oldeuropean
Topic Author
Posts: 1686
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 5:19 pm

Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:22 pm

Tim Clark: EK consider to order another 30 A380s:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-0...rjumbos-for-network-expansion.html
Wer nichts weiss muss alles glauben
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23209
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:32 pm

Well JL said he had a large order in the works and a number of folks thought it could be another major top-up from EK...
 
User avatar
EPA001
Posts: 3797
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:13 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:51 pm

Quoting Stitch (Reply 1):
Well JL said he had a large order in the works and a number of folks thought it could be another major top-up from EK...

Well, as always time will tell.   But they are going to need that new airport in Dubai now pretty soon. Where else can they park all these A380's, B77W's and the A350's to come.  
 
KC135Hydraulics
Posts: 440
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:05 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:53 pm

Is there really the need?? I can't imagine the necessity.
MSgt, USAF
KC-135R / C-17A Pneudraulic Systems Mechanic Supervisor
 
starrion
Posts: 974
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 1:19 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:03 pm

at what point does top-up become over-the-top-up?

Or is the plan to start cycling units out of the fleet?
Knowledge Replaces Fear
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23209
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:06 pm

Quoting starrion (Reply 4):
Or is the plan to start cycling units out of the fleet?

A good number (if not majority) of EK's frames are on 12-year leases, so they will certainly be placing replacement orders.
 
Steelyman
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:40 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:08 pm

It is really interesting that in DXB you can see enormous rows of aircrafts seating in the tarmac for many hours and they still order 380 while they don't put up on the air their actual planes...
BRGDS, Mike
 
United885
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:18 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:11 pm

120 A380.
That´s an unbelievable number!
But why not? They have 5 daily flights to LHR on it´s own...I guess one day, EK will serve even the smallest airports with multiple A380 flights daily 
I haven´t been everywhere, but it´s on my list.
 
User avatar
KarelXWB
Crew
Posts: 20232
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:13 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:44 pm

Quoting starrion (Reply 4):
Or is the plan to start cycling units out of the fleet?

Both. EK wants 120 whalejets but they will have to replace the older frames in the near feature. So expect a few new orders between today and 2020.
Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
 
ozglobal
Posts: 2524
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 7:33 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:51 pm

Quoting KC135Hydraulics (Reply 3):
Is there really the need?? I can't imagine the necessity.

This is partly about developing demand, not just servicing it. 707's were big when no one but the wealthy could afford to fly, but they and 747's introduced 'tourist' class and the capacity tapped new demand. A huge new middle class is developing in China, India and other high growth markets. More and more people are travelling long haul more readily and more often in the world. Out of 8 Billion inhabitants, how many fly today on this planet today?

Your text exactly is what many US members wrote in the relation to the very idea of the A380 project. Now that it is delivered and EK is building its growth largely and successfully on the aircraft, we hear the same again, "can't imagine the necessity". Clearly the US aviation market dynamics are not those of other parts or even most parts of the world. Further, when I see the number of A380s now at JFK and LAX, I wonder if US carriers didn't just get that wrong too.
When all's said and done, there'll be more said than done.
 
User avatar
scbriml
Posts: 13475
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 10:37 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:50 pm

Quoting KC135Hydraulics (Reply 3):
Is there really the need?? I can't imagine the necessity.

Have you seen their passenger numbers and the sustained year-on-year growth in those numbers?

Quoting starrion (Reply 4):
at what point does top-up become over-the-top-up?

When their passenger numbers stop growing?

It's odd that EK ordering 50 77Ws at a throw isn't generally seen as "ridiculous". Why is that?  

Quoting Stitch (Reply 1):
Well JL said he had a large order in the works and a number of folks thought it could be another major top-up from EK...

Indeed. It could be that an MoU/LoI has already been signed. If it has, I would expect a firm order at the Dubai air show in November. Then again, the postulated "significant order" could be something else all together.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana!
 
greenwichsud
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 11:18 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:10 pm

Quoting OzGlobal (Reply 9):
Your text exactly is what many US members wrote in the relation to the very idea of the A380 project. Now that it is delivered and EK is building its growth largely and successfully on the aircraft, we hear the same again, "can't imagine the necessity". Clearly the US aviation market dynamics are not those of other parts or even most parts of the world. Further, when I see the number of A380s now at JFK and LAX, I wonder if US carriers didn't just get that wrong too.

