HB-IWC
Topic Author
Posts: 4033
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2000 1:09 am

CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:03 pm

On June 27, CX will be launching a fifth daily HKG LHR service:

CX239 HKG LHR 1025 1615
CX238 LHR HKG 2235 1715

This flight will operate with a 3-class B77W (without First Class service).

Where does the LHR slot to operate this service come from? Is it NZ's soon to be abandoned HKG LHR HKG slot or did CX find a different source. As fas as I know, no replacement for the NZ slot has so far been announced.
 
lutfi
Posts: 689
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2000 6:33 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 12:10 am

Yes. it is the NZ slot
 
User avatar
DolphinAir747
Posts: 1736
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:07 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 12:24 am

I understand the need for VLAs now...
 
na
Posts: 9170
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 1999 3:52 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 12:38 am

High time to get 748s or A380 for CX. Five flights per day to LHR, what a waste.
 
lutfi
Posts: 689
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2000 6:33 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:01 am

Why a waste? The number of HKG-LHR flights has actually reduced (used to be 11, plus one to LGW, it is now 9 I think)
 
User avatar
DolphinAir747
Posts: 1736
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:07 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:06 am

Quoting Lutfi (Reply 4):
Why a waste? The number of HKG-LHR flights has actually reduced (used to be 11, plus one to LGW, it is now 9 I think)

LHR slots are very expensive, as iare the extra cists from fuel, pilots, etc.
 
User avatar
DolphinAir747
Posts: 1736
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:07 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:11 am

Wait...without F service? If a HKG-LHR flight (because CX has F on other LHR flights, but still) cannot sustain F, I wonder if any route in the world can.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23206
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:19 am

Quoting na (Reply 3):
High time to get 748s or A380 for CX. Five flights per day to LHR, what a waste.

Looking at the updated schedule, while this new flight is very close to an existing flight, the others are spread out a bit more through the day:

HKG -LHR

CX255 dep 0035 local arrive 0620 local B744
CX257 dep 1005 local arrive 1600 local B77W
CX239 dep 1025 local arrive 1615 local B77W - New Flight
CX253 dep 1400 local arrive 2030 local B77W
CX251 dep 2355 local arrive 0540 local (next day) B77W

LHR- HKG

CX252 dep 1230 local arrive 0705 local (next day) B744
CX250 dep 1820 local arrive 1305 local (next day) B77W
CX256 dep 2015 local arrive 1505 local (next day) B77W
CX254 dep 2220 local arrive 1705 local (next day) B77W
CX238 dep 2235 local arrive 1715 local (next day) B77W - New flight


Does CX expect to pick up most of the ex-NZ passengers? If NZ was using a 747-400, the total seats on the route are relatively close (379 for NZ vs. 340 for CX).


Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 6):
Wait...without F service?

I am guessing the other flight departing in the same block has First Class?

[Edited 2013-02-06 17:22:25]
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:20 am

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 6):

They know which flights F travellers go on.. Generally they wouldn't take day flights when you can fly overnight. It also increases Y capacity quite substantially. What's missed in the OP is the fact that the 4-class 77W operates on a Wednesday; more likely due to lack of 3-class 77Ws than anything I'd imagine.
It's all about the destination AND the journey.
 
lutfi
Posts: 689
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2000 6:33 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:26 am

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 5):

True, and as you can see, the total number of flights has dropped. (QF/BA/VS have all reduced flights) Actually, it is now 8 flights a day (down from 11) and this extra CX flight will mean capacity stays the same. Only difference is that CX now has 63% of the flights, whereas before they had 36% (4/11, now 5/8)
 
User avatar
DolphinAir747
Posts: 1736
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:07 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:27 am

Quoting NZ107 (Reply 8):
They know which flights F travellers go on.. Generally they wouldn't take day flights when you can fly overnight. It also increases Y capacity quite substantially. What's missed in the OP is the fact that the 4-class 77W operates on a Wednesday; more likely due to lack of 3-class 77Ws than anything I'd imagine.

