LHLX
Topic Author
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 6:25 am

LH Downgrades MUC-TLV To A321?!

Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:32 am

According to the booking tool on is webpage, Lufthansa in W12/13 flies MUC-TLV-MUC with airbus 321 instead of 330/340. Frankfurt is twice daily 330. Anyone know the reason for this? Since LH reinstated MUC-TLV some 4 or 5 years ago the route was always on 330/340 and sometimes even 346...
 
TWA902fly
Posts: 2869
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 1999 5:47 am

RE: LH Downgrades MUC-TLV To A321?!

Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:07 am

I'd like to point out that LH's A321 seats 200 people, while the A330 seats 221 people - not a huge capacity difference. I would guess this change is for one of the 2 following reasons;

1.) The A330/340's premium cabins (especially F and intercontinental J) are not needed on this route due to lack of premium demand at this time. (The A321's Y capacity is actually more than the 330's)

2.) The range of the A330/340 is needed on other routes that an A321 cannot be used on, and the fleet must be well utilized - there's better long-haul destinations to send it on than TLV, which can be done with the A321 without much capacity loss.

I don't know the actual reasons, but those would be my two guesses, if anyone can chime in who knows more, I'd love to hear.

'902
life wasn't worth the balance, or the crumpled paper it was written on
 
jmc1975
Posts: 2884
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2000 10:57 am

RE: LH Downgrades MUC-TLV To A321?!

Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:50 pm

Quoting TWA902fly (Reply 1):

I don't know the actual reasons, but those would be my two guesses, if anyone can chime in who knows more, I'd love to hear.

I think you pretty much covered it.
.......
 
Senchingo
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 9:59 pm

RE: LH Downgrades MUC-TLV To A321?!

Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:54 pm

Quoting TWA902fly (Reply 1):
1.) The A330/340's premium cabins (especially F and intercontinental J) are not needed on this route due to lack of premium demand at this time. (The A321's Y capacity is actually more than the 330's)

2.) The range of the A330/340 is needed on other routes that an A321 cannot be used on, and the fleet must be well utilized - there's better long-haul destinations to send it on than TLV, which can be done with the A321 without much capacity loss.

That and maybe the upcoming fleet refurbishment of their premium products?

Cheers, Sen.
 
User avatar
larshjort
Posts: 1427
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:54 pm

RE: LH Downgrades MUC-TLV To A321?!

Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:55 pm

Quoting TWA902fly (Reply 1):
I don't know the actual reasons, but those would be my two guesses, if anyone can chime in who knows more, I'd love to hear.

And I guess 3) is that most cargo go via FRA and not MUC.

/Lars
139, 306, 319, 320, 321, 332, 34A, AN2, AT4, AT5, AT7, 733, 735, 73G, 738, 739, 146, AR1, BH2, CN1, CR2, DH1, DH3, DH4,

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: aviatorcraig, Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], clrd4t8koff, flyDTW1992, GCT64, MIflyer12, OA940, Revelation, SpoonNZ, stlgph, yeogeo and 249 guests