No one is denying that that the global aviation market is growing at a rate faster than that of the US. That is the definition of a mature market: 1. all demand that can be stimulated has been tapped and 2. population and wealth growth in the US, for the most part, is typical of that of a mature nation. That is not the case in much of the world and there is clearly much more demand to be tapped beyond US O&D. With that said, when you read about the woes of the European carriers (AF being in worse shape than most), QF and, more recently SQ, one must wonder if there is enough room at this growing table for everyone.

Quoting OzGlobal (Reply 9):
Further, when I see the number of A380s now at JFK and LAX, I wonder if US carriers didn't just get that wrong too.

The revenue numbers from the stronger US carriers (none of whom fly A380s) indicate otherwise.
 
JAAlbert
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 12:43 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:26 pm

Quoting scbriml (Reply 10):
Quoting KC135Hydraulics (Reply 3):
Is there really the need?? I can't imagine the necessity.

Have you seen their passenger numbers and the sustained year-on-year growth in those numbers?
Quoting scbriml (Reply 10):
It's odd that EK ordering 50 77Ws at a throw isn't generally seen as "ridiculous". Why is that?


Okay, I'll say it - ordering 50 77Ws at a pop sounds ridiculous!

Having on hand 120 380s also sounds outrageous. Of course, Mr. Clark knows far better than us a.netters how many aircraft he needs and if he needs 50 new 77Ws and 120 380s, of course he should have them straight away. And yes, it seems he's making mountains of money flying these things around. I think what we are all breathless about is the shear size of these orders. No other carrier orders widebodies in such numbers - and certainly not in a single order or so. A thread a few years ago listed the largest 747s operators of the time. JAL had 70 or so 747s, BA had north of 50. Those are big airplanes and big fleets. EK comes along and intends on almost doubling the size of the largest 747 fleet with the even larger 380. On top of that, EK operates 50 77Ws and has another 120 on order. Its an astonishing number of big, big aircraft and certainly worth pondering.

Quoting Steelyman (Reply 6):
It is really interesting that in DXB you can see enormous rows of aircrafts seating in the tarmac for many hours and they still order 380 while they don't put up on the air their actual planes...

This is an interesting comment. What is the utilization rate of EK's aircraft? Could it do more with fewer planes?
 
Viscount724
Posts: 19065
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:13 pm

Quoting United885 (Reply 7):
120 A380.
That´s an unbelievable number!

It's not that big when you look at the number of 747s (over 50 in a few cases) operated by several carriers long ago when the global air traffic market was much smaller and deregulation was almost non-existent.

Or look at QF which once had around 30 744s in service, and Australia isn't a huge market and, unlike DXB, isn't a connecting hub well-located for most of the world's population.
 
ozglobal
Posts: 2524
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 7:33 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:14 pm

Quoting JAAlbert (Reply 12):
Okay, I'll say it - ordering 50 77Ws at a pop sounds ridiculous!

Having on hand 120 380s also sounds outrageous. Of course, Mr. Clark knows far better than us a.netters how many aircraft he needs and if he needs 50 new 77Ws and 120 380s, of course he should have them straight away. And yes, it seems he's making mountains of money flying these things around. I think what we are all breathless about is the shear size of these orders. No other carrier orders widebodies in such numbers - and certainly not in a single order or so. A thread a few years ago listed the largest 747s operators of the time. JAL had 70 or so 747s, BA had north of 50. Those are big airplanes and big fleets. EK comes along and intends on almost doubling the size of the largest 747 fleet with the even larger 380. On top of that, EK operates 50 77Ws and has another 120 on order. Its an astonishing number of big, big aircraft and certainly worth pondering.

