User avatar
TVNWZ
Topic Author
Posts: 1655
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:28 am

Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 1:29 am

As suggested by srbmod, here is an airline installed hard IFE product vs all other forms thread. Let the discussion start!

I very rarely use Delta's installed IFE. But, I do use wi-fi extensively. I also think in the airlines rush to cut costs and use less fuel the heavy, installed traditional systems will give way to personal laptops and tablets. If the airlines elect to continue offering separate IFE, I think it will be something like digi players or pre-loaded tablets. Less weight, better quality.

Now your thoughts.
 
N62NA
Posts: 4006
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:05 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 1:42 am

The only thing I use the installed IFE for (on planes so equipped) is for the "Airshow/Moving Map" feature. Otherwise, give me WiFi and I'd be happy.
 
SonomaFlyer
Posts: 1868
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:47 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 1:50 am

I'd generally agree with tablet/wifi on most flights but long flights (TATL/TransPac) i.e. over about six hours, its difficult for devices to store enough content to last the entire flight (even assuming you can plug the thing in at your seat).

UA has talked up streaming on 747 in Y. It will be interesting to see the product offering. Hopefully, it'll be superior to the product offered on the newly config'd 777's which charge about $10.00 for not much content.
 
DLPMMM
Posts: 2121
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:34 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 1:58 am

I almost never use the wifi and I use the IFE all the time. I dislike the digiplayers and tablets that I have used on various airlines currently using them.

I am a DL DM with over 2 MM and an AA EXP.

Different strokes for different folks.
 
AirCanada787
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:56 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 2:18 am

Quoting DLPMMM (Reply 3):
I almost never use the wifi and I use the IFE all the time.

Currently in Canada we don't have much choice when it comes to routes with Wi-fi. However I too prefer to use the IFE over my own device, I wouldn't spend my whole flight just surfing the web. I don't always travel with my laptop and even if I do I'd rather use a system installed on the plane so I don't have to have my laptop taking up the tray table. Plus Its great when airlines like AC have the system switched on as soon as you leave the gate so you can use it during takeoff and landing, when other deices have to be put away.
The mind, like a parachute, functions only when open.
 
United1
Posts: 2862
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 9:21 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 2:47 am

Quoting SonomaFlyer (Reply 2):
Hopefully, it'll be superior to the product offered on the newly config'd 777's which charge about $10.00 for not much content.

There is no charge for IFE on UAs 777s....
I know the voices in my head aren't real but sometimes their ideas are just awesome!!!
 
frmrCapCadet
Posts: 1023
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 8:24 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 3:36 am

Can an engineer chime in? What issues would there be with recharging power available at all seats. Our library has 5(?) amp connections available. Do you really need that much? What are the weight differentials between builtin IFE, and Wifi plus charging capability?

One advantage of Wifi is that it encompasses most entertainment features, whereas IFE does not provide the web.
Buffet: the airline business...has eaten up capital...like..no other (business)
 
TSS
Posts: 2483
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:52 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 3:50 am

Quoting TVNWZ (Thread starter):
If the airlines elect to continue offering separate IFE, I think it will be something like digi players or pre-loaded tablets. Less weight, better quality.

Agreed.

Quoting N62NA (Reply 1):
The only thing I use the installed IFE for (on planes so equipped) is for the "Airshow/Moving Map" feature.

That is a feature I would enjoy, but I can't justify spending $6-$10 per flight just for that feature. It would be nice if the "Airshow/Moving Map" was the default program on the IFE screen.

Quoting SonomaFlyer (Reply 2):
UA has talked up streaming on 747 in Y. It will be interesting to see the product offering. Hopefully, it'll be superior to the product offered on the newly config'd 777's which charge about $10.00 for not much content.

That has been my problem with the IFE systems I've encountered: Poor value for the money because of limited content. My cheap soul will not allow me to pony up $6-$10 for the privilege of watching on a tiny screen either one or two movies in which I have not the slightest interest or reruns of mediocre TV shows that I've already seen multiple times.

