An225
Topic Author
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 6:37 pm

Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 6:24 am

When I looked a few minutes ago in the Boeing 767 page in Wikipedia I was surprised to see that in 2011 and 2012 new orders were placed for this great aircraft. According to the O&D table (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_767#Orders_and_deliveries):
2011: 42 frames
2012: 19 frames
At current production rates, and given the backlog of 78 frames, it means that the line will be still open for the next 5 years or so.

Now, as much as I love this aircraft, this is a almost 35 years old design. I am not sure if Airbus has something similar still in production. On the other hand, Boeing has updated the design several times during its production period, so this not the same aircraft anymore.

So now for the questions:
1. Why should an airline place orders for an older design when it has newer options (e.g. 787, A330, 777)?
2. Which airlines place orders? cargo airlines of passenger airlines as well?
3. Did the delays in development of the A350 and 787 diverted orders to the 767?
4. In light of the future production of the KC767, will Boeing increase civil frames production rates and at the same time stop accepting new orders in order to concentrate on the KC production?
5. Is it still profitable for Boeing to continue production and development of the 767 in light of current rate of production of this model?

Long live the 767!

Thanks,


An225
 
User avatar
aerorobnz
Posts: 7412
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 3:43 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 6:32 am

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
Why should an airline place orders for an older design when it has newer options

If they need capacity immediately, and if they can negotiate a competitive price.

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
3. Did the delays in development of the A350 and 787 diverted orders to the 767?

My feeling is that no it didn't divert many orders, but it did create additional need for the 763 as a stopgap. NH was ordering 763s anyway because even with the 787 in service the 763 still performs well in the niche they want it for.

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
. Is it still profitable for Boeing to continue production and development of the 767 in light of current rate of production of this model?

Boeing would not be doing it if it wasn't. They are a business first of all.
Flown to 120 Airports in 44 Countries on 73 Operators. Visited 55 Countries and counting. Wanderlust is like Syphilis, once you have the itch it's too late for treatment.
 
An225
Topic Author
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 6:37 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 6:38 am

Quoting aerorobnz (Reply 1):
Boeing would not be doing it if it wasn't. They are a business first of all.

Not if they still need to deliver the backlog and keep the line till kik-starting the KC production

An225
 
User avatar
ADent
Posts: 920
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:11 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 6:58 am

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
1. Why should an airline place orders for an older design when it has newer options (e.g. 787, A330, 777)?

The airline will make more money with the 767.

Could be that with 787 averaging 1 plane a month a new order will be delivered in approximately a very long time. 777's are much bigger. Fleet commonality. FedEx needs volume, not weight. Boeing cutting deals on 787 penalties and wanting to keep the 767 line hot for the Air Force orders.

Quote:
2. Which airlines place orders? cargo airlines of passenger airlines as well?

LAN (10)
BDS USAF Tanker (4)
MIAT Mongolian Airlines (1)
FedEx (42)
Air Astana (4)

I think all but the USAF and FedEx are passenger.

Quote:
3. Did the delays in development of the A350 and 787 diverted orders to the 767?

Yes.

Quote:
4. In light of the future production of the KC767, will Boeing increase civil frames production rates and at the same time stop accepting new orders in order to concentrate on the KC production?

Not sure. Boeing is taking a bath on the first order of KC-46s and need to keep the line up. Obviously once the KC-46 is in production that will probably take precedence in production sequence. Boeing has to deliver 18 by 2017. At 2/month that is 9 months of the line. And most of those will be built delivered in 2016 and 2017.

Quote:

5. Is it still profitable for Boeing to continue production and development of the 767 in light of current rate of production of this model?

Yes. AF plans on 15 deliveries per year (that is adjustable), so at the current 2/month rate an average of 9 civilian (or foreign KC-46s) could be built.

