zrs70
Topic Author
Posts: 3300
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2000 4:08 am

Piedmont 767 Service

Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:19 am

How many 767's did PI operate? What routes were served? What was their first/ business product like?
17 year airliners.net vet! 2000-2016
 
kaitak
Posts: 8935
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 1999 5:49 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:41 am

Six were ordered, five of which remain with US (and one is now operated by Transaero).

They were delivered in 1987-88, then went to US Airways in 1989, with the takeover.

N603P became N245AY
N604P became N246AY
N605P became EI-DBW (Transaero)
N606P became N248AY
N614P became N249AU
N614P became N250AY

The only information I have on routes is that they operated PI's service to LGW, which was of course taken over by US and continues to this day (soon to move to LHR).

As to service, it was definitely a two class operation; I think they had 25 seats in C Class, but I stand to be corrected on that one.
 
MSYPI7185
Posts: 133
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:45 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:43 am

IIRC PI took delivery of 6 767's and US took the remaining 6 after the merger, and the dumbest thing IMO US did not exercise the options on the other 12 762ER's.

The first Route was TPA-CLT-LGW-CLT-TPA. Other than familiarization flights upon introduction of the type.
Other routes operated off the top of my head were CLT-MCO/TPA/LAX/MIA/BWI. I think we operated BWI-LAX for a time.

I think CLT-FRA was announced, but did not start until after US took over. With out checking the Data base, I seem to recall we received 3 in PI colors the other 3 polished AL w/Piedmont decals.

I'm sure someone here with a time table may be able to nail this down, but my memory just isnt that good. The merger with US in the middle of all this just makes it difficult for me to remember.

Just as PI was the lauch customer for the 734, but we never received one in PI colors, just polished AL with crappy decals!!

The First Class service was good. We had China, Glassware and stainless silverware. Hot Towel Service on Intl and West coast flights. The pax seemed to like it, I had only been on one EAL flight in First and it was a late night flight ATL-MSY, so I had nothing to personally compare it to. The EAL flight for me was just a larger seat and free drinks, nothing special.
I really enjoyed the First Class on PI, but then as I said, I have nothing else to compare it to. PI intented their FC to be one of the premier FC products among the legacy carriers, but IIRC the merger quickly scaled that back.

Hope this helps,

Later MD
 
PITrules
Posts: 2109
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2000 11:27 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:54 am

Quoting MSYPI7185 (Reply 2):
IIRC PI took delivery of 6 767's and US took the remaining 6 after the merger, and the dumbest thing IMO US did not exercise the options on the other 12 762ER's.
PI ordered 6 767s and 6 options. After the merger, US exercised the options for those 6 additional a/c for a total of 12 frames. I'm not sure where you are getting "the options on the other 12 762ER's" (for a total of 24) from?

[Edited 2012-12-29 04:26:17]
FLYi
 
jfk777
Posts: 5828
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:31 pm

Piedmont didn't enjoy the "glow" from their 767 for long since they merged soon after. CLT to London was the route which the 767 allowed Piedmont to launch. Surely Piedmont would have launched more European flights from CLT and BWI.
 
User avatar
ramprat74
Posts: 1322
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 6:01 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:00 pm

I flew on one in 1987. They had them on the LAX-BWI-LAX route. I still have the headphones from the flight.
 
802flyguy
Posts: 232
Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 1:56 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:23 pm

The PI F/C service on 767 was very nice indeed (as it was in 727 days, when PI only had F/C on Calif flights. Even Y class was nothing to sneeze at, with how towels and free (CA, of course) wines.

The original PI seating was 25/185, with F/C in 2-1-2; the F/C seats offered great room and recline (although not lie flat). It was changed to 24 seats in 2-2-2 during the BA wetlease/codeshare days, actually a bit of a downgrade to match BA C class standard.

CLT-LAX flights on the 767 commenced in early summer of '87; BWI-LAX (a new market for PI) followed later. (Early 88?)

Until shortly after the US merger, the 767 audio entertainment had a UAL Ch9 style ATC/pilot channel, although I don't think that was advertised.

Those who been around PI for a while had seen their airline go from a local service carrier with YS-11s and FH-227s hopping across the Mid-South to flying wide body jets across eight time zones, a bit of a source of pride.
 
wedgetail737
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 8:44 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sun Dec 30, 2012 1:56 am

I had the priviledge of flying PI/US 767-200's between CLT-LAX...then onto OAK. If I remember right, the 767-200's had different, more comfortable coach seats during the merger transition timeframe.
 