It seems to me that a power port at each seat coupled with on-board WiFI would be a much lighter and easier to maintain setup for airlines, and adding the option of renting an iPad/Kindle/etc. for those not already possessing such a device (of which I am one) should take care of in-flight entertainment needs quite nicely. Until then, I'll just make do by looking out the window or reading a book.
Able to kill active threads stone dead with a single post!
 
User avatar
Tugger
Posts: 6019
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:38 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 4:24 am

Quoting TSS (Reply 7):
That has been my problem with the IFE systems I've encountered: Poor value for the money because of limited content. My cheap soul will not allow me to pony up $6-$10 for the privilege of watching on a tiny screen either one or two movies in which I have not the slightest interest or reruns of mediocre TV shows that I've already seen multiple times.

And don't forget that whatever you watch is always "airplane edited". That was an interesting discovery I made once, that there are essentially three "editions" of movies (and two for TV shows): one is the original unedited version, second is the "for public broadcast" version and they edit out profanity and sexual stuff and some violence etc., but the third is an "airplane" version for situations where essentially anyone may be able to view without supervision or privacy. So the airplane mode can be REALLY chopped up.

As lousy as Die Hard 4 is, the one I watched on a flight I was on was so chopped up it was ridiculous.

Oh and this goes for music as well. You will not here the original unedited version of any song that has "questionable" lyrics.

Tugg

[Edited 2012-05-23 21:26:25]
I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
 
User avatar
DocLightning
Posts: 19765
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:51 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 4:27 am

Quoting SonomaFlyer (Reply 2):

I'd generally agree with tablet/wifi on most flights but long flights (TATL/TransPac) i.e. over about six hours, its difficult for devices to store enough content to last the entire flight (even assuming you can plug the thing in at your seat).

And if the flight goes over 10 hours, you run into battery issues, even with WiFI

Quoting SonomaFlyer (Reply 2):
UA has talked up streaming on 747 in Y.

But will they install charging ports to support it? I doubt it.
-Doc Lightning-

"The sky calls to us. If we do not destroy ourselves, we will one day venture to the stars."
-Carl Sagan
 
tdscanuck
Posts: 8572
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:25 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 4:38 am

Quoting frmrCapCadet (Reply 6):
What issues would there be with recharging power available at all seats.

It's not practical to provide enough capacity to every seat to have everyone charging at once; you have to play some complicated statistical games to try to ensure, with high probability, that everyone who wants power will get it without overloading any one bus.

Running power to every seat is relatively simple; the latest generation of IFE from Panasonic and Thales does exactly that.

Quoting frmrCapCadet (Reply 6):
Our library has 5(?) amp connections available. Do you really need that much?

No. 2 amps is plenty for most foreseeable portable electronic devices.

Quoting frmrCapCadet (Reply 6):
What are the weight differentials between builtin IFE, and Wifi plus charging capability?

IFE weighs more because of all the screens, boxes, and wiring. WiFi is relatively light (the antenna + transmitter are big but there's only one). The power system isn't light but it's no worse than the IFE data system.

Quoting frmrCapCadet (Reply 6):
One advantage of Wifi is that it encompasses most entertainment features, whereas IFE does not provide the web.

The major issue with WiFi is cost; IFE isn't cheap but, relative to WiFi, it's cheaper and predictable. All current airplane WiFi products that I'm aware of charge the airline by the amount of data used. It's been challenging to come up with a business model to cover the WiFi costs. People expect IFE to be free (and that makes some sense since it's almost entirely a fixed cost once the airline purchases the content) but it's not as simple with WiFi.

Tom.
 
nasula
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:20 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 6:28 am

For wifi the ither issue is the technology itself. Does anyone know of any accesspoints that handle 200+ users properly on a single frequency or handles multip,e frequencies while handling 200+ users?
 
User avatar
Tugger
Posts: 6019
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:38 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 7:18 am

Quoting nasula (Reply 11):
For wifi the ither issue is the technology itself. Does anyone know of any accesspoints that handle 200+ users properly on a single frequency or handles multip,e frequencies while handling 200+ users?

Wouldn't be very hard at all. I forgot how many but Apple had to handle something like 1,000 "live" connections for the press at the iPad event at Yerba Buena Center. So 200,and where not every user is a power user, wouldn't be too hard.