Well, that's an extra reason to eliminate the extra day flights and consolidate them into fewer flights...
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:44 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 7):
Does CX expect to pick up most of the ex-NZ passengers? If NZ was using a 747-400, the total seats on the route are relatively close (379 for NZ vs. 340 for CX).

NZ have operated the 772 on this route for a while - it was only a 744 right at the beginning and was changed not long after. Either way, NZ passengers can't codeshare on the LHR services yet (for some reason or another).. The only way to get to LHR on NZ remains via LAX. In other words, this easily covers the capacity of passengers heading to LHR; though there would be many NZ passengers terminating in HKG.

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 10):
Well, that's an extra reason to eliminate the extra day flights and consolidate them into fewer flights...

What are you on about?
It's all about the destination AND the journey.
 
airDFW
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:44 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 2:20 am

Are these frequencies are the biggest in terms from Hub to hub connection (long haul)? Does anybody else like UA-LH has this kind of frequencies?
 
ChazPilot
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 1:46 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:02 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 7):
Does CX expect to pick up most of the ex-NZ passengers? If NZ was using a 747-400, the total seats on the route are relatively close (379 for NZ vs. 340 for CX).

I think CX is more interested in the increasing # of Mainland visitors to the UK, which is taking active steps to be more China-tourist friendly and is even in the process of revamping the visa application process to be more streamlined with that of continental Europe (France currently still scores 5x number of high spending Chinese tourists than UK!) And given the choice, most Chinese intl. travelers much prefer to fly CX - even with the added connection - than fly direct on, say, MU or CA.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23206
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:12 am

Quoting NZ107 (Reply 11):
NZ have operated the 772 on this route for a while - it was only a 744 right at the beginning and was changed not long after.

Thank you. Are the 1025 and 2235 slots similar to what NZ had? Or was CX allowed to adjust them?



Quoting ChazPilot (Reply 13):
I think CX is more interested in the increasing # of Mainland visitors to the UK...

And thank you, as well.

I'm guessing they have seen strong demand at those two times (~1000 ex-HKG and ~2200 ex-LHR)? If so, did CX consider moving CX257 and CX238 to a 747-400 for the additional Economy seating? Or is demand strongest in Business and Premium Economy (which the four-class 777-300ER offers more of in comparison to the four-class 747-400)?
 
HB-IWC
Topic Author
Posts: 4033
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2000 1:09 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:20 am

I find it interesting that CX and for instance not one of the Middle Eastern carriers got its hands on the NZ slot. LHR slots are increasingly hard to come by and the last major transaction before this NZ to CX swap was the SA CPT slot which went to SQ.

Coming up are the QF LHR BKK and LHR HKG slots, which have been temporarily leased out to BA, but which are expected to go to EK once they are returned from lease. Apart from those, there are no immediate signs of any LHR slots being vacated, although if the situation at GF continues to go downhill that 2 pairs of LHR slots, including one prime morning arrival may become available.
 
Gemuser
Posts: 4348
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 12:07 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:20 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 7):
the others are spread out a bit more through the day:

Not really:
HKG-LHR
CX251/255 are 40 min apart
CX257/230 are 20 min apart

LHR-HKG
All flights, except CX252 are within a 4:15 window and three of them are within a 2:20 window.

Surely CX251/255 could be combined IF an A388 was big enough. (I now think I understand why CX may want the A389!) and CX257/239 certainly could. Eastbound CX254/238 seem obvious, but same condition as CX251/255, surely CX 250/256 could be combined at about 1900.(Slot constraints aside)
BTW I assume NZ has leased the LHR slots to CX, anybody know for how long?