IAHFLYR
Posts: 3941
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:56 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:21 am

Quoting MSYPI7185 (Reply 2):
Just as PI was the lauch customer for the 734, but we never received one in PI colors, just polished AL with crappy decals!!


I thought US was the launch customer, but know thinking about it you're probably correct.....damn I hate it that PI is gone, loved their service top to bottom and the Piedmont Punch was fabulous. I still have one can sitting in my airplane room!
Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
 
n5014k
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:19 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:05 am

I still miss PI very much. My home airport is BWI and while I acknowledge the benefit WN has brought to us I maintain that PI's service and attitude during its peak years were superior to those of just about every other domestic US airline. We had two Presidents Club rooms here, too.

I flew the 767 BWI-LAX-BWI many times and their first class service was quite good. On the flights I took the service was designated First Class, not Business class - I still have some boarding passes somewhere saying so. They had 2-1-2 seating in First, and I tried the single middle seat just once. It looked like it would be nicer than it was - the seats had hard "slabs" on either side of the seats and that made it tough to spread out. After than I found aisle seats somewhere else. For a while after US took them over I'd ask the nicest flight attendant working First Class if he or she was from PI and the answer almost always was "yes." My apologies to you US fans out there but in about 18 months I found US had either ruined or chased away the nicer PI folk. Different corporate cultures. Same thing when they took over PSA, for that matter. I gave up on USAir a couple of years later and switched back to DL, staying with them until they canceled the Flying Colonel program.

By the way, maybe there is no perfect way to do First Class in a 767 - Delta's 2-2-2 seating was uncomfortably cramped, certainly not a satisfactory successor to the 1011 from a passenger comfort point of view.
 
FI642
Posts: 992
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 9:48 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:23 am

I used to non-rev BWI-MCO-BWI on the PI 762's they always put me up front and treated me great. I do remember the
employees at BWI grumbling about the engine selection, which I always thought was strange. PI was in no way stupid
they weighted their options carefully. I really truly miss them. What a great carrier they were.
737MAX, Cool Planes for the Worlds Coolest Airline.
 
802flyguy
Posts: 232
Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 1:56 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:03 am

Quoting kaitak (Reply 1):

N603P became N245AY
N604P became N246AY
N605P became EI-DBW (Transaero)
N606P became N248AY
N614P became N249AU
N614P became N250AY


Too lazy to look it up on rzjets, there was an N607P in the original PI order; it had reputation as a "hangar queen". IIRC, it was this ship that suffered a tail strike on landing at LAX not long after the start of PI's 767 service there. It sat in the old AA hangars for a couple of weeks, as PI and Boeing engineers and techs pored over it. In the wake of the JAL123 disaster, the rear pressure bulkhead received a great deal of attention indeed. With that plane out of commission, the morning LAX-CLT was downguaged to a 727-200; PI took a lot of oversales for a while
 
zippyjet
Posts: 5077
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 3:32 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:04 am

I remember back in the days of Reagan/Bush that Piedmont flew the 767 from BWI to LGW on a red eye flight. Where out of MIA did the 767 fly for Piedmont? I thought Miami only got Piedmont 737's, Fokkers and maybe a DC 9.
I'm Zippyjet & I approve of this message!
 
DL_Mech
Posts: 2061
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2000 7:48 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:01 am

Here is a seat map:

This plane is built to withstand anything... except a bad pilot.
 
alexinwa
Posts: 865
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2000 2:08 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:22 pm

Awesome seat map. Where did you find it?
You mad Bro???
 
User avatar
longhauler
Posts: 4941
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:00 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:31 pm

Quoting alexinwa (Reply 14):
Awesome seat map. Where did you find it?

Back before the days of the Internet, one could subscribe to a monthly publication filled with seat charts of all airlines. There was an International version as well as a Domestic version. They were about the size of an airline timetable.

This seat chart appears to come from that publication.
Just because I stopped arguing, doesn't mean I think you are right. It just means I gave up!
 
connies4ever
Posts: 3393
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:54 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:32 pm

Quoting n5014k (Reply 9):
My apologies to you US fans out there but in about 18 months I found US had either ruined or chased away the nicer PI folk. Different corporate cultures.