Tugg
I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
 
blueflyer
Posts: 3633
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 4:17 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 8:56 am

The funny thing is, the IFE vs WiFi debate is almost academic. It will be years before there's enough bandwidth at affordable prices for passengers to use their own device to stream in bandwidth-heavy entertainment from the ground up.

What will happen before that is that IFE will be delivered to each seat over Wi-Fi using one of two scenarios.
Some airlines will retain at-seat screens (perhaps in premium classes only) that will be fed from a centralized entertainment library over an in-plane WiFi network, while other airlines will do away with the screens entirely and tell passengers to connect directly to the library controller through their own device's WiFi antenna.

Quoting nasula (Reply 11):
For wifi the ither issue is the technology itself.

There is no concurrent connection capacity issue. Finding an access point able to handle 200+ concurrent connections is easy. The problem is that many access points still top out at 1GB of shared bandwidth for all the connections. Many deployments require multiple access points not because of the number of connections, but to ensure that each connection has enough bandwidth...

Quoting tugger (Reply 8):
And don't forget that whatever you watch is always "airplane edited".

In the US, perhaps. I've watched stuff on Air Canada that wouldn't make a US broadcast network's prime time line up.
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has no clothes.
 
warden145
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:36 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 8:57 am

Quoting SonomaFlyer (Reply 2):
I'd generally agree with tablet/wifi on most flights but long flights (TATL/TransPac) i.e. over about six hours, its difficult for devices to store enough content to last the entire flight (even assuming you can plug the thing in at your seat).

Agreed...even if I'm only using it lightly, my laptop would die after 4 hours or so on battery, and that's with a relatively new extended-life battery. I could put enough stuff on my laptop to keep me occupied for a 10 hour flight, but unless there's a way to plug in, it wouldn't be very useful after the battery died.

IMHO if IFE's going to be ditched on long flights, airlines really need to supply some sort of recharging power. I can spend a 3 hour flight looking out the window or reading a newspaper, but for a 10 hour flight, movies really do make the flight go quicker    and that could well influence my decision on which airline to go with.

Quoting tugger (Reply 8):
the third is an "airplane" version for situations where essentially anyone may be able to view without supervision or privacy. So the airplane mode can be REALLY chopped up.

I knew about this, but I was surprised to watch a couple of movies and TV shows on BA that weren't edited in any way shape or form...including some F-bombs and even an unedited "intimate" scene from the film "Elizabeth".

Maybe the "airplane version" is a U.S. thing? I've never played with the IFE system on a U.S. airline...
ETOPS = Engine Turns Off, Passengers Swim
 
United1
Posts: 2862
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 9:21 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 12:11 pm

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 9):
Quoting SonomaFlyer (Reply 2):
UA has talked up streaming on 747 in Y.

But will they install charging ports to support it? I doubt it.


They have been looking at doing just that....adding WiFi that will let you surf the internet worldwide, streaming prerecorded content and power ports. The cost issue has always been that the recaro seats they use will not support the current generation of PTV's they can however add power without too much trouble.
I know the voices in my head aren't real but sometimes their ideas are just awesome!!!
 
User avatar
1337Delta764
Posts: 4899
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:02 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 12:15 pm

I still expect IFE and Wi-Fi will continue to coexist. Many people like the convenience of having a PTV, and also don't like the hassle of packing and unpacking their laptops or tablets, as well as them taking up space.
The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
 
brilondon
Posts: 3018
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 6:56 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 12:24 pm

I don't like the IFE on most of the airlines, the movie selection usually sucks and are not to my taste. My preference is to have my laptop and just use the power supplied by the aircraft, and have the movies I want to watch downloaded on to my computer. The moving map is interesting in that it lets me know how much longer I will have to wait to get off the aircraft but that is all the current IFE holds for me. I even don't really need that as I can get that information off the computer. This is my preference anyway.
Rush for ever; Yankees all the way!!
 
User avatar
TVNWZ
Topic Author
Posts: 1655
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:28 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 2:11 pm

Howabout digi players or pre-loaded tablets.?

