billreid
Topic Author
Posts: 734
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:04 am

Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:09 am

Just read on the Telegraaf.nl that WN had another problem with a woman who was wearing a summer dress. They old her that she had to cover her breasts or she ouldn't board. She got on and the guy behind her had a condon on his tee-shirt which was no problem apparently.

This is one sick airline.
It one thing to make bad planning and merger decisions.
It's a whole other thing to allow condoms on tee-shirts and deny women boarding who show cleavage.

She can sit beside me in her summer dress any time I fly.
Some people don't get it. Business is about making MONEY!
 
billreid
Topic Author
Posts: 734
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:04 am

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:12 am

Some people don't get it. Business is about making MONEY!
 
comair25
Posts: 214
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:45 am

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:24 am

These threads on airlines denying pax boarding are getting so old. First off what do we know about the guy with the condom on his shirt? Do we know the message on the shirt? Did you know we have t-shirts and bracelts here in the states that clearly state "I love boobies". They are for breast cancer awareness. I know I have one. Secondly. This women was asked to cover up her cleavage. Is this one of those just because somebody else has something that "you" don't think is appropriate makes it inappropriate. WN crew apparently had no issue. So what's the big deal? People are upset because they don't get to fly next to a women showing lots of cleavage? Come on..

[Edited 2012-06-18 21:27:07]
 
remcor
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:25 am

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:36 am

This really makes me mad. I mean it is completely unacceptable that there is a thread started about denying boarding to a woman with too much cleavage without a gratuitous cleavage photo of the woman in question. What is this country coming to?
 
PanHAM
Posts: 8533
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:44 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:26 am

I mean, this was at Las Vegas. So what, if that had happened at Amarillo TX or somewhere in the bible belt, but LAS and probably on a flight to the Siicon Valley?

I love Dutch "te diep voor vlucht" - replace the V in vlucht with an F and you get the German word for "run". . People should run away from that airline.
powered by Eierlikör
 
SouthernDC9
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:41 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:15 pm

It's the shirt I find offensive, geez. "Pardon me, miss - 1995 called, they'd like their flannel back."

I would encourage anyone who is bent out of shape about this young woman's plight to simply not fly Southwest under any circumstance, even if their fares are cheaper or their flights are more convenient for your particular trip. I can't think of a single realistic situation in which one would have no choice but to betray one's principles and fly Southwest, so let the market work its magic.
What does AA/US merger mean for CLT/JFK/PHX/North America/Southern Hemisphere/God's Plan for the Universe
 
71Zulu
Posts: 1605
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:42 am

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:41 pm

Clickable links only please!
 
blueflyer
Posts: 3633
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 4:17 am

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:17 pm

So I read the entire article and some of the comments, and all I get from this thread is: Nordstrom has bra fitters?!? Didn't even know that was a legit profession.

Southwest kicking someone else out because they don't look right? Big yawn. I'm starting to think they borrowed a page from MOL and do this every so often to promote their family-friendly atmosphere without actually having to pay for all the exposure.
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has no clothes.
 
NBGSkyGod
Posts: 810
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 7:30 am

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:23 pm

Quoting blueflyer (Reply 10):
So I read the entire article and some of the comments, and all I get from this thread is: Nordstrom has bra fitters?!? Didn't even know that was a legit profession.

I know what my retirement job is going to be!!
Pilots are idots, who at any given moment will attempt to kill themselves or others.
 
SouthernDC9
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:41 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:55 pm

Quoting blueflyer (Reply 10):
So I read the entire article and some of the comments, and all I get from this thread is: Nordstrom has bra fitters?!? Didn't even know that was a legit profession.

I have absolutely no idea how I know this or where I saw it but yes, apparently the vast majority of women don't wear the correct bra size (and for some reason this does not cause any sort of "This bra doesn't fit right" reaction among the affected ladies), and stores like Nordstrom and Victoria's Secret are cashing in on this epidemic by helping women get fitted for the correct size bra (so they can buy lots of them).

Quoting NBGSkyGod (Reply 11):

I know what my retirement job is going to be!!

In a world populated by confused supermodels wondering why their bras are so tight/loose/whatever yes this would be lovely but go to the mall and look about you, there might be unpleasant situations.

