gilesdavies
Topic Author
Posts: 2268
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 7:51 pm

Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:51 pm

I was curious to know why Lufthansa has such a lack of a presence in Berlin?

I am looking at this from an outsider looking in (with limited knowledge), but it just seems strange that Germany's largest city with a population of over 3.5 million and the nations capital is only served by a handful of destinations from Germany's own flag carrier...

The airline seems to have missed a trick, with allowing numerous low cost carriers to come in and serve the city to multiple destinations across Europe and the other major legacy carriers of Europe offering good feeds to their respective hubs... They had the opportunity with a new airport being built which is due to open next summer and to have possibly created a hub.

Air Berlin seems to be doing a great job filling the gap, to numerous destinations across Europe and a handful of long haul routes and with them becoming a member of One World in 2012, this is going to secure a bit of a fortress for them at the new airport.

Is this not a missed opportunity Lufthansa?
 
wdleiser
Posts: 865
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 9:32 am

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:21 pm

Because they can easily send everyone through Frankfurt, Munich, or Zurich to just about anyplace in the world without having to invest in new infrastructure and new overhead costs. There is also Dusseldorf to an extent.
 
sandrozrh
Posts: 2420
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:19 am

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:32 pm

I seem to remember somebody saying that Berlin is notoriously low-yielding, and when putting a little thought into it, it makes sense. As far as my frankly limited knowledge can tell, Berlin is neither a large financial nor a large industry/technology center. Germany's financial center is clearly FRA, while large industry/technology centers can be found around DUS in the Ruhrgebiet, aswell as in the south around STR and MUC. Berlin on the other hand is strong in the tourist sector, but as most on this board will know, tourists are low-yielding. This will also explain why LCCs haven't found it hard to establish themselves at Berlin. I've always been amazed that a large global city like Berlin can only generate a rather limited amount of airline passengers, even with currently two civil airports, but then again, I just pretty much explained myself why this is the case.

I think it's no coincidence thats LH's main hubs are at FRA and MUC, with a smaller focus city at DUS.
 
Jonathanxxxx
Posts: 328
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 7:48 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:59 pm

Quoting SandroZRH (Reply 2):
seem to remember somebody saying that Berlin is notoriously low-yielding, and when putting a little thought into it, it makes sense. As far as my frankly limited knowledge can tell, Berlin is neither a large financial nor a large industry/technology center. Germany's financial center is clearly FRA,

  
Completely Agree.

For example, Jacksonville is Florida's largest city. The thing is, even though it's population is large the industry and business ties are not that large. Obviously the main financial center would be Miami/Ft. Lauderdale. Even TPA and RSW have a bit more business ties and industry than Jacksonville, yet JAX can't support flights to Europe yet a city like RSW can afford flights to DUS. It really all depends on the business ties the city has with other places.
 
Semaex
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:17 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Thu Oct 20, 2011 11:53 pm

Quoting SandroZRH (Reply 2):

That is exactly the reason, and you pointed out the circumstances quite well.

Obviously LH could step in to represent themselves in the capital of one of the wealthiest nations of the world, but that would not be a good business case. Any long-haul flight with LH ex BER would bleed money surely, as the cost-base of LH is simply a lot higher than that of AB (and even they can hardly make money on any route). BER is really a hard market to get to for any major. All may want, but the cake is for the LCCs. As pointed out, Berlin is a tourist-heavy and thus low-yielding destination.

But then again why would LH take over any long-haul ex BER anyways? The amount of traffic on LH metal between BER and FRA is fantastic, something like 120 flights per week. As for European traffic: Everyone is invited to go with the carrier of the respective country you are going to, as I understand they have sufficient flights to BER.
// You know you're an aviation enthusiast when you look at your neighbour's cars and think about fleet commonality.
 
luckyone
Posts: 2280
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:50 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:28 am

Quoting SandroZRH (Reply 2):
As far as my frankly limited knowledge can tell, Berlin is neither a large financial nor a large industry/technology center. Germany's financial center is clearly FRA, while large industry/technology centers can be found around DUS in the Ruhrgebiet, aswell as in the south around STR and MUC. Berlin on the other hand is strong in the tourist sector, but as most on this board will know, tourists are low-yielding.

All fallout from the two Germanys. West German businesses never had the confidence en masse to set up shop in West Berlin without subsidies, and a lot of industry in and around East Berlin has sadly gone the way of the dodo.
 