Gemuser
DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
 
lutfi
Posts: 689
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2000 6:33 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:34 am

Quoting HB-IWC (Reply 15):
I find it interesting that CX and for instance not one of the Middle Eastern carriers got its hands on the NZ slot. LHR slots are increasingly hard to come by and the last major transaction before this NZ to CX swap was the SA CPT slot which went to SQ.

CX & NZ did a codesharing deal, and I guess CX buying/ leasing the slots from NZ was part of that deal (so there is now CX/NZ codesharing on the HKG-AKL flights, and will be on HKG-LHR)

I think CX has bought the slots, not leasing, but we won't know until the annual reports come out
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:41 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 14):
Thank you. Are the 1025 and 2235 slots similar to what NZ had? Or was CX allowed to adjust them?

Seems like the slots are within half an hour of NZ's current timings - adjusted for daylight saving of course. Currently, NZ35 lands at 1445 (30 min off the daylight saving arrival of 1615) and departs as NZ38 at 2105 (30 min off the daylight saving departure of 2235).

Quoting HB-IWC (Reply 15):
I find it interesting that CX and for instance not one of the Middle Eastern carriers got its hands on the NZ slot.

Why? It wouldn't make sense for NZ to sell it - I'm sure they could operate another route to LHR sometime in the future; possibly from another point in North America. So it is highly likely it was leased to CX. NZ isn't that close with any Middle Eastern carriers either.
It's all about the destination AND the journey.
 
Gemuser
Posts: 4348
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 12:07 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:48 am

Quoting HB-IWC (Reply 15):
Coming up are the QF LHR BKK and LHR HKG slots, which have been temporarily leased out to BA, but which are expected to go to EK once they are returned from lease

That's interesting! Is this just speculation or is there a more concrete basis for it?
Whatever, I can't see QF selling the LHR slots, they very well may lease them to EK once they are returned from BA but I just cannot see them being transferred permanently to anybody. I fully expect QF to return to four daily LHR flights, although not for a while, maybe not even until the 2020-2025 or even 2025-30 time frame.

Gemuser
DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
 
CXA330300
Posts: 1258
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 5:51 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:52 am

Quoting na (Reply 3):
High time to get 748s or A380 for CX. Five flights per day to LHR, what a waste.

On one of the world's most lucrative and trafficked long-haul routes? Hardly a waste.
AC/AA/UA/DL/B6/WN/US*/CO*/FI/BA/IB/AF/SK/LX/Sabena*/TK/LY/SA/MN/SW/AM/CE*/CX/CA/MU/JL/SQ/TG/MH/KA/5J
 
phlwok
Posts: 439
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 11:41 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 4:02 am

Quoting airdfw (Reply 12):
Are these frequencies are the biggest in terms from Hub to hub connection (long haul)? Does anybody else like UA-LH has this kind of frequencies?

I would think JFK-LHR is probably the winner in this regard. On Fri Mar 1, for example, I see 4 flights on VS, 3 on DL, 5 on AA and 7 on BA for a total of 19 versus 8 on HKG-LHR on BA/CX/NZ/VS.
 
skipness1E
Posts: 3397
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:18 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 4:57 am

Quoting na (Reply 3):
High time to get 748s or A380 for CX. Five flights per day to LHR, what a waste.

What a good schedule you mean. However much you might wish, they don't need the B747-8, it's not that much bigger than the B77W, indeed the CX257 / 256 is often an A343. Seems that all the worlds B77Ws end up in LHR one day, I hadn't even realises there were two configs til now! Good news indeed.

[Edited 2013-02-06 21:10:35]
 
migair54
Posts: 2147
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 4:24 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:03 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 7):
CX257 dep 1005 local arrive 1600 local B77W
CX239 dep 1025 local arrive 1615 local B77W - New Flight
Quoting Stitch (Reply 7):
CX254 dep 2220 local arrive 1705 local (next day) B77W
CX238 dep 2235 local arrive 1715 local (next day) B77W - New flight

I´m not sure if CX will ever order the A380 but this two flights are perfectly suitable to be replace by one A380 only.