So back to the story (and to hopefully make this post relevant to the topic at hand) it seems that this lady wasn't kicked off the plane or denied boarding but was allowed to board? Making this a story about... absolutely nothing?

I'd also be curious to know if it was a male or female WN employee who told the passenger to cover herself. Just wondering, that's all.

Actually does the story have any real information beyond this one young lady's account of what happened? And we're supposed to trust her take on things because...
What does AA/US merger mean for CLT/JFK/PHX/North America/Southern Hemisphere/God's Plan for the Universe
 
1stfl94
Posts: 1082
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:33 am

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:58 pm

Can't really see what's offensive about this, apart from the rope thing and the bad shirt and the silly scarf but really can't see the grounds for kicking her off the flight, unless FA's are being told to do so when Southwest wants some publicity...
 
SouthernDC9
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:41 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:13 pm

Quoting 1stfl94 (Reply 13):
Can't really see what's offensive about this, apart from the rope thing and the bad shirt and the silly scarf but really can't see the grounds for kicking her off the flight,

But it's not at all clear to me that she was kicked off the flight, it seems as though she flew as scheduled.

"That's no consolation for Avital, who told us she'll never fly Southwest again..." - Wow, I'm sure at WN headquarters they're crunching the numbers to see if the airline can survive this setback. "She'll never fly Southwest again [until it's like $5 cheaper than another airline and/or a non-stop vs. a connection]" is probably more like it...

[Edited 2012-06-19 11:16:14]

And if your name is Avital does asking Jezebel to not use your last name really offer you that much anonymity? If you're as bored at work as I am today go on Facebook and search "Avital" and you'll find this young lady.


[Edited 2012-06-19 11:21:59]
What does AA/US merger mean for CLT/JFK/PHX/North America/Southern Hemisphere/God's Plan for the Universe
 
IAHFLYR
Posts: 3943
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:56 am

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:36 pm

Quoting remcor (Reply 3):
I mean it is completely unacceptable that there is a thread started about denying boarding to a woman with too much cleavage without a gratuitous cleavage photo of the woman in question.



I normally would agree with you and tjwgrr however; in this particular case rather have avoided the picture!      
Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
 
1stfl94
Posts: 1082
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:33 am

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:18 pm

Quoting SouthernDC9 (Reply 14):
Quoting 1stfl94 (Reply 13):
Can't really see what's offensive about this, apart from the rope thing and the bad shirt and the silly scarf but really can't see the grounds for kicking her off the flight,

But it's not at all clear to me that she was kicked off the flight, it seems as though she flew as scheduled.

"That's no consolation for Avital, who told us she'll never fly Southwest again..." - Wow, I'm sure at WN headquarters they're crunching the numbers to see if the airline can survive this setback. "She'll never fly Southwest again [until it's like $5 cheaper than another airline and/or a non-stop vs. a connection]" is probably more like it..

It doesn't say specifically that she kicked off but it does imply that the staff did not want to let her on until she covered up. I wonder if WN employs a lot of former Saudia employees???
 
workhorse
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:35 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:49 pm

Quoting SouthernDC9 (Reply 14):
"That's no consolation for Avital, who told us she'll never fly Southwest again..." - Wow, I'm sure at WN headquarters they're crunching the numbers to see if the airline can survive this setback. "She'll never fly Southwest again [until it's like $5 cheaper than another airline and/or a non-stop vs. a connection]" is probably more like it...

Well... I, for one, tend to avoid flying WN for that very reason. Because you know, this is not the first time we hear stories like that about them, right?

I mean, of course, let's be realistic, if I happen to need to go from A to B with the only reasonable choice being Southwest (for example, all other carriers being twice the price, or twice the travel time...), I will fly with them; BUT if Southwest is just one of several choices, I will prefer another airline.

You see, I am sure that other airlines happen to have people dressed in a multitude of different ways every day on board of their aircraft. But, for some reason, we don't read stories like that about DL, UA, US or B6 (we do about AA though). Maybe, because they are more tolerant. Maybe because they know how to ask to "cover up" or to hide a controversial picture / phrase on a tee-shirt without offending people. Maybe because when such kind of conflicts happen (and they probably do), they know how to fix this before the infuriated person goes to the media.