I can see a scenerio where flight attendants slide down the aisles with carts hawking pre-loaded tablets from a cart. Battery running low, well sir, here's a fresh one, just let me slide your credit card.

I think we also have to project forward. It really hasn't been that long when those bulky tvs in the middle of the aisle were the latest and greatest. What will the future hold?
 
softrally
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:32 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 5:26 pm

I hardly ever use the IFE. I'd rather have a power port and WiFi; I normally watch Mayday on my iPod and occasionally play games on my laptop. I don't like the movie and music selections on IFE systems. The only thing I use the IFE for is for the flight information.

Quoting nasula (Reply 11):

For wifi the ither issue is the technology itself. Does anyone know of any accesspoints that handle 200+ users properly on a single frequency or handles multip,e frequencies while handling 200+ users?

The speed will be the biggest problem. I have problems accessing basic websites on VIA rail (There are routers on each train). I couldn't even come to A.net; it would be even worse on aircraft.
Flown on: 738, 744, 762/763, 772, 77W, 788, A306, A318/319/320/321, A332/333, E145, E190, CRJ700
 
boeingorbust
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:44 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 6:02 pm

Quoting AirCanada787 (Reply 4):
Currently in Canada we don't have much choice when it comes to routes with Wi-fi. However I too prefer to use the IFE over my own device, I wouldn't spend my whole flight just surfing the web. I don't always travel with my laptop and even if I do I'd rather use a system installed on the plane so I don't have to have my laptop taking up the tray table. Plus Its great when airlines like AC have the system switched on as soon as you leave the gate so you can use it during takeoff and landing, when other deices have to be put away.

I think that was a TC issue wasn't it? Now airlines in Canada can have their IFE on during taxi takeoff and landing as well as the ability to have cell phones on during taxi. I like AC's new IFE but wifi would be nice as well.

Perhaps airlines could offer both? Wifi doesn't add as much to the CASM as IFE does but I don't think IFE can be done away with all together. How about a choice to keep IFE in and charge for wifi like a lot of airports do. Pay a few bucks to use wifi on your flight if you want it.
 
brilondon
Posts: 3018
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 6:56 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 6:03 pm

Quoting tugger (Reply 8):
And don't forget that whatever you watch is always "airplane edited". That was an interesting discovery I made once, that there are essentially three "editions" of movies (and two for TV shows): one is the original unedited version, second is the "for public broadcast" version and they edit out profanity and sexual stuff and some violence etc., but the third is an "airplane" version for situations where essentially anyone may be able to view without supervision or privacy. So the airplane mode can be REALLY chopped up.

Well, on DL they show unedited versions of movies including nudity and the use of the F-bomb and other such mind numbing dialogue in the movies. I don't see any reason why they need to edit anything out. Most people are exposed such reality type dialogue on network television these days.
Rush for ever; Yankees all the way!!
 
irelayer
Posts: 929
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 6:14 pm

Well if it is a LiveTV offering a-la B6 and DL and what not I'm all for it over my laptop/tablet (I don't have a laptop or a tablet...). I LOVE LOVE LOVE the novelty of watching live sports or the news while cruising up in the air. If it was just pre loaded movies and tv shows and what not then I think I would obviously take my own selection over the IFE, but then battery life becomes an issue. Plus usually the basic IFE is free whereas WiFi costs money.

I did try out WiFi once on a DL redeye (SAN-ATL) where it cost 5 dollars instead of 8 or whatever. I managed to have a stable stream from my SlingBox back home! It was the coolest thing ever. I think I was probably using up a good chunk of the bandwidth on that plane.

-IR
 
frmrCapCadet
Posts: 1023
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 8:24 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 6:16 pm

tdscanuck - thanks for all the info.

My problem with IFE is about the same as with the dish satellite at home. 200+ channels, but seldom anything I want to watch. Likely I am picky about what I want, but between preloading books, movies (don't watch many), and various blogs the Web is by far my preferred mode in info.
Buffet: the airline business...has eaten up capital...like..no other (business)
 
planejamie
Posts: 564
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:41 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 6:47 pm

The thing for me is, how easily can you stream video (e.g. YouTube) from the onboard WiFi? If being able to pick a few youtube videos or (in the UK or using a clever proxy) get onto BBC iPlayer to watch something would be better than the IFE on a shorter flight. On long haul (e.g. TATL) I'd prefer to have the regular IFE, I can stick a crappy movie on and just relax without having to get out a laptop or tablet and be bombarded with e-mails from work/school, plus without the fear of leaving something on board.
 
