kaitak
Posts: 8934
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 1999 5:49 am

EK And A330-300?

Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:09 pm

You may recall reports, a while back - before EK ordered the A350s - that it was also going to order a good number of A330-300s, as an interim measure (much like SQ did); however, as far as I can see, this came to nothing. Is it still being considered?
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22937
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: EK And A330-300?

Sun Dec 09, 2007 6:21 pm

I imagine it is still being considered, but a ~250t 787-10 would make a fantastic A330-300 replacement so EK might very well be waiting for Boeing to offer it and then will order it along with the 787-8 or 787-9, which would be the A330-200 replacement.
 
A350
Posts: 1010
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 6:40 am

RE: EK And A330-300?

Sun Dec 09, 2007 8:41 pm

As long as EK seats 10 abreast in the T7s but not 9 abreast in the busses, it might after all be more economic to refurbish the oldest 777s and keep them in service longer than planned than purchasing A333s.

Just my  twocents 

A350
 
A342
Posts: 4017
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:05 pm

RE: EK And A330-300?

Sun Dec 09, 2007 8:57 pm



Quoting A350 (Reply 2):
As long as EK seats 10 abreast in the T7s but not 9 abreast in the busses, it might after all be more economic to refurbish the oldest 777s and keep them in service longer than planned than purchasing A333s.

They've already started selling some 777s:
Emirates Selling Three 777s (by A342 Sep 19 2007 in Civil Aviation)

That aside, I wonder why EK and EY haven't chosen the A333. On most of their flights, the A332's range isn't needed, and if filled, the A333 has a lower CASM. Trips cost should be about the same as A332.
Exceptions confirm the rule.
 
excalibur
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 4:49 pm

RE: EK And A330-300?

Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:37 pm



Quoting A342 (Reply 3):
I wonder why EK and EY haven't chosen the A333. On most of their flights, the A332's range isn't needed, and if filled, the A333 has a lower CASM. Trips cost should be about the same as A332.

I wonder that too... I think the A330-300X would perfectly fit their actual fleet, just as QR did, thus making an interesting interim solution before the EIS of the A350XWB. It could be an ideal replacement of the older non-ER 777s too.
 twocents 

Alex.
Aviation is an Art
 
EI321
Posts: 4788
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:43 pm

RE: EK And A330-300?

Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:04 pm

Im not sure they need more planes. They have tonnes of 777s on order.
 
alangirvan
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2000 2:13 pm

RE: EK And A330-300?

Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:18 pm

If lots of airlines take A330s as interim planes until their A350s arrive, there will be a lot of A330s being returned in 7 years time.
 
excalibur
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 4:49 pm

RE: EK And A330-300?

Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:34 pm



Quoting EI321 (Reply 5):
Im not sure they need more planes. They have tonnes of 777s on order.

I totally agree with you, but you know M.Clark galactic ambitions. Nothing is too much for EK! New Dubai airport, traffic expansion (explosion?) and lot of money... They want to be THE biggest. weightlifter 

Alex.
Aviation is an Art
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22937
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: EK And A330-300?

Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:08 am



Quoting Alangirvan (Reply 6):
If lots of airlines take A330s as interim planes until their A350s arrive, there will be a lot of A330s being returned in 7 years time.

They will likely find new homes as it is still a desirable family of aircraft.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 777222LR, AC853, anonms, Baidu [Spider], D328, flyguy89, Freshside3, hoons90, qf2220, qf789, redzeppelin, rtw4010, TWA772LR, Viscount724, Yahoo [Bot], zkanz and 250 guests