Of course the KC-46 line is an ITAR line. The P-8 line is also ITAR and Boeing could build civilian 737s there, but has chosen not to. So it would look like civilian 767s sales will come to an end, but there is no real reason that can't keep the 767 building.
 
redrooster3
Posts: 222
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 2:35 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 6:59 am

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
new orders were placed for this great aircraft.

You answered half your question, it's a great plane, very comfortable plane for passengers, and great efficiency. Though, I do agree with you that it is a old design. Don't forget USAF's KC767 order last year, expect to see KC767's till 2050+?

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
something similar still in production

The A320 is a late 70's early 80's design. Still going very strong.

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
Why should an airline place orders for an older design when it has newer options

Well it is a great aircraft, keep in mind. Very quiet, and availability. You can get one in six years, versus the 787 of....God...I have know idea.

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
Which airlines place orders? cargo airlines of passenger airlines as well?

UPS, FX, Lan Airlines, Air Astana, Azerbaijan Airlines, USAF. All have ordered the 767 within the past three years.

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
Did the delays in development of the A350 and 787 diverted orders to the 767?

None were diverted, but NH did get some compensation for the delays, they ordered a few 767's because of the delays. I think JL did, but im not too sure.


I feel the 767 has the highest chance of breaching the 100 year mile stone of flight, and still being active.
The only thing you should change about a woman is her last name.
 
lafite82
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 1:58 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:00 am

Air Astana, ANA, LAN and Uzbeskistan Airways are airlines who have ordered new B767-300ER... with deliveries finishing by 2014. The military version KC-46A will not be delivered to the air force till 2017.
 
SCL767
Posts: 2812
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:25 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:14 am

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
2. Which airlines place orders? cargo airlines of passenger airlines as well?

LAN Airlines placed two separate orders for the B-767-300ERs last year. During 2011, LAN received 3 new B-767-316ERs. This year, LAN will receive 9 new B-767-316ERs. During 2013, LAN will receive 4 new B-767-316ERs.

Here is LAN's newest B-767-316ER, (CC-BDF) at KPAE:
http://paineairport.com/kpae5218.htm

Quoting aerorobnz (Reply 1):
Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
Why should an airline place orders for an older design when it has newer options

If they need capacity immediately, and if they can negotiate a competitive price.

Quite accurate; especially for a fast growing airline such as LAN which already operates a size-able fleet of B-767-300ERs and B-767-300ER/Fs.

Quoting aerorobnz (Reply 1):
My feeling is that no it didn't divert many orders, but it did create additional need for the 763 as a stopgap. NH was ordering 763s anyway because even with the 787 in service the 763 still performs well in the niche they want it for.

Similarly, the B-767-300ERs continue to perform very well for LAN on various routes where LAN deploys the B-763s and is a profitable airliner for LAN's operations. Also, it is part of LAN's fleet renewal program.

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
1. Why should an airline place orders for an older design when it has newer options (e.g. 787, A330, 777)?

In the case of LAN, it's for the reasons I stated above. Also, LAN needed to acquire additional widebody passenger aircraft during 2011-2013 to offset the delays associated with Boeing 787 deliveries.
LAN may acquire more 767s as 787s are delayed
 
airbazar
Posts: 6805
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:12 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:27 pm

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
1. Why should an airline place orders for an older design when it has newer options (e.g. 787, A330, 777)?

All of those are much bigger planes. There's a huge gap between the largest narrowbody and the smallest widebody, if you don't include the 767. In addition, the 767 is available much sooner than the 788/358 and costs a lot less.
 
spiritair97
Posts: 1191
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:28 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:13 pm

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):

Many airlines still favor fleet commonality, rather than dropping a bunch of money for a new type, then having to train employees, groundcrews, and others to work with the plane. For some airlines it's cheaper to go with what they know works.
 
na
Posts: 9129
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 1999 3:52 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:19 pm

The 767 is much cheaper than a 787, and available much faster. On the other hand it has the same propulsion than the 744, which some say is old technology. If the 744 is old, the 767 is older. I think that 767s built now will have an extreme depreciation and will have a short service life. I doubt many of the post-2010 built frames will see more than 15 years of flying. They´ll end up as spares for the USAF tankers like the late-built 707s did in the 80s.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22947
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:57 pm

The new 767 FAL has significantly reduced both the time and the cost of building a 767 and this appears to have generated new interest in the type due to greater availability (the line now builds 2 per month and can go to 3) and better pricing (the cheaper Boeing can produce the plane, the lower the average sales price while still keeping margins strong).