One major reason why mergers don't work the way bean counters tell you. See: AC & CP. Ten years ago and more, there are still grievances being argued about it, drags down overall performance. As well as lingering "us vs them" mentality.
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
 
User avatar
mayor
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:58 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:39 pm

Quoting n5014k (Reply 9):
By the way, maybe there is no perfect way to do First Class in a 767 - Delta's 2-2-2 seating was uncomfortably cramped, certainly not a satisfactory successor to the 1011 from a passenger comfort point of view.

As delivered, DL's -200s had 24 FC seats, in a 2-2-2 configuration. After complaints of cramped seating, 1 row of FC was removed, making it 18 seats.
"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
 
USAIRWAYS321
Posts: 1703
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 4:31 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:49 pm

Quoting 802flyguy (Reply 11):
Too lazy to look it up on rzjets, there was an N607P in the original PI order

Yes, N607P became N647US. With Piedmont, it was named "City of Charlotte" and was the first widebody airframe I ever flew on. She is now EI-DBW with Transaero.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © OGGturbojets
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peachair


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank C. Duarte Jr.
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Marlo Plate - Iberian Spotters


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alexey Vlasyuk

 
wedgetail737
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 8:44 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:58 pm

Quoting mayor (Reply 17):
As delivered, DL's -200s had 24 FC seats, in a 2-2-2 configuration. After complaints of cramped seating, 1 row of FC was removed, making it 18 seats.

Off the overall subject but inline with your specific subject... I flew 1st class on USAir (not US Airways at the time) BAe-146 from OAK-LAX and the guy next to me was an international flier. He made it pretty clear that the first class in those airplanes sucked...no legroom. He told me that he shouldn't have to touch the monumment in front of him when he crossed his legs while seated.
 
User avatar
deltacto
Posts: 317
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:49 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:11 pm

Quoting alexinwa (Reply 14):
Awesome seat map. Where did you find it?

Here is one web site that shows the Piedmont 767-200ER

http://boardingarea.com/blogs/freque...t-map-piedmont-airlines-767-200er/

This is an amazing site - lots of old seat maps
 
User avatar
deltacto
Posts: 317
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:49 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:14 pm

Quoting mayor (Reply 17):
As delivered, DL's -200s had 24 FC seats, in a 2-2-2 configuration. After complaints of cramped seating, 1 row of FC was removed, making it 18 seats.

Correct - here is DL's 767-200 seat map after the reconfiguration: F-18 Y-186

http://boardingarea.com/blogs/freque...ir-lines-boeing-767-200-from-1987/
 
okay
Posts: 597
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:11 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:37 pm

Was the aft galley so short in depth in reality or is it just wrongly drawn in the seat map?

okAY
 
93Sierra
Posts: 354
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:01 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:42 pm

It would nice to give these birds a few flights out west before they go. Phx -clt or, PHX to HNL.
 
johnclipper
Posts: 462
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 5:44 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Tue Jan 01, 2013 12:46 am

Quoting deltacto (Reply 20):
This is an amazing site - lots of old seat maps

Just remember, these are not the official airline seat maps. These were generated by the publication.
"Flown every aircraft since the Wright Flyer" (guys, if you take this literally, then you need to get a life...)
 
MSYPI7185
Posts: 133
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:45 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Tue Jan 01, 2013 8:24 am

Quoting PITrules (Reply 3):
PI ordered 6 767s and 6 options. After the merger, US exercised the options for those 6 additional a/c for a total of 12 frames. I'm not sure where you are getting "the options on the other 12 762ER's" (for a total of 24) from?

Your correct the total was for 12 767's. 6 and 6 options, however I seem to remember that US did not exercise the 6 options. Later they did order 6 767's but had quite a delay getting them. I do remember being irritated that they did not take the options only to turn around and order 6 767's sometime later. Like I said my memory is not as good as it used to be. I need to look through my PI things to see if I can dig up anymore on this. I just hope I have'nt completely lost my mind!!

MD
 
PITrules
Posts: 2109
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2000 11:27 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Tue Jan 01, 2013 12:20 pm

Quoting MSYPI7185 (Reply 25):

No worries; I do remember US taking up only 12 total airframes, so I assumed it was exercising the options on the original 6/6 order. You may be correct that they cancelled the original 6 options only to order 6 more at a later date. 24 seemed like a larger number.

