safetyDemo
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:39 am

Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:42 am

Hi Everyone,

I reported to work in PIT today and saw, sitting just off the "C" gates, an Air Canada Boeing 767. It was surrounded by fire trucks, had air stairs attached to 1L, and apparently the nosegear was being paid special attention to.

I wouldn't know how to go about finding online what flight it was or why it came here ... so does anyone know?

Thanks!

-safetyDemo

PS - Hope my US friends enjoyed their Thanksgiving!
Please direct your attention to the flight attendants in the cabin...
 
Lexy
Posts: 1265
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:05 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:48 am

Airline Air Canada
Flight Number 401
Departure City (Airport) , ()
Departure Time
Arrival City (Airport) Pittsburgh, PA (PIT)
Arrival Time 11/22/2007 10:32 AM
Remaining Flight Time 00:00
Aircraft Type Boeing 767-200
Current Altitude 0 feet
Current Groundspeed 0 mph
Flight Status Arrived


I believe it was from Montreal, but I may be wrong on that.
Nashville, Tennessee KBNA
 
RP TPA
Posts: 510
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 1999 9:40 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 2:12 am

AC401 (YUL-YYZ) diverted to PIT because of YYZ weather (snow). It was then further delayed due to a "broken tow lug", whatever that is. Arrived PIT 1035, departed at 1518.

Incredibly, we had another YUL-YYZ flt a bit later (AC255) that also diverted to PIT because of weather. Arrived at 1043, departed at 1219. At least that one didn't have a "broken tow lug". So, PIT had 2 Rapidair flts sitting there at the same time. Must have been a helluva morning in Toronto.
 
northstardc4m
Posts: 2724
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2000 11:23 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 2:18 am



Quoting RP TPA (Reply 2):
Must have been a helluva morning in Toronto.

1st major winter storm of the year= chaos in Toronto... no fun getting to work this morning... 2 hours doing what would take me 30 minutes most days. YYZ must of been a mess, though i did hear departures pounding off of Runway 23 while i was stuck on Derry Rd.
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
 
tdscanuck
Posts: 8572
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:25 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 2:42 am



Quoting RP TPA (Reply 2):
It was then further delayed due to a "broken tow lug", whatever that is.

It's the piece of the nose gear where the tug's tow bar attaches. If the ground crew gets too...enthusiastic...they can damage the towing lug.

Tom.
 
KELPkid
Posts: 5247
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:33 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:40 am



Quoting Lexy (Reply 1):
Airline Air Canada
Flight Number 401
Departure City (Airport) , ()
Departure Time
Arrival City (Airport) Pittsburgh, PA (PIT)
Arrival Time 11/22/2007 10:32 AM
Remaining Flight Time 00:00
Aircraft Type Boeing 767-200
Current Altitude 0 feet
Current Groundspeed 0 mph
Flight Status Arrived


I believe it was from Montreal, but I may be wrong on that.

I know that this is a long shot, but what are the chances that this was the Gimli Glider? Anyone have the tail number?
Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
 
Arrow
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:44 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:43 am



Quoting KELPkid (Reply 5):
I know that this is a long shot, but what are the chances that this was the Gimli Glider? Anyone have the tail number?

Zero chance. Glider was retired just a few weeks ago. There was a thread on it.
Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
 
PITrules
Posts: 2109
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2000 11:27 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:11 am



Quoting RP TPA (Reply 2):
Incredibly, we had another YUL-YYZ flt a bit later (AC255) that also diverted to PIT because of weather.

The other flight was an A-320. Both aircraft landed within one minute of each other.
FLYi
 
mel
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 1999 5:13 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:01 am

The Gimli Glider was NOT retired weeks ago. It was intended to be retired, but is still flying. Today the Glider was in Vancouver, operating a 14:30 departure Vancouver-Montreal, so no, the Glider was not in Pittsburgh.
NO URLS in signature
 
FLYACYYZ
Posts: 1820
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 12:13 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:14 am



Quoting Arrow (Reply 6):
Zero chance. Glider was retired just a few weeks ago. There was a thread on it.

The thread refuted that myth. I saw the aircraft in YVR yesterday.
Above and Beyond
 
DCAYOW
Posts: 542
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 3:24 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 2:11 pm

I am perplexed by the choice of diversion airport. It seems weird a Canadian domestic flight would fly all the way down to PIT to divert, if they could have flown to PIT - couldn't they have flown at least back to Ottawa (YOW) or onto London (YXU)? The passengers were not pre-cleared to enter the US so I am sure CBP made those poor people sit on the plane the entire time.

Just weird...
Retorne ao céu...
 
YHMYYZspotter
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 1:06 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:30 pm



Quoting DCAYOW (Reply 10):
I am perplexed by the choice of diversion airport. It seems weird a Canadian domestic flight would fly all the way down to PIT to divert, if they could have flown to PIT - couldn't they have flown at least back to Ottawa (YOW) or onto London (YXU)?

Or what about Hamilton (YHM). We barely had any snow here in this area. It amazes me why the first snow storm takes everyone by surprise still. We live in Canada! It's like its a shock to people that its snowing in November hahaha....
 
User avatar
longhauler
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:00 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:31 pm



Quoting DCAYOW (Reply 10):
I am perplexed by the choice of diversion airport.

PIT is about number 10 on the choice list of alternates for YYZ. If it was used, it is because the top 9 were not suitable.

Weather was very bad in southern Ontario yesterday.
Just because I stopped arguing, doesn't mean I think you are right. It just means I gave up!
 