I expect passenger sales will start to dry up, but the freighter's prospects look good. UPS will need another 50 to replace their remaining A300-600RFs and FedEx will need well over a hundred more to complete replacement of their A300-600RF, A310F and MD-10F fleets.



Quoting An225 (Reply 2):
Not if they still need to deliver the backlog and keep the line till kik-starting the KC production

The original 100-frame lease deal was killed in December 2003. Since January 2004, Boeing has sold 161 commercial 767s and this is almost as many as the 179 KC-46s that are slated to be delivered in the RFP.

As such, I am somewhat puzzled with the belief that Boeing would have sold commercial 767s at production cost (or even a loss) just to keep the line open for military frames. I am guessing people believe that Boeing will sell those at a 200% or higher markup and therefore make up all the lost revenues from those commercial birds.

The problem with that line of thinking is that Boeing won the KC-X RFP due to the KC-767 being cheaper than the Airbus KC-30B. So unless Airbus was planning to sell the USAF KC-30Bs at a 250% markup...

With Boeing already having to invest hundreds of millions of dollars into the KC-46A program and with the very real possibility of having to invest even more, those 161 commercial 767s may very well be better for Boeing's bottom line than those 179 KC-46As.

[Edited 2012-07-10 09:47:58]
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 13757
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:27 pm

Quoting An225 (Reply 2):
Quoting aerorobnz (Reply 1):
Boeing would not be doing it if it wasn't. They are a business first of all.

Not if they still need to deliver the backlog and keep the line till kik-starting the KC production

There's no evidence that they are losing money on the current 767 orders.

Keep in mind the tanker competition was primarily based on price, and was intensely fought over, so there's very little fat in that contract.

Boeing has admitted they are currently spending more than anticipated developing the tanker, therefore I don't think they can plan to lose money on the UPS and FedEx orders to make it up later on tankers.

Some of the orders that are due to 787 delays (ANA, LAN) presumably are underwritten by the 787 program.

I'm sure the recent freighter orders were attractively priced, but it seems the purchasers find they will make more money with these airframes than their older ones (mostly A300/A310) and the competition (A330, which has a huge backlog and thus no availability and no incentive to bargain).

I'm also sure that the USAF purchase gives the customers confidence that the frame will be supported long into the future.
Inspiration, move me brightly!
 
135mech
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:56 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:47 pm

Quoting redrooster3 (Reply 4):


I feel the 767 has the highest chance of breaching the 100 year mile stone of flight, and still being active.

That would be awesome, and just like the KC-135 some of them are replacing will be a great workhorse in the meantime!

Also, as was mentioned earlier, the 767 has seen an amazing amount of upgrades in improvements and is much better than the original birds!

Fleet commonality is a good thing for many airlines, for many reasons, so if you buy brand new birds that are the same/similar to what you already have, you save so much money for your bottom line and can maintain profitability.

[Edited 2012-07-10 10:05:08]
135Mech
 
dcaviation
Posts: 242
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:26 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:49 pm

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
new orders were placed for this great aircraft.

There's your answer.
 
N766UA
Posts: 7843
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 1999 3:50 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:58 pm

The 767 is still a viable airplane, especially for cargo. FedEx holds the majority of those 767 orders, I believe. Keep in mind Airbus was still selling the A300 new-build to UPS and FedEx right up until a few years ago.
This Website Censors Me
 
kl911
Posts: 3979
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 1:10 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:04 pm

Quoting N766UA (Reply 14):
The 767 is still a viable airplane, especially for cargo.