Don't forget, the UAE have a limited time window to re-invent them-selves as an economy. They have the sense to recongnize that their relatively modest oil reserves will run out soon enough and the music will stop. They have as a sort of city state, the task of inventing an alternative economy to replace the oil. I think they look to Singapore: a city state with nothing but a strategic location as a port (sea and air). UAE want to be the new Singapore. Emirates is one of their main levers. Now may be seen as the time to put it all on that horse and hope it comes home, as Singapore Airlines has helped Singapore to be what it is today....
When all's said and done, there'll be more said than done.
 
justinlee
Posts: 323
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 3:08 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:43 pm

Quoting OzGlobal (Reply 9):
This is partly about developing demand, not just servicing it. 707's were big when no one but the wealthy could afford to fly, but they and 747's introduced 'tourist' class and the capacity tapped new demand. A huge new middle class is developing in China, India and other high growth markets. More and more people are travelling long haul more readily and more often in the world. Out of 8 Billion inhabitants, how many fly today on this planet today?

That's the whole point of EK. They are not serving passengers, they are creating passengers. With one stop service linking every major cities in Europe, Asia and Africa, it provides cheaper and more convenient connections for the rising middle class and business.
 
User avatar
hOMSaR
Posts: 1415
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:47 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:47 pm

Quoting Stitch (Reply 5):
A good number (if not majority) of EK's frames are on 12-year leases, so they will certainly be placing replacement orders.

So then the question is, what happens when several dozen A380s suddenly flood the second-hand market?

12 years isn't exactly old, especially on a plane that spends most of its life doing long-haul flights.
The plural of Airbus is Airbuses. Airbii is not a word, and doesn't even make sense.
There is no 787-800, nor 787-900 or 747-800. It's 787-8, 787-9, and 747-8.
A321neoLR is also unnecessary. It's simply A321LR.
 
User avatar
scbriml
Posts: 13475
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 10:37 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:47 pm

Quoting Steelyman (Reply 6):
It is really interesting that in DXB you can see enormous rows of aircrafts seating in the tarmac for many hours and they still order 380 while they don't put up on the air their actual planes...

If you look at DXB in the middle of one of EK's arrival banks, there will be a lot of planes on the ground. Look at Dubai at other times and it's almost devoid of Emirates planes. I would suggest EK's utilisation of its planes is better than many other airlines.

Quoting JAAlbert (Reply 12):
Okay, I'll say it - ordering 50 77Ws at a pop sounds ridiculous!

Having on hand 120 380s also sounds outrageous.

But what, in Emirates history of amazing traffic and profit growth, makes anyone think they don't know exactly what they're doing?   
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana!
 
dergay
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 8:42 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:54 pm

Quoting OzGlobal (Reply 9):
Your text exactly is what many US members wrote in the relation to the very idea of the A380 project. Now that it is delivered and EK is building its growth largely and successfully on the aircraft, we hear the same again, "can't imagine the necessity". Clearly the US aviation market dynamics are not those of other parts or even most parts of the world. Further, when I see the number of A380s now at JFK and LAX, I wonder if US carriers didn't just get that wrong too.

Totally agree - remember Concorde, America initially banned it! They then restricted it in such a way as to harm it's economical operation. When will they ever learn............
Flown on A300,A310,A318,A319,A320,A321,A330,B707,B720,B727,B737,B747,B757,B767,L382,L1011,C5,DC-3,DC8,
 
KaiTak747
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:08 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:40 pm

Quoting OzGlobal (Reply 9):
Out of 8 Billion inhabitants, how many fly today on this planet today?


I read on the Swiss inflight magazine that only 5% of the world's population have been on a plane... not sure if accurate but a surprising figure nonetheless.

EK really are banking on a huge, sustained increase in travel demand from East to West to fill all those A380s, 777s and A350s. They are well positioned to connect emerging economies in Asia, Africa and elsewhere to the rest of the world and with their new airport I'm sure they will prosper.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23209
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:48 pm

Quoting dergay (Reply 19):
When will they ever learn...

You could ask the same of India....

They banned supersonic overflight by Concorde services planned for SE Asia and Australia and they currently ban the A380...
 
scouseflyer
Posts: 2165
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:02 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:50 pm

Quoting HoMsaR (Reply 17):
So then the question is, what happens when several dozen A380s suddenly flood the second-hand market?