[Edited 2013-01-01 04:24:38]
FLYi
 
CF-CPI
Posts: 1305
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2000 12:54 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:17 pm

Quoting mayor (Reply 17):
As delivered, DL's -200s had 24 FC seats, in a 2-2-2 configuration. After complaints of cramped seating, 1 row of FC was removed, making it 18 seats.

After the seat row was removed, FC was a generous 41"-42", which nicely compensated for the narrower seats vs. the L1011. Does anyone know the pitch prior to the rearrangement? I'm thinking it could have been as low as 36", which is tight for FC. Combined with the narrower seat, you can see why pax might have complained. I have an brochure for the DL 767, showing people in that original FC, and it does look tight (there's a staged photo of people eating a meal).
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18850
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:16 pm

Quoting CF-CPI (Reply 27):
Quoting mayor (Reply 17):
As delivered, DL's -200s had 24 FC seats, in a 2-2-2 configuration. After complaints of cramped seating, 1 row of FC was removed, making it 18 seats.

After the seat row was removed, FC was a generous 41"-42", which nicely compensated for the narrower seats vs. the L1011.

Regardless of seat pitch, 6-abreast F class (or even J class) on the 767 has always been a second-rate product (referring to the old recliner seats). The 767 requires 5-abreast (2-2-1 or 2-1-2) to offer comparable standards to the A300/310/330/340 with 2-2-2 seating and of course the even wider DC-10/MD-11/L-1011. With 2-2-2 on the 767 (just one less seat across than Y class) both the seats and armrests are notably narrow.
 
User avatar
mayor
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:58 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Tue Jan 01, 2013 5:28 pm

Quoting CF-CPI (Reply 27):
Quoting mayor (Reply 17):
As delivered, DL's -200s had 24 FC seats, in a 2-2-2 configuration. After complaints of cramped seating, 1 row of FC was removed, making it 18 seats.

After the seat row was removed, FC was a generous 41"-42", which nicely compensated for the narrower seats vs. the L1011. Does anyone know the pitch prior to the rearrangement? I'm thinking it could have been as low as 36", which is tight for FC. Combined with the narrower seat, you can see why pax might have complained. I have an brochure for the DL 767, showing people in that original FC, and it does look tight (there's a staged photo of people eating a meal).

I non-revved on a DL before they re-configured FC but I can't give any specifics other than my impression that it was relatively tight.
"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
 
PHLapproach
Posts: 1052
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 6:37 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Tue Jan 01, 2013 5:39 pm

Quoting 802flyguy (Reply 6):
Until shortly after the US merger, the 767 audio entertainment had a UAL Ch9 style ATC/pilot channel, although I don't think that was advertised.

I can confirm it actually still works. When I worked for US a few years ago once in a while when I was on break I would go up on aircraft during turns and one time I noticed the switch for OBS Audio on the overhead. Although I think it was placarded "deactivated" But I flipped it on and went to the back and sure enough there was ATC piping in from COMM1 through what I think was Channel 14 IIRC.
 
LGA777
Posts: 954
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 12:46 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Tue Jan 01, 2013 9:46 pm

As a Piedmont Employee and very frequent non rever back in that era would like to add a few of my memories not previously mentioned.

First I can't remember the month in 1987 that 767 service started but I do remember three huge milestones occurred the same day.

The start of 767 service. (Piedmont's first wide body service)
The start of CLT-LGW service (Piedmont's first transatlantic service)
The start of system wide First Class service (was previously only offered on a sub fleet of 6 727-200's for service to LAX and SFO).

It was a lot to introduce in one day but Piedmont pulled it off as I recall with Flying colors and I flew 4 First Class legs that first day and all was very smooth. Flying on just a 737-200 on my final leg of the day on the short CLT-LGA leg and getting Shrimp Cocktail, a nice steak with baked potato and vegetables and Piedmont's signature desert Chocolate Covered Strawberries was such a perfect end to an amazing day, after doing CLT-BWI-TPA-CLT on the 767 then watching the inaugural CLT-LGW depart with much pomp and circumstance.

The initial 2 aircraft rotation was CLT-BWI-TPA-CLT-LGW and LGW-CLT-TPA-CLT then a CLT-LAX-CLT turn was added when the 3rd aircraft 647 was delivered. If I remember correctly the slightly odd one way BWI-TPA leg lasted till around the merger in 1989 and was usually full or close.

The seats in First/Business were very plush looking and that 1 middle seat was narrower than the other 4, basically I think around the width of one that 2-2-2 configs had, and the other 4 you could really notice the difference in width from most other US carriers 2-2-2 seats, very comfortable.

