36 am



Quoting Carpethead (Reply 18):
If we based it on your argument, JL or NH would have flown to SEA (due to Ichiro), but of course, this hasn't happened and nor will it happen anytime soon.

As mentioned, SEA already has 16x weekly flights to NRT. And while the market has dwindled a bit in the past couple years, lots of Japanese tourists do come to see Ichiro.

Quoting B752OS (Reply 27):
NW/KL must do pretty well on the BOS-AMS service as they have added a second daily flight. I wonder how feasible it would be to have NW do a BOS-ICN run to connect with the KE connections, taking into account if KE has no intentions of flying ICN-BOS.

Pretty unlikely - it would be challenging in terms of aircraft rotation to operate BOS-ICN without a DTW-ICN or something similar. NW would operate NRT-BOS if they did anything.

Quoting Bobnwa (Reply 30):
The West Coast flights on NWA out of Narita are connecting passengers from all over Asia to the flights thus insuring good loads. The majority are not local O&D NRT-West Coast, or West Coast-NRT. The majority are Asia-West Coast or West Coast-Asia via NRT. Narita is a hub for NWA and it works well that way.

Yes it does. NRT certainly isn't the nicest airport in Asia but NW's hub works really well. Easy connections and a generally on-time operation. But, as mentioned, ICN (and HKG too) are much more passenger friendly facilities.
 
allstarflyer
Posts: 3264
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:32 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Sat Nov 24, 2007 2:00 am



Quoting Phxmkeflyer (Thread starter):
Simple question really...but I thought that there would be at least one carrier flying this route nonstop and was surprised to find that there isn't. Any explanation why not?

Two weeks ago, I was in BOS with 2 days to go in my paid vacation. I thought about either heading home to the center of America or going across the pond (Atlantic). My only option (that I could tell - it was about 1PM at the time) was on AA. I figured US/DL/UA would have something listed for late afternoon, but there was nothing.

I'm sure there's some sort of market for that route, but when BOS doesn't have much going across the other pond, I wouldn't see much going by way of the Pacific.
Living the American Dream
 
Rcardinale
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 9:20 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Sat Nov 24, 2007 3:37 am



Quoting Allstarflyer (Reply 35):
I'm sure there's some sort of market for that route, but when BOS doesn't have much going across the other pond

Are you talking about the Atlantic? We have 14 airlines that fly to 18 destinations in Europe soo I don't understand what you are saying
 
bagoldex
Posts: 269
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:33 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:25 am



Quoting Allstarflyer (Reply 35):
but when BOS doesn't have much going across the other pond

What the hell are you talking about?
 
User avatar
chrisnh
Posts: 3329
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 1999 3:59 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:29 am



Quoting BAGoldEx (Reply 37):
Quoting Allstarflyer (Reply 35):
but when BOS doesn't have much going across the other pond

What the hell are you talking about?

Maybe he meant the Caspian Sea, or something  Big grin
 
bobnwa
Posts: 4459
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2000 12:10 am

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Sat Nov 24, 2007 12:38 pm



Quoting Allstarflyer (Reply 35):
I'm sure there's some sort of market for that route, but when BOS doesn't have much going across the other pond

I think you have all of confused. What on earth are you talking about. As pointed out above, 14 airlines across the Atlantic isn't enough??
 
747400sp
Posts: 3832
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 7:27 pm

RE: Why No BOS-NRT Nonstop?

Sat Nov 24, 2007 2:03 pm

[quote=ChrisNH,rep

I agree 100%. First, the 787 will be the plane best-suited to the route. Up till now the planes have been too big and too expensive. Second, I believe it will be an Asian carrier that debuts the route rather than a domestic carrier. Since the route is a thin one, first one in will essentially have it to themselves. The only domestic carrier with a chance would be Northwest, because they'll have the 787 soonest.

Chris in NH[/quote]

I also agree 100%. I think NW should take notes from this topic, and start a BOS-NRT route using their new 787. It is the perfect jet for the BOS-NRT and BOS-NRT is the prefect route for the 787 and NW is the right airline to do it.