Flyingsottsman
Topic Author
Posts: 582
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:32 pm

Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:48 am

Reported in the Sunday Hearld Sun today a passenger on a flight from Bali wants to lodge documents in the Supreme Court because as he says he was "Assaulted by the extreme volume in his headset"and is now launching a damages clam in the Supreme Court.
In the paper its says "A statement of claim alleges a short time into the flight to Melbourne the man fitted the ear plugs intio his ears supplied by the airline and plugged them into the his seat's audio jack. "His ears were imediately assualted by the extreme volume playing through the headset".
It goes on to say that now he clams he has accoustic shock, tinnitus in both ear and sleep disruption syndrome. It also says that evern thow he was listining to the music at a lower volume when the anouncements came over it was at such a high volume now he want to sue JQ.

How many more greedy, stupid people are out there that will waste the Court's time in order to get a quick easy buck. Jetstar surly has nothing to worry about, I wounder if some of these Judges laugh and shake their heads at what some people will do to get easy money these days.
 
PEET7G
Posts: 468
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:00 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:19 am

Peet7G
 
User avatar
CrimsonNL
Posts: 1783
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:34 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:45 am

That's why you should always turn down the volume before you plug in your headset.. It is incidents like these that make me wonder why people don't have common sense anymore.

Martijn
Always comparing your flown types list with mine
 
Dogbreath
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 8:49 am

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:11 pm

What I find even sadder than this ridiculous individual, is that there are solicitors/lawyers that would take this case on.
Truth, Honour, Loyalty
 
Flyingsottsman
Topic Author
Posts: 582
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:32 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Sun Dec 23, 2012 1:11 pm

Where I work at, the Supreme Court, we had a lady that sued Delta Airlines she was on a flight from Detriot to Los Angeles she was using the toliet and some one open the door on her while she was sitting there. She flew all the way back to Melbourne then decided to sue DL cause of the problems she has suffered since some one walked in on her, the thing is that she won her claim. I was reading her file because it was Delta Airlines. If it was not so serious you would be rolling on the floor laughing but people are doing this and whats more they are getting away with it by winning their clams. Such a stupid world we live in now when it comes to this thing. And the Lawyers and Solicitors are rubbing their hands together they must see money walking into their firms every day now.
 
User avatar
zeke
Posts: 9757
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:42 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Sun Dec 23, 2012 2:10 pm

Quoting Flyingsottsman (Thread starter):
Jetstar surly has nothing to worry about, I wounder if some of these Judges laugh and shake their heads at what some people will do to get easy money these days.

I think the passenger has every right to take this to court if they feel like they have a case, at the same time I think the court should be able to award costs and damages against such claimants where they are of the view it is frivolous litigation.

The boundary needs to be established by the courts based upon facts, not public opinion.
We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
 
User avatar
817Dreamliiner
Posts: 3209
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 4:12 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Sun Dec 23, 2012 2:14 pm

Jeez, and i was thinking the story about that passenger suing because of a tailstrike was ridiculous...
Please let me know... If you know this is the end of the world, Let me know... If you know the truth...
 
Elevated
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 6:52 am

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Sun Dec 23, 2012 9:24 pm

Quoting zeke (Reply 5):
I think the passenger has every right to take this to court if they feel like they have a case


That is such an ambiguous statement.

That's half the problem right there. The other part is the courts ruling and listening to their outrageous claims/behavior. How about a little bit of responsibility goes a long way and a little personal awareness too? God forbid.

Step one) Is lowering the volume prior to plugging in the headset if you're such a fragile flower. We live in a World of zero accountability or personal liability. Step two) NetJets.

Where does the "Idiocracy" end and the logical, analytic reasoning start these days? You wouldn't believe what people say and say they are going to "sue or write in" over in the Cabin. The entitlement.
 
User avatar
Francoflier
Posts: 3690
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2001 12:27 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:21 pm

Quoting Flyingsottsman (Thread starter):
Jetstar surly has nothing to worry about, I wounder if some of these Judges laugh and shake their heads at what some people will do to get easy money these days.

Judges won't shake their heads at anything, they'll just do their job in total impartiality. What they think of all of that once they get back home is another issue I guess.

As far as Jetstar not having anything to worry about, I'm not so sure. Even if the case is thrown out, it will take weeks, months and several preliminary hearings before it happens, with all the associated legal costs. Unless the case is clear cut, many companies (and the court) will prefer to settle to avoid protracted, expensive and possibly mediatized legal affair.