So, the question is not that much about what happened on this particular WN flight, but about what image does this airline want to have with the flying public (such as me). I, for one, do not like this image.


[Edited 2012-06-19 14:06:55]
 
aztrainer
Posts: 713
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:17 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:22 pm

Well, this is a one sided story, but imagine if she did not have the shirt on.

" Southwest spokesperson Christi McNeill told us that the company offered Avital an apology and a refund "as a gesture of goodwill," but that their Contract of Carriage allows them to refuse to transport a customer whose clothing is lewd, obscene, or patently offensive."

I have seen a dress that looked like that and there is no back to it. You could have excessive mammalary movement or lack of coverage of the mammalary glands.

Quoting remcor (Reply 3):
This really makes me mad. I mean it is completely unacceptable that there is a thread started about denying boarding to a woman with too much cleavage without a gratuitous cleavage photo of the woman in question. What is this country coming to?

That is funny right there....
 
Cubsrule
Posts: 11428
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:13 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:23 pm

Quoting workhorse (Reply 17):
So, the question is not that much about what happened on this particular WN flight, but about what image does this airline want to have with the flying public (such as me). I, for one, do not like this image.

I live in a big WN city and fly WN a lot, mainly for the same reasons you do (though that leads me on to WN more than it might lead you on to WN, because there are many routes from my hometown where WN makes the most sense). My personal experience - which I trust far more than any journalist - is that WN employees are, with very few exceptions professional and customer-focused. What poor experiences have you had with WN?
I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 
SouthernDC9
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:41 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:34 pm

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 19):
My personal experience - which I trust far more than any journalist - is that WN employees are, with very few exceptions professional and customer-focused.

I also have had great experiences with WN and most other airlines - and of course, people who fly an airline and have even a remarkably pleasant experience generally don't rush to the media to tell the tale (and best I can tell from my reading of this Jezebel site, for example, they are not in the habit of reporting "Hey, something nice and unironic happened today!" kind of stories). And even in the event of a negative experience, in my opinion it takes a very, um, special kind of quite self-regarding personality to make a big to-do of it - i.e. most normal people tend to not feel that an awkward encounter with an airline employee has some sort of greater meaning for the entire world.
What does AA/US merger mean for CLT/JFK/PHX/North America/Southern Hemisphere/God's Plan for the Universe
 
workhorse
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:35 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:35 pm

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 19):
What poor experiences have you had with WN?

I never had! What I'm talking about is the brand image. And when I have to choose, for example, between WN and AS (flying out of SJC, which is the place from where I fly the most when I am in the US), all other things being equal, brand image is what makes me choose AS and not WN.
 
Cubsrule
Posts: 11428
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:13 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:40 pm

Quoting workhorse (Reply 21):
And when I have to choose, for example, between WN and AS (flying out of SJC, which is the place from where I fly the most when I am in the US), all other things being equal, brand image is what makes me choose AS and not WN.

I guess I don't understand why that is a rational choice. WN is many times larger than AS. Of course WN will have many times more crazy stories than AS and, as SouthernDC9 points out, the good experiences don't get reported.
I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 
workhorse
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:35 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:41 pm

Quoting SouthernDC9 (Reply 20):
most normal people tend to not feel that an awkward encounter with an airline employee has some sort of greater meaning for the entire world

Sure. But, again, why almost every time we read such a story in the media, it happens to be about WN? These strange people who "feel that an awkward encounter with an airline employee has some sort of greater meaning for the entire world", they surely fly other airlines as well, don't they?
 
workhorse
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:35 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:51 pm

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 22):
I guess I don't understand why that is a rational choice.

Brand image is what comes into play in a competitive environment when you have more then one rational choice. For example, when you buy a laptop and you have a Hewlett-Packard and a Dell with the same features and priced the same, what makes you choose the former ot the latter is the brand image. Companies have to care a lot about brand image, that's why they have those huge marketing and PR departments.