That isn't the much of an issue for EK as they've sold and leased back many of their planes so it's the lessors tkaing the punt on future values and even 50 A380s hitting the used market is small compared to the numbers of narrow bodies that will soon be "churned" every year - both A and B are looking between 400 and 500 deliveries a year add to that the C series and any chinese offering and that's possibly 1000 new NBs a year being delivered and pushing a similar number of older frames onto the second hand market.
 
KC135Hydraulics
Posts: 440
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:05 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:57 pm

Quoting Stitch (Reply 20):
They banned supersonic overflight by Concorde services planned for SE Asia and Australia and they currently ban the A380...

Aside from obviously smaller airports that cannot handle an aircraft the size of an A380, where is this aircraft "banned" in the United States? Maybe this is sarcasm and I'm missing it, because I'm slow on the up-take, but I've not heard of any banning of this aircraft at US airports equipped with the infrastructure to accomodate it
MSgt, USAF
KC-135R / C-17A Pneudraulic Systems Mechanic Supervisor
 
rjm777ual
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:32 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:25 am

The A380 is clearly not banned anywhere, as it is flown to almost every major US airport. He may mean that some airports might not have the runway space/terminal space to accommodate it, but that isn't "banning."
Greetings from Dulles!
 
flood
Posts: 1045
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:05 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:40 am

Quoting KC135Hydraulics (Reply 22):
Aside from obviously smaller airports that cannot handle an aircraft the size of an A380, where is this aircraft "banned" in the United States?

His comment was in reference to India, not the US. India hasn't permitted LH and EK to operate anything larger than the 748 into the country.

Not sure what the current status is, but here's an older thread on the issue:
Indian Govt: Indefinite Ban On A380 To India (by bastew Oct 4 2011 in Civil Aviation)
 
Asiaflyer
Posts: 705
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:50 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:56 am

Not really big news about another 30 A380 for EK as Tim Clark was mentioning this already last year.
What impresses me with EK is their massive growth with sustained profitability. European carriers are struggling to stay with one daily flight on traditional trunk routes like Europe-BKK, while EK announces their 5th daily to BKK.
Those who declared the hub-concept dead might have to re-think.
SQ,MI,MH,CX,KA,CA,CZ,MU,KE,OZ,QF,NZ,FD,JQ,3K,5J,IT,AI,IC,QR,SK,LF,KL,AF,LH,LX,OS,SR,BA,SN,FR,WF,1I,5T,VZ,VX,AC,NW,UA,US,
 
tardis
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:57 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:58 am

This sounds like Pan Am in the early 1970's Too many wide bodies.....
 
skipness1E
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:18 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:11 am

Pan Am in the early 70s was flying half empty B741s all over the place, for almost zero profit. Spot the key difference with EK.....
 
User avatar
hOMSaR
Posts: 1415
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:47 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:31 am

Quoting scouseflyer (Reply 21):
Quoting HoMsaR (Reply 17):
So then the question is, what happens when several dozen A380s suddenly flood the second-hand market?

That isn't the much of an issue for EK as they've sold and leased back many of their planes so it's the lessors tkaing the punt on future values and even 50 A380s hitting the used market is small compared to the numbers of narrow bodies that will soon be "churned" every year - both A and B are looking between 400 and 500 deliveries a year add to that the C series and any chinese offering and that's possibly 1000 new NBs a year being delivered and pushing a similar number of older frames onto the second hand market.

It may not be an issue for EK, per se, but it will be an issue for the lessors and the market as a whole.

It's different from the narrowbody issue because there's a massive market for narrowbodies, including a significant second-hand market for smaller carriers, upstarts, even major carriers looking for additional lift faster than the manufacturers can produce it.

If EK decides to give up its A380s after 12 years, where will those planes go? 50 A380s represents just shy of two years' production (the 747-8 passenger version probably won't contribute to significantly to that number), so that is kind of a large influx of used metal into the market (of course, all 50 wouldn't become available at once).
The plural of Airbus is Airbuses. Airbii is not a word, and doesn't even make sense.
There is no 787-800, nor 787-900 or 747-800. It's 787-8, 787-9, and 747-8.
A321neoLR is also unnecessary. It's simply A321LR.
 
ASA
Posts: 1006
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:12 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:35 am

Quoting HoMsaR (Reply 16):
So then the question is, what happens when several dozen A380s suddenly flood the second-hand market?