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 22):
I hadn't even realises there were two configs til now! Good news indeed.

Actually according to seatguru the B777-300 has 5 different versions.
 
LHRFlyer
Posts: 700
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:50 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:11 am

I think CX operated five daily LHR-HKG flights for a period of time before before the financial crisis, but unless I'm mistaken the fifth flight departed LHR much earlier in the day (at around 4-5pm).

If QF leases two slot pairs to EK, this will incense BA.
 
CX Flyboy
Posts: 6039
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 1999 6:10 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:18 am

Quoting migair54 (Reply 23):


Actually according to seatguru the B777-300 has 5 different versions.

Actually we have 3 different configs for our 77Ws, one with 3 class including first. One 3 class with premium economy but no first class and a 4 class one. Our regional 777-300s have a high density two class fit.
 
Gemuser
Posts: 4348
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 12:07 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:33 am

Quoting LHRFlyer (Reply 24):

If QF leases two slot pairs to EK, this will incense BA.

I doubt it, its just business. And I not really sure EK would want 2 extra slot pairs seeing EK only has 4 banks (or 3.5 if you prefer) 7 slots seems over kill and as I said above they would only be leased. There's also the consideration that QF may not want EK to have them.

Gemuser
DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
 
nickofatlanta
Posts: 1272
Joined: Tue May 23, 2000 1:06 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:35 am

Quoting LHRFlyer (Reply 24):

I think the two LHR slot pairs that QF are not using are leased to BA.
 
jfk777
Posts: 5863
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 12:07 pm

Quoting na (Reply 3):
High time to get 748s or A380 for CX. Five flights per day to LHR, what a waste.

Cathay is a frequency airline even on their longest routes, why would that change ? Would you be saying "waste" if the flights were 5 A380's ?
 
justinlee
Posts: 323
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 3:08 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 12:07 pm

Quoting PHLwok (Reply 21):
I would think JFK-LHR is probably the winner in this regard. On Fri Mar 1, for example, I see 4 flights on VS, 3 on DL, 5 on AA and 7 on BA for a total of 19 versus 8 on HKG-LHR on BA/CX/NZ/VS.

I think DXB-LHR is the No.2. For today, there are 5x388 by EK, 1x744 and 2x777 by BA, 1x333 by VA and 1x772 by BI: a total of 10 but 5x388, which means for available seats, the figure is closer to JFK-LHR. And I can see a big growth potential in the future after the QF-EK coopeartion.
 
factsonly
Posts: 2034
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:08 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 12:44 pm

DXB-LHR is definitely getting into to the high frequency & high capacity long-haul market, especially with 7x A380 daily this Summer 2013.

- 01:00 05:30 QF009 A380
- 01:55 06:20 BA106 B744
- 01:55 06:25 BI097 B767
- 02:05 06:35 QF001 A380
- 02:30 07:00 EK007 A380
- 07:45 12:15 EK001 A380
- 09:30 14:05 BA108 B777
- 09:40 14:20 EK029 A380
- 10:55 15:55 VS401 A343
- 14:15 18:40 EK003 A380
- 15:45 20:15 EK005 A380
 
babybus
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 5:07 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:11 pm

I think CX look like a likely candidate for an A380 or two.

Flying to Heathrow you don't need to have such frequency to connect well. LHR has plenty of departures to Europe and domestically all day.

I thinking global greeness here. Five flights a day is an extravagant waste of fuel.
and with that..cabin crew, seats for landing please.
 
CXB77L
Posts: 2604
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:18 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:53 pm

Quoting na (Reply 3):
Five flights per day to LHR, what a waste.

How so? HKG-LHR is one of the highest demand routes, and by increasing frequency they are both increasing capacity as well as choice for the customer. CX have shown in the past that they prefer to increase frequency where the market demands justify such an increase, instead of upguaging, because that allows them the flexibility to reduce the frequency again if and when demand drops, and it also negates the need for a small subfleet of very large aircraft for one or two routes, which ultimately adds to cost.