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 22):
WN is many times larger than AS. Of course WN will have many times more crazy stories than AS

Okay, Delta is larger then WN, but, for some reason, I have never read about someone being kicked off a Delta flight because her boobs are too big.

[Edited 2012-06-19 14:52:40]
 
PHX787
Posts: 7877
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:46 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:55 pm

Quoting tjwgrr (Reply 6):

how the heck did you make that???   

Quoting workhorse (Reply 17):
I mean, of course, let's be realistic, if I happen to need to go from A to B with the only reasonable choice being Southwest (for example, all other carriers being twice the price, or twice the travel time...), I will fly with them; BUT if Southwest is just one of several choices, I will prefer another airline.

I think WN overplays their supposed "importance" a lot which gives them this entitlement to deny passengers flying rights.

But as someone above said, these threads are getting a little old. usually what happens is someone complains to a major news company, the airline pays a settlement/gives them a free flight, yadda yadda yadda, it's done, nobody hears from them again.

Quoting workhorse (Reply 24):
Brand image is what comes in a competitive environment when you have more then one rational choice.

For me it's reputation, service, price, then image. For example: If AA can give me a cheap flight from CVG or PHX to somewhere that DL doesn't serve, despite all I feel against AA, I'll fly them for that route.
Follow me on twitter: www.twitter.com/phx787
 
Cubsrule
Posts: 11428
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 12:13 pm

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:56 pm

Quoting workhorse (Reply 24):
Okay, Delta is larger then WN, but, for some reason, I have never read about someone being kicked off a Delta flight because her boobs are too big.

All I can offer on that point is that you need to read more carefully.
I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
 
User avatar
Tugger
Posts: 6020
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:38 am

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:16 pm

Quoting billreid (Thread starter):
She can sit beside me in her summer dress any time I fly.

Are you sure....? 
Quoting akelley728 (Reply 7):
pics of the woman in question here:

You know, looking at the pic, her boob or nipple could have been hanging out. I've seen shoulder bag straps pull tops every which way as people throw them over their shoulder.

So why do some here not just think that her boob/nipple was showing?

Quoting workhorse (Reply 24):
Okay, Delta is larger then WN,

Actually Southwest is larger when just using domestic numbers *(which is really all Southwest is for now).

Tugg
I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
 
User avatar
jaybird
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2001 4:23 am

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:50 pm

All airlines have policies which affect dress and behavior. Unless a specific incident gets released to the media - you just never hear about it. On Southwest's new TV program "On The Fly" they're very clear that they will not tolerate any clothing that they believe is offensive to the crew and/or other passengers. They've made people who had swearing on their shirts either change shirts or turn them inside-out, they've had people cover up who they felt were "overexposed," they've pulled passengers off the planes or just refused to allow them on the planes if they've clearly had too much to drink. Passengers have mouthed off, called their lawyers (on camera), etc., - but the bottom line is - airlines have the right to determine their policies and enforce them. When possible they do work with the passengers to correct the situation. Of course, if you're just flat-out drunk there's not much they can do.

Once you get "in the tube" - whatever airline you're on - it's their rules. Period. You don't have to like them. It's a controlled enviornment and they have the right, and final say, about what they feel is acceptable or nonacceptable. You don't have to agree with their policies - that's your choice. But if you don't comply with the policies - they will deny you boarding or pull you off the flight - that is their choice.

Southwest seems to make it into the media a lot which is curious because I'm sure they're not the only one that is enforcing their policies.
 
don0245
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 1:44 am

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Tue Jun 19, 2012 11:29 pm

WN give me a friggin' break! I have never & would never fly with you regardless of all this crap! Call Tammy Fae Baker back please! Love ya'!
 
kl5147
Posts: 286
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 4:58 am

RE: Report Telegraaf, Cleavage Denied On WN

Wed Jun 20, 2012 5:38 pm

WN has probably forgotten how they did their advertisements in the 70's
  
"The world is just a click away!"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ACATROYAL, ba319-131, Baidu [Spider], David L, DoktorR, FAST Enterprise [Crawler], intotheair, KarelXWB, MaxiAir, RalXWB, RohanDXB, Scorpio, Sjoerd, SyeaphanR, TP777, travelhound, tvh and 267 guests