YYZYYT
Posts: 905
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 12:41 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 7:01 pm

Quoting AirCanada787 (Reply 4):
Currently in Canada we don't have much choice when it comes to routes with Wi-fi. However I too prefer to use the IFE over my own device, I wouldn't spend my whole flight just surfing the web. I don't always travel with my laptop and even if I do I'd rather use a system installed on the plane so I don't have to have my laptop taking up the tray table. Plus Its great when airlines like AC have the system switched on as soon as you leave the gate so you can use it during takeoff and landing, when other deices have to be put away.

I agree - mostly for the kids' sake, as they are quiet and well behaved when staring at the little box... having to shut down an ipad or laptop for take off or landing is a pain.

I prefer IFE, despite the fact that the content can sometimes be underwhelming.
 
will777
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:21 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 7:04 pm

Quoting tugger (Reply 8):
And don't forget that whatever you watch is always "airplane edited". That was an interesting discovery I made once, that there are essentially three "editions" of movies (and two for TV shows): one is the original unedited version, second is the "for public broadcast" version and they edit out profanity and sexual stuff and some violence etc., but the third is an "airplane" version for situations where essentially anyone may be able to view without supervision or privacy. So the airplane mode can be REALLY chopped up.

As lousy as Die Hard 4 is, the one I watched on a flight I was on was so chopped up it was ridiculous.

Oh and this goes for music as well. You will not here the original unedited version of any song that has "questionable" lyrics.

I experienced this on my AF flight from PHL to CDG back in 2008. I watched a movie and it was definitely edited with curse words removed. However, I was surprised on my flight from EWR to IAH about a month ago (on a 777), I watched the Descendants and it seemed to be the complete normal version. Lots of cursing going on in that movie, including many F-bombs. It doesn't bother me at all, but I can see how parents would be unhappy.
 
irelayer
Posts: 929
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 7:43 pm

Well if it is a LiveTV offering a-la B6 and DL and what not I'm all for it over my laptop/tablet (I don't have a laptop or a tablet...). I LOVE LOVE LOVE the novelty of watching live sports or the news while cruising up in the air. If it was just pre loaded movies and tv shows and what not then I think I would obviously take my own selection over the IFE, but then battery life becomes an issue. Plus usually the basic IFE is free whereas WiFi costs money.

I did try out WiFi once on a DL redeye (SAN-ATL) where it cost 5 dollars instead of 8 or whatever. I managed to have a stable stream from my SlingBox back home! It was the coolest thing ever. I think I was probably using up a good chunk of the bandwidth on that plane.

-IR
 
planejamie
Posts: 564
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:41 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 9:08 pm

Quoting irelayer (Reply 28):
I did try out WiFi once on a DL redeye (SAN-ATL) where it cost 5 dollars instead of 8 or whatever. I managed to have a stable stream from my SlingBox back home! It was the coolest thing ever. I think I was probably using up a good chunk of the bandwidth on that plane.

Of course! I'd actually forgotten I have a slingbox (me and my dad use it as we travel a lot), so WiFi would actually be a lot better, though I'd only get whatever's on "Freeview" (only those in the UK will know what I'm on about but basically free to air digital channels, about 30 of them) it's not too bad
 
liftsifter
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:25 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Thu May 24, 2012 10:25 pm

Something no one has brought up is using a laptop/tablet while eating. That's almost impossible, unless you somehow fit both on a tray table.
A300 A310 A319 A320 A321 A332 A333 A342 A343 A346 A380 B736 B737 B738 B744 B763 B77L B77E B77W B788 E190
 
phatty3374
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 5:30 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Fri May 25, 2012 12:54 am

I could be wrong but it seems that there may be two different "WiFi vs. IFE" scenarios here:

The first scenario: WiFi as a means of obtaining internet connectivity inflight, allowing passengers to browse the web or stream music/videos from the internet (provided there is a dramatic increase in bandwidth from the systems that are currently offered inflight). Connectivity would be provided as it is today, from multiple stations strategically positioned on the ground or via satellite for int'l/transoceanic flights.