But imo a very ugly plane. I can never understand that between the sexy 757 and the powerhorse 777 they designed this ugly bird.
 
135mech
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:56 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:16 pm

Quoting kl911 (Reply 15):
But imo a very ugly plane. I can never understand that between the sexy 757 and the powerhorse 777 they designed this ugly bird.

HAHA!!! It's [767] always been a "generic" looking bird to me... I always hated the look of the 757 until a few years back, and remember that the main reason the cockpit slopes down on it was to have cockpit (internal) commonality with the 767 which it was simultaneously produced. But, the 757 has such a distinct look and could for so many years be easily identified.
135Mech
 
User avatar
1337Delta764
Posts: 4891
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:02 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:21 pm

Quoting kl911 (Reply 15):
But imo a very ugly plane. I can never understand that between the sexy 757 and the powerhorse 777 they designed this ugly bird.

I can see what you mean with the 762, but the 764ER is a sleek and beautiful aircraft:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © T Silgrim
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Patrick Kane



The 763 doesn't look ugly either.

[Edited 2012-07-10 10:22:47]
The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
 
N766UA
Posts: 7843
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 1999 3:50 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:21 pm

Quoting 135mech (Reply 16):
It's [767] always been a "generic" looking bird to me.

Yeah, it's certainly boring, but I would never call it ugly. If anything, it's far cleaner looking than the A300; its multitude of flap track fairings and blocky wing fences don't help it to look any less pudgy.
This Website Censors Me
 
flaps30
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 12:33 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:22 pm

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
2011: 42 frames
2012: 19 frames

Do all new production 767's roll off the assembly line with blended winglets as a basic feature now?
every day is a good day to fly
 
User avatar
USAF336TFS
Posts: 1355
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:05 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:27 pm

Quoting An225 (Thread starter):
1. Why should an airline place orders for an older design when it has newer options (e.g. 787, A330, 777)?

"Older" does not necessarily mean obsolete or uncompetitive. Nor should one assume that the airframes being built today are the same as those flying when first introduced. The 767 is a wonderful design and has stood the test of time, IMHO.
336th Tactical Fighter Squadron, 4th Fighter Wing, Seymour Johnson AFB
 
135mech
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:56 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:55 pm

Quoting N766UA (Reply 18):
Quoting 135mech (Reply 16):
It's [767] always been a "generic" looking bird to me.

Yeah, it's certainly boring, but I would never call it ugly. If anything, it's far cleaner looking than the A300; its multitude of flap track fairings and blocky wing fences don't help it to look any less pudgy.

LOL sooo true! To me the A300 was more pudgy/fugly than any other bird...even Antonov's!

[Edited 2012-07-10 10:57:30]
135Mech
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22947
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 6:01 pm

Quoting flaps30 (Reply 19):
Do all new production 767's roll off the assembly line with blended winglets as a basic feature now?

No. The winglets are added after delivery at other facilities.
 
cargolex
Posts: 1201
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:20 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 6:14 pm

Quoting flaps30 (Reply 19):
Do all new production 767's roll off the assembly line with blended winglets as a basic feature now?

No. Winglets are not added on the assembly line. They're a post-delivery mod.
 
irelayer
Posts: 929
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 6:16 pm

Also consider this...767 acquisition and maintenance cost is probably significantly lower than the 787 at this point in time. Parts are cheaper and more abundant, supply chains are well established, accurate performance data is there, and you probably do get a good discount from Boeing even in smaller quantities. It's kind of like if you want to buy a car and look at lifetime cost of operation between a Prius and a small car. Prius is twice the price so it would take you X number of years to realize the cost savings vs. a cheaper car with good gas mileage. I realize the analogy isn't perfect but it is just for illustration purposes. In other words, a perfect starter aircraft for poorer airlines that might want an efficient long range aircraft on the cheap.