Birdwatching
Posts: 3573
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 10:48 am

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 6:43 am

Lufthansa wasn't allowed to fly into Berlin until 20 years ago, so the FRA hub was well established by that time. When the first A310 landed in Berlin after the fall of the wall, FRA was one of the largest airports in the world and Lufthansa practically ran the place. Why would they give that all up and move to another city just because it is the new capital? Lufthansa isn't stupid, and believe me, if Berlin was a profitable market in LH's business model then Lufthansa would be expanding more.
Besides, FRA being a huge cargo hub, FRA is simply at a more central location in Germany for all the road and rail connections. I'd say, part of the success of FRA is because it's almost exactly in the middle of Germany.

Soren   
All the things you probably hate about travelling are warm reminders that I'm home
 
point2point
Posts: 2080
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:54 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:53 am

Quoting luckyone (Reply 5):
All fallout from the two Germanys. West German businesses never had the confidence en masse to set up shop in West Berlin without subsidies, and a lot of industry in and around East Berlin has sadly gone the way of the dodo.
Quoting luckyone (Reply 5):
Lufthansa wasn't allowed to fly into Berlin until 20 years ago, so the FRA hub was well established by that time. When the first A310 landed in Berlin after the fall of the wall, FRA was one of the largest airports in the world and Lufthansa practically ran the place. Why would they give that all up and move to another city just because it is the new capital? Lufthansa isn't stupid, and believe me, if Berlin was a profitable market in LH's business model then Lufthansa would be expanding more.
Besides, FRA being a huge cargo hub, FRA is simply at a more central location in Germany for all the road and rail connections. I'd say, part of the success of FRA is because it's almost exactly in the middle of Germany.

IIRC, wasn't it up until recently that Berlin was actually considered under the jurisdiction of the U.S., Great Britain, and France in the west part of it, and under the jurisdiction of the former Soviet Union in the east sector? Therefore, even though West Berlin was considered a part of West Germany, it was the U.S., British, and French airlines that that had the authority to fly out of West Berlin, and the Soviet Union likewise with the east. Passing through there many, many years ago, I still remember the Pan Am planes there for that reason, and I believe that Pan Am even made a focus city there.

Also, a good portion of Berlin throughout those years was by far not as developed (economically) as West Germany. Even the western sector of Berlin , because of the circumstances, was considered by many a dying city, and investment seemed to be just a bare minimum and maybe even less. And as stated above, once the wall fell, I believe that things were a mess for a short while in all sorts of ways, but these circumstances also allowed for the LLCs to swoop in and establish themselves very quickly.

LH currently has a slight presence in the city, but since it was already pretty much established elsewhere, what point would it be to use their limited resources (and in economics, everything per se is limited resources) just to duke it out with the LLCs there?
 
PanHAM
Posts: 8530
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:44 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 10:07 am

Quoting point2point (Reply 7):
IIRC, wasn't it up until recently that Berlin was actually considered under the jurisdiction of the U.S., Great Britain, and France in the west part of it, and under the jurisdiction of the former Soviet Union in the east sector? Therefore, even

If you consider a good 21 years ago "recently" you are right. The 4 powers had full sovereignty over Berlin which was only turned to the Federal Republic of Germany in the 2 + 4 treaty signed in Mosvow Sept 12, 1990.

The median income in Berlin is not that high and BER is mainly a low cost destination for young people having a party. the industrial base could be better and shuttling the pax to their main hubs is the better way to catch BER traffic . Besides, LH also has low cost Germanwings in the game.
powered by Eierlikör
 
LondonCity
Posts: 964
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:57 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 11:47 am

As others have mentioned, Berlin is a "blue collar" destination compared with the wealthier cities of HAM, FRA, DUS and MUC so there is not the volume of high-yielding premium traffic.

Look at the mixed fortunes of LH's service to London where flight schedules (from LH) change year by year. You would think the capital cities of two of the EU's most important countries would have a better link by Germany's national airline.

Notice too that very few long-haul foreign airlines serve Berlin. SQ tried in the past (with a service into SXF) but it did not last for more than a few years. Has DL ceased its transatlantic service yet ?