We all get our own A380s to drive around ...      

Well, atleast, EK keeps the A380 program floating and in the black. EU should be proud!  
 
BlueSky1976
Posts: 1605
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:18 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:43 am

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 27):
Pan Am in the early 70s was flying half empty B741s all over the place, for almost zero profit. Spot the key difference with EK.....

Pan Am = no little to none domestic feed network with huge number of intercontinental routes.

Emirates = strategically placed hub at the historic trading routes crossing between three biggest continents in the world(Asia, Africa and Europe) and growing feed to its hub.

While it does not justify the number of A380s bought, it does justify the number of any other type in their fleet and the general business model.
POLAND IS UNDER DICTATORSHIP. PLEASE SUPPORT COMMITTEE FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACY, K.O.D.
 
User avatar
aerorobnz
Posts: 7488
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 3:43 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:16 am

I feel that the 30 will only come when the 389 is confirmed, I also think that many of the existing undelivered 388 orders will be trensfered to 389s.
Flown to 120 Airports in 44 Countries on 73 Operators. Visited 55 Countries and counting. Wanderlust is like Syphilis, once you have the itch it's too late for treatment.
 
ozglobal
Posts: 2524
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 7:33 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:28 am

Quoting JAAlbert (Reply 12):
Okay, I'll say it - ordering 50 77Ws at a pop sounds ridiculous!

Having on hand 120 380s also sounds outrageous. Of course, Mr. Clark knows far better than us a.netters how many aircraft he needs and if he needs 50 new 77Ws and 120 380s, of course he should have them straight away. And yes, it seems he's making mountains of money flying these things around. I think what we are all breathless about is the shear size of these orders. No other carrier orders widebodies in such numbers - and certainly not in a single order or so. A thread a few years ago listed the largest 747s operators of the time. JAL had 70 or so 747s, BA had north of 50. Those are big airplanes and big fleets. EK comes along and intends on almost doubling the size of the largest 747 fleet with the even larger 380. On top of that, EK operates 50 77Ws and has another 120 on order. Its an astonishing number of big, big aircraft and certainly worth pondering.

Don't forget, the UAE have a limited time window to re-invent them-selves as an economy. They have the sense to recongnize that their relatively modest oil reserves will run out soon enough and the music will stop. They have as a sort of city state, the task of inventing an alternative economy to replace the oil. I think they look to Singapore: a city state with nothing but a strategic location as a port (sea and air). UAE want to be the new Singapore. Emirates is one of their main levers. Now may be seen as the time to put it all on that horse and hope it comes home, as Singapore Airlines has helped Singapore to be what it is today....
When all's said and done, there'll be more said than done.
 
User avatar
scbriml
Posts: 13475
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 10:37 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:29 am

Quoting aerorobnz (Reply 32):
I feel that the 30 will only come when the 389 is confirmed, I also think that many of the existing undelivered 388 orders will be trensfered to 389s.

That's not what Tim Clark has said.   

Frankly, Airbus would be pretty dumb to launch the -900 before they've delivered all (or the vast majority) of EK's -800s.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana!
 
gauravpai
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 7:04 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:29 am

Quoting Steelyman (Reply 6):
It is really interesting that in DXB you can see enormous rows of aircrafts seating in the tarmac for many hours and they still order 380 while they don't put up on the air their actual planes...

do you have an actual source on a comment like that?
i have it that the average turnaround per aircraft currently at DXB is only 4 hrs or so...please check the facts

Quoting Stitch (Reply 20):
You could ask the same of India....

They banned supersonic overflight by Concorde services planned for SE Asia and Australia and they currently ban the A380...

there are hardly enough airports that can support the A380 ..and how does it affect flights to SE Asia, flights can overfly indian airspace they just cant land here,thats all???
 
abba
Posts: 1382
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 12:08 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:07 am

Quoting KaiTak747 (Reply 19):
EK really are banking on a huge, sustained increase in travel demand from East to West to fill all those A380s, 777s and A350s. They are well positioned to connect emerging economies in Asia, Africa and elsewhere to the rest of the world and with their new airport I'm sure they will prosper.