-IR
 
User avatar
Aesma
Posts: 7477
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:14 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 6:29 pm

Quoting Stitch (Reply 10):
I expect passenger sales will start to dry up, but the freighter's prospects look good. UPS will need another 50 to replace their remaining A300-600RFs and FedEx will need well over a hundred more to complete replacement of their A300-600RF, A310F and MD-10F fleets.

Some of those A300 are from 2007 ! I doubt they'll be replaced soon. That's also my answer to the OP. The A300 was still being build as a cargo plane when most airlines that flew A300s had already retired them.
New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
 
nomadic
Posts: 347
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 1:56 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:03 pm

Quoting redrooster3 (Reply 4):
I feel the 767 has the highest chance of breaching the 100 year mile stone of flight, and still being active.

A while back I remember reading an 'alternate history' novel about a future America following an economic collapse, set in 2070 or so. The main characters travel from the west coast to Washington DC aboard a 'beat up but serviceable' 767. ( I think the airline was Delunimerican)
 
captainstefan
Posts: 338
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 7:53 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:03 pm

Quoting redrooster3 (Reply 4):
Azerbaijan Airlines,
Quoting flaps30 (Reply 19):
Do all new production 767's roll off the assembly line with blended winglets as a basic feature now?
Quoting Stitch (Reply 22):
No. The winglets are added after delivery at other facilities.
Quoting cargolex (Reply 23):
No. Winglets are not added on the assembly line. They're a post-delivery mod.

Delta's TOC at ATL is currently hosting 4K-AZ82 while winglets are added. Sharp looking bird (sitting adjacent to "Janet" 737-66N N319BD).
Long Live the Tulip!
 
ghifty
Posts: 885
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:12 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:10 pm

Quoting nomadic (Reply 26):
A while back I remember reading an 'alternate history' novel about a future America following an economic collapse, set in 2070 or so. The main characters travel from the west coast to Washington DC aboard a 'beat up but serviceable' 767. ( I think the airline was Delunimerican)

That sounds interesting, alt history novels are always fun reads.. any chance you can remember the name?

Quoting flaps30 (Reply 19):
Do all new production 767's roll off the assembly line with blended winglets as a basic feature now?

Nope.

Quoting irelayer (Reply 24):
It's kind of like if you want to buy a car and look at lifetime cost of operation between a Prius and a small car.

A better analogy would be if you have a 2007 Prius, and you want to either buy a completely new 2007 model or 2012 model. You have a very good idea of what you can expect out of the new '07 model.. no big surprises. The '12 model might come with a few..
Fly Delta Jets
 
GCPET
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 12:43 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:16 pm

The 767 is still a very good plane and has a wide range of routes it's profitable on! An example would be BA's SH and LH 767's. It's very profitable to the airline because they can be used on European routes for Cargo, e.g. Early morning FRA is profitable due to the Cargo it carries but is also profitable on long routes. The added bonus of commonality to the 757 makes it more desirable if the airline already has 757's. Smaller airlines are ordering the 767 due to the reduced price in comparison to the 787 and it's a well estabilished aircraft overall.   Long live the 767!

GCPET
If it's not Boeing, I'm not going!
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18846
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:22 pm

Quoting cargolex (Reply 23):
Quoting flaps30 (Reply 19):
Do all new production 767's roll off the assembly line with blended winglets as a basic feature now?

No. Winglets are not added on the assembly line. They're a post-delivery mod.

And winglets aren't certified for the 767 freighter which accounts for most recent 767 deliveries.
 
tdscanuck
Posts: 8572
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:25 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:34 pm

Quoting kl911 (Reply 15):
I can never understand that between the sexy 757 and the powerhorse 777 they designed this ugly bird.

It's all in the eye of the beholder; I like the look of the 767. It looks like an airliner should. The 757, on the other hand, is the ugliest commercial jet ever to come out of Boeing. And I include the thank-god-never-built-Hunchback-Of-Mukilteo in that assessment.