QR is a shining exception and, of course, EK would like to start flights into Berlin. But the Gulf airlines have the advantage of carrying much 6th freedom traffic.
 
jfk777
Posts: 5822
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 11:55 am

Lufthansa will probably have long haul flights at some point to Star hubs. New York, Chicago, Tokyo, Singapore, Toronto and Sao Paulo will probably be flown. LH will base some A340 in Berlin, eventually.
 
PanHAM
Posts: 8530
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:44 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:00 pm

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 10):
Lufthansa will probably have long haul flights at some point to Star hubs. New York, Chicago, Tokyo, Singapore, Toronto and Sao Paulo will probably be flown. LH will base some A340 in Berlin, eventually

why should LH open a fourth hub in Germany when the traffic base is not there? Look how long it taks to develop DUS which has a much greater catchment area than BER will ever have.
powered by Eierlikör
 
point2point
Posts: 2080
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:54 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:12 pm

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 8):
If you consider a good 21 years ago "recently" you are right. The 4 powers had full sovereignty over Berlin which was only turned to the Federal Republic of Germany in the 2 + 4 treaty signed in Mosvow Sept 12, 1990.

Well, yes, I guess, and all one could say is - "oh my, how time flies......."


 
 
PlaneInsomniac
Posts: 351
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:34 am

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:56 pm

Also note that while Berlin may be Germany's largest city, the metropolitan regions Berlin-Brandenburg, Rhein-Main (around Frankfurt) and München each have a comparably sized population of between 5.5 and 6 million. (In the case of Berlin-Brandenburg and München, these are areas corresponding to ca. 2 hours driving distance from the center, while Rhein-Main, notably, only is half as big.) In the case of München, even the smaller immediate urban agglomeration ("Planungsregion"), roughly corresponding to the coverage area of München's light rail system (S-Bahn), has a population of 2.6 million.

Add to that the already discussed much greater wealth and industrial importance of Rhein-Main and München compared to Berlin, and it becomes clear where the more important markets are for LH.

History certainly played a big role, but unification was 20 years ago. I am sure LH management considered installing a big hub in Berlin, but they clearly put the emphasis on MUC as their second major hub in Germany. They must have had their reaons...
Am I cured? Slept 5 hours on last long-haul flight...
 
GCT64
Posts: 1259
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:34 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:18 pm

I suspect the Berlin market will evolve once the new airport is open. There is high-tech business in Berlin (for example, my company has its German office at the Adlershof Science and Technology park - one of the biggest in Europe with, IIRC, 16,000 scientists on site and, interestingly, on the site of Johannisthal Air Field where Germany's first powered flight took place). I know others in the UK who regularly travel to Berlin on pharma/medical business.

At the moment, splitting the traffic between TXL (Legacy airlines but not well linked to the public transport system) and SXF (better linked but LCC and a pretty horrible travel experience) is not efficient for city of its size. In my view, as the infrastructure investments pay off (not just BER but rail investment is going on all over the city) and the airlines consolidate at BER, I would expect to see higher levels of airline service.

From my experience, the LCC flights into SXF aren't all tourists and students, there are actually quite a lot of business people on them (we use Easy and Ryanair to travel from the UK to our office).

What happens as LH, BA, AF, IB meet 4U, FR and U2 at the new airport will be interesting. I suspect it will end up the same as MUC with 4U and FR co-existing with the legacies and FR deciding it is to too expensive to operate ultra-LCC services from.
Flown in: A30B,A306,A310,A319,A320,A321,A332,A333,A343,A346,A388,BA11,BU31,B190, B461,(..53 more types..),VC10,WESX
 
EddieDude
Posts: 6171
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 10:19 am

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 4:18 pm

I would like to add that in the future we might see Berlin become a higher-yielding destination. The large number of passengers who travel to Berlin for governmental and diplomatic reasons probably constitute a high-yielding group already. In addition, it seems Berlin is becoming as of late one of the preferred sites for tech companies to establish themselves:

http://www.reuters.com/video/2011/08...reative-startups?videoId=217830118

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=13753267

http://www.ota-berlin.de/blog/06/04/...9-attracking-high-tech-industries/

If this trend continues and some of these startups begin to grow, then we will see increased travel demand for bankers, lawyers, consultants, etc., as well as a large group of local businesspeople who will need to fly to many places within and outside Europe and who will be willing to pay for flexible economy tickets and for business class tickets.
Next flights: MEX-LAX AM 738, LAX-PVG DL 77L, SHA-PEK CA 789, PEK-PVG CA A332, PVG-ORD MU 77W, ORD-MEX AM 738
 
jfk777
Posts: 5822
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 6:10 pm

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 11):
why should LH open a fourth hub in Germany when the traffic base is not there? Look how long it taks to develop DUS which has a much greater catchment area than BER will ever have.