The second scenario: A local wireless network that is not connected to the ground, but provides passengers' devices access to a centralized on-board hard drive that has been preloaded with movies/shows/music that can be streamed (an inflight "cloud-drive"). A very similar setup to current IFE systems (access to a centralized drive with preloaded media files), except passengers' tablets, laptops and smartphones would take the place of IFE screens and the system would be wireless, not integrated into seats, etc. Connectivity issues would be minimal, as the system would, by definition, have to be fast enough for passengers to stream videos.

The second option to me is the most viable. If implemented, it would reduce aircraft weight by allowing for the removal of IFE screens, harnesses, wiring, etc. For a transitional period, the airline could keep several "digiplayers" on each aircraft for those passengers that did not have compatible tablets/phones/laptops, but wanted some form of media entertainment. After a while, it would become "known" in the market that, to be able to use IFE on an aircraft, a compatible device of your own is required.
 
SonomaFlyer
Posts: 1868
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:47 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Fri May 25, 2012 1:51 pm

Quoting United1 (Reply 5):
There is no charge for IFE on UAs 777s....

The last time I few UA (summer 2011), they offered in Y their IFE service on their "upgraded" 777's (3x3x3). If you wanted to look at more than one or two movies (plus ANY kids related material), you had to break out your credit card and swipe. It was $9 or $10 for LHR to SFO.

If UA has rethought that silliness, I'm very glad. I didn't mind paying $99 per person x4 people for Y+ but was irked that this the IFE feature itself came in two tiers. I'm assuming if I spent $3,000 on a J ticket or $10,000 on a F ticket, no swiping of a credit card would be required.
 
chrisair
Posts: 1777
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2000 11:32 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Fri May 25, 2012 7:54 pm

It's amazing how some people are completely helpless without TV for 5 hours. I wonder how anyone suffered through long flights before the year 2000--I also wonder how many people commenting were born before the year 1998?   I flew lots of transcons on DL with NO tv, NO movies, NO internet and NO iPad/laptop. Give me wifi so I can work.

Quoting liftsifter (Reply 29):

Something no one has brought up is using a laptop/tablet while eating. That's almost impossible, unless you somehow fit both on a tray table.

Not hard. I've watched movies/read on my iPad while eating. It's like reading a book. You hold it in one hand, food in the other.

The laptop can be done, but is trickier. I typically turn the tray sideways and can do both if need be. Most of the time the laptop goes away when the food comes out.

Quoting irelayer (Reply 27):
I managed to have a stable stream from my SlingBox back home!

This is tough to do on Gogo, but I've streamed my sling box a number of times on WN flights. I've watched hockey and basketball games, Dirty Jobs, the Simpsons etc all in sparkling HD and they stream great. I LOVE it. Best $330 I spent was on a sling box and their iPad app.
 
YYZYYT
Posts: 905
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 12:41 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Fri May 25, 2012 8:42 pm

Quoting chrisair (Reply 33):
It's amazing how some people are completely helpless without TV for 5 hours. I wonder how anyone suffered through long flights before the year 2000--I also wonder how many people commenting were born before the year 1998? I flew lots of transcons on DL with NO tv, NO movies, NO internet and NO iPad/laptop. Give me wifi so I can work.

Quoting liftsifter (Reply 29):

Something no one has brought up is using a laptop/tablet while eating. That's almost impossible, unless you somehow fit both on a tray table.

Not hard. I've watched movies/read on my iPad while eating. It's like reading a book. You hold it in one hand, food in the other.

"book"?

what is this "book" that you speak of? something loaded on an ipad?
 