Tom.
 
User avatar
kc135topboom
Posts: 10997
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:26 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 9:24 pm

Quoting Lafite82 (Reply 5):
The military version KC-46A will not be delivered to the air force till 2017.

No, the first of 4 SDD KC-46s is due for delivery in 2015, and all four flying flight testing by 2016. The remaining 14 KC-46As have not been ordered, yet. Only the 4 SDD tankers have been a firm order. So the delivery schedule for the 14 remaining tankers may slip due to the USAF ordering system, not any fault of Boeing.

Quoting na (Reply 9):
I doubt many of the post-2010 built frames will see more than 15 years of flying. They´ll end up as spares for the USAF tankers like the late-built 707s did in the 80s.

I disagree, the post 2010 B-767s ordered by the airlines will fly out to about 20 years, as most airliners do. Some may be converted to BCFs in 10-15 years, and the B-763Fs will fly for a very long time.

In the 1980s, when the USAF bought up all those B-707s, they were not for spares for the KC-135 fleet. They were bought to 'donate' their engines and parts of the horizontial stabilizer to KC-135As being converted to the KC-135E.

Quoting flaps30 (Reply 19):
Do all new production 767's roll off the assembly line with blended winglets as a basic feature now?

No, the FedEx birds won't have them, the UPS birds don't have them and the KC-46As won't have them.
 
jeffry747
Posts: 906
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:26 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 9:26 pm

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 31):
It's all in the eye of the beholder;

Agreed. I love the look of the 757, 762, 763, and 772. But I can't stand the overly stretched look of the 753, 764, and especially the 773. They REALLY overdid it with the 777-300. The only birds that looked good stretched are the DC-8, 727-200, and 747-8.
C'mon Big B, FLY!
 
roseflyer
Posts: 9606
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 9:45 pm

The 767 has a big advantage because it is the lowest trip cost widebody. The A330-200 or 787-8 will never beat the 767-300 on trip costs. The A330 and 787 however beat the 767 on fuel burn per seat and CASM. However in some operations, total trip costs is more important than CASM. Most airlines are heavily focused on CASM, but there are some 767 operators that need an airplane with payload and range, but don’t have the capacity needs for anything bigger. Airlines based on more rural parts of the world or far distances from main economic centers like MIAT, Air Astana or LAN need range, but not capacity. There’s no plane that would be more profitable operating to Easter Island or from Kazakhstan or Mongolia to Europe. When bigger isn’t better, the 767 is still the best plane on the market.

Similarly, it works because of trip costs for the Air Force Tanker and FedEx or UPS. It may have higher fuel burn, but overall it’s costs are lower to operate and with lower load factors that some operators have, the 767 makes sense.

I think the 767 is still being produced and ordered because no manufacturer decided to target the 200 passenger medium-long haul mission. The mission is best covered by the 757/767. It’s a small market so Airbus and Boeing aren’t particularly interested in it, so airlines are forced to use either airplanes that are too large or are older designs.
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
 
User avatar
1337Delta764
Posts: 4891
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:02 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:02 pm

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 34):

The 767 has a big advantage because it is the lowest trip cost widebody. The A330-200 or 787-8 will never beat the 767-300 on trip costs. The A330 and 787 however beat the 767 on fuel burn per seat and CASM. However in some operations, total trip costs is more important than CASM. Most airlines are heavily focused on CASM, but there are some 767 operators that need an airplane with payload and range, but don’t have the capacity needs for anything bigger. Airlines based on more rural parts of the world or far distances from main economic centers like MIAT, Air Astana or LAN need range, but not capacity. There’s no plane that would be more profitable operating to Easter Island or from Kazakhstan or Mongolia to Europe. When bigger isn’t better, the 767 is still the best plane on the market.