The service to and from LGW up front was quite impressive I thought. Most courses were served on serving trolleys in each aisle. I recall having Prime Rib carved next to my seat, and being able to choose from 4 or 5 vegetables and others sides being added to my plate after choosing them by sight. Desert was usually some sort of large tall cake served on the trolley and being sliced at your seat, I recall this also on CLT-LAX as well.

One last observation was the ability to broadcast live TV over the Movie screens while on the ground. I recall watching the CBS evening news during boarding in CLT several times and on one memorable CLT-LAX evening flight the Lakers were in the NBA finals and the great crew actually was able to show most of the second half live, as I recall the movie had ended and many passengers were asking for the score and the GREAT crew decided to do even better. As I recall we started out watching from an ABQ station then as we continued west they switched to a PHX station and finally an LA one. The passengers loved it and created quite a happy party atmosphere on board, especially when the Lakers won.

Well these are some of my recollections from a very proud Piedmont employee, I hope some of you enjoyed them.

Cheers

LGA777
 
CF-CPI
Posts: 1305
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2000 12:54 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:56 pm

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 28):
With 2-2-2 on the 767 (just one less seat across than Y class) both the seats and armrests are notably narrow.

Right - the seat pairs are 48" wide, whereas the Airbus widebodies come in at 52"-53", and the 767 5 across is about that as well (54" I think). Boeing and Airbus narrowbody, as well as the L10/D10 and 747 offered 57" pairs and the center armrests are really nice and wide.
 
User avatar
nitepilot79
Posts: 781
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 9:10 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:54 pm

Before US, North Carolina was Piedmont country dammit  
 
User avatar
nitepilot79
Posts: 781
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 9:10 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:02 am

Piedmont is missed by many   
 
PI4EVER
Posts: 617
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:29 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:01 pm

I simply want to Thank many of you for the kind comments about "my" airline. I spent 20 years at PI and another 11+ years at US before early retirement. PI provided me the opportunity to live my dream of working for an airline right after I left military service, and although I worked for PI when it wasn't fashionable to do so....we were a "puddle jumper" airline who flew prop airplanes and had the reputation of being a "local yokel", I proudly wore my uniform and worked my you-know-what off for "my" airline. I was rewarded with a successful career, and pride at being associated with a truly outstanding airline and Company. It is hard to describe how one feels when you see the accomplishment your Company has made....thanks in part to dedicated employees....in the delivery of a 767 and the start of an international route, knowing you were a part of a successful, profitable, award-winning airline that grew from flying props throughout the South. Trust me, the delivery of a new 737-200 in the 70's was a big deal so to move forward to 1987 and experience the growth and success the 767 represented was very special for PI people.
I felt my years at US were equally successful, and mixed with the emotion and drama of 2 dynamic mergers in 2 years....PS and PI merged to US by 1989, I came away knowing I had been blessed to live my dream. I did not have the passion before, nor since about anything I've ever done, that surpassed the privilege and opportunity this airline gave me in 1969. And Thank You to my colleagues for working with me side-by-side, in the good times and bad, to help make this Company such a memorable legacy.
It was real. It was fun. It was real fun. Would I do it all over again?
In a heartbeat.....
watch what you want. you may get it.
 
CF-CPI
Posts: 1305
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2000 12:54 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:35 pm

Quoting PI4EVER (Reply 35):
.we were a "puddle jumper" airline who flew prop airplanes

You flew the YS-11, and that in and of itself was a unique feature on the US aviation landscape in the 60s and 70s.
 
802flyguy
Posts: 232
Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 1:56 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Thu Jan 03, 2013 8:00 pm

Quoting zrs70 (Thread starter):

How many 767's did PI operate? What routes were served?

Boy, has this thread brought back some memories!  

Getting back to the OP, on the routings. One of PI's first transcon redeyes was LAX-BWI on the 767. In the morning the aircraft would do a BWI-BDA turn, then usually back to LAX.
 
User avatar
SpaceshipDC10
Posts: 4462
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:44 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Thu Jan 03, 2013 9:18 pm

Quoting zrs70 (Thread starter):
What routes were served?

Maybe it was just a one off, but in July 1989 I saw one at ORD waiting on a taxiway near the concourses.
 