User avatar
fanoftristars
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2000 9:03 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Fri May 25, 2012 8:47 pm

I prefer both, like many of Delta's aircraft. Fun to be able to check your email while watching a streaming movie or MSNBC while flying transcon...
"FLY DELTA JETS"
 
PPVRA
Posts: 7878
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:48 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Fri May 25, 2012 8:53 pm

Could an airline app, designed for access to IFE and Wifi, also allow a computer onboard the aircraft access to monitor the battery levels in each device and allocate power amongst them to reduce the loads on the system?

Say, seat 37A's tablet has 80% battery left, so we will cut off his power until it goes down below 40% battery level, meanwhile we'll be charging your neighbor's device up because it is running low.
"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
 
United1
Posts: 2862
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 9:21 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Sat May 26, 2012 12:57 am

Quoting SonomaFlyer (Reply 32):
The last time I few UA (summer 2011), they offered in Y their IFE service on their "upgraded" 777's (3x3x3). If you wanted to look at more than one or two movies (plus ANY kids related material), you had to break out your credit card and swipe. It was $9 or $10 for LHR to SFO.

If UA has rethought that silliness, I'm very glad.

They dropped that a few months after they started...the only IFE that they charge for is DirectTV in Y on the 737's.
I know the voices in my head aren't real but sometimes their ideas are just awesome!!!
 
bojangles
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:49 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Sat May 26, 2012 10:43 am

Quoting warden145 (Reply 14):
I knew about this, but I was surprised to watch a couple of movies and TV shows on BA that weren't edited in any way shape or form...including some F-bombs and even an unedited "intimate" scene from the film "Elizabeth".

Maybe the "airplane version" is a U.S. thing? I've never played with the IFE system on a U.S. airline...

Surprising for an American viewer, perhaps, but fairly par for the course for their British counterpart! I'm perplexed at how Americans are prolific swearers in day to day life, yet if this is reflected on network tv people are up in arms! BTW, on BA we have the ability to lock IFE content on a per seat basis, at the request of a parent/guardian.
 
nomadd22
Posts: 1566
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 7:42 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Sun May 27, 2012 12:12 am

Quoting tugger (Reply 8):
And don't forget that whatever you watch is always "airplane edited".

If they ever showed "Airplane" it would be four minutes long.
Anon
 
warden145
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:36 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Sun May 27, 2012 7:26 am

Quoting nomadd22 (Reply 38):
If they ever showed "Airplane" it would be four minutes long.

That's probably a big part of why they'll likely never show it in flight 

Just gave me an idea for a practical joke, though....get someone in a window seat to watch "Airport '77" while in flight, and get him to fall asleep afterwards...then put some fish stickers on the inside of the window   

Quoting bojangles (Reply 37):
Surprising for an American viewer, perhaps, but fairly par for the course for their British counterpart! I'm perplexed at how Americans are prolific swearers in day to day life, yet if this is reflected on network tv people are up in arms! BTW, on BA we have the ability to lock IFE content on a per seat basis, at the request of a parent/guardian.

I didn't know that BA had that capability; that's cool. And, at the risk of going off-topic, I agree with you...what's allowed (and not allowed) on network TV in the U.S. is inconsistent to the point of being ridiculous. Gruesome murder scenes are perfectly okay, but show a part of a woman's natural body for a split second (i.e. Janet Jackson) and the world comes to an end. For the record, I wasn't offended or anything like that...it just surprised me.
ETOPS = Engine Turns Off, Passengers Swim
 
brilondon
Posts: 3018
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 6:56 am

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Sun May 27, 2012 12:19 pm

The only real advantage to have IFE is if your battery runs out before you run out of flight then I can see the need for IFE, but a solution to this would be to have power at every seat. It would not only allow for people to watch on their laptops but also to keep their devices charged up and more importantly, there would, I imagine be less weight on the aircraft and more leg room because of the removal of the boxes on the floor where our feet would be in coach.
Rush for ever; Yankees all the way!!
 
SonomaFlyer
Posts: 1868
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:47 pm

RE: Airline IFE Vs WiFi Cage Match

Sun May 27, 2012 3:20 pm

Quoting United1 (Reply 36):
They dropped that a few months after they started...the only IFE that they charge for is DirectTV in Y on the 737's.

I'm glad to hear this idea went away. This puts UA's offering at least in the ballpark with the competition to LHR from SFO.