FlyingAY
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:26 pm

A320 Sharklets Better Than Expected In Tests

Mon May 28, 2012 8:45 am

Sorry if this has been discussed already, but just noticed that Aviation week was reporting last week that Fernando Alonso of Airbus is claiming that they have seen better than expected fuel burn in the tests:

http://www.aviationweek.com/Article....l/avd_05_23_2012_p02-01-460724.xml

The sharklets were supposed to improve the fuel burn up to 3.5 percent. If they've managed to exceed that, it must be good for NEO program as well. Now if only the GTF would beat expectations...
 
kl911
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 1:10 am

RE: A320 Sharklets Better Than Expected In Tests

Mon May 28, 2012 9:36 am

Quoting flyingAY (Thread starter):
The sharklets were supposed to improve the fuel burn up to 3.5 percent. If they've managed to exceed that, it must be good for NEO program as well.

Very good news indeed! All we need now is the GTF to meet or exceed expectations and we will have a guaranteed winner.  
 
User avatar
lightsaber
Crew
Posts: 11740
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:55 pm

RE: A320 Sharklets Better Than Expected In Tests

Mon May 28, 2012 5:42 pm

This is good to hear. The reality is that A320 family needs a boost of payload at range. This alone will help. At least for the last OEOs going out the door.   

I'm very curious as to the winglet's performance by cruise weight. This is due to high interest in a TATL range A321. The greater the benefit at high cruise weights the more likely we'll see a TATL A321.    Note: I do not expect this to be the case at EIS, but rather after an airframe and an engine PIP.

Quoting kl911 (Reply 1):
All we need now is the GTF to meet or exceed expectations and we will have a guaranteed winner.

Right now we're looking at a relative improvement between the A320NEO and the 737MAX of about 5%. This is the 3.5% of the sharklets plus the ~4% advantage of the larger fan minus the aerodynamic benefits of the new 737 tail and other changes. Not to mention both will aim for weight reductions...

If the Pratt's do indeed exceed expectations (they should in the long run), it will open up new missions for the A320. At this point, the sharklets are needed for better TCON payload. With the NEO, US West Coast to Hawaii will come into range. (The more range, the further inland we can call US West Coast). We'll also see a tremendous improvement in missions to/from the mid-east and I imagine Indigo will utilize the added range to great advantage now that they are going international.

This isn't to say the MAX won't be competitive. The relative competitiveness just will shift a bit in favor of the NEO. IMHO, this will just mean Airbus discounts a little bit less.

Lightsaber
"They did not know it was impossible, so they did it!" - Mark Twain
 
windshear
Posts: 2256
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2000 4:45 pm

RE: A320 Sharklets Better Than Expected In Tests

Tue May 29, 2012 6:40 am

Yeah they've worked wonders for the 737NG for about a decade now...

Boaz.
"If you believe breaking is possible, believe in fixing also"-Rebbe Nachman

Who is online