Frivolous suers, and I'm inclined to believe that man is one of them, do not necessarily go to court with the aim of winning the case. They just hope to stir enough crap around that the defendant (usually a big company) will prefer to quietly sweep it under the carpet rather than risk it. Not to mention that it's sometimes cheaper to settle than to pay for endless hours of some of the most expensive lawyers around...

Oh, I almost forgot:

I'll do my own airline. With Blackjack. And hookers. In fact, forget the airline.
 
User avatar
a36001
Posts: 251
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 2:47 am

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:36 pm

This is one of the reason our insurance premiums are so high! (Like green slips in NSW). Sue at all cost's! This world is becoming full of little darlings, I'm over it! I want my deserted island! Happy Christmas  
 
YVRFlyer
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:19 am

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:53 pm

Quoting francoflier (Reply 8):
Frivolous suers, and I'm inclined to believe that man is one of them, do not necessarily go to court with the aim of winning the case. They just hope to stir enough crap around that the defendant (usually a big company) will prefer to quietly sweep it under the carpet rather than risk it. Not to mention that it's sometimes cheaper to settle than to pay for endless hours of some of the most expensive lawyers around...

That's why it's time for the airlines to go on the offensive: Just as they impose longterm or lifetime bans on passengers for violence, why not create something for frivolous litigants? Like, if someone tries to do this, ban him/her for life from ever flying on the airline again - perhaps compile a list with other airlines, so they too can avoid these risks. People who engage in these kinds of lawsuits often make it a habit elsewhere. A little bit of ostracism and shunning would be a good inhibitor against bad behavior! Let 'em fly on NetJets if they want.
YVRFlyer
 
Longhornmaniac
Posts: 2960
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:33 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:58 pm

Is this the new a.net meme thread?   

Cheers,
Cameron
Cheers,
Cameron
 
User avatar
airportugal310
Posts: 3208
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 12:49 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:04 pm

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 11):
Is this the new a.net meme thread?


 
I sell airplanes and airplane accessories
 
qf002
Posts: 3064
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:14 am

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Mon Dec 24, 2012 12:08 am

Quoting Elevated (Reply 7):
The other part is the courts ruling and listening to their outrageous claims/behavior

Our courts are far less inclined to listen to these sorts of claims than others around the world. They will listen and they will judge based on what they hear, but they will only let a case like this proceed if there is a really clear link to the company being at fault and if the damages are real (ie not just "I broke my fingernail, give me $1m please").

I don't see this going much further.
 
User avatar
EK413
Posts: 4328
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2003 3:11 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Mon Dec 24, 2012 1:13 am

Quoting zeke (Reply 5):

I was waiting for the part when you say "just kidding" but your honesty in favor of such people living in our society...

As for the passenger suing JQ he should receive a life ban from flying FULL STOP!

EK413
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
 
YVRFlyer
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:19 am

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:06 am

Quoting EK413 (Reply 14):
As for the passenger suing JQ he should receive a life ban from flying FULL STOP!

        
        

Totally with you there, EK413! I imagine that a lot of airlines' strategists and lawyers hang out here, hopefully they will see that some types passengers aren't worth try to attract, and it is worth examining ways to repel and purge them. Lifetime bans will certainly have an educational effect on the public! Even just floating the idea as a trial balloon will make potential frivolous litigants think twice.

So, to the community, do you think this could be implemented? Yes, no? And if so, how would you try to roll out a program like this?
YVRFlyer
 
airtrainer
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 11:44 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Mon Dec 24, 2012 8:24 am

Quoting EK413 (Reply 14):
As for the passenger suing JQ he should receive a life ban from flying FULL STOP!

Guess this moron would try to sue for that as well. Stupidity is endless...for sure   
Life is short : eat dessert first !
 
ZuluAlpha
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:22 am

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:02 pm

Quoting airtrainer (Reply 16):
Quoting EK413 (Reply 14):
As for the passenger suing JQ he should receive a life ban from flying FULL STOP!