MY scenario would NOT turn Berlin into a 4th hub but a focus city like DUS. Lufthansa is Germany's airline not " Munich & Frankfurt Airways".
 
fraT
Posts: 992
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 4:32 am

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 6:53 pm

A lot of reasons have been mentioned but to make it a bit more clear, there is none of the 30 German DAX (similar to the Dow Jones in the US) companies headquartered in BER. It is true, that the number of companies is growing but BER is still far behind the Rhein Main area (FRA), Ruhrgebiet (served mainly by DUS) and the MUC metro area.

There is Government travel but not that much to bring more intercont flights to BER. The new airport will finally give the city an adequate airport and the traffic numbers will go up. But the capacity will already be limited once the new airport opens next year.

LH has already two major hubs in a comparatively small country with DUS being a focus city and ZRH, BRU, VIE closeby hubs of their daughter airlines. So there is really no need for them to bring widebodies to BER. I think that some Star partner might fly there with small equipment, which LH does not have (757 or 767) and it might be also a good destination once airlines are getting the 787.
 
Semaex
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:17 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:59 pm

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 10):
Lufthansa will probably have long haul flights at some point to Star hubs. New York, Chicago, Tokyo, Singapore, Toronto and Sao Paulo will probably be flown. LH will base some A340 in Berlin, eventually.

Not sure where you conclude this rise in traffic from, but it's certainly also my secret desire.
The only way I see premium traffic growing in BER is that all these students of the current generation base their center of life in and around the city and not move west in time. That way per capita income can slowly rise and make Berlin more attractive to legacies. The past 20 years have shown that subsidies alone do not make Berlin become a more desirable location to settle a company and attract wealthy people.


Quoting jfk777 (Reply 16):
MY scenario would NOT turn Berlin into a 4th hub but a focus city like DUS. Lufthansa is Germany's airline not " Munich & Frankfurt Airways".

I don't like this "One-City-Airlines" talk around a.net, whether it be BA or, randomly enough, LH. After all, airlines are chasing after the markets which bring the most money, and if only one or a handful of cities in a country can sustain permanent traffic, then so be it. I'd never expect LH to step into a market which will bleed them money, because if that happens then only taxpayer's money will sustain such traffic, and personally I think that's the worst case scenario for both an airline and the public.


Quoting frat (Reply 17):
So there is really no need for them to bring widebodies to BER. I think that some Star partner might fly there with small equipment, which LH does not have (757 or 767) and it might be also a good destination once airlines are getting the 787.

Here's to hoping for 787 traffic to BER!
// You know you're an aviation enthusiast when you look at your neighbour's cars and think about fleet commonality.
 
PanHAM
Posts: 8530
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:44 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:14 pm

Quoting PlaneInsomniac (Reply 13):
hey must have had their reaons...
Quoting jfk777 (Reply 16):
MY scenario would NOT turn Berlin into a 4th hub but a focus city like DUS. Lufthansa is Germany's airline not " Munich & Frankfurt Airways".

DUS has become a mini hub, it's not only the 5 long distance flight they will have from next year, it is a substantial European net as well. HAM is a focus city, STR comes next and BER after that. What developes in BER emains to be seen.
powered by Eierlikör
 
sandrozrh
Posts: 2420
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:19 am

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:26 pm

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 16):
MY scenario would NOT turn Berlin into a 4th hub but a focus city like DUS. Lufthansa is Germany's airline not " Munich & Frankfurt Airways".

The days when airlines were able (or rather stupid enough) to base their business decisions on national pride have long gone. Airlines, like many other privately run companies, have to base their decisions on financial aspects. Running four hubs in a country the size of Germany is economical nonsense, period. By your definition, BA would be London airways, Swiss Zurich airways, Iberia Madrid airways, Air France Paris airways, Alitalia Rome airways, KLM Amsterdam airways.. Do you see a pattern here? Looking at their competition, it's already quite remarkable that LH manages to run let's say.. 2.5 hubs successfully.
 