LGA777
Posts: 954
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 12:46 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:30 am

Quoting SpaceshipDC10 (Reply 38):
Maybe it was just a one off, but in July 1989 I saw one at ORD waiting on a taxiway near the concourses.

Piedmont never flew the 767 in and out of ORD on a scheduled basis so what ever you saw was either a charter or perhaps a BWI-LAX or LAX-BWI diversion perhaps, pretty sure Piedmont's ORD gates were not wide body capable as well.

Cheers

LGA777
 
connies4ever
Posts: 3393
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:54 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:27 am

Never was able to sample PI's 767 service, unfortunately. Sounds like it was a premium product. But I did do some shorthauls out of GSO with my then fiance. Piedmont was easily the best short haul outfit I've flown with, including WS. They could take a lesson.
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
 
cedarjet
Posts: 8101
Joined: Mon May 24, 1999 1:12 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:17 am

Piedmont did well to get the 767 when they did - it must have represented a significant gamble at the time (esp going from a puddlejumper to London - then again, what is the Atlantic, if not the world's greatest puddle?).

Here are two good regional airlines that made the same leap and it didn't work out - betcha forgot either of these even had 767s (both -200s, like Piedmont).

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Kjell Nilsson
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Johan Ljungdahl


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © MICHAEL BAKER
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bob Harrington - Bobqat Photographs



By pure coincidence, I have just glanced down at what I put on this morning, and it's this t-shirt!
http://www.skyshirts.com/product_info.php?cPath=21_53&products_id=157

[Edited 2013-01-04 02:17:38]
fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
 
User avatar
SpaceshipDC10
Posts: 4462
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:44 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:47 am

Quoting cedarjet (Reply 41):

Yes they took a big gamble, and indeed Braathens and Pacific Western didn't succeed, but from what I understand Piedmont had plans to use the 767s on transcon and trans-atlantic routes, which are quite different from the shorter hops in Western Canada or Norway
 
User avatar
longhauler
Posts: 4941
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:00 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:26 pm

Pacific Western had trans-cons, through YBR or YWG to YYZ. They had applied for non-stop YYZ-YYC, but was denied. Also, PW also had a large charter operation using B707-320s, which the B767s were to replace. Southern vacation charters, as well as trans-con charters.

But it was the denial of YYZ-YYC scheduled rights that sealed the fate for the B767s at PW. Ironically enough, AC which would have been instrumental in the denial of the YYZ-YYC rights, was quite happy to "pick up" the now unnecessary B767s from PW ... and that started the whole PWA / TCA registration battle that followed in the next decade!
Just because I stopped arguing, doesn't mean I think you are right. It just means I gave up!
 
Viscount724
Posts: 18850
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:15 am

Quoting longhauler (Reply 43):
Also, PW also had a large charter operation using B707-320s, which the B767s were to replace.

There was about a 4 year gap between disposal of their last 707-320C in 1979 and delivery of the two 762s in 1983. One of the two 707-320Cs crashed in a snowstorm on approach to YEG in 1973 killing the crew and a load of cattle. I think the -320Cs operated as freighters for quite a bit of their time with PW.

Their longest-lived 707 was an ex-QF -138B, with PW from 1967 to 1978, and another ex-QF 138B from 1969 to 1971. The first one was converted to a VIP aircraft after its years with PW and was restored in its original QF livery a few years ago after several years parked derelict in the UK. It was flown back to Australia and is now on display at a museum at Longreach where QF was founded. It was QF's first 707 (then VH-EBA) and the first commercial jet registered in Australia.
http://www.qfom.com.au/707.html

While with PW.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Kjell Nilsson
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ian Oswald (via Martin Stephen)

 
User avatar
longhauler
Posts: 4941
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:00 am

RE: Piedmont 767 Service

Sat Jan 05, 2013 1:19 am

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 44):
There was about a 4 year gap between disposal of their last 707-320C in 1979 and delivery of the two 762s in 1983.

Yes, the CEO (I think it was Rhys Eyton) had mentioned (to the pilots) when the B767s were delivered that he wanted PW to get back into the international charter market left with the last the B707s.

But ... say as he did, I really think he was banking on more transcontinental rights in Canada.
Just because I stopped arguing, doesn't mean I think you are right. It just means I gave up!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: a300, Alexa [Bot], BreninTW, clrd4t8koff, frequentpete, Google [Bot], JHwk, MKIAZ, ooslc, Planesmart, PlanesNTrains, seahawk, Someone83, ZKLOU and 267 guests