Guess this moron would try to sue for that as well. Stupidity is endless...for sure

I know of persons that work for an airline in their reservations centre where the staff have claimed acoustic shock and after the third workers claim of acoustic shock, the airline took the step as to not allow the staff to take phone calls. A similar situation could happen here, if this person is successful in suing JQ then, for the safety of the own passenger, they could restrict the movements of the passenger to fly. Or I guess they sign a disclaimer written up by the JQ lawyers, stating that if he uses the entertainment system, it is his own silly fault.
Flown on:_CRJ, CR& D10 DHT DH8, DH2, DH3, DH4, EMB, E45, E75, E90, F28 J32 M80 SH6 320, 32B, 332, 333, 380, 717, 732, 733, 734, 73H, 743, 744, 752 762, 763, 772, 77W
 
fiscal
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:47 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Mon Dec 24, 2012 11:13 pm

One thing that everyone seems to have missed is that the post states that it was the announcement that was loud not the music.

If it was the PA that did the damage, then maybe this is something a bit more serious.

I must admit that I do not fly JQ, so I do not know what IFE options they offer, so not sure of the veracity of the story anyway.
 
User avatar
zeke
Posts: 9757
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:42 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Tue Dec 25, 2012 12:21 am

Quoting EK413 (Reply 14):

I was waiting for the part when you say "just kidding" but your honesty in favor of such people living in our society...

As for the passenger suing JQ he should receive a life ban from flying FULL STOP!

The courts is the only forum where all the facts can come to light in an impartial setting. At the same time, I think the courts should be able to award costs against plaintiffs for frivolous litigation. I am not in favor of frivolous litigation, and I am not in favor of removing peoples access to legal representation. I do not have all the information, neither do you, a kangaroo court achieves nothing.
We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
 
CXB77L
Posts: 2600
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:18 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Tue Dec 25, 2012 1:20 pm

Quoting CrimsonNL (Reply 2):
That's why you should always turn down the volume before you plug in your headset.. It is incidents like these that make me wonder why people don't have common sense anymore.

I agree that there appears to be a lack of common sense here, but I would also think that when one plugs in a headset, one does not expect the volume to be so loud as to damage their hearing. There should be some safeguards in place to prevent the volume from getting too high.

Quoting Dogbreath (Reply 3):
What I find even sadder than this ridiculous individual, is that there are solicitors/lawyers that would take this case on.

Because everybody is entitled to legal representation.

Quoting Elevated (Reply 7):
That's half the problem right there. The other part is the courts ruling and listening to their outrageous claims/behavior.

The court will determine what's "outrageous" and what's "frivolous". The defendant may file a motion to strike out a statement of claim for various reasons, one of which is if they believe a claim is frivolous or vexatious. The court will then rule on that motion.

Quoting zeke (Reply 19):
The courts is the only forum where all the facts can come to light in an impartial setting. At the same time, I think the courts should be able to award costs against plaintiffs for frivolous litigation. I am not in favor of frivolous litigation, and I am not in favor of removing peoples access to legal representation. I do not have all the information, neither do you, a kangaroo court achieves nothing.

  

I agree that making a "ruling" here on a.net without knowing all the facts doesn't achieve anything.

Incidentally, costs are awarded to the defendant if a claim is struck off as being frivolous.
Boeing 777 fanboy
 
aztrainer
Posts: 713
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:17 pm

RE: Man Wants To Take JQ To Court Over Headset

Tue Dec 25, 2012 4:40 pm

Quoting CXB77L (Reply 20):
I agree that there appears to be a lack of common sense here, but I would also think that when one plugs in a headset, one does not expect the volume to be so loud as to damage their hearing. There should be some safeguards in place to prevent the volume from getting too high.

One would think that someone would know that a setting for one person may not be comfortable for another. Most auditory equipment have limits, but you then have a problem with people that have hearing problems and need amplified singles. They then could get into trouble for not having equal access for people with hearing loss/damages.

Quoting fiscal (Reply 18):
One thing that everyone seems to have missed is that the post states that it was the announcement that was loud not the music.

If it was the PA that did the damage, then maybe this is something a bit more serious.

I have been on flights where the announcements are slightly louder and have a different sound than that of the music, but it had never been at a extremely higher rate. Also, I have a problem with only one person experiencing discomfort due to the volume increase. I would think that it should of happened to more people than just this individual.

Lastly, thank GOD this is not an American for once and our wonderful litigious society.

Quoting EK413 (Reply 14):
As for the passenger suing JQ he should receive a life ban from flying FULL STOP!

Totally agree and I wish that there was a idiot "no fly" list that people could be placed on for these type of actions. If proven to be a frivolous lawsuit you have the possibility of a ban. Flying is a privilege and not a right. You abuse the privilege, you should lose the right to fly. IMHO