WROORD
Posts: 665
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:36 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Fri Oct 21, 2011 11:43 pm

I've seen this topic discussed indetails at least four times within the last couple of years...(where is the moderator when you need them?)....
It is easy to speculate, but simple look at LH official statement on this matter suggest that at least now they do not want to expend their service in BBI. BBI is AB territory hence the new TXL-LAX service for summer 2012.
 
LAXintl
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sat Oct 22, 2011 1:37 am

I'd be curious if any one here could point me to a source of demographic and economic data about German cities/states.

Be curious to dig into the numbers a bit and get a refreshed feel to both their macro and per-capita standings.
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
Semaex
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:17 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sat Oct 22, 2011 1:38 am

Quoting WROORD (Reply 21):
It is easy to speculate, but simple look at LH official statement on this matter suggest that at least now they do not want to expend their service in BBI. BBI is AB territory hence the new TXL-LAX service for summer 2012.

As far as LH statements go, they explicitly said that BER is going to be a "focus city", much like HAM and STR are in the LH network. That is not to say that coverage is going to be the same in BER as the other places...
// You know you're an aviation enthusiast when you look at your neighbour's cars and think about fleet commonality.
 
bohica
Posts: 2298
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:21 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:01 am

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 10):
Lufthansa will probably have long haul flights at some point to Star hubs. New York, Chicago, Tokyo, Singapore, Toronto and Sao Paulo will probably be flown. LH will base some A340 in Berlin, eventually.

I remember back in 2000 when LH flew an A343 Berlin-IAD. The service didn't last too long. IIRC it only lasted one summer never to operate again.
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18834
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:35 am

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 22):
I'd be curious if any one here could point me to a source of demographic and economic data about German cities/states.

Here's a starting point. Also see the "Links".
http://www.statistik-portal.de/Statistik-Portal/en/

Since this thread involved Berlin, here are the English versions of statistical publications covering Berlin and surrounding Brandenberg.

Berlin:
http://www.statistik-berlin-brandenb...e/kleinestatistik/kBEst_2010_e.pdf
http://www.statistik-berlin-brandenb...Brochure/berlin_in_Zahlen_engl.pdf

Brandenberg:
http://www.statistik-berlin-brandenb...e/kleinestatistik/kBBst_2010_e.pdf
http://www.statistik-berlin-brandenb...ure/brandenburg_in_Zahlen_engl.pdf

The Federal statistics yearbook is in German but the introductory pages are also in English.
http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/port...plateId=renderPrint.psml__nnn=true

This English publication may also be of interest. The 2009 edition seems to be the latest.
http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/port...hures/Pocketbook,property=file.pdf
 
PanHAM
Posts: 8530
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:44 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sat Oct 22, 2011 6:43 am

Quoting bohica (Reply 24):
I remember back in 2000 when LH flew an A343 Berlin-IAD. The service didn't last too long. IIRC it only lasted one summer never to operate again.

I think that was the last time LH did something under poltical pressure and if it was just for proving the point. Interesting enough is that the German Air Force was the competitor on that route as they regularly fly CGN-IAD.
powered by Eierlikör
 
twa@fra
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 8:10 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sat Oct 22, 2011 10:29 am

Agree that BER will need some time till they get anything close to DUS by LH, but they wont easily give it up to AB, once their intercont. routes becomes serious and serving these markets direct helps to defend premium traffic against the middle east carriers
 
LAXintl
Posts: 20183
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sat Oct 22, 2011 3:48 pm

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 25):
Here's a starting point.

Thanks much for the links.   
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
Someone83
Posts: 2899
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 5:47 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:36 pm

Quoting gilesdavies (Thread starter):
Air Berlin seems to be doing a great job filling the gap

Looking at their financial results I wouldn't said their doing a greit job. They might be filling a gap, but that gap ain't much profitable.....
 
pelican
Posts: 2429
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 9:51 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:48 pm

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 8):
The median income in Berlin is not that high and BER is mainly a low cost destination for young people having a party.
Quoting LondonCity (Reply 9):
As others have mentioned, Berlin is a "blue collar" destination compared with the wealthier cities of HAM, FRA, DUS and MUC so there is not the volume of high-yielding premium traffic.
Quoting Semaex (Reply 18):
The past 20 years have shown that subsidies alone do not make Berlin become a more desirable location to settle a company and attract wealthy people.