Quoting babybus (Reply 31):
I thinking global greeness here. Five flights a day is an extravagant waste of fuel.

The 777-300ER burns less fuel per trip than the A380. 5 x 777-300ER will burn less fuel than 5 x A380. The environment doesn't care about fuel burn per seat, it cares about emissions, which in commercial aviation has a correlation with fuel burn per trip.
Boeing 777 fanboy
 
HKG212
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:50 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 2:01 pm

Quoting justinlee (Reply 29):
I think DXB-LHR is the No.2. For today, there are 5x388 by EK, 1x744 and 2x777 by BA, 1x333 by VA and 1x772 by BI: a total of 10 but 5x388, which means for available seats, the figure is closer to JFK-LHR. And I can see a big growth potential in the future after the QF-EK coopeartion.

If you add LCY-JFK and LHR-EWR, with additional BA, VS, and UA flights, the number of available seats between NYC-LON is much, much higher than LHR-DXB or any other international city pair, by a large margin.
 
bthebest
Posts: 434
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:35 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 2:04 pm

Quoting Stitch (Reply 7):
HKG -LHR

CX255 dep 0035 local arrive 0620 local B744
CX257 dep 1005 local arrive 1600 local B77W
CX239 dep 1025 local arrive 1615 local B77W - New Flight
CX253 dep 1400 local arrive 2030 local B77W
CX251 dep 2355 local arrive 0540 local (next day) B77W

LHR- HKG

CX252 dep 1230 local arrive 0705 local (next day) B744
CX250 dep 1820 local arrive 1305 local (next day) B77W
CX256 dep 2015 local arrive 1505 local (next day) B77W
CX254 dep 2220 local arrive 1705 local (next day) B77W
CX238 dep 2235 local arrive 1715 local (next day) B77W - New flight

I'm assuming its the timing of the slot that dictates where the new flight is? Otherwise it would make sense to move the 3 original LHR-HKG evening departures forward starting at say 16.00 to catch the after lunch travelers and spread the new flight out a bit? 12.5 hr layover for the 251/250 aircraft seems quite excessive
 
CX Flyboy
Posts: 6039
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 1999 6:10 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 2:36 pm

Quoting bthebest (Reply 34):
I'm assuming its the timing of the slot that dictates where the new flight is? Otherwise it would make sense to move the 3 original LHR-HKG evening departures forward starting at say 16.00 to catch the after lunch travelers and spread the new flight out a bit? 12.5 hr layover for the 251/250 aircraft seems quite excessive

Your assumption is correct. CX, along with most operators at LHR simply do not have the luxury of picking what slot they want. Even getting a slot is quite a task, let alone picking a perfect one. Sometimes you just have to make do with what you have.

The extended ground time is certainly not wasted. A number of maintenance tasks are always done with the time on ground, especially cabin defects and general maintenance, deep cleaning etc... These tasks must be completed somewhere on the CX network at some point, so the airline makes use of ground time in LHR as well as several other ports around the network to complete simple maintenance tasks and checks.
 
User avatar
lightsaber
Crew
Posts: 11864
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:55 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 2:47 pm

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 2):
I understand the need for VLAs now...

   But does CX have enough routes to maintain a sub-fleet of VLAs? IMHO, 17 is the minimum economic number for an airframe.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 7):
HKG -LHR

CX255 dep 0035 local arrive 0620 local B744
CX257 dep 1005 local arrive 1600 local B77W
CX239 dep 1025 local arrive 1615 local B77W - New Flight
CX253 dep 1400 local arrive 2030 local B77W
CX251 dep 2355 local arrive 0540 local (next day) B77W

LHR- HKG

CX252 dep 1230 local arrive 0705 local (next day) B744
CX250 dep 1820 local arrive 1305 local (next day) B77W
CX256 dep 2015 local arrive 1505 local (next day) B77W
CX254 dep 2220 local arrive 1705 local (next day) B77W
CX238 dep 2235 local arrive 1715 local (next day) B77W - New flight

Thank you. Did 238 catch one of the last departure slots at LHR?

