jet72uk
Topic Author
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:14 pm

Sri Lankan Eyes LGW

Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:10 pm

 
fcogafa
Posts: 861
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:37 pm

RE: Sri Lankan Eyes LGW

Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:21 pm

That is a frightening prospect if you have seen how much runway their A340s use at LHR!
 
skipness1E
Posts: 3370
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:18 am

RE: Sri Lankan Eyes LGW

Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:58 pm

Quoting fcogafa (Reply 1):
That is a frightening prospect if you have seen how much runway their A340s use at LHR!

Same as the Virgin A343s and got the photos to prove it.
 
gilesdavies
Posts: 2268
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 7:51 pm

RE: Sri Lankan Eyes LGW

Thu Nov 10, 2011 12:22 pm

Quoting fcogafa (Reply 1):
That is a frightening prospect if you have seen how much runway their A340s use at LHR!

Don't quite get your point?!

LGW has a 3,316m/10,879ft runway... This is capable of handling all passenger aircraft!

An A340-300 at MTOW only requires a 2900m runway, and that would not be required on a route to Sri Lanka. They may even choose to their A330-200's on the routes.

In order to preserve engines and fuel these days, pilots rarely use full thrust for take off and will choose a power appropriate to the runway they are operating out of.
 
KFlyer
Posts: 316
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:05 pm

RE: Sri Lankan Eyes LGW

Thu Nov 10, 2011 12:36 pm

Quoting gilesdavies (Reply 3):
They may even choose to their A330-200's on the routes.

Per what I've heard, the 332 can carry no cargo on the route.
The opinions above are solely my own and do not express those of my employers or clients.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: aviationaware, Baidu [Spider], Brundd, CHCalfonzo, Google [Bot], Indy, pugman211, springtx, timboflier215, WA707atMSP, ZK-NBT and 159 guests