I am not so surprised by the many 380 - relative to the model EK is working after.

I am more curios as to why they want all these 777ERs and 350s - in particular as TC seems to want them as capable as possible.

I understand that they have a few long routes that need capacity for many hours of flight. However, a very large proportion of EKs destinations is within 5-6 hours travel from DBX (that will cover most important parts of Africa, Asia and Europe). Why TC is not calling for a super light WB with the 777ER/351 capacity build for up to max 10h flights is beyond my understanding. Rather they use ER frames for MR missions...
 
cmf
Posts: 3120
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 11:22 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:28 am

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 27):
Pan Am in the early 70s was flying half empty B741s all over the place, for almost zero profit. Spot the key difference with EK.....

Boeing claimed break even was as little as 100 passengers.

Quoting scbriml (Reply 33):
Frankly, Airbus would be pretty dumb to launch the -900 before they've delivered all (or the vast majority) of EK's -800s.

Why?
Don’t repeat earlier generations mistakes. Learn history for a better future.
 
na
Posts: 9171
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 1999 3:52 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:37 am

I would rather see the rumoured "significant" A380 order coming from a new airline, but Emirates has surprised us more than often. They upgrade many routes from 77Ws to A380 and it seems to work.

Quoting HoMsaR (Reply 28):
If EK decides to give up its A380s after 12 years, where will those planes go? 50 A380s represents just shy of two years' production (the 747-8 passenger version probably won't contribute to significantly to that number), so that is kind of a large influx of used metal into the market (of course, all 50 wouldn't become available at once).

By the time that happens, after 2020, many 744s still need to be replaced. But who knows, maybe EK extends the leases.
Also note that before that, from 2016 onwards, EK and SQ will flood the market with used 77Ws.
 
User avatar
scbriml
Posts: 13475
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 10:37 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:20 pm

Quoting cmf (Reply 36):
Why?

To avoid EK simply switching undelivered -800s to -900s. That would generate some incremental revenue for Airbus, but nowhere near the revenue that the same number of new -900 sales would represent.

I don't think there's enough other interest in the -900 today to justify its launch. I'd love to see it, but I don't think it makes sense for Airbus today (workload on A350 and A320neo).
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana!
 
User avatar
EPA001
Posts: 3797
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:13 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:50 pm

Quoting scbriml (Reply 38):
I don't think there's enough other interest in the -900 today to justify its launch. I'd love to see it, but I don't think it makes sense for Airbus today (workload on A350 and A320neo).

I would love to see it too. But I guess a launch of the A389 in 2015 and an EIS in 2020 seems realistic. The A350 development should be finalized in 2017 or so which means development resources are becoming available for the possible A389.  

I am sure EK would be one of the launch customers for the plane, but first let us wait and see if they will be the one taking another 30 A380's.  .
 
cmf
Posts: 3120
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 11:22 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:30 pm

Quoting scbriml (Reply 38):
To avoid EK simply switching undelivered -800s to -900s. That would generate some incremental revenue for Airbus, but nowhere near the revenue that the same number of new -900 sales would represent.

I know this is a difficult concept but revenue as standalone measurement is useless.

Switching models will mean some lost profit. But if this is a short term loss and long term the profit is greater by selling -900s then it is a smart move. Which leads to:

Quoting scbriml (Reply 38):
I don't think there's enough other interest in the -900 today to justify its launch. I'd love to see it, but I don't think it makes sense for Airbus today (workload on A350 and A320neo).

If there isn't enough interest then it shouldn't be done, simple as that. But what is the interest and how much is needed? Despite all the claims about there not being enough market for the A380 it has proven to take enough orders to justify itself. Not to cover the problematic development and production, which are different issues, but enough to justify the business case.

I do not have any direct data. No cost calculations from Airbus and certainly no direct information of what airlines are thinking. But looking at secondary information, what airbus is publicly releasing, what airlines are saying and projections and historical data from many sources, I find it easy to see a case for the -900 after NEO and A350. It is time for Airbus to think about what they will do after those two programs, and I think the -900 looks like a very good option.

Conversion of some -800 orders isn't a bad way to get it rolling.