Arrow
Posts: 2325
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:44 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:57 pm



Quoting FLYACYYZ (Reply 9):
The thread refuted that myth. I saw the aircraft in YVR yesterday.

Oops. Guess I stopped reading it too soon. Sorry about that. Why the sudden change in plans?
Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
 
safetyDemo
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:39 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:00 pm

The number on the plane was something like 621. I briefly got a chance to spot it as the aircraft taxied past on its way to 28R. But I honestly only remember the number on the nosegear door started with a "6" (which they probably all do? The 767s?)

Anyway - thanks for the responses. What a long day for everyone involved!

-safetyDemo
Please direct your attention to the flight attendants in the cabin...
 
cnz3
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:12 pm

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:11 pm



Quoting SafetyDemo (Reply 14):
The number on the plane was something like 621. I briefly got a chance to spot it as the aircraft taxied past on its way to 28R. But I honestly only remember the number on the nosegear door started with a "6" (which they probably all do? The 767s?)

621 is C-FVNM, the oldest in the fleet.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Derek Manning

D94/5 DH1/2/3/4 CR2/7/A/9 E45/70/75/90 319/20/21 734/G/8/9 752/3 762/3/4 313 333 388 L1011 772/L/W
 
DTWAGENT
Posts: 753
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:16 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:22 pm

From what I was able to get on the FAA web site. YYZ was having snow and freezeing rain issues for most of the day. At one point they listed a 4 hour delay in arrival flights because of the weather. But then again it is the goverment web site.....

chuck
 
User avatar
United_fan
Posts: 6374
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 11:11 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:33 pm

Jeez,they could have came to ROC. That's alot closer than PIT. Though,I don't think we have any 'heavy' gates for 767's.
Champagne For My Real Friends,and Real Pain For My Sham Friends
 
FLYACYYZ
Posts: 1820
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 12:13 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 8:12 pm



Quoting Arrow (Reply 13):
Oops. Guess I stopped reading it too soon. Sorry about that. Why the sudden change in plans?

Think they must need the lift as we head into the busy holiday period as they have stepped up 767-300XM conversions

FINS 641/681/682 will be off line undergoing refurbishment in November &
FINS 637/683/684 will be off line undergoing refurbishment in December.

Of note...these are all ex-CP metal.
Above and Beyond
 
cayman
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 2:28 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:19 pm



Quoting FLYACYYZ (Reply 18):
FINS 641/681/682 will be off line undergoing refurbishment in November &
FINS 637/683/684 will be off line undergoing refurbishment in December.

Of note...these are all ex-CP metal.

Good to hear I flew YOW LHR on one of these ex CP 763s recently, by the way service was just great and I had the middle 3 all to myself on an otherwise full flight---but boy that a/c was on its last legs in terms of the interior---BADLY in need of a re-fit.
 
visityyj
Posts: 380
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2000 7:23 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:23 pm



Quoting DCAYOW (Reply 10):
couldn't they have flown at least back to Ottawa (YOW) or onto London (YXU)?

Looking at flightaware it does look at least one of them tried YXU: http://flightaware.com/live/flight/ACA401

My question is why they dispatched them in the first place, surely it didn't deteriorate that badly in the 1-hour window.
 
EXAAUADL
Posts: 1740
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:48 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 10:07 pm

Why couldnt they go back to YUL or YOW?

It would be quite risky to divert to the USA. What if the plane goes out of service and you have a bunch of Canadian pax with no papers to enter the USA?
 
User avatar
longhauler
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:00 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:03 pm



Quoting EXAAUADL (Reply 21):
Why couldnt they go back to YUL or YOW?

They were not above alternate limits at the time of departure. YXU was barely above limits but is not that well equipped to handle a B767. Close to YYZ, which were also below limits were YHM, BUF, YTR and IAG. PIT was likely only being held as a "technical alternate". Meaning it is required, and legal, but not likely to be used.

YYZ ATC which is running at close to maximum at the best of times, likely had to slow down inbound traffic, and the holding fuel was used up. This is very rare, but does happen. I have held PIT as an alternate for YYZ probably 10 times in the last year, and never had to use it.

Not having a close look at the flight plan, I do see that the aircraft was in the air for over 3:30, which means he was holding a LOT of fuel for a :55 flight. I am sure no one in flight dispatch ever though that holding times in YYZ would get close to 2 hours!!! It happens!
Just because I stopped arguing, doesn't mean I think you are right. It just means I gave up!
 
andyinpit
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:45 am

RE: Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT

Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:17 am



Quoting Tdscanuck (Reply 4):
It's the piece of the nose gear where the tug's tow bar attaches. If the ground crew gets too...enthusiastic...they can damage the towing lug.

Tom.

95% of the ramp works for UA in PIT have 15+ years with the company. So it's not some vendor/scab outfit doing work for $7.00/hr, our guys know what they're doing. The AC 767 had a different tow bar hook up versus our 767's. We've had our widebodies divert in from IAD all the time, with no problem. So we had to borrow a towbar for the right configuration from ASI. After pushback the towbar got wedged against the "lug" and after repeated attempts to get it disconnected, the lug tore away from the nose gear, but only half of it actually tore off. So a world of problems came about. #1. As noted above, Pax could not get off the plane. #2. Since the plane couldnt be towed or pushed, it had to remain out on the ramp, which prompted the fire dept. to dispatch to the scene (disabled aircraft) and #3. Air Canada did NOT want a contract mechanic working on one of their aircraft, at all. So there was a back and forth argument to get this mechanic to saw off the rest of the lug and let the plane get the hell out of there. FINALLY it was able to, and off it went.

Who is online