Similarly, it works because of trip costs for the Air Force Tanker and FedEx or UPS. It may have higher fuel burn, but overall it’s costs are lower to operate and with lower load factors that some operators have, the 767 makes sense.

I think the 767 is still being produced and ordered because no manufacturer decided to target the 200 passenger medium-long haul mission. The mission is best covered by the 757/767. It’s a small market so Airbus and Boeing aren’t particularly interested in it, so airlines are forced to use either airplanes that are too large or are older designs.

And actually, the 764ER has a lower CASM than the A332. The reason why the A332 outsells it isn't because of lower CASM, but more range and cargo capacity. The 764ER was mainly designed to suit the widebody trijet replacement needs of DL and CO. Remember that aircraft stretches will naturally have a lower CASM than aircraft shrinks. The 753 arguably has the lowest CASM of any narrowbody, yet it wasn't a big seller, so sales numbers mean nothing about CASM.

[Edited 2012-07-10 15:08:58]
The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
 
s.p.a.s.
Posts: 916
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2001 2:04 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:32 pm

Quote:

And winglets aren't certified for the 767 freighter which accounts for most recent 767 deliveries.

Not certified on freighters, hun? I see ...


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andrés Contador - AirTeamImages


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © DacmOne


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andrés Bravo Herrera


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Michael Walter



On a more serious note, IIRC, the blended winglets are not certified on the RR powered 767s

Cheers!
"ad astra per aspera"
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18846
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:06 pm

Quoting s.p.a.s. (Reply 36):
Quote:

And winglets aren't certified for the 767 freighter which accounts for most recent 767 deliveries.

Not certified on freighters, hun? I see ...

Thanks. That was the case at one time. I guess someone agreed to pay for the certification costs.
 
YYCSpotter
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 6:03 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:11 pm

Quoting redrooster3 (Reply 4):
I feel the 767 has the highest chance of breaching the 100 year mile stone of flight, and still being active.

That or the 737

Quoting GCPET (Reply 29):
LH 767's

Since when does LH operate 767s? (besides the condor lease of D-ABUA in 1994-1995 and the short lease in 2004 (i think)
I
 
flightsimer
Posts: 879
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 5:34 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:31 am

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 37):

Actually, The first freighter received the winglets just a few months after the first passenger winglets installation...
Commercial Pilot- SEL, MEL, Instrument
 
User avatar
DeltaMD90
Posts: 8245
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:25 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:44 am

Any chance of seeing more 764s? Or is that water under a bridge?
Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22947
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:47 am

Quoting DeltaMD90 (Reply 40):
Any chance of seeing more 764s? Or is that water under a bridge?

Very unlikely any more will be built. Boeing floated a 767-400ER freighter to FedEx, but they decided to take the standard 767-300 freighter model.
 
tdscanuck
Posts: 8572
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:25 am

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Wed Jul 11, 2012 1:08 am

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 34):
The A330-200 or 787-8 will never beat the 767-300 on trip costs.

This got beat to death on another thread; the 787-8 actually drops below the 767-300 on trip fuel at a surprisingly short range...estimates very because it depends on whose figures you use but it's somewhere in the 800-1500nm range where the 787-8 actually passes the 767-300 on trip fuel (for equal payload), let alone per-seat fuel.

Tom.
 
GCPET
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 12:43 pm

RE: Boeing 767 New Orders - Why?

Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:24 pm

Quoting YYCspotter (Reply 38):
Since when does LH operate 767s? (besides the condor lease of D-ABUA in 1994-1995 and the short lease in 2004 (i think)

I mean't Longhaul Aircraft (LH) as oppose to Lufthansa   sorry for the confusion

GCPET
If it's not Boeing, I'm not going!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: alomar, calpsafltskeds, cesarv777, coairman, GlenP, hongkongflyer, hummingbird, ikolkyo, intotheair, rta, thekorean, Thenoflyzone, TracyAnnFL, Yahoo [Bot] and 282 guests