I would assume 255/252 are the two most popular flights (due to the 744), but I would have thought it would be 255/256 on timing.

Lightsaber
"They did not know it was impossible, so they did it!" - Mark Twain
 
flyinghippo
Posts: 690
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:48 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:41 pm

Quoting Stitch (Reply 14):
I'm guessing they have seen strong demand at those two times (~1000 ex-HKG and ~2200 ex-LHR)? If so, did CX consider moving CX257 and CX238 to a 747-400 for the additional Economy seating?

CX is desperately trying to get rid of 744 on long haul routes due to the high fuel prices. Even if they can pack a 744, they're still losing $$ on routes such as HKG-YVR, HKG-LHR.

I believe that's one of the reason they reduced HKG-JFK frequency to free up a 77W on another long haul (LHR?)
 
ecbomberman
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:26 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 4:31 pm

Quoting flyinghippo (Reply 37):
Quoting flyinghippo (Reply 37):
CX is desperately trying to get rid of 744 on long haul routes due to the high fuel prices. Even if they can pack a 744, they're still losing $$ on routes such as HKG-YVR, HKG-LHR.

Any proof of that? I think CX is an airline which give CHOICES to their customers. Plus I believe if they can fill up the front end (a la First and Business Class) they won't lose any money...

It's not just CX that flies HKG-LHR in such a short timeframe 2300-0100... BA and VS does at that timeframe.
VS343/346/744 CX744/L1101/343 MH332/333/733 BD32x/EMB 145 AK320 SQ310/77E/773/744 UA747SP/744 BA744 BI763ER/319 QF763ER
 
flyinghippo
Posts: 690
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:48 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:06 pm

Quoting ecbomberman (Reply 38):
http://www.businesstraveller.asia/as...c-announces-readjusted-routes-to-s

In an internal newsletter to CX employees (Which I cannot find right now), it also stressed that CX is accelerating the retirement of 744s, and that CX is reducing some 77W to NA so they can be used on flights to Europe, replacing 744s on those European routes.
 
User avatar
PW100
Posts: 2745
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 9:17 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:08 pm

Quoting Lutfi (Reply 4):
Why a waste? The number of HKG-LHR flights has actually reduced (used to be 11, plus one to LGW, it is now 9 I think)
Quoting Lutfi (Reply 9):
True, and as you can see, the total number of flights has dropped. (QF/BA/VS have all reduced flights) Actually, it is now 8 flights a day (down from 11) and this extra CX flight will mean capacity stays the same. Only difference is that CX now has 63% of the flights, whereas before they had 36% (4/11, now 5/8)

We might be overlooking an important factor here. True, the number of flights might have reduced, but what about the NET capacity HKG-LHR?

Important factor is off course that many of those11 were merely using HKG as a stop. So many pax on those flights were not flying HKG-LHR or vv. They were travelling SYD-LHR, or AKL-LHR. So the net capacity available to HKG-LHR was (much) less than the equivalent of those 11 flights.

True, many pax on today’s 4 (soon to be 5) CX flights are also not travelling HKG-LHR, but transferring at HKG. But then again, those pax can just as easily use a different hub, like SIN, SEL, KUL, BKK, DXB etc. That choice elasticity was less on the previous QF/BA/VS flights direct SYD-LHR, AKL-LHR etc.

PW100
Immigration officer: "What's the purpose of your visit to the USA?" Spotter: "Shooting airliners with my Canon!"
 
YULWinterSkies
Posts: 1266
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 11:42 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 7:37 pm

Quoting na (Reply 3):
High time to get 748s or A380 for CX. Five flights per day to LHR, what a waste.