[Edited 2013-01-09 05:45:42]
Don’t repeat earlier generations mistakes. Learn history for a better future.
 
a380900
Posts: 801
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 11:26 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:44 pm

Quoting HoMsaR (Reply 16):
So then the question is, what happens when several dozen A380s suddenly flood the second-hand market?

Indeed. Can companies start operations with the A380 with second hand planes? I guess that's what carrier like Corsair did with the 747. That will really start a new life for the plane, probably in the super high-density, ultra low casm market.

Quoting scbriml (Reply 17):
If you look at DXB in the middle of one of EK's arrival banks, there will be a lot of planes on the ground. Look at Dubai at other times and it's almost devoid of Emirates planes. I would suggest EK's utilisation of its planes is better than many other airlines.

Was in Dubai in December, so all the gates empty in the middle of the day. Don't believe the pictures. All the planes are there at the same time because that's how a hub is supposed to work.

Quoting dergay (Reply 18):
Totally agree - remember Concorde, America initially banned it! They then restricted it in such a way as to harm it's economical operation. When will they ever learn............

They learn all right: they successfully killed Concorde.

Quoting HoMsaR (Reply 28):
If EK decides to give up its A380s after 12 years, where will those planes go? 50 A380s represents just shy of two years' production (the 747-8 passenger version probably won't contribute to significantly to that number), so that is kind of a large influx of used metal into the market (of course, all 50 wouldn't become available at once).

Indeed.

Quoting aerorobnz (Reply 31):
I feel that the 30 will only come when the 389 is confirmed, I also think that many of the existing undelivered 388 orders will be trensfered to 389s.

Isn't the freighter version making more sense than the A380-900, as much as I would love to see it built...

Quoting cmf (Reply 40):
But looking at secondary information, what airbus is publicly releasing, what airlines are saying and projections and historical data from many sources, I find it easy to see a case for the -900 after NEO and A350. It is time for Airbus to think about what they will do after those two programs, and I think the -900 looks like a very good option.

Same thing: wouldn't the freighter make more sense than the A380-900?

We all say that the length of the 900 could be as long as 15m longer or so. Uzar Hazy version. What does the factory in Toulouse say? What can they handle in there?
 
babybus
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 5:07 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:29 pm

Quoting justinlee (Reply 15):
They are not serving passengers, they are creating passengers.

Umm...if only all airlines could do that.

As Airbus say in their marketing blurb ' it takes an A380 to compete with an A380'. Flying with Emirates has many advantages compared to flying with any other airline, for instance, nice food, sexy staff and the A380 itself.

Flying long haul on any twin jet is just not fun.
and with that..cabin crew, seats for landing please.
 
User avatar
lightsaber
Crew
Posts: 11866
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:55 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:40 pm

Quoting dergay (Reply 18):
Totally agree - remember Concorde, America initially banned it!

Concord violated noise requirements. It was given an exemption for a small number of airports. How can one require new planes to be quieter than a threshold and yet let Concorde be much louder? Eventually it was allowed, but there was a regulation missed.

Otherwise, now that ATL, MIA, IAD, JFK, LAX, and SFO are A380 ready, what is the worry for the US. If you mean India...    EK is more constrained by the 54k/week seat cap by the bilateral.

Quoting KC135Hydraulics (Reply 22):
Aside from obviously smaller airports that cannot handle an aircraft the size of an A380, where is this aircraft "banned" in the United States?

Amazingly, more and more airports are finding 'cheap ways' to be A380 ready... Amazing what happens.

Quoting a380900 (Reply 41):
Same thing: wouldn't the freighter make more sense than the A380-900?

I disagree. The freight market is weak right now. Now if you mean to first develop the gear and breaks... ok. But there really isn't a market today as FedEx has moved on. For LHR, NRT/HND, PEK, and a few other markets, the A389 is needed today.

Lightsaber
"They did not know it was impossible, so they did it!" - Mark Twain
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23209
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:36 pm

Quoting cmf (Reply 40):
Switching models will mean some lost profit. But if this is a short term loss and long term the profit is greater by selling -900s then it is a smart move.

Airbus doesn't need to launch the A380-900 because there is no competition to the A380-800. It's the only viable VLA in service now and it will remain so for a very long time.