Wealth or income of people is, if at all, a minor factor. High yield traffic is mostly generated by business and not by leisure flights. It's the lack of business in Berlin that counts (lack of business also means less income & wealth).

Quoting GCT64 (Reply 14):
I suspect the Berlin market will evolve once the new airport is open.

Indeed. The catch 22 that Berlin has not enough international flights to attract big business and not enough big business to attract international flights will loose some of its truth once BER opens.

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 11):
Quoting jfk777 (Reply 10):
Lufthansa will probably have long haul flights at some point to Star hubs. New York, Chicago, Tokyo, Singapore, Toronto and Sao Paulo will probably be flown. LH will base some A340 in Berlin, eventually
why should LH open a fourth hub in Germany when the traffic base is not there? Look how long it taks to develop DUS which has a much greater catchment area than BER will ever have.

At least it seems LH isn't ruling out to open intercontienental flights from BER. They build a hangar big enough for A 340s at BER...

pelican
 
european742
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 2:39 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:11 pm

Its simply a case as others have mentioned of thats where the business is, its exactly the same in Switzerland, why was Zurich established as the main hub and not the capital Berne? all for the same reason hence why BRN only has a small regional airport, there is not much business there.
 
workhorse
Posts: 215
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:35 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:34 pm

OK, if Berlin is so low yielding and so uninteresting, then why all the lobbying to prevent Emirates flying to it?   
 
Semaex
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:17 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sun Oct 23, 2011 12:35 am

Quoting workhorse (Reply 32):
OK, if Berlin is so low yielding and so uninteresting, then why all the lobbying to prevent Emirates flying to it?

Because there are 127 weekly flights on LH to FRA, where pax are ought to step into the plane to Indonesia...
// You know you're an aviation enthusiast when you look at your neighbour's cars and think about fleet commonality.
 
dazeflight
Posts: 481
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 1999 1:32 am

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sun Oct 23, 2011 3:44 am

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 19):
DUS has become a mini hub, it's not only the 5 long distance flight they will have from next year, it is a substantial European net as well. HAM is a focus city, STR comes next and BER after that. What developes in BER emains to be seen.

While HAM and STR might have more destinations served by LH, the amount of flights are a different story. LH roughly has 1,5 times the amount of flights from TXL compared to STR.

Quoting european742 (Reply 31):
Its simply a case as others have mentioned of thats where the business is, its exactly the same in Switzerland, why was Zurich established as the main hub and not the capital Berne? all for the same reason hence why BRN only has a small regional airport, there is not much business there.

Sorry, but that comparison is bollocks. Bern is a small city not far from Zurich. Berlin might not have as much higher-yielding traffic as FRA or MUC do, but the origin traffic is a big as in FRA and larger than in MUC.

For me, the amazing thing is that LH currently does not manage to serve more than two international destinations from Berlin. We are not talking about intercontinental here, no, international. And yes, a lot of those destinations are succesfully served by non-LCCs with multiple daily flights.
 
PanHAM
Posts: 8530
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:44 pm

RE: Lufthansa's Presence In Berlin

Sun Oct 23, 2011 8:05 am

Quoting dazeflight (Reply 34):
And yes, a lot of those destinations are succesfully served by non-LCCs with multiple daily flights.

....feeding their hubs also with long distance traffic. Nomal biz for BA, AF/KL. For LH that would be spoke to spoke routes. Add to the cities served by LH those served by Star partners and OS/LX the overall picture improves.

Quoting dazeflight (Reply 34):
While HAM and STR might have more destinations served by LH, the amount of flights are a different story. LH roughly has 1,5 times the amount of flights from TXL compared to STR.

sure, because of the remote location of BER, flights to DUS, CGN, FRA,STR,MUC have no direct competition from ICE trains, that adds up in numbers.
powered by Eierlikör

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AAlaxfan, airnorth, Baidu [Spider], boscmh, chrisnh, coolian2, dubaiamman243, gcskye, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], HELyes, jpetekyxmd80, klakzky123, lakeeffect, lavalampluva, msycajun, n0ct, nikeson13, nws2002, NZdsgnr, piedmont762, piedmontf284000, Polot, ScottB, sdh9, TWA1985, Tyrol, ucdtim17 and 369 guests