Indeed. Time has come.

Quoting na (Reply 3):
Why a waste?

Because if you look at the schedule below, they are only flown over 3 time slots one way and four time slots the other way. CX would save much by concentrating those flights into one.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 7):
HKG -LHR

CX255 dep 0035 local arrive 0620 local B744
CX257 dep 1005 local arrive 1600 local B77W
CX239 dep 1025 local arrive 1615 local B77W - New Flight
CX253 dep 1400 local arrive 2030 local B77W
CX251 dep 2355 local arrive 0540 local (next day) B77W

LHR- HKG

CX252 dep 1230 local arrive 0705 local (next day) B744
CX250 dep 1820 local arrive 1305 local (next day) B77W
CX256 dep 2015 local arrive 1505 local (next day) B77W
CX254 dep 2220 local arrive 1705 local (next day) B77W
CX238 dep 2235 local arrive 1715 local (next day) B77W - New flight
When I doubt... go running!
 
skipness1E
Posts: 3397
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:18 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:01 pm

Not sure how you get two B77W loads onto an A380. So you sell the slots to the other guy then get slammed in a pincer movement on frequency? How many routes does CX *need* a VLA for given HKG is likely to get two new runways?
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23206
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:30 pm

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 42):
Not sure how you get two B77W loads onto an A380.

An 80m A380-900 would offer about the same cabin floor space as two 777-300ERs (though you might not be able to actually fit the same number of seats). However, it would only offer the cargo volume of one 777-300ER.

A 550-seat A380-900 would need 22 of the 44 LD3 positions for passenger bags (using the IATA standard of 1 LD3 per 25 passengers), leaving 20 open for revenue cargo. CX's 777-300ERs dedicate 11 of their 44 LD3 positions to passenger bags using the same formula.

So if CX replaced two 275-seat 777-300ERs with a 550-seat A380-900 they would be giving up 64 LD3 positions worth of cargo volume. CX could send a 777F to make up the difference, however.   
 
TC957
Posts: 2092
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 1:12 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:58 pm

When is the first CX 77F due ?
 
Gemuser
Posts: 4348
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 12:07 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:52 pm

Quoting nickofatlanta (Reply 27):
I think the two LHR slot pairs that QF are not using are leased to BA.

Yes, but only for two years from when HKG/BKK-LHR ceased. The talk of the slots going to EK is *after* the two years is up.

Gemuser
DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
 
skipness1E
Posts: 3397
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:18 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:33 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 43):
When is the first CX 77F due ?

Didn't they swap them with CA for more B747-8Fs?
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 23206
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:42 am

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 46):
Didn't they swap them with CA for more B747-8Fs?

There have been rumors to that effect, but Boeing still shows 2 747-8F and 8 777F still on order.
 
workhorse
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:35 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:43 am

Quoting Stitch (Reply 43):
A 550-seat A380-900 would need 22 of the 44 LD3 positions for passenger bags (using the IATA standard of 1 LD3 per 25 passengers), leaving 20 open for revenue cargo.

Why not 22 (44-22)?

Quoting Stitch (Reply 43):
CX's 777-300ERs dedicate 11 of their 44 LD3 positions to passenger bags using the same formula.So if CX replaced two 275-seat 777-300ERs with a 550-seat A380-900 they would be giving up 64 LD3 positions worth of cargo volume.

Why not 44 ((44-11)+(44-11)-22)?



[Edited 2013-02-07 23:54:22]
 
CXB77L
Posts: 2604
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:18 pm

RE: CX To Lauch 5th Daily LHR

Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:26 pm

Quoting YULWinterSkies (Reply 41):
CX would save much by concentrating those flights into one.

How so? There's no aircraft available at present that can carry the same load as 2 x 777-300ERs. If they had combined two flights into one they might save on landing and departure fees as well as fuel, but they're also making less revenue by having fewer seats and less cargo.
Boeing 777 fanboy