I am sure EK would love the A380-900 because it would have them money - they could take their five A380-800 frequencies to LHR and condense them to three A380-900s. But I expect Airbus makes more money from selling EK five A380-800s then they would selling them three A380-900s.
 
JAAlbert
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 12:43 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:50 pm

Quoting scbriml (Reply 17):
But what, in Emirates history of amazing traffic and profit growth, makes anyone think they don't know exactly what they're doing?

Absolutely nothing - as I stated in my post. EK obviously created a profitable business plan - but that doesn't take away from the amazement and wonder a person such as myself feels when reading about these huge airplane orders.

Quoting dergay (Reply 18):
remember Concorde, America initially banned it! They then restricted it in such a way as to harm it's economical operation. When will they ever learn............

America didn't restrict the Concorde with the intent of harming the plane's economical operation - it restricted supersonic overflight of the continent because of the noise and sonic boom problem. I think the USA made the right call on that issue. Having our walls shaken and windows rattling throughout the day as these planes passed overhead would have been miserable.
 
ozglobal
Posts: 2524
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 7:33 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:00 pm

Quoting JAAlbert (Reply 45):
Quoting dergay (Reply 18):
remember Concorde, America initially banned it! They then restricted it in such a way as to harm it's economical operation. When will they ever learn............

America didn't restrict the Concorde with the intent of harming the plane's economical operation - it restricted supersonic overflight of the continent because of the noise and sonic boom problem. I think the USA made the right call on that issue.

Really? I'm surprised to hear that from an aviation enthusiast. I'm sure if the US had built it, it would not have been the case. Do a search on some of the not so practical reasons and the lobbies behind the 'housewife' who led the opposition.
When all's said and done, there'll be more said than done.
 
ATL
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 1:20 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:03 pm

Quoting OzGlobal (Reply 9):
Out of 8 Billion inhabitants, how many fly today on this planet today?

Your text exactly is what many US members wrote in the relation to the very idea of the A380 project. Now that it is delivered and EK is building its growth largely and successfully on the aircraft, we hear the same again, "can't imagine the necessity". Clearly the US aviation market dynamics are not those of other parts or even most parts of the world. Further, when I see the number of A380s now at JFK and LAX, I wonder if US carriers didn't just get that wrong too.

7 Billion. And no. US Aviation market dynamics are obviously not those of other parts of the world. But this isn't news. This is the result of a mature economy, the biggest one at that. You can't blame Boeing for not forecasting an oil kingdom throwing its money at the A380 program like that. I totally agree that the flying world is about to hit another growth boom, with Chinese middle class and other countries' middle class growing, but there is no need to compare making calculated decisions with 'clearly they're getting it all wrong'.

Quoting dergay (Reply 18):
Totally agree - remember Concorde, America initially banned it! They then restricted it in such a way as to harm it's economical operation. When will they ever learn............

Don't make an accusation with no actual evidence. Noise restrictions. The Concorde was loud. Also only banned for a few months.... In its very first year....

Please keep the anti-US circlejerking to a minimum
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23209
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:15 pm

Quoting OzGlobal (Reply 46):
I'm sure if the US had built it, it would not have been the case.

  

The US Congress ended the US SST program in 1971 when they ended funding to Boeing to continue the 2707-300. And one of the main factors that resulted in the Senate and House of Representatives ending support was pressure from environmental groups who argued against the 2707 for the same reasons they argued against Concorde.

It's a dry read, but the book Clipped Wings: The American SST Conflict by Mel Horwitch goes into great detail about the SST debate in the United States.
 
UALWN
Posts: 2176
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:27 pm

RE: Another 30 A380 For EK?

Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:34 pm

Quoting ATL (Reply 47):
Quoting OzGlobal (Reply 9):
Out of 8 Billion inhabitants, how many fly today on this planet today?
Quoting ATL (Reply 47):
7 Billion.

Try less than half a billion. Only about 5% of today's world population has ever been on a commercial flight.
AT7/111/146/Avro/CRJ/CR9/EMB/ERJ/E75/F50/100/L15/DC9/D10/M8X/717/727/737/747/757/767/777/787/AB6